712
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The ability to pay for broadband

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Agresti, A. (2013). Categorical data analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Barr, M. (2004). Banking the poor. Yale Journal on Regulation, 21, 121–238.
  • Brock, A., Kvasny, L., & Hales, K. (2010). Cultural appropriations of technical capital: Black women, weblogs, and the digital divide. Information, Communication & Society, 13(7), 1040–1059.
  • Carare, O., McGovern, C., Noriega, R., & Schwarz, J. (2015). The willingness to pay for broadband of non-adopters in the U.S.: Estimates from a multi-state survey. Information Economics and Policy, 30, 19–35.
  • Chattoe, E., & Gilbert, N. (1999). Talking about budgets: Time and uncertainty in household decision making. Sociology, 33(1), 85–103.
  • Dailey, D., Bryne, A., Powell, A., Karaganis, J., & Chung, J. (2010). Broadband adoption in low-income communities. Brooklyn, NY: Social Science Research Council.
  • Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Eubanks, V. (2011). Digital dead end: Fighting for social justice in the information age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Federal Communications Commission (FCC). (2010). Connecting America: The national broadband plan. Retrieved from https://www.fcc.gov/general/national-broadband-plan
  • Federal Communications Commission (FCC). (2017). Strategies and recommendations for promoting digital inclusion. Retrieved from https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-342993A1.pdf
  • Flamm, K., & Chaudhuri, A. (2007). An analysis of the determinants of broadband access. Telecommunications Policy, 31(6–7), 312–326.
  • Gangadharan, S. P., & Byrum, G. (2012). Introduction: Defining and measuring meaningful broadband adoption. International Journal of Communication, 6, 2601–2608.
  • Gant, J. P., Turner-Lee, N. E., Li, Y., & Miller, J. S. (2010). National minority broadband adoption: Comparative trends in adoption, acceptance, and use (White Paper). Washington, DC: Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies.
  • Gasser, L. (1986). The integration of computing and routine work. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 4(3), 205–225.
  • Glass, V., & Stefanova, S. K. (2010). An empirical study of broadband diffusion in rural America. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 38(1), 70–85.
  • Gonzales, A. (2016). The contemporary US digital divide: From initial access to technology maintenance. Information, Communication & Society, 19(2), 234–248.
  • Gonzales, A., Ems, L., & Suri, V. R. (2016). Cell phone disconnection disrupts access to healthcare and health resources: A technology maintenance perspective. New Media & Society, 18(6), 1422–1438.
  • Horrigan, J. (2009). Home broadband adoption 2009: Broadband adoption increases, but monthly prices do too. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
  • Jaeger, P. T., Gorham, U., Bertot, J. C., & Sarin, L. C. (2014). Public libraries, public policies, and political processes: Serving and transforming communities in times of economic and political constraint. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Jeffcoat, C., Davis, A. F., & Wuyang, H. (2012). Willingness to pay for broadband access by Kentucky farmers. Journal of Agricultural & Applied Economics (Southern Agricultural Economics Association), 44(3), 323.
  • Katz, V. S., & Gonzalez, C. (2016). Community variations in low-income Latino families’ technology adoption and integration. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(1), 59–80.
  • Katz, V. S., Matsaganis, M. D., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (2012). Ethnic media as partners for increasing broadband adoption and social inclusion. Journal of Information Policy, 2, 79–102.
  • Kraut, R., Brynin, M., & Kiesler, S. (Eds.). (2006). Computers, phones, and the internet: Domesticating information technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • LaRose, R., Bauer, J. M., DeMaagd, K., Chew, H. E., Ma, W., & Jung, Y. (2014). Public broadband investment priorities in the United States: An analysis of the broadband technology opportunities program. Government Information Quarterly, 31, 53–64.
  • LaRose, R., Gregg, J. L., Strover, S., Straubhaar, J., & Carpenter, S. (2007). Closing the rural broadband gap: Promoting adoption of the Internet in rural America. Telecommunications Policy, 31(6–7), 359–373.
  • Lee, H. J., & Whitacre, B. (2017). Estimating willingness-to-pay for broadband attributes among low-income consumers: Results from two FCC lifeline pilot projects. Telecommunications Policy, 41(9), 769–780.
