‘A rational solution to a different problem’; understanding the verisimilitude of anti-vaccination communication

References

• Adler, J. (2008). Two modes of thought: The narrative/paradigmatic disconnect in the Bailey book controversy. The Official Publication of the International Academy of Sex Research, 37(3), 422–425.
   Google Scholar
• Attwell, K., Leask, J., Meyer, S., Rokkas, P., & Ward, P. (2017). Vaccine rejecting parents’ engagement with expert systems that inform vaccination programs. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 14(1), 65–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attwell, K., Ward, P. R., Meyer, S. B., Rokkas, P. J., & Leask, J. (2018). “Do-it-yourself”: Vaccine rejection and complementary and alternative medicine. Social Science & Medicine, 196, 106–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. (1975). An introduction to the structural analysis of narrative. New Literary History, 6(2), 237–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beard, F. H., Hull, B. P., Leask, J., Dey, A., & McIntyre, P. B. (2016). Trends and patterns in vaccination objection, Australia, 2002-2013. The Medical Journal of Australia, 204(7), 275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beard, F. H., Leask, J., & McIntyre, P. B. (2017). No Jab, No Pay and vaccine refusal in Australia: The jury is out. The Medical Journal of Australia, 206(9), 381–383. doi:10.5694/mja16.00944
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, J. (2017). Narrative possibility and narrative explanation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 62, 31–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley, J. (2010). Current research on public perceptions of nanotechnology. Emerging Health Threats Journal, 3(1), e8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1 (Autumn, 1991)), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucchi, M., & Trench, B. (2014). Routledge handbook of public communication of science and technology. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burioni, R., Odone, A., & Signorelli, C. (2018). Lessons from Italy’s policy shift on immunization. Nature, 555(7694), 30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, K. (1969). A grammar of motives. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, E. W., Rusch, E., Ford, A., & Stratton, K. (2012). Adverse effects of vaccines: Evidence and causality. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlstrom, M. F. (2014). Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(Supplement 4), 13614–13620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlstrom, M. F., & Ho, S. S. (2012). Ethical considerations of using narrative to communicate science. Science Communication, 34(5), 592–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubé, E., Vivion, M., & Macdonald, N. E. (2014). Vaccine hesitancy, vaccine refusal and the anti-vaccine movement: Influence, impact and implications. Expert Review of Vaccines, 14(1), 99–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubé, E., Vivion, M., Sauvageau, C., Gagneur, A., Gagnon, R., & Guay, M. (2016). “Nature does things well, why should we interfere?”: Vaccine hesitancy among mothers. Qualitative Health Research, 26(3), 411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1993). Discourse and social change. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2012). Critical discourse analysis. International Advances in Engineering and Technology, 7, 452–487.
   Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B., & Scheufele, D. A. (2014). The science of science communication II. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(Supplement 4), 13583–13584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. R. (1984). Narration as a human communication paradigm: The case of public moral argument. Communication Monographs, 51(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. R. (1994). Narrative rationality and the logic of scientific discourse. Argumentation, 8(1), 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, L., Hausman, B. L., Cashion, M., Lucchesi, N., Patel, K., & Roberts, J. (2015). Vaccination persuasion online: A qualitative study of two provaccine and two vaccine-skeptical websites. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(5), e133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helps, C., Leask, J., Barclay, L., & Carter, S. (2019). Understanding non-vaccinating parents’ views to inform and improve clinical encounters. BMJ Open, 9(5), e026299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson-West, P. (2005). Understanding resistance to childhood vaccination in the UK: Radicals, reformists and the discourses of risk, trust and science. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Nottingham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Hviid, A., Hansen, J. V., Frisch, M., & Melbye, M. (2019). Measles, mumps, rubella vaccination and autism: A nationwide cohort study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 170(8), 513–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyvärinen, M. (2008). “Life as narrative” revisited. Partial Answers: Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas, 6(2), 261–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, A. (2014). Risk, science and public communication: Third-order thinking about scientific culture. In M. Bucchi & B. Trench (Eds.), Routledge handbook of public communication of science and technology (pp. 199–212). Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. L. (1998). The right to refuse medication: Freedom and responsibility. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 21(3), 252–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. (2017). How can we use the ‘science of stories’ to produce persuasive scientific stories? Palgrave Communications, 3(1), 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. (2015). Climate science communication and the measurement problem. Political Psychology, 36, 1–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 14(2), 147–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M. (2014). Vaccine risk perceptions and ad hoc risk assessment. Cultural Cognition Project Yale Law, 17(1–44). doi:10.2139/ssrn.2386034
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., & Braman, D. (2006). Cultural cognition and public policy. Yale Law & Policy Review, 24(1), 149–172.
