MERTK is a host factor that promotes classical swine fever virus entry and antagonizes innate immune response in PK-15 cells

References

• Meyers G, Thiel HJ, Rümenapf T. Classical swine fever virus: recovery of infectious viruses from cDNA constructs and generation of recombinant cytopathogenic defective interfering particles. J Virol. 1996;70:1588–1595. doi: 10.1128/JVI.70.3.1588-1595.1996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paton DJ, McGoldrick A, Greiser-Wilke I, et al. Genetic typing of classical swine fever virus. Vet Microbiol. 2000;73:137–157. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1135(00)00141-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rijn PA, Bossers A, Wensvoort G, et al. Classical swine fever virus (CSFV) envelope glycoprotein E2 containing one structural antigenic unit protects pigs from lethal CSFV challenge. J Gen Virol. 1996;77:2737–2745. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-77-11-2737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, He WR, Shen L, et al. The laminin receptor is a cellular attachment receptor for classical swine fever virus. J Virol. 2015;89:4894–4906. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00019-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holinka LG, Largo E, Gladue DP, et al. Alteration of a second putative fusion peptide of structural glycoprotein E2 of classical swine fever virus alters virus replication and virulence in swine. J Virol. 2016;90:10299–10308. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01530-16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dräger C, Beer M, Blome S. Porcine complement regulatory protein CD46 and heparan sulfates are the major factors for classical swine fever virus attachment in vitro. Arch Virol. 2015;160:739–746. doi: 10.1007/s00705-014-2313-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronecker S, Zimmer G, Herrler G, et al. Formation of bovine viral diarrhea virus E1-E2 heterodimers is essential for virus entry and depends on charged residues in the transmembrane domains. J Gen Virol. 2008;89:2114–2121. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.2008/001792-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Omari K, Iourin O, Harlos K, et al. Structure of a pestivirus envelope glycoprotein E2 clarifies its role in cell entry. Cell Rep. 2013;3:30–35. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Nie Y, Wang P, et al. Characterization of classical swine fever virus entry by using pseudotyped viruses: E1 and E2 are sufficient to mediate viral entry. Virology. 2004;330:332–341. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2004.09.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulst MM, Moormann RJ. Inhibition of pestivirus infection in cell culture by envelope proteins E(rns) and E2 of classical swine fever virus: E(rns) and E2 interact with different receptors. J Gen Virol. 1997;78:2779–2787. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-78-11-2779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulst MM, van Gennip HG, Vlot AC, et al. Interaction of classical swine fever virus with membrane-associated heparan sulfate: role for virus replication in vivo and virulence. J Virol. 2001;75:9585–9595. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.20.9585-9595.2001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Shi Z, Guo H, et al. Annexin 2 is a host protein binding to classical swine fever virus E2 glycoprotein and promoting viral growth in PK-15 cells. Virus Res. 2015;201:16–23. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2015.02.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perera-Lecoin M, Meertens L, Carnec X, et al. Flavivirus entry receptors: an update. Viruses. 2013;6:69–88. doi: 10.3390/v6010069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya S, Zagórska A, Lew ED, et al. Enveloped viruses disable innate immune responses in dendritic cells by direct activation of TAM receptors. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;14:136–147. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amara A, Mercer J. Viral apoptotic mimicry. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13:461–469. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt CL, Kolokoltsov AA, Davey RA, et al. The Tyro3 receptor kinase Axl enhances macropinocytosis of Zaire ebolavirus. J Virol. 2011;85:334–347. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01278-09
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meertens L, Carnec X, Lecoin MP, et al. The TIM and TAM families of phosphatidylserine receptors mediate dengue virus entry. Cell Host Microbe. 2012;12:544–557. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.08.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan MN, Sukumaran B, Pal U, et al. Rab 5 is required for the cellular entry of dengue and West Nile viruses. J Virol. 2007;81:4881–4885. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02210-06