  • McFall, L. (2014). Devising consumption: Cultural economies of insurance, credit and spending. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & Hamilton, A. (2012). Measuring digital citizenship: Mobile access and broadband. International Journal of Communication, 6, 2492–2528.
  • Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2009). Savings policy and decision-making in low-income households (Policy Brief No. 24). Washington, DC: National Policy Center.
  • Napoli, P. M., & Obar, J. A. (2014). The emerging mobile Internet underclass: A critique of mobile Internet access. The Information Society, 30(5), 323–334.
  • National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). (2010). Digital nation: 21st century America’s progress toward universal broadband internet access. An NTIA research preview. Washington, DC: National Telecommunications and Information Administration.
  • National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). (2015). ASR analytics reports and case studies. Washington, DC: National Telecommunications and Information Administration. Retrieved from https://www.ntia.doc.gov/report/2015/asr-analytics-reports-and-case-studies
  • National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). (2018). NTIA requests feedback on improving broadband availability data. Washington, DC: National Telecommunications and Information Administration.
  • National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). (n.d.). Broadband technology opportunities program. Washington, DC: National Telecommunications and Information Administration.
  • Park, E. A., & Jayakar, K. (2013). Implementation of BTOP funding for public computing centers: Goal consensus and project performance. Government Information Quarterly, 30, 514–524.
  • Park, Y. J. (2015). My whole world’s in my palm! The second-level divide of teenagers’ mobile use and skill. New Media & Society, 17(6), 977–995.
  • PCs for People. (n.d.). What we do. Retrieved from https://www.pcsforpeople.com/about-us/what-we-do
  • Pew Research (2018a). Mobile fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/mobile/
  • Pew Research (2018b). Internet/broadband fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/internet-broadband/
  • Powell, A., Byrne, A., & Dailey, D. (2010). The essential internet: Digital exclusion in low-income American communities. Policy & Internet, 2(2), 161–192.
  • Reisdorf, B. C., Hampton, K., Fernandez, L., & Dutton, W. H. (2018). Broadband to the neighborhood: Digital divides in detroit. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3103457
  • Rhinesmith, C. (2012). Free library hot spots: Supporting broadband adoption in Philadelphia’s low-income communities. International Journal of Communication, 6, 2529–2554.
  • Rhinesmith, C. (2016). Digital inclusion and meaningful broadband adoption initiatives. Evanston, IL: Benton Foundation.
  • Rhinesmith, C., Quan-Haase, A., & Haight, M. (2016). The complexity of ‘relevance’ as a barrier to broadband adoption. Evanston, IL: Benton Foundation.
  • Rosenworcel, J. (2016). Closing the homework gap. Speech presented at Cue16, Palm Springs, California. Retrieved from https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-338474A1.pdf
  • Rosston, G., Savage, S., & Waldman, D. (2011). Household demand for broadband internet service. Communications of the ACM, 54(2), 29–31.
  • Schuler, D. (1996). New community networks: Wired for change. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
  • Servon, L. (2002). Bridging the digital divide: Technology, community and public policy. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • US Census Bureau (n.d.). Quick facts, Detroit city, Michigan. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/detroitcitymichigan/INC110216#viewtop
  • Wallsten, S. (2016). Learning from the FCC’s lifeline broadband pilot projects. Retrieved from https://techpolicyinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Wallsten_Learning-from-the-FCCs-Lifeline-Broadband-Pilot-Projects.pdf
  • Wheeler, T., & Clyburn, M. (2015). Detroit’s digital divide. Retrieved from https://www.fcc.gov/news-events/blog/2015/10/27/detroits-digital-divide
  • Whitacre, B., & Rhinesmith, C. (2016). Broadband un-adopters. Telecommunications Policy, 40(1), 1–13.
  • Wijetunga, D. (2014). The digital divide objectified in the design: Use of the mobile telephone by underprivileged youth in Sri Lanka. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 712–726.
  • Wolfson, T., Crowell, J., Reyes, C., & Bach, A. (2017). Emancipatory broadband adoption: Toward a critical theory of digital inequality in the urban United States. Communication, Culture and Critique, 10(3), 441–459.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.