   Google Scholar
• Kata, A. (2010). A postmodern Pandora’s box: Anti-vaccination misinformation on the internet. Vaccine, 28(7), 1709–1716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kata, A. (2012). Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm. Vaccine, 30(25), 3778–3789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KhosraviNik, M. (2014). Persian nationalism, identity and anti-Arab sentiments in Iranian Facebook discourses. Journal of Language and Politics, 13(4), 755–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kou, Y., Kow, Y., Gui, X., & Cheng, W. (2017). One social movement, two social media sites: A comparative study of public discourses. The Journal of Collaborative Computing and Work Practices, 26(4), 807–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. New York, New York: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kritikos, K. (2016). Reading the comments: Likers, haters, and manipulators at the bottom of the web. Journal of Information Ethics, 25(1), 156–159.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S., & Hacking, I. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions: 50th anniversary edition. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, W. (1997). Some further steps in narrative analysis. Journal of Narrative & Life History, 7(1–4), 395–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, H. J., & Schulz, W. S. (2019). Reverse global vaccine dissent. Science, 364(6436), 105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leask, J., Chapman, S., & Cooper Robbins, S. C. (2010). All manner of ills – The features of serious diseases attributed to vaccination. Vaccine, 28(17), 3066–3070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidskog, R., & Sundqvist, G. R. (2013). Sociology of risk. In S. Roeser, R. Hillerbrand, P. Sandin, & M. Peterson (Eds.), Essentials of Risk Theory (pp. 75–105). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, N. E. (2015). Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants. Vaccine, 33(34), 4161–4164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavoa, J., Gibbs, M., & Carter, M. (2017). Constructing the young child media user in Australia: A discourse analysis of Facebook comments. Journal of Children and Media, 11(3), 330–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdams, D. P. (1993). The stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of the self. New York, New York: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McKinnon, M., & Orthia, L. (2017). Vaccination communication strategies: What have we learned, and lost, in 200 years? Journal of Science Communication, 16(3), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messenger, A. (2015). ‘No Jab, No Pay’ recommendation raises concerns. Public Health Research & Practice, 25(2), e2521525.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meyer, G. (2016). In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return? Public Understanding of Science, 25(4), 433–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteagudo, J. G. (2011). Jerome Bruner and the challenges of the narrative turn: Then and now. Narrative Inquiry, 21(2), 295–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullet, D. R. (2018). A general critical discourse analysis framework for educational research. Journal of Advanced Academics, 29(2), 116–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nan, X., Dahlstrom, M. F., Richards, A., & Rangarajan, S. (2015). Influence of evidence type and narrative type on hpv risk perception and intention to obtain the hpv vaccine. Health Communication, 30(3), 301–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NASEM. (2017). Communicating science effectively: A research agenda. Retrieved from www.nap.edu/catalog/23674/communicating-science-effectively-a-research-agenda
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, E., Cooper, K., & Garrett, R. (2015). The partisan brain: How dissonant science messages lead conservatives and liberals to (dis)trust science. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658(1), 36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M., & Markowitz, E. (2014). Understanding public opinion in debates over biomedical research: Looking beyond political partisanship to focus on beliefs about science and society. PLoS ONE, 9(2), e88473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American Journal of Botany, 96(10), 1767–1778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2015). Does correcting myths about the flu vaccine work? Vaccine, 33(3), 459–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., Richey, S., & Freed, G. L. (2014). Effective messages in vaccine promotion: A randomized trial. Pediatrics, 133(4), e835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, D. C. (2016). Payback for Pearl Harbor. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 40(3), 247–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, D. R. (2012). Narrative, cognition, and rationality. In J. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 604–615). ProQuest Ebook Central: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Paxton, G. A., Tyrrell, L., Oldfield, S. B., Kiang, K., & Danchin, M. H. (2016). No Jab, No Pay – No planning for migrant children. The Medical Journal of Australia, 205(7), 296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, L. J. (2011). Analysing the dialogic turn in the communication of research-based knowledge: An exploration of the tensions in collaborative research. Public Understanding of Science, 20(1), 80–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pluviano, S., Watt, C., & Della Sala, S. (2017). Misinformation lingers in memory: Failure of three pro-vaccination strategies. PLoS ONE, 12(7), e0181640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich, J. A. (2016). Calling the shots: Why parents reject vaccines. New York, New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seethaler, S. (2016). Shades of grey in vaccination decision making. Science Communication, 38(2), 261–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seethaler, S., Evans, J. H., Gere, C., & Rajagopalan, R. M. (2019). Science, values, and science communication: Competencies for pushing beyond the deficit model. Science Communication, 41(3), 378–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (2000). The perception of risk. London, UK: Earthscan Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C., & Uccelli, P. (2009). The challenge of academic language. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 112–133). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sobo, E. J. (2015). Social cultivation of vaccine refusal and delay among Waldorf (Steiner) school parents. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 29(3), 381–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobo, E. J. (2016). Theorizing (vaccine) refusal: Through the looking glass. Cultural Anthropology, 31(3), 342–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suldovsky, B. (2016). In science communication, why does the idea of the public deficit always return? Public Understanding of Science, 25(4), 415–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uslaner, E. A. (2018). The Oxford handbook of social and political trust. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Aims of critical discourse analysis. Japanese Disourse, 1(1), 12.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. (2011). Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction. London, UK: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Veland, S., Scoville-Simonds, M., Gram-Hanssen, I., Schorre, A., El Khoury, A., Nordbø, M., … Bjørkan, M. (2018). Transformative role of storytelling in realizing 1.5°C futures. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 31, 41–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellcome. (2018). Wellcome global monitor report. Retrieved from https://wellcome.ac.uk/reports/wellcome-global-monitor/2018
   Google Scholar
• White, H. (1980). The value of narrativity in the representation of reality. Critical Inquiry, 7(1), 5–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. (2014). WHO SAGE vaccine hesitancy working group report. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/immunization/sage/meetings/2014/october/SAGE_working_group_revised_report_vaccine_hesitancy.pdf?ua=1.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. (2019). Ten threats to global health in 2019. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/emergencies/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, K. E., Steffens, M., Berry, N., & Leask, J. (2017). An audit of the quality of online immunisation information available to Australian parents. BMC Public Health, 17(1), 76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, R. M., & Sharp, L. K. (2002). Anti-vaccinationists past and present. British Medical Journal, 325(7361), 430–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y. T., & Studdert, D. M. (2017). Linking immunization status and eligibility for welfare and benefits payments: The Australian “No Jab, No Pay” legislation. JAMA, 317(8), 803–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zollo, F., Novak, P. K., Del Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Mozetič, I., Scala, A., … Quattrociocchi, W. (2015). Emotional dynamics in the age of misinformation. PLoS ONE, 10(10), 1–22.
   Google Scholar