An “ideological fantasy”: how market discourses confuse, obscure and deflect consumers’ attention away from the science of energy conservation

References

• Abrahamse, W. (2019). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: What works, what doesn’t, and why. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2009). How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households ’direct and indirect energy use and savings? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(5), 711–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnaud, N., Mills, C. E., Legrand, C., & Maton, E. (2016). Materializing strategy in mundane tools: The key to coupling global strategy and local strategy practice? British Journal of Management, 27(1), 38–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, K. L., Kuhn, T. R., & Cooren, F (2009). Constitutional amendments: Materializing organizational communication. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 1–64.
   Google Scholar
• Brechin, S. R. (2016). Climate change mitigation and the collective action problem: Exploring country differences in greenhouse gas contributions. Sociological Forum, 31(S1), 846–861.
   Google Scholar
• Burlat, C. & Mills, C. E. (2018). Power to the people? How an energy company’s strategic texts constitute the company-consumer interface working against collective action. M@n@gement, 21(2), 736–770. [Special issue entitled,“Interconnecting the practice turn and communicative approach to organizing: A new challenge for collective action?” Editors N. Arnaud, B. Fauré, Jeanne Mengis and François Cooren].
   Google Scholar
• Caronia, L., & Cooren, F. (2014). Decentering our analytical position: The dialogicity of things. Discourse and Communication, 8(1), 41–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. (2004). Textual agency: How texts do things in organizational settings. Organization, 11(3), 373–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. (2010). Action and agency in dialogue: Passion, incarnation and ventriloquism. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F., Kuhn, T., Cornelissen, J. P., & Clark, T. (2011). Communication, organizing and organization: An overview and introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 32(9), 1149–1170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Kopaneva, I. M., & Cheney, G. (2019). Organizational identity formation in alternative organizations: A study of three benefit corporations. Management Communication Quarterly, 33(4), 484–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (2008). Technology/ideology: How ideological fields influence consumers and technological narratives. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(6), 865–881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. R. (2008). A communicative theory of the firm: Developing an alternative perspective on intra-organizational power and stakeholder relationships. Organization Studies, 29(8–9), 1227–1254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1996). On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. Soziale Welt, 47(4), 369–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paring, G., Pezé, S., & Huault, I. (2017). ‘Welcome to the whiteboard, the new member of the team’: Identity regulation as a sociomaterial process. Organization, 24(6), 844–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L., & Nicotera, A. M. (2008). Building theories of organizing: The constitutive role of communication. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schoeneborn, D., Blaschke, S., Cooren, F., McPhee, R. D., Seidl, D., & Taylor, J. R. (2014). The three schools of CCO thinking: Interactive dialogue and systematic comparison. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(2), 285–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment & Planning A, 42(6), 1273–1285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E. (2018). What is wrong with energy efficiency? Building Research and Information, 36(7), 779–789.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6, 81–97.
   Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, K. M. (2013). Sensemaking. In D. Reece and M Augier (EDs.), The Palgrave encyclopedia of strategic management. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. R., & Van Every, E. J. (2000). The emergent organization. Communication as site and surface. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erblaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 352–371). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhoit, E. D., & Kisselburgh, L. G. (2015). Collective action without organization: The material constitution of bike commuters as collective. Organization Studies, 36(5), 573–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, A. (2012). Fantasies of empowerment: Mapping neoliberal discourse in the coalition government’s schools policy. Journal of Education Policy, 27(3), 279–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2006). Case study methods. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 111–122). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., NJ.
   Google Scholar