An alternative approach to student assessment for engineering–laboratory learning

References

• Abdulwahed, M., and Z. K. Nagy. 2009. “Applying Kolb’s Experiential Learning Cycle for Laboratory Education.” Journal of Engineering Education 98 (3): 283–294. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01025.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bone, A. 2010. “Sue Bloxham and Pete Boyd.” Developing Effective Assessment in Higher Education: A Practical Guide. The Law Teacher 44 (1): 106–108. doi:10.1080/03069400903541476.
   Google Scholar
• Boude, D., & F. Dochy. 2010. “Assessment 2020: Seven Propositions for Assessment Reform in Higher Education.” Education and Training 330–333. doi:10.1200/JOP.2011.000236.
   Google Scholar
• Caspersen, J., J. C. Smeby, and P. Olaf Aamodt. 2017. “Measuring Learning Outcomes.” European Journal of Education 52 (1): 20–30. doi:10.1111/ejed.12205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couteur, P. Le. 2009. “Review of Literature on Remote & Web-Based Science Labs.” 1–22. Accessed http://www.nic.bc.ca/pdf_docs/carti/Review_of_Literature_on_Remote_and_Web-based_Science_Labs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2013. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. SAGE. doi:10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2.
   Google Scholar
• Derek, H.1992. “Assessment of Practical Work Some Considerations in Philosophy of Science.” Science & Education 1 (2):115–144.
   Google Scholar
• Duit, R., H. Gropengießer, U. Kattmann, M. Komorek, and I. Parchmann. 2012. “The Model of Educational Reconstruction – a Framework for Improving Teaching and Learning Science.” In Jorde D., Dillon J. (eds) Science Education Research and Practice in Europe: Retrospective and Prospective, 13–37. doi:10.1007/978-94-6091-900-8_2.
   Google Scholar
• Engineers Australia. 2008. “Accreditation Management System–Education Programs at the Level of Professional Engineer. Document G02 – Accreditation Criteria Guidelines.” Engineer Australia, Canberra. https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/sites/default/files/content-files/2016-12/G02_Accreditation_Criteria_Guidelines.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Engineers Australia. 2011. “Stage 1 Competency Standard for Professional Engineer.” Engineers Australia, 1–6. Accessed http://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/shadomx/apps/fms/fmsdownload.cfm?file_uuid=DBA27A80-95B2-94BD-5BE8-A105DEDDED21&siteName=ieaust
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C. 2013. “Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education.” Review of Educational Research 83 (1): 70–120. doi:10.3102/0034654312474350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feisel, L. D., and A. J. Rosa. 2005. “The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education.” Journal of Engineering Education 94 (1): 121–130. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00833.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, J. A., and M. Diloreto. 2016. “The Effects of Student Engagement, Student Satisfaction, and Perceived Learning in Online Learning Environments.” NCPEA International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation 11 (1): 98–119.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, K., and S. Morón-García. 2009. “Assignment submission, student behaviour and experience.” Engineering Education 4 (1): 16–28. https://doi.org/10.11120/ened.2009.04010016
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. 2003. “How Classroom Assessments Improve Learning.” Educational Leadership 60 (5): 6–11. Accessed http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9 h&AN=9029496&site=ehost-live
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., and V. N. Lunetta. 1982. “The Role of the Laboratory in Science Teaching: Neglected Aspects of Research.” Review of Educational Research 52 (2): 201–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, L., A. Koenders, and V. Gynnild. 2012. “Assessing Practical Laboratory Skills in Undergraduate Molecular Biology Courses.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 37 (7): 861–874. doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.576313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. 2005. “Assessment for Learning.” Learning and Skills Development Agency 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, E. D., and M. C. Good. 2005. “Effects of Laboratory Access Modes upon Learning Outcomes.” IEEE Transactions on Education 48 (4): 619–631. doi:10.1109/TE.2005.852591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, D., S. Murray, E. Lindsay, and D. Liu. 2009. “Evolving Remote Laboratory Architectures to Leverage Emerging Internet Technologies.” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 2 (4): 289–294. doi:10.1109/TLT.2009.33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, J., and J. V. Nickerson. 2006. “Hands-on, Simulated, and Remote Laboratories: A Comparative Literature Review.” ACM Computing Surveys 38 (3): 1–24. doi:10.1145/1132960.1132961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McColskey, W., and R. O’Sullivan. 2012. “How to Assess Student Performance in Science.” Journal of Turkish Science Education (TUSED) 9 (3): 131–136. Accessed http://ehis.ebscohost.com.ezpustaka.upsi.edu.my/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=bacd0ff7-72 cd-478a-b92d-1ad45ed3ddd7@sessionmgr12&vid=13&hid=114
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., and D. MacFarlane-Dick. 2006. “Formative Assessment and Selfregulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 199–218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olds, B. M., and R. L. Miller. 1998. “An Assessment Matrix for Evaluating Engineering Programs.” Journal of Engineering Education 87 (2) (April): 173–178. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.1998.tb00338.x.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. J., N. H. Choe, D. L. Schallert, and A. K. Forbis. 2017. “The Chemical Engineering Research Laboratory as Context for Graduate Students’ Training: The Role of Lab Structure and Cultural Climate in Collaborative Work.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 13 (March): 113–122. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.04.001.
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez, E., J. Tejero, R. Bringué, C. Fité, F. Cunill, and I. Montserrat. 2014. “Revamping of Teaching – Learning Methodologies in Laboratory Subjects of the Chemical Engineering Undergraduate Degree of the University of Barcelona for Their Adjustment to the Bologna Process.” Education for Chemical Engineers 9 (3): e43–e49. doi:10.1016/j.ece.2014.04.002.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, R., K. Brown, and T. Torabi. 2017. “LUS – A Tablet-Based NFC System to Facilitate Instant Database Archival of Laboratory Assessment.” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 4952 (July): 1–7. doi:10.1080/22054952.2017.1312837.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2005. “Interpretations of Criteria-Based Assessment and Grading in Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (2): 175–194. doi:10.1080/0260293042000264262.
   Google Scholar
• Saniie, J., E. Oruklu, R. Hanley, V. Anand, and T. Anjali. 2015. “Transforming Computer Engineering Laboratory Courses for Distance Learning and Collaboration.” International Journal of Engineering Education 31 (1): 106–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stassen, M., K. Doherty, and M. Poe. 2001. Course-Based Review and Assessment: Methods for Understanding Student Learning, 54.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, H. 2007. “Assessment as Learning? How the Use of Explicit Learning Objectives, Assessment Criteria and Feedback in Post-Secondary Education and Training Can Come to Dominate Learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 14 (3): 281–294. doi:10.1080/09695940701591867.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. 2011. “What is Assessment for Learning?” Studies in Educational Evaluation 37 (1): 3–14. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. 2014. “Squaring the Circle: A New Alternative to Alternative-Assessment.” Teaching in Higher Education 19 (5): 565–577. doi:10.1080/13562517.2014.882894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar