The Role of Speech-Language Pathology in Supporting Legal Capacity

References

• Arstein-Kerslake,A., Watson,J., Browning,M., Martinis, J., & Blanck, P. (2017). Future directions in supported decision-making. Retrieved from http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/5070
   Google Scholar
• Australian Law Reform Commission. (2014). Equality, capacity and disability in commonwealth laws. Sydney, NSW: Australian Law Reform Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Bach, M., & Kerzner, L. (2010). A new paradigm for protecting autonomy and the right to legal capacity. Ontario, Canada: Law Commission of Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Bach, M. (2015). Keynote address: Beyond a cognitive theory of capacity - Another frontier for inclusion. Paper presented at the IASSIDD Americas Regional Congress, Hawaii, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Beamer, S., & Brookes, M. (2001). Making decisions. Best practice and new ideas for supporting people with high support needs to make decisions. London: Values in Action.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, B. (2014). What about us? A case for legal recognition of interdependence in informal care relationships. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 36(2), 129–148.
   Google Scholar
• Darzins, P. (2010). Can this patient go home? Assessment of decision-making capacity. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 57(1), 65–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dearn, L. (2010). Too much guardianship? Reflections on guardianship in Victoria 1988-2008. Retrieved from https://www.publicadvocate.vic.gov.au/our-services/publications-forms/research-reports/guardianship/guardianship-law-reform/288-too-much-guardianship-reflections-on-guardianship-1988-2008-1
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, M. (2010). Health care decision making and the law: Autonomy, capacity and the limits of liberalism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A., Duffield, G., & Worrall, L. (2010). Legal decision making by people with aphasia: Critical incidents for speech pathologists. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 45, 244–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkinson, J. C. (1993). Who shall decide? The relevance of theory and research to decision-making by people with an intellectual disability. Disability, Handicap and Society, 8(4), 361–375.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkinson, J., & Nelms, R. (1994). Patterns of decisionmaking behaviour by people with intellectual disability: An exploratory study. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 19(2), 99–109.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, H., Watson, J., Iacono, T., Bloomberg, K., & West, D. (2012). Assessing communication in people with severe-profound disabilities: Co-constructing competence. Journal of Clinical Practice in Speech-Language Pathology, 14(2), 64–68.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, M., Bose, A., & Marinis, T. (2017). Decisionmaking capacity in aphasia: SLT’s contribution in England. Aphasiology, 31(11), 1344–1358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., Iacono, T., & Williams, R. (1990). Communication options for people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities: state of the art and future directions. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15, 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiraishi, H. (2007). Capacity assessment and the role of physicians. Psychogeriatrics, 7(4), 147–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suleman, S., & Hopper, T. (2016). Decision-making capacity and aphasia: Speech-language pathologists’ perspectives. Aphasiology, 30(4), 381–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2011). Guide to practice on reservations to treaties. Retrieved from http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft_articles/1_8_2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (2013). Concluding observations on the initial report of Australia, adopted by the Committee at its tenth session (2-13 September 2013). Retrieved from http://www.refworld.org/docid/5280b5cb4.html
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly. (2006). The convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. New York, NY: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly. (2007). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: Declarations and reservations. United Nations treaty collection. New York, NY: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Law Reform Commission. (2012). Guardianship: Final report. Retrieved http://www.lawreform.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/Guardianship_FinalReport_Full%20text.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ward, T., & Stewart, C. (2008). Putting human rights into practice with people with an intellectual disability. Journal of Developmental & Physical Disabilities, 20(3), 297–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, J. (2016a). Assumptions of decision-making capacity: The role supporter attitudes play in the realisation of article 12 for people with severe or profound intellectual disability. Laws, 5(1), 6.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J. (2016b). The right to supported decisionmaking for people rarely heard (unpublished PhD thesis), Deakin University, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J., Wilson, E., & Hagiliassis, N. (2017). Supporting end of life decision making: Case studies of relational closeness in supported decision making for people with severe or profound intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 30(6), 1022–1034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehmeyer, M. (2005). Self-determination and individuals with severe disabilities: Re-examining meanings and misinterpretations. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30, 113–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehmeyer, M., Agran, M., & Hughes, C. (2000). A national survey of teachers’ promotion of self-determination and student-directed learning. Journal of Special Education, 34, 58–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welie, S. P. K., Dute, J., Nys, H., & van Wijmen, F.C. B. (2005). Patient incompetence and substitute decision-making: An analysis of the role of the health care professional in Dutch law. Health Policy, 73(1), 21–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuscak, S., Peisah, C., & Ferguson, A. (2016). A collaborative approach to supporting communication in the assessment of decision-making capacity. Disability and Rehabilitation, 38(11), 1107–1114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar