Autonomous readers: the impact of news customisation on audiences’ psychological and behavioural outcomes

References

• Agresti, A., & Finlay, B. (2009). Statistical methods for the social sciences. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252–1265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L. (2008). Changing citizenship in the digital age. In W. L. Bennett (Ed.), Civic Life Online: Learning how digital media can engage youth (pp. 1–24). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boczkowski, P. J. (2004). Digitizing the news: Innovation in online newspapers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bode, L. (2016). Political news in the news feed: Learning politics from social media. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 24–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmon, Z., Wertenbroch, K., & Zeelenberg, M. (2003). Option attachment: When deliberating makes choosing feel like losing. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(1), 15–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 715–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyr, D., Head, M., & Ivanov, A. (2009). Perceived interactivity leading to e-loyalty: Development of a model for cognitive affective user responses. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(10), 850–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 237–288). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62, 119–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human Behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Dineen, B. R., Ling, J., Ash, S. R., & DelVecchio, D. (2007). Aesthetic properties and message customization: Navigating the dark side of web recruitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 356–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403–422). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Horning, M. A. (2017). Interacting with news: Exploring the effects of modality and perceived responsiveness and control on news source credibility and enjoyment among second screen viewers. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 273–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995–1006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A. (2008). Losing the news: The future of the news that feeds democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyanaraman, S., & Sundar, S. S. (2006). The psychological appeal of personalized content in web portals: Does customization affect attitudes and behavior? Journal of Communication, 56(1), 110–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, H., & Sundar, S. S. (2013). Depleted egos and affirmed selves: The two faces of customization. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2273–2280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellar, M., Watters, C., Duffy, J., & Shepherd, M. (2005). Effect of task on time spent reading as an implicit measure of interest. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 168–175.
   Google Scholar
• Koestner, R., Horberg, E. J., Gaudreau, P., Powers, T., Di Dio, P., Bryan, C., … Salter, N. (2006). Bolstering implementation plans for the long haul: The benefits of simultaneously boosting self-concordance or self-efficacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(11), 1547–1558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konstan, J. A., Miller, B. N., Maltz, D., Herlocker, J. L., Gordon, L. R., & Riedl, J. (1997). GroupLens: Applying collaborative filtering to Usenet news. Communications of the ACM, 40(3), 77–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, T., Sela, M., Oppenheim, I., Inbar, O., & Meyer, J. (2010). User attitudes towards news content personalization. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(8), 483–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mick, D. G., Broniarczyk, S. M., & Haidt, J. (2004). Choose, choose, choose, choose, choose, choose, choose: Emerging and prospective research on the deleterious effects of living in consumer hyperchoice. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(2), 207–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mook, D. G. (1983). In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist, 38(4), 379–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morita, M., & Shinoda, Y. (1994) Information filtering based on user behavior analysis and best match text retrieval. In W. B. Croft, & C. J. van Rijsbergen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 272–281). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Negroponte, N. (1996). Being digital. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, H., & Cairns, P. (2015). An empirical evaluation of the User Engagement Scale (UES) in online news environments. Information Processing & Management, 51(4), 413–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, T. (2007). Young people and news: A report from the Joan Shorenstein Center on the press, politics and public policy. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, W., Lin, J.-H., Pfeiffer, K. A., & Winn, B. (2012). Need satisfaction supportive game features as motivational determinants: An experimental study of a self-determination theory guided exergame. Media Psychology, 15(2), 175–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plant, R. W., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and the effects of self-consciousness, self-awareness, and ego-involvement: An investigation of internally-controlling styles. Journal of Personality, 53, 435–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert, L., & Dennis, A. R. (2005). Paradox of richness: A cognitive model of media choice. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48(1), 10–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Rotter, J. B. (1990). Internal versus external control of reinforcement: A case history of a variable. American Psychologist, 45(4), 489–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). The darker and brighter sides of human existence: Basic psychological needs as a unifying concept. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 319–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schade, A. (2016, July 10). Customization vs. personalization in the user experience. Nielson Norman Group. Retrieved from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/customization-personalization/
   Google Scholar
• Schmierbach, M., Limperos, A. M., & Woolley, J. K. (2012). Feeling the need for (personalized) speed: How natural controls and customization contribute to enjoyment of a racing game through enhanced immersion. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(7), 364–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York, NY: Ecco.
   Google Scholar
• Sela, M., Lavie, T., Inbar, O., Oppenheim, I., & Meyer, J. (2015). Personalizing news content: An experimental study. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(1), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stellin, S. (2000, August 28). Internet companies learn how to personalize service. The New York Times. Retrieved from: http://partners.nytimes.com/library/tech/00/08/cyber/commerce/28commerce.html
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., Bellur, S., & Jia, H. (2012). Motivational technologies: A theoretical framework for designing preventive health applications. In International Conference on Persuasive Technology (pp. 112–122). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., & Marathe, S. S. (2010). Personalization versus customization: The importance of agency, privacy, and power usage. Human Communication Research, 36(3), 298–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., & Nass, C. (2001). Conceptualizing sources in online news. Journal of Communication, 51(1), 52–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamborini, R., Bowman, N. D., Eden, A., Grizzard, M., & Organ, A. (2010). Defining media enjoyment as the satisfaction of intrinsic needs. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 758–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurman, N. (2011). Making “The Daily Me”: Technology, economics and habit in the mainstream assimilation of personalized news. Journalism, 12(4), 395–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurman, N., & Schifferes, S. (2012). The future of personalization at news websites. Journalism Studies, 13(5–6), 775–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkay, S., & Adinolf, S. (2015). The effects of customization on motivation in an extended study with a massively multiplayer online roleplaying game. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 9, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Vansteenkiste, M., Niemiec, C. P., & Soenens, B. (2010). The development of the five mini-theories of self-determination theory: An historical overview, emerging trends, and future directions. In T. C. Urdan & S. A. Karabenick (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement, v. 16A – The decade ahead: Theoretical perspectives on motivation and achievement (pp. 105–165). London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J. H.-Y., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 162–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J. T., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Klauda, S. L., McRae, A., & Barbosa, P. (2008). Role of reading engagement in mediating effects of reading comprehension instruction on reading outcomes. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 432–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, G. C., Lynch, M., & Glasgow, R. E. (2007). Computer-assisted intervention improves patient-centered diabetes care by increasing autonomy support. Health Psychology, 26(6), 728–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, K., & Reeves, B. (2007). The effect of user control on the cognitive and emotional processing of pictures. Media Psychology, 9(3), 549–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• York, C. (2013). Overloaded by the news: Effects of news exposure and enjoyment on reporting information overload. Communication Research Reports, 30(4), 282–292.
   Google Scholar