Why would we believe them? Meat consumers’ reactions to online farm animal welfare activism in Australia

References

• Ahmed, S., & Jaidka, K. (2013, December 9–11). The common man: An examination of content creation and information dissemination on Twitter during the 2012 New Delhi gang-rape protest. Paper presented at the International Conference on Asia-Pacific Digital Libraries, Bangalore, India.
   Google Scholar
• Ahteensuu, M. (2012). Assumptions of the deficit model type of thinking: Ignorance, attitudes, and science communication in the debate on genetic engineering in agriculture. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 25(3), 295–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso, A. D., & Krajsic, V. (2016). Perceptions and images of ‘typical’ Australian dishes: An exploratory study. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 19(2), 147–163.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L., & Benbow, H. M. (2015). Cultural indigestion in multicultural Australia. Gastronomica: The Journal of Critical Food Studies, 15(1), 34–43.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. J. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ankeny, R. (2008). The moral economy of red meat in Australia. In S. Friedland (Ed.), Food and morality: Proceedings of the Oxford symposium on food and cookery 2007 (pp. 20–28). London: Prospect Books.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences. (2016). Agricultural commodities statistics report. Retrieved from http://data.daff.gov.au/data/warehouse/agcstd9abcc002/agcstd9abcc0022016_Sn9Dg/ACS_2016_v1.0.0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, K., Marshall, P. D., & Moore, C. (2014). Persona to persona studies. M/C Journal, 17(3). Retrieved from http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/841
   Google Scholar
• Bohm, I., Lindblom, C., Åbacka, G., Bengs, C., & Hörnell, A. (2015). “He just has to like ham” – The centrality of meat in home and consumer studies. Appetite, 95, 101–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, S. R., Young, J. A., & McLeod, D. A. (2015). Utilizing digital advocacy in community organizing: Lessons learned from organizing in virtual spaces to promote worker rights and economic justice. Journal of Community Practice, 23(2), 255–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, H. J., & Ankeny, R. A. (2017a). Happy chickens lay tastier eggs: Motivations for buying free-range eggs in Australia. Anthrozoös, 30(2), 213–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, H. J., & Ankeny, R. A. (2017b). Not just about “the science”: Science education and attitudes to genetically modified foods among women in Australia. New Genetics and Society, 36(1), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, H. J., Zambrano, S. C., Chur-Hansen, A., & Ankeny, R. A. (2016). Not appropriate dinner table conversation? Talking to children about meat production. Appetite, 100, 1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brighton, P., & Foy, D. (2007). News values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Buddle, E. A., Bray, H. J., & Pitchford, W. S. (2017). Keeping it ‘inside the fence’: An examination of responses to a farm animal welfare issue on Twitter. Animal Production Science, 58(3), 435–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, A. J., & Hair, J. F. (1985). An assessment of the mall intercept as a data collection method. Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 158–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buttliere, B., & Buder, J. (2017). Reading more vs. writing back: Situation affordances drive reactions to conflicting information on the internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 330–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, P. (2016). Animal welfare policy in Australia: Pace, race, and shelf-space. In R. Garner & S. O’Sullivan (Eds.), The political turn in animal ethics (pp. 175–190). London: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Cherry, E. (2015). I was a teenage vegan: Motivation and maintenance of lifestyle movements. Sociological Inquiry, 85(1), 55–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, M., & Morgan, K. (2011). Vegaphobia: Derogatory discourses of veganism and the reproduction of speciesism in UK national newspapers. The British Journal of Sociology, 62(1), 134–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, G. J. (2010). Educating the public: Information or persuasion? Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 37(1), 74–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, C. (2017, March) Love meat too much to be vegetarian? Go flexitarian. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/love-meat-too-much-to-be-vegetarian-go-flexitarian-73741
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Backer, C. J. S., & Hudders, L. (2014). From meatless Mondays to meatless Sundays: Motivations for meat reduction among vegetarians and semi-vegetarians who mildly or significantly reduce their meat intake. Ecology of Food and Nutrition, 53(6), 639–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson, G., & Papoutsaki, E. (2017). Youth-led activism and political engagement in New Zealand: A survey of Generation Zero. Communication Research and Practice, 3(2), 194–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dole, N. (2017, July 20). Australia’s meat sales plunged 15% after Indonesian cattle cruelty revelations, court told. ABC News. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-20/australia-meat-sales-plunged-15pc-over-cattle-cruelty-court-told/8729300
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, K., & Smith, E. E. (1996). A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 5–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, S. (Reporter), O’Brein, K. (Presenter) (2011). A bloody business. In Doyle, M. (Producer), & Spencer, S. (Executive Producer) Four corners. Australia: Australian Broadcasting Comission.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance (Vol. 2). USA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fiddes, N. (2004). Meat: A natural symbol. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, M. I. (2014, November). Slacktivism, clicktivism, and real social change. Retrieved from https://blog.oup.com/2014/11/slacktivism-clicktivism-real-social-change/
   Google Scholar
• Galusky, W. (2014). Technology as responsibility: Failure, food animals, and lab-grown meat. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 27(6), 931–948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glenn, C. L. (2015). Activism or ‘slacktivism?’: Digital media and organizing for social change. Communication Teacher, 29(2), 81–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harcup, T., & O’Neill, D. (2017). What is news?: News values revisited (again). Journalism Studies, 18(12), 1470–1488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, P. S., & Nisbet, E. C. (2012). Boomerang effects in science communication. Communication Research, 39(6), 701–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayley, A., Zinkiewicz, L., & Hardiman, K. (2015). Values, attitudes, and frequency of meat consumption. Predicting meat-reduced diet in Australians. Appetite, 84, 98–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog, H. (2010). Some we love, some we hate, some we eat: Why it’s so hard to think straight about animals. New York: Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, J. C. (2007). Orthodoxy vs. power: The defining traits of grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 151–164). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, P. N., Savage, S., Saviaga, C. F., Toxtli, C., & Monroy-Hernández, A. (2016). Social media, civic engagement, and the slacktivism hypothesis: Lessons from Mexico’s ‘El Bronco’. Journal of International Affairs, 70, 55–73.
