Reclaiming a discourse of difference through storytelling: positioning New Zealand women’s lived experience as the ‘starting off thought’

References

• Black, L. L., & Stone, D. (2005). Expanding the definition of privilege: The concept of social privilege. Journal of Mulicultural Counseling and Development, 33(4), 243–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boje, D. M. (2001). Narrative methods for organizational and communication research. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, A. (2007). Feminist standpoint epistemology: Building knowledge and empowerment through women’s lived experience. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. L. Leavy (Eds.), Feminist research practice: A primer (pp. 53–82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (2001). Self-making and world-making. In J. Brockmeier & D. Carbaugh (Eds.), Narrative and identity: Studies in autobiography, self and culture (pp. 25–38). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (2002). Making stories: Law, literature, life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bude, H. (1984). Reconstruction of life constructions - an answer to the question of what biography research brings. In M. Kohli & G. Robert (Eds.), Biography and social reality: New contributions and research perspectives (pp. 7–28). Stuttgart: JB Metzler.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, M., Michelle, C., & Simon-Kumar, R. (2011). Connecting women in the age of difference: Re-thinking gender in twenty-first century Aotearoa New Zealand. Women’s Studies Journal, 25(2), 2–8. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/docview/924407727?accountid=17287
   Google Scholar
• Caretta, M. A. (2016). Member checking: A feminist participatory analysis of the use of preliminary results pamphlets in cross-cultural, cross-language research. Qualitative Research, 16(3), 305–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clandinin, D. J., & Rosiek, J. (2007). Mapping a landscape of narrative inquiry: Borderland spaces and tensions. In D. J. Clandinin (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 35–75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (2015). Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas. Annual Review Sociology, 41, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culler, J. (2004). Story and discourse in the analysis of narrative. In M. Bal (Ed.), Narrative theory: Critical concepts in literary and cultural studies (pp. 117–131). Oxon, MA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cunliffe, A. L. (2004). On becoming a critically reflexive practitioner. Journal of Management Education, 28(4), 407–426.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword. Feminist Theory, 9(1), 67–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, K., Johnson, S., Milnes, K., & Rickett, B. (2010). Exploring women’s agency and resistance in health-related contexts: Contributors’ introduction. Feminism & Psychology, 20(2), 238–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dictonary.com. (in press). Privilege. Retrieved from Dictionary.com: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/privilege?s=t
   Google Scholar
• Etherington, K. (2004). Research methods: Reflexivities – Roots, meanings, dilemmas. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 4(2), 46–47. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238195734
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (2006). An introduction to qualitative research. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, H. (2004). Doing narrative research: Analysing personal stories line by line. Qualitative Social Work, 3(2), 179–201.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, C. L., & Chávez, K. R. (2012). Standing at the intersections of feminism, intersectionality, and communication studies: Introduction. In C. L. Griffin & K. R. Chávez (Eds.), Standing at the intersection: Feminist voices, feminist practices in communication studies (pp. 1–34). New York: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1993). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “strong objectivity”? In L. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 49–82). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. L. (2017). Re-situating organizational knowledge: Violence, intersectionality and the privilege of partial perspective. Human Relations, 70(3), 263–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayfield, N., & Huxley, C. (2015). Insider and outsider perspectives: Reflections on researcher identities in research with lesbian and bisexual women. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(2), 91–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendry, P. M. (2007). The future of narrative. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 487–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, D. A. (2015). Coming to understand experience: Dewey’s theory of experience and narrative inquiry. Journal of Thought, 49(3–4), 3–17. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/docview/1767560552?accountid=17287
   Google Scholar
• Josselson, R. (2011). Bet you think this song is about you: Whose narrative is it in narrative research? Narrative works: Issues. Investigations, & Interventions, 1(1), 33–51. Retrieved from https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/NW/article/view/18472/19970
   Google Scholar
• Kerrick, M. R., & Henry, R. L. (2016). “Totally in love”: Evidence of a master narrative for how new mothers should feel about their babies. Sex Roles, 76, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinger, C. (1995). Über neuere Tendenzen in der Theorie der Geschlechterdifferenz. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 43(5), 801–814.
   Google Scholar
• Laurenceau, J. P., & Bolger, N. (2005). Using diary methods to study marital and family processes. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(1), 86–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, P. J. (2011). Storytelling as research/research as storytelling. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(6), 505–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardo, E. (2003). EU gender policy: Trapped in the ‘Wollstonecraft dilemma’? The European Journal of Women’s Studies, 10(2), 159–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludvig, A. (2006). Differences between women? Intersecting voices in a female narrative. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3), 245–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, J. (2013, November 7). Gender equality and social justice - progress, paradox and promise. Retrieved from Canterbury Workers’ Educational Association http://www.cwea.org.nz
   Google Scholar
• Mumby, D. L. (1993). Narrative and social control: Critical perspectives. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholl, H. (2010). Diaries as a method of data collection in research. Paediatric Nursing, 22(7), 16–20. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/docview/751272267?accountid=17287
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S., Niessen, C., & Zapf, D. (2010). Diary studies in organizational research: An introduction and some practical recommendations. Journal of Peersonnel Psychology, 9(2), 79–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riessman, C. K. (1990). Divorce talks: Women and men make sense of personal relationships. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, B. (2002). Biographical research. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rooney, T., Lawlor, K., & Rohan, E. (2016). Telling tales: Storytelling as a methodological approach in research. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 14(2), 147–156. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/docview/1860725226?accountid=17287
   Google Scholar
• Skeggs, B. (2002). Techniques for telling the reflexive self. In T. May (Ed.), Qualitative research in action (pp. 349–374). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, F. L., & Dougherty, D. S. (2012). Revealing a master narrative: Discourses of retirement throughout the working life cycle. Management Communication Quarterly, 26(3), 453–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symington, A. (2004). Intersectionality: A tool for gender and economic justice. Women’s Rights and Economic Change, 9, 1–8. Retrieved from https://www.awid.org/publications/intersectionality-tool-gender-and-economic-justice
   Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. (2008). “We’ve never been close, we’re very different”: Three narrative types in sister discourse. Narrative Inquiry, 18, 206–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Discourse, ideology and context. Folia Linguistica, 35, 11–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisman, C. B. (2016). Does feminism convince us: A response to “the case for feminist standpoint epistemology in social work research”. Research on Social Work Practice, 27(4), 1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3), 193–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar