Gender and word elongation in Facebook-mediated communication in Palestinian Arabic

References

• Badoyan, H., & Muntigl, P. (2016). Gender and Emotional Expressiveness in CMC: Linguistic and Paralinguistic Approach [master’s thesis]. Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, P., & Egbert, J. (Eds.). (2016). Triangulating methodological approaches in corpus linguistic research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, T., & Chai, J. (2011). Beyond normalization: Pragmatics of word form in text messages. ACL Anthology, Proceedings of 5th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, 1437–1441, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, N. S. (2004). Rethinking written culture. Language Sciences, 26(1), 57–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13(2), 145–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berná, J. (2017). Representations of gender in belloc lowndes’ the lodger (Bachelor’s thesis). Retrieved from https://theses.cz/id/1bgk6r/Representations_of_Gender_in_Belloc_Lowndes__The_Lodger_-.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya, P. (2010). Emotion analysis of internet chat. In In the Proceedings of the ICON Conference, Mumbai, India.
   Google Scholar
• Bisio, I., Delfino, A., Lavagetto, F., & Marchese, M. (2013). Opportunistic detection methods for emotion-aware smartphone applications. In B. Guo, D. Riboni, & P. Hu (Eds.), Creating personal, social, and urban awareness through pervasive computing (pp. 53–85). Pennsylvania: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Bisio, I., Delfino, A., Lavagetto, F., & Marchese, M. (2016). Opportunistic detection methods for emotion-aware smartphone applications. In Information Resources Management Association (Ed.), Psychology and mental health: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 670–704). Pennsylvania: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Brierley, C., Sawalha, M., Heselwood, B., & Atwell, E. (2016). A verified Arabic-IPA mapping for Arabic transcription technology, informed by Quranic recitation, traditional Arabic Linguistics, and modern phonetics. Journal of Semitic Studies, 61(1), 157–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, S., & Diakopoulos, N. (2011).Cooooooooooooooollllllllllllll!!!!!!!!!!!!!!: Using word lengthening to detect sentiment in microblogs. ACLAnthology, Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 562–570, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Bunting, J., & Ryan, M. (2012). Gendered differences in perceived emotion: The impact on clinical diagnoses and treatment [master’s thesis]. University of Exeter, Exeter, England. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c7fa/aec17b1a1008dbcdf3fbb4f7e25cde3371d8.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Coulmas, F. (2013). Writing and society: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crystal, D. (2005). Speaking of writing and writing of speaking. Retrieved March 27, 2017, from http://www.pearsonlongman.com/dictionaries/pdfs/speaking
   Google Scholar
• Doll, J. (2013, March). Why drag it out? The Atlantic. Retrieved August 15, 2019, from  http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/03/dragging-it-out/309220/
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, P. (1993). Facial expression and emotion. American Psychologist, 48(4), 384–392. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.4.384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, C. (2011). From speech to screen: The orthography of colloquial arabicin electronically-mediated communication [Bachelor’s thesis]. Retrieved from https://www.swarthmore.edu/sites/default/files/assets/documents/linguistics/2011_Gordon.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grant, T. (2010). Text messaging forensics Txt 4n6: Idiolect free authorship analysis? In M. Coulthard & A. Johnson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics (pp. 536–550). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guadagno, R. E., & Cialdini, R. B. (2002). Online persuasion: An examination of gender differences in computer-mediated interpersonal influence. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(1), 38–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, S. C. (2003). Gender and power in on-line communication. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (pp. 202–228). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Iosub, D., Laniado, D., Castillo, C., Morell, M. F., & Kaltenbrunner, A. (2014). Emotions under discussion: Gender, status and communication in online collaboration. PloS One, 9(8), e104880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, L. A., Ervin, K. S., Gardner, P. D., & Schmitt, N. (2001). Gender and the Internet: Women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles, 44(5–6), 363–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarrar, M., Habash, N., Akra, D. F., & Zalmout, N. (2014). Building a corpus for Palestinian Arabic: A preliminary study. ANLP, 2014, 18–27.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. T., & Shulman, G. A. (1988). More alike than meets the eye: Perceived gender differences in subjective experience and its display. Sex Roles, 19(1–2), 67–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joiner, R., Stewart, C., Beaney, C., Moon, A., Maras, P., Guiller, J., … Brosnan, M. (2014). Publically different, privately the same: Gender differences and similarities in response to Facebook status updates. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 165–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazir, B. (2012). Gender patterns on Facebook: A sociolinguistic perspective. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(3), 252–265. doi:https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v4i3.1899
   Google Scholar
• Ochs, E. (1993). Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26(3), 287–306.
   Google Scholar
• Palfreyman, D., & al Khalil, M. (2003). A funky language for teenzz to use:” Representing Gulf Arabic in INSTANT MESSAGING. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 9(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00355.x
   Google Scholar
• Park, G., Yaden, D. B., Schwartz, H. A., Kern, M. L., Eichstaedt, J. C., Kosinski, M., … Seligman, M. E. (2016). Women are warmer but no less assertive than men: Gender and language on Facebook. PloS One, 11(5), e0155885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkins, R. (2012). Gender and emotional expressiveness: An analysis of prosodic features in emotional expression. Pragmatics and Intercultural Communication, 5(1), 46–54.
   Google Scholar
• Parrott, W. (2001). Emotions in social psychology: Essential readings. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renkema, J., & Schubert, C. (2018). Introduction to discourse studies: (New ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
   Google Scholar
• Scotton, C. M. (1980). Explaining linguistic choices as identity negotiations. In H. Giles, W. P. Robinson, & P. M. Smith (Eds.), Language social psychological perspectives (pp. 359–366). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaul, B. (2020). Facebook: Here’s how to view a post’s edit history. Adweek. Retrieved April 17, 2021, from https://www.adweek.com/digital/facebook-heres-how-to-view-a-posts-edit-history/
   Google Scholar
• Tchokni, S. E., Séaghdha, D. O., & Quercia, D. (2014). Emoticons and phrases: Status symbols in social media. In Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Palo Alto, CA: The AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trnka, R. (2013). Gender differences in human interpersonal conflicts: A reply to. Evolutionary Psychology: An International Journal of Evolutionary Approaches to Psychology and Behavior, 11(4), 781–787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar