An Introduction to Research on Statistical Learning and Reading

References

• Adwan-Mansour, J., & Bitan, T. (2017). The effect of stimulus variability on learning and generalization of reading in a novel script. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60, 2840–2851. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-16-0293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alt, M., Meyers, C., & Ancharski, A. (2012). Using principles of learning to inform language therapy design for children with specific language impairment. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 47(5), 487–498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00169.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alt, M., Meyers, C., Oglivie, T., Nicholas, K., & Arizmendi, G. (2014). Cross-situational statistically based word learning intervention for late-talking toddlers. Journal of Communication Disorders, 52, 207–220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apfelbaum, K. S., Hazeltine, E., & McMurray, B. (2013). Statistical learning in reading: Variability in irrelevant letters helps children learn phonics skills. Developmental Psychology, 49(7), 1348–1365. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arciuli, J. (2017). The multi-component nature of statistical learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 372(1711). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arciuli, J. (2018). Reading as statistical learning. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49, 634–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arciuli, J., & Conway, C. (2018). The promise – and challenge – of statistical learning for elucidating atypical language development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 492–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arciuli, J., & Cupples, L. (2006). The processing of lexical stress during visual word recognition: Typicality effects and orthographic correlates. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(5), 920–948. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980443000782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arciuli, J., & Cupples, L. (2007). Would you rather “embert a cudsert” or “cudsert an embert’? How spelling patterns at the beginning of English disyllables can cue grammatical category. In A. Schalley D. Khlentzos (Eds.) Mental states: Language and cognitive structure (pp. 213–237). John Benjamins Publishing: Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Arciuli, J., McMahon, K., & de Zubicaray, G. (2012). Probabilistic orthographic cues to grammatical category in the brain. Brain and Language, 123(3), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arciuli, J., & Monaghan, P. (2009). Probabilistic cues to grammatical category in English orthography and their influence during reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13(1), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430802633508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arciuli, J., Monaghan, P., & Ševa, N. (2010). Learning to assign lexical stress during reading aloud: Corpus, behavioral, and computational investigations. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(2), 180–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arciuli, J., & Paul, R. (2012). Sensitivity to probabilistic orthographic cues to lexical stress in adolescent speakers with ASD and typical peers. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1288–1295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arciuli, J., & Simpson, I. C. (2011). Statistical learning in typically developing children: the role of age and speed of stimulus presentation. Developmental Science, 14(3), 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00937.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arciuli, J., & Simpson, I. C. (2012). Statistical learning is related to reading ability in children and adults. Cognitive Science, 36(2), 286–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01200.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Pipenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1993). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, T. F., & Oliva, A. (2008). Statistical learning using real-world scenes extracting categorical regularities without conscious intent. Psychological Science, 19(7), 678–685. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02142.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burani, C., & Arduino, L. S. (2004). Stress regularity or consistency? Reading aloud Italian polysyllables with different stress patterns. Brain and Language, 90(1–3), 318–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-934x(03)00444-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetail, F. (2017). What do we do with what we learn? Statistical learning of orthographic regularities impacts written word processing. Cognition, 163, 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, C. M., Baurnschmidt, A., Huang, S., & Pisoni, D. (2010). Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key. Cognition, 114(3), 356–371. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiser, J., & Aslin, R. N. (2001). Unsupervised statistical learning of higher-order spatial structures from visual scenes. Psychological Science, 12(6), 499–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, R., Armstrong, B. C., Siegelman, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (2015). Domain generality versus modality specificity: The paradox of statistical learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 117–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, R., Siegelman, N., Narkiss, A., & Afek, L. (2013). What predicts successful literacy acquisition in a second language? Psychological Science, 24(7), 1243–1252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612472207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fudge, E. (1984). English word stress. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Gabay, Y., Thiessen, E. D., & Holt, L. L. (2015). Impaired statistical learning in developmental dyslexia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(3), 934–945. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gathercole, S. E., Alloway, T. P., Willis, C., & Adams, A. M. (2006). Working memory in children with reading disabilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93(3), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2005.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimani, A., & Protopapas, A. (2016). Derivational suffixes as cues to stress position in reading Greek. Journal of Research in Reading. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, W., & Tong, S. (2017). Quantity matters: Children with dyslexia are impaired in a small, but not large, number of exposures during implicit repeated sequence learning. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26(4), 1080–1091. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_ajslp-15-0190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, X., & Tong, X. (2017). Statistical learning as a key to cracking Chinese orthographic codes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(1), 60–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebb, D. (1961). Distinctive features of learning in the higher animal. In J.F. Delafresnaye (Ed.), Brain mechanisms and learning (pp. 37–46). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hedge, C., Powell, G., & Sumner, P. (2017). The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences. Behavioral Research Methods. doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, L. M. & Warmington, M. (2017). A sequence learning impairment in dyslexia? It depends on the task. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 60, 198–210. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2016.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jouravlev, O., & Lupker, S. J. (2014). Stress consistency and stress regularity effects in Russian. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(5), 605–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.813562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jouravlev, O., & Lupker, S. J. (2015). Lexical stress assignment as a problem of probabilistic inference. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(5), 1174–1192. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0802-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahta, S., & Schiff, R. (2019). Deficits in statistical learning of auditory sequences among adults with dyslexia. Dyslexia, 25, 142–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalra, P. B., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Finn, A. S. (2019). Evidence of stable individual differences in implicit learning. Cognition, 190, 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, S.B., DeYoung, C.G., Gray, J.R., Jiménez, L., Brown, J., & Mackintosh, N. (2010). Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition, 116, 321–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M. (2004). Word onset patterns and lexical stress in English. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(3), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2003.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M., Morris, J., & Verrekia, L. (1998). Orthographic cues to lexical stress: Effects on naming and lexical decision. Memory & Cognition, 26(4), 822–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/e536982012-107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, N., Nilsson, J., & Arciuli, J. (2009). Noun or verb? Adult readers’ sensitivity to spelling cues to grammatical category in word endings. Reading and Writing, 22(6) 637–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, E. (2012). Implicit statistical learning is directly associated with the acquisition of syntax. Developmental Psychology, 48, 171–184. doi:10.1037/a0025405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, E., & Arciuli, J. (2016). Individual differences in statistical learning predict children’s comprehension of syntax. Child Development, 87(1), 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, E., Smithson, M., Christiansen, M, H., & Arciuli, J. (2019). A longitudinal investigation of auditory and visual statistical learning in children. Interdisciplinary Advances in Statistical Learning Conference. San Sebastian, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Kleij, S. W. v. d., Groen, M. A., Segers, E., & Verrhoeven, L. (2019). Sequential implicit learning ability predicts growth in reading skills in typical readers and children with dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23, 77–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lum, J. A., Ullman, M. T., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (2013). Procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia: Evidence from a meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(10), 3460–3476. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.07.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaghan, P, Arciuli, J. & Ševa, N. (2016). Cross-linguistic evidence for probabilistic orthographic cues to lexical stress. In J. Thomson & L. Jarmulowicz (Eds.) Linguistic rhythm and literacy (pp 215–236). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mousikou, P., Sadat, J., Lucas, R., & Rastle, K. (2017). Moving beyond the monosyllable in models of skilled reading: Mega-study of disyllabic nonword reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 93, 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolson, R. I., Fawcett, A. J., Brookes, R. L., & Needle, J. (2010). Procedural learning and dyslexia. Dyslexia, 16(3), 194–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nigro, L., Jiménez-Fernández, G., Simpson, I. C., & Defior, S. (2015). Implicit learning of written regularities and its relation to literacy acquisition in a shallow orthography. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44(5), 571–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-014-9303-9
   Google Scholar
• Nissen, M.J. & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 1–32. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(87)90002-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacton, S., Fayol, M., & Perruchet, P. (2005). Children’s implicit learning of graphotactic and morphological regularities. Child Development, 76, 324–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacton, S., Perruchet, P., Fayol, M., & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Implicit learning out of the lab: The case of orthographic regularities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(3), 401–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model. Cognitive Psychology, 61(2), 106–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plante, E., Ogilvie, T., Vance, R., Aguilar, J. M., Dailey, N. S., Meyers, C., … Burton, R. (2014). Variability in the language input to children enhances learning in a treatment context. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23, 530–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protopapas, A., Mitsi, A., Koustoumbardis, M., Tsitsopoulou, S. M., Leventi, M., & Seitz, A. R. (2017). Incidental orthographic learning during a color detection task. Cognition, 166, 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi, Z., Sanchez Araujo, Y., Georgan, W. C., Gabrieli, J. D., & Arciuli, J. (2018). Hearing matters more than seeing: A cross-modality study of statistical learning and reading ability. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23, 101–115. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1485680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashotte, C., Torgerson, J. K., & Wagner, R. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency. Oxford, UK: Pearson Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (2000). Lexical and nonlexical print-to-sound translation of disyllabic words and nonwords. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(3), 342–364. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6(6), 855–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(67)80149-x
   Google Scholar