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. M., & Poulsen, J. (1995). Recruiting strangers and friends: Moral shocks and social networks in animal rights and anti-nuclear protests. Social Problems, 42(4), 493–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joy, M. (2010). Why we love our dogs, eat pigs, and wear cows: An introduction to carnism. San Fransisco, CA: Red Wheel/Weiser.
   Google Scholar
• Kien, G. (2013). Media memes and prosumerist ethics: Notes toward a theoretical examination of memetic audience behaviour. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13(6), 554–561.
   Google Scholar
• MacInnis, C. C., & Hodson, G. (2017). It ain’t easy eating greens: Evidence of bias toward vegetarians and vegans from both source and target. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(6), 721–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McKendree, M., Croney, C., & Widmar, N. (2014). Effects of demographic factors and information sources on United States consumer perceptions of animal welfare. Journal of Animal Science, 92(7), 3161–3173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mika, M. (2006). Framing the issue: Religion, secular ethics and the case of animal rights mobilization. Social Forces, 85(2), 915–941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaghan, F. (2014). Seeing red: Social media and football fan activism. In P. Seargent & C. Tagg (Eds.), The language of social media (pp. 228–254)). UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, C., Barbour, K., & Lee, K. (2017). Five dimensions of online persona. Persona Studies, 3, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Mummery, J., & Rodan, D. (2017). Mediation for affect: Coming to care about factory-farmed animals. Media International Australia, 165(1), 37–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mummery, J., Rodan, D., Ironside, K., & Nolton, M. (2014, July). Mediating legal reform: Animal law, livestock welfare and public pressure. Paper presented at the meeting of The Australian and New Zealand Communication Association Annual Conference, Victoria, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, L. (2014). The live animal export controversy in Australia: A moral crusade made for the mass media. Social Movement Studies: Journal of Social. Cultural and Political Protest, 14, 214–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council, and the Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee. (2007). National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research, updated March 2014. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/e72
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220.
   Google Scholar
• Nocella, G., Hubbard, L., & Scarpa, R. (2010). Farm animal welfare, consumer willingness to pay, and trust: Results of a cross-national survey. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 32, 275–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obar, J. A. (2014). Canadian advocacy 2.0: An analysis of social media adoption and perceived affordances by advocacy groups looking to advance activism in Canada. Canadian Journal of Communication, 39(2), 211–233.
   Google Scholar
• Packwood Freeman, C. (2009). This little piggy went to press: The American news media’s construction of animals in agriculture. The Communication Review, 12(1), 78–103.
   Google Scholar
• Penney, J. (2015). Social media and symbolic action: Exploring participation in the Facebook red equal sign profile picture campaign. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(1), 52–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piazza, J., Ruby, M. B., Loughnan, S., Luong, M., Kulik, J., Watkins, H. M., & Seigerman, M. (2015). Rationalizing meat consumption. The 4Ns. Appetite, 91, 114–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picard, R. G. (2015). The humanisation of media? Social media and the reformation of communication. Communication Research and Practice, 1(1), 32–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Praiser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Rodan, D., & Mummery, J. (2014, July). Platforms and activism: Sharing ‘My Make it Possible Story’ Narratives. Paper presented at the meeting of The Australian and New Zealand Communication Association Annual Conference, Victoria, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Rothgerber, H. (2014). Underlying differences between conscientious omnivores and vegetarians in the evaluation of meat and animals. Appetite, 27, 251–258.
   Google Scholar
• Roy Morgan Research (2016, August). The slow but steady rise of vegetarianism in Australia. Retrieved from http://www.roymorgan.com/findings/vegetarianisms-slow-but-steady-rise-in-australia-201608151105
   Google Scholar
• Santich, B. (1990). Feed the man meat! In H. Walker (Ed.), Staple foods: Oxford Symposium on food and cookery 1989 (pp. 224–227). London: Prospect Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenmaker, S., & Alexander, D. (2012). Live cattle trade – The case of an online crisis. Social Alternatives, 31(2), 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, I. (2007). The journalistic gut feeling: Journalistic doxa, news habitus and orthodox news values. Journalism Practice, 1(2), 190–207.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. (1990). Animal liberation (2nd ed.). Norfolk: Lowe and Brydone Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, S. B. (2016). #Advocacy: Social media activism’s power to transform law. Kentucky Law Journal, 105, 413–452.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sturgis, P., & Allum, N. (2004). Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science, 13(1), 55–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiplady, C. M., Walsh, D. B., & Phillips, C. J. C. (2013). Public Response to Media Coverage of Animal Cruelty. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 26(4), 869–885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonsor, G. T., & Olynk, N. J. (2011). Impacts of animal well-being and welfare media on meat demand. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62(1), 59–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vie, S. (2014). In defense of ‘slacktivism’: The Human Rights Campaign Facebook logo as digital activism. First Monday, 19. Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/article/view/4961/3868
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. (2016). ‘Success’ and online political participation: The case of Downing Street E-petitions. Information, Communication & Society, 19(6), 843–857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, W., & Annes, A. (2013). Halal on the menu?: Contested food politics and French identity in fast-food. Journal of Rural Studies, 32, 388–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar