158
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Bridging intercultural communication divides: examining technology use by dispersed research teams working in South East Asia

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 377-393 | Received 16 Jan 2023, Accepted 14 Jul 2023, Published online: 23 Aug 2023

References

  • ACIAR. (2022). Lao PDR. Retrieved from https://www.aciar.gov.au/east-and-south-east-asia/lao-pdr
  • Amir, S., & Nugroho, Y. (2013). Beyond the triple helix: Framing STS in the developmental context. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 33(3–4), 115–126. doi:10.1177/0270467613509603
  • Atouba, Y., & Shumate, M. (2010). Interorganizational networking patterns among development organizations. Journal of Communication, 60(2), 293–317. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01483.x
  • Beaver, D., & Rosen, R. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 1(1), 65–84. doi:10.1007/BF02016840
  • Bilbao-Osorio, B., Dutta, S., & Lanvin, B. (2014). Global Information technology report 2014. Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved from: www.weforum.org/gitr.
  • Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2013). Introduction - grounded theory research: Methods and practices. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 1–28). London: SAGE.
  • Burrows, G. R., Drummond, D. L., & Martinsons, M. G. (2005). Knowledge management in China. Communications of the ACM, 48(4), 73–76. doi:10.1145/1053291.1053322
  • Cardon, P. W., & Marshall, B. (2015). The hype and reality of social media use for work collaboration and team communication. International Journal of Business Communication, 52(3), 273–293. doi:10.1177/2329488414525446
  • Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2 ed.). London: SAGE.
  • Chua, V., Mathews, M., & Loh, Y. C. (2016). Social capital in Singapore: Gender differences, ethnic hierarchies, and their intersection. Social Networks, 47, 138–150. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2016.06.004
  • Delante, N. (2020). Classroom teaching as an intercultural communication phenomenon: A thematic analysis of a foreign teacher’s rhetorical practices as communication dynamic. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 49(6), 536–568. doi:10.1080/17475759.2020.1790406
  • Duque, R., Shrum, W., Barriga, O., Jr., & Henriquez, G. (2009). Internet practice and professional networks in Chilean science: Dependency or progress? Scientometrics, 81(1), 239–263. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-2125-0
  • Duque, R., Ynalvez, M., Sooryamoorthy, R., Mbatia, P., Dzorgbo, D.-B. S., & Shrum, W. (2005). Collaboration paradox: Scientific productivity, the Internet, and problems of research in developing areas. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 755–785. doi:10.1177/0306312705053048
  • Duranti, C. M., & de Almeida, F. C. (2012). Is more technology better for communication in international virtual teams? International Journal of E-Collaboration, 8(1), 36–52. doi:10.4018/jec.2012010103
  • Fulk, J., Monge, P., & Hollingshead, A. (2005). Knowledge resource sharing in dispersed multinational teams: Three theoretical lenses. In D. L. Shapiro, M. A. V. Glinow, & J. Cheng (Eds.), Managing multinational teams : Global perspectives (pp. 155–188). Burlington, Canada: Emerald Group Publishing. doi:10.1016/S0747-7929(05)18006-8
  • Gervedink Nijhuis, C. J., Voogt, J. M., & Pieters, J. M. (2012). The cultural complexity of international collaboration: Conditions for sustainable curriculum development in Ghana. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36(5), 647–658. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2012.02.003
  • Gui, Q., Liu, C., & Du, D. (2019). Globalization of science and international scientific collaboration: A network perspective. Geoforum, 105, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.06.017
  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: comparing values, behaviours, institutions and organisations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • ITU. (2020). Key ICT indicators for developed and developing countries and the world (totals and penetration rates). http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/stat/default.aspx
  • Jelinek, M., & Wilson, J. (2005). Macro influences in multicultural teams: A multi-level view. In D. L. Shappiro, M. A. V. Glinow, & J. Cheng (Eds.), Managing multinational teams: Global perspectives (Vol. 18, pp. 209–231). Elsevier. doi:10.1016/S0747-7929(05)18008-1
  • Jesionkowska, J. (2019). Designing online environment for collaborative learning in a scientific community of practice. Paper presented at the ICL2018: The Challenges of the Digital Transformation in Education, Kos Island, Greece. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331779749
  • Lim, S. S., & Goggin, G. (2014). Mobile communication in Asia: Issues and imperatives. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 663–666. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12080
  • Luo, A., & Olson, J. S. (2008). How collaboratories affect scientists from developing countries. In G. M. Olson, N. Bos, & A. Zimmerman (Eds.), Scientific collaborations on the internet (pp. 365–376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/7482.003.0029
  • Manh, H. D. (2015). Scientific publications in Vietnam as seen from Scopus during 1996–2013. Scientometrics, 105(1), 83–95. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1655-x
  • McEwan, C., & Mawdsley, E. (2012). Trilateral development cooperation: Power and politics in emerging aid relationships. Development & Change, 43(6), 1185–1209. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2012.01805.x
  • Muriithia, P., Horner, D., Pemberton, L., & Wao, H. (2018). Factors influencing research collaborations in Kenyan universities. Research Policy, 47(1), 88–97. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.10.002
  • Nicholson, B., Nielsen, P., Sahay, S., & Sæbø, J. I. (2022). Digital public goods platforms for development: The challenge of scaling. The Information Society, 38(5), 364–376. doi:10.1080/01972243.2022.2105999
  • Olson, J. S., Hofer, E. C., Bos, N., Zimmerman, A., Olson, G. M., Cooney, D., & Faniel, I. (2008). A theory of remote scientific collaboration. In G. M. Olson, N. Bos, & A. Zimmerman (Eds.), Scientific collaboration on the internet (pp. 73–97). Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262151207.003.0005
  • Pearce, K. E. (2013). Phoning it in: Theory in mobile media and communication in developing countries. Mobile Media & Communication, 1(1), 76–82. doi:10.1177/2050157912459182
  • Pereira, M. D. M. (2019). Boundary-work that does not work: Social inequalities and the non-performativity of scientific boundary-work. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 44(2), 338–365. doi:10.1177/0162243918795043
  • Shrum, W. (2005). Reagency of the Internet, or, how I became a Guest for science. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 723–754. doi:10.1177/0306312705052106
  • Shrum, W., & Campion, P. (2000). Are scientists in developing countries isolated? Science, Technology and Society, 5(1), 1–34. doi:10.1177/097172180000500101
  • Sonnenwald, D. (2007). Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 643–681. doi:10.1002/aris.2007.1440410121
  • Spielman, D. J., Hartwich, F., & Grebmer, K. (2010). Public–private partnerships and developing-country agriculture: Evidence from the international agricultural research system. Public Administration and Development, 30(4), 261–276. doi:10.1002/pad.574
  • Sumberg, J., Thompson, J., & Woodhouse, P. (2013). Why agronomy in the developing world has become contentious. Agriculture and Human Values, 30(1), 71–83. doi:10.1007/s10460-012-9376-8
  • Thatcher, B. (2010). Understanding digital literacy across cultures. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Digital literacy for technical communication: 21st century theory and practice (pp. 169–198). Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.
  • Thatcher, B. (2012). Intercultural rhetoric and professional communication: Technological advances and organizational behaviour. Herschey, PA: IGI Global.
  • Wagner, C. S., Whetsell, T. A., & Mukherjee, S. (2019). International research collaboration: Novelty, conventionality, and atypicality in knowledge recombination. Research Policy, 48(5), 1260–1270. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.002
  • Ward, W. S., & Given, L. M. (2019). Assessing intercultural communication: Testing technology tools for information sharing in multinational research teams. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(4), 338–350. doi:10.1002/asi.24159
  • Ward, W. S., & Southwell, A. F. (2021). Intercultural relations in international agricultural research teams: Perceived issues influencing communication effectiveness. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 50(2), 122–145. doi:10.1080/17475759.2020.1782970
  • Windsor, P. A. (2011). Perspectives on Australian animal health aid projects in South-East Asia. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, 58(5), 375–386. doi:10.1111/j.1865-1682.2011.01216.x
  • Wöhlert, R. (2020). Communication in international collaborative research teams: A review of the state of the art and open research questions. Studies in Communication and Media, 9(2), 151–217. doi:10.5771/2192-4007-2020-2-151
  • Yang, S., Fichman, P., Zhu, X., Sanfilippo, M., Li, S., & Fleischmann, K. R. (2020). The use of ICT during COVID-19. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57(1), e297. doi:10.1002/pra2.297
  • Yao, X., Zhang, C., Qu, Z., & Tan, B. C. Y. (2020). Global village or virtual Balkans? Evolution and performance of scientific collaboration in the information age. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(4), 395–408. doi:10.1002/asi.24251
  • Ynalvez, M., & Shrum, W. (2006). International training and the digital divide: Computer and email use in the Philippines. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 5(4), 277–302. doi:10.1163/156915006779206051
  • Ynalvez, M., & Shrum, W. M. (2011). Professional networks, scientific collaboration, and publication productivity in resource-constrained research institutions in a developing country. Research Policy, 40(2), 204–216. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.004
  • Zhao, X., & Mills, C. (2019). Reconciling multiple realities in an international joint venture: A case for deliberately fostering communication hybridity at the interfirm interface. Communication Research & Practice, 5(1), 57–72. doi:10.1080/22041451.2019.1561397

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.