• Reber, P. J. (2013). The neural basis of implicit learning and memory: A review of neuropsychological and neuroimaging research. Neuropsychologia, 51(10), 2026–2042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274(5294), 1926–1928. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.274.5294.1926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawi, O. M., & Rueckl, J. (2019). Reading and the neurocognitive bases of statistical learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23, 8–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiff, R., Katan, P., Sasson, A., & Kahta, S. (2017). Effect of chunk strength on the performance of children with developmental dyslexia on artificial grammar learning task may be related to complexity. Annals of Dyslexia, 67(2), 180–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-017-0141-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiff, R., Sasson, A., Star, G., & Kahta, S. (2017). The role of feedback in implicit and explicit artificial grammar learning: a comparison between dyslexic and non-dyslexic adults. Annals of Dyslexia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-017-0147-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmalz, X., Moll, K., Mulatti, C., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2019). Is statistical learning ability related to reading ability, and if so, why? Scientific Studies of Reading, 23, 64–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senechal, M., Gingras, M., & L’Heureux, L. (2016). Modeling spelling acquisition: The effect of orthographic regularities on silent-letter representations. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20, 155–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegelman, N., Bogaerts, L., Elazar, A., Arciuli, J., & Frost, R. (2018). Linguistic entrenchment: Prior knowledge impacts statistical learning performance. Cognition, 177, 198–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegelman, N. & Frost, R. (2015). Statistical learning as an individual ability: Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 81, 105–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegelman, N., Rueckl, J. G., Steacy, L. M., Frost, S. J., van den Bunt, M., Zevin, J. D., Seidenberg, M. S., Pugh, K. R., Compton, D. L., & Morris, R. D. (2020). Individual differences in learning the regularities between orthography, phonology and semantics predict early reading skills. Journal of Memory and Language, 114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ševa, N., Monaghan, P., & Arciuli, J. (2009). Stressing what is important: Orthographic cues and lexical stress assignment. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22(3), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P. T., Baker, R. G., & Groat, A. (1982). Spelling as a source of information about children’s linguistic knowledge. British Journal of Psychology, 73(3), 339–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1982.tb01816.x
   Google Scholar
• Snell, J., & Theeuwes, J. (2020). A story about statistical learning in a story: Regularities impact eye movements during book reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steacy, L. M., Compton, D. L., Petscher, Y., Elliot, J. D., Smith, K., Rueckl. J. G., Sawi, O., Frost, S. J., & Pugh, K. (2019). Development and prediction of context-dependent vowel pronunciation in elementary readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23, 49–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulpizio, S., & Colombo, L. (2017). Early markers of lexical stress in visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 45(8), 1398–1410. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421017-0735-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura, N., Castles, A., & Nation, K. (2017). Orthographic learning, fast and slow: Lexical competition effects reveal the time course of word learning in developing readers. Cognition, 163, 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiessen, E.D., Kronstein, A.T., & Hufnagle, D.G. (2013). The extraction and integration framework: A two-process account of statistical learning. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 792–814. doi:10.1037/a0030801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, Z., Leung, W. W. S., & Tong, X. (2019). Visual statistical learning and orthographic awareness in Chinese children with and without developmental dyslexia. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 92, 103443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2019.103443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torkildsen, J. v. K., Arciuli, J., & Wie, O. B. (2019). Individual differences in statistical learning predict children’s reading ability in a semi-transparent orthography. Learning and Individual Differences, 69, 60–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torkildsen, J. v. K, Dailey, N. S., Aguilar, J. M., Gómez, R., & Plante, E. (2013). Exemplar variability facilitates rapid learning of an otherwise unlearnable grammar by individuals with language-based learning disability. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56(2), 618–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treiman, R. (2018). Statistical learning and spelling. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49, 644–652. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_LSHSS-STLT1-17-0122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk-Browne, N. B., Jungé, J. A., & Scholl, B. J. (2005). The automaticity of visual statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(4), 552. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vellutino, F.R, Fletcher, J. M, Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2–40. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, G. S., & Robertson, G. J. (2006). Wide range achievement test (4th ed.). Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Witteloostuijn, M., Boersma, P., Wijnen, F., & Rispens, J. (2017). Visual artificial grammar learning in dyslexia: A meta-analysis. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 70, 126–137. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2017.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 415–438. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.91.3.415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. (1998). Woodcock Reading Mastery Test (Revised/Normative Update). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R., McGrew, K., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b4b0/7e51f6ecb9fa52b9a43310fb1675d9a099ee.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yin, L., & McBride, C. (2015). Chinese kindergartners learn to read characters analytically. Psychological Science, 26(4), 424–432. doi:10.1177/0956797614567203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, L., & McBride, C. (2018). Unspoken knowledge: Kindergarteners are sensitive to patterns in Chinese pinyin before formally learning it. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33, 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2017.1360502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, A., Chen, M, S. Y., Cherodath, S., Hung, D. L., Tzeng, O. J. L., Wu, D. H. (2019). Neuroimaging evidence for sensitivity to orthography-to-phonology conversion in native readers and foreign learners of Chinese. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 50, 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2018.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeno, S. M., Ivens, S. H., Millard, R. T., & Duvvuri, R. (1995). The educator’s word frequency guide. Brewster, NY: Touchstone Applied Science Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Zevin, J., & Joanisse, M. (2000). Stress assignment in nonword reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 41B, S5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar