References
- Abidin, C. (2015). Communicative ♥ intimacies: Influencers and perceived interconnectedness. Ada: A Journal of Gender New Media and Technology, 8, 1–16.
- Abidin, C. (2017). #familygoals: Family influencers, calibrated amateurism, and justifying young digital labor. Social Media + Society, 3(2). doi:10.1177/2056305117707191
- Archer, C. (2019). How influencer ‘mumpreneur’ bloggers and ‘everyday’ mums frame presenting their children online. Media International Australia, 170(1), 47–56.
- Archer, C., & Kao, K. T. (2018). Mother, baby and Facebook makes three: Does social media provide social support for new mothers? Media International Australia, 168(1), 122–139.
- Blum-Ross, A., & Livingstone, S. (2017). “Sharenting,” parent blogging, and the boundaries of the digital self. Popular Communication, 15(2), 110–125.
- Boyd, D. (2008). Taken out of Context: American Teen Sociality in Networked Publics (PhD thesis) University of California.
- Boyd, D. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 9–58). New York: Routledge.
- Bridle, J. (2018, June 17). How peppa pig became a video nightmare for children. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jun/17/peppa-pig-youtube-weird-algorithms-automated-content
- Buckingham, D., Davies, H., Jones, K., & Kelley, P. (1999). Public service goes to market: British Children’s television in transition. Media International Australia, 93(1), 65–76.
- Clark, L. (2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory, 21(4), 323–343.
- Donovan, S. (2020). “Sharenting”: The forgotten children of the GDPR. Peace Human Rights Governance, 4(1), 35–59.
- Fox, A. K., & Hoy, M. G. (2019). Smart devices, smart decisions? Implications of parents’ sharenting for children’s online privacy: An investigation of mothers. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 38(4), 414–432.
- Gesenhues, A. (2019, September 4). YouTube settlement with FTC includes $170M fine, changes to how it monetizes children’s content: The company said it will stop serving up personalized ads on kid videos. Marketing Land. Retrieved from: https://marketingland.com/youtube-settlement-with-ftc-includes-170m-fine-changes-to-how-it-monetizes-childrens-content-266662
- Hampton, K. N. (2016). Persistent and pervasive community: New communication technologies and the future of community. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(1), 101–124.
- Helsper, E. J. (2012). A corresponding fields model of digital inclusion. Communication Theory, 22(4), 403–426.
- Holloway, D., & Green, L. (2016). The internet of toys. Communication Research and Practice, 7(2), 506–519.
- Hughs, C. (2020a) Average number of Facebook friends in Australia as of April 2018, by age group Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/649369/australia-average-number-of-facebook-friends-by-age/
- Hughs, C. (2020b) Average number of friends, contacts or followers on social networking sites in Australia as of April 2018. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/649405/australia-average-number-of-contacts-on-social-networking-sites/
- Keen, C. (2020). Apathy, convenience or irrelevance? Identifying conceptual barriers to safeguarding children’s data privacy. New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/1461444820960068
- Leaning, M. (2019). An approach to digital literacy through the integration of media and information literacy. Media and Communication, 7(2), 4–13.
- Leaver, T. (2017). Intimate surveillance: Normalizing parental monitoring and mediation of infants online. Social Media + Society, 3(2). doi:10.1177/2056305117707192
- Leaver, T., & Highfield, T. (2018). Visualising the ends of identity: Pre-birth and post-death on Instagram. Information, Communication & Society, 21(1), 30–45.
- Lemish, D. (2007). Children and television: A global perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
- Lepkowska, D., & Nightingale, J. (2019). Meet the parents: How schools can work effectively with families to support children’s learning. New York: Routledge.
- Lipu, M., & Siibak, A. (2019). ‘Take it down!’: Estonian parents’ and pre-teens’ opinions and experiences with sharenting. Media International Australia, 170(1), 57–67.
- Litt, E. (2012). Knock, knock. Who’s There? The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(3), 330–345.
- Litt, E., & Hargittai, E. (2016). The imagined audience on social network sites. Social Media & Society, 2(1). doi:10.1177/2056305116633482
- Litt, E. J. (2013). Measuring users’ Internet skills: A review of past assessments and a look toward the future. New Media & Society, 15(4), 612–630.
- Livingstone, S. (2020, January 28). Can we realise children’s rights in a digital world? Reframing childhood past and present. https://medium.com/reframing-childhood-past-and-present/can-we-realise-childrens-rights-in-a-digital-world-d4f5f19f298f
- Livingstone, S., Blum-Ross, A., & Zhang, D. (2018). What do parents think, and do, about their children’s online privacy? Parenting for a Digital Future: Survey Report 3, LSE. Retrieved from: http://www.lse.ac.uk/media-and-communications/assets/documents/research/preparing-for-a-digital-future/P4DF-Report-3.pdf
- Livingstone, S., Ólafsson, K., Helsper, E. J., Lupiáñez-Villanueva, F., Veltri, G. A., & Folkvord, F. (2017). Maximizing opportunities and minimizing risks for children online: The role of digital skills in emerging strategies of parental mediation. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 82–105.
- Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2011). I tweet honestly, i tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133.
- Moser, C., Chen, T., & Schoenebeck, S. Y. (2017). Parents’ and children’s preferences about parents sharing about children on social media. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Denver, Colorado, USA, ACM: 5221–5225.
- Nikken, P., & Schols, M. (2015). How and why parents guide the media use of young children. Journal of Child and Family, 24(11), 3423–3435.
- Ofcom (2017). Children and parents media use attitudes. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/108182/children-parents-media-use-attitudes-2017.pdf
- Ouvrein, G., & Verswijvel, K. (2019). Sharenting: Parental adoration or public humiliation? A focus group study on adolescents’ experiences with sharenting against the background of their own impression management. Children and Youth Services Review, 99, 319–327.
- Potter, A., & Barnes, R. (forthcoming). The sharent trap: Parenting in a digital age and a child’s right to privacy. In: Holloway, D., Stocco, F., Murcia, K., Willson, M and Archer, C. (eds.), The digital in children’s early years: Research, design and practice. London: Springer.
- Quinn, K. (2014). An ecological approach to privacy: ‘Doing’ online privacy at midlife. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(4), 562–580.
- Simpson, B. (2004). Children and Television. London: Continuum.
- Sonck, N., Livingstone, S., Kuiper, E., & de Haan, J. (2011). Digital literacy and safety skills. London, UK: EU Kids Online, London School of Economics & Political Science. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/33733
- Third, A., Collin, P., Walsh, L., & Black, R. (2019). Online safety. In: Young people in digital society. Studies in childhood and youth. London: Palgrave Macmillan.