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Schaar HM, Rust MJ, Chen C, et al. Dissecting the cell entry pathway of dengue virus by single-particle tracking in living cells. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4:e1000244. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamel R, Dejarnac O, Wichit S, et al. Biology of Zika virus infection in human skin cells. J Virol. 2015;89:8880–8896. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00354-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowakowski TJ, Pollen AA, Di Lullo E, et al. Expression analysis highlights AXL as a candidate Zika virus entry receptor in neural stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;18:591–596. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meertens L, Labeau A, Dejarnac O, et al. Axl mediates Zika virus entry in human glial cells and modulates innate immune responses. Cell Rep. 2017;18:324–333. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drayman N, Glick Y, Ben-nun-shaul O, et al. Pathogens use structural mimicry of native host ligands as a mechanism for host receptor engagement. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;14:63–73. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Li Y, Li LF, et al. RNA interference screening of interferon-stimulated genes with antiviral activities against classical swine fever virus using a reporter virus. Antiviral Res. 2016;128:49–56. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2016.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo Y, Ji S, Liu Y, et al. Isolation and characterization of a moderately virulent classical swine fever virus emerging in China. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017;64:1848–1857. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo Y, Li N, Cong X, et al. Pathogenicity and genomic characterization of a pseudorabies virus variant isolated from Bartha-K61-vaccinated swine population in China. Vet Microbiol. 2014;174:107–115. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li LF, Yu J, Zhang Y, et al. Interferon-inducible oligoadenylate synthetase-like protein acts as an antiviral effector against classical swine fever virus via the MDA5-mediated type I interferon-signaling pathway. J Virol. 2017;91:e01514–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YN, Liu YY, Xiao FC, et al. Rab5, Rab7, and Rab11 are required for caveola-dependent endocytosis of classical swine fever virus in porcine alveolar macrophages. J Virol. 2018;92:e00797–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renson P, Blanchard Y, Le Dimna M, et al. Acute induction of cell death-related IFN stimulated genes (ISG) differentiates highly from moderately virulent CSFV strains. Vet Res. 2010;41:7. doi: 10.1051/vetres/2009055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Z, Sun J, Guo H, et al. Genomic expression profiling of peripheral blood leukocytes of pigs infected with highly virulent classical swine fever virus strain Shimen. J Gen Virol. 2009;90:1670–1680. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.009415-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothlin CV, Ghosh S, Zuniga EI, et al. TAM receptors are pleiotropic inhibitors of the innate immune response. Cell. 2007;131:1124–1136. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke G, Lu Q. Macrophage regulation by Tyro 3 family receptors. Curr Opin Immunol. 2003;15:31–36. doi: 10.1016/S0952-7915(02)00016-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke G, Rothlin CV. Immunobiology of the TAM receptors. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:327–336. doi: 10.1038/nri2303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravichandran KS. Beginnings of a good apoptotic meal: the find-me and eat-me signaling pathways. Immunity. 2011;35:445–455. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morizono K, Xie Y, Olafsen T, et al. The soluble serum protein Gas6 bridges virion envelope phosphatidylserine to the TAM receptor tyrosine kinase Axl to mediate viral entry. Cell Host Microbe. 2011;9:286–298. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2011.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao WH, Zhen YX, Eisenberg RA, et al. The Mer receptor tyrosine kinase is expressed on discrete macrophage subpopulations and mainly uses Gas6 as its ligand for uptake of apoptotic cells. Clin Immunol. 2009;133:138–144. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2009.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibrewal N, Wu Y, D'mello V, et al. Autophosphorylation docking site Tyr-867 in Mer receptor tyrosine kinase allows for dissociation of multiple signaling pathways for phagocytosis of apoptotic cells and down-modulation of lipopolysaccharide-inducible NF-kappaB transcriptional activation. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:3618–3627. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M706906200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott RS, McMahon EJ, Pop SM, et al. Phagocytosis and clearance of apoptotic cells is mediated by MER. Nature. 2001;411:207–211. doi: 10.1038/35075603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolino M, Choidas A, Wallner S, et al. The E3 ligase Cbl-b and TAM receptors regulate cancer metastasis via natural killer cells. Nature. 2014;507:508–512. doi: 10.1038/nature12998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li LF, Yu J, Li Y, et al. Guanylate-binding protein 1, an interferon-induced GTPase, exerts an antiviral activity against classical swine fever virus depending on its GTPase activity. J Virol. 2016;90:4412–4426. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02718-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimojima M, Stroher U, Ebihara H, et al. Identification of cell surface molecules involved in dystroglycan-independent Lassa virus cell entry. J Virol. 2012;86:2067–2078. doi: 10.1128/JVI.06451-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Yang YF, Yang Y, et al. AXL promotes Zika virus infection in astrocytes by antagonizing type I interferon signalling. Nat Microbiol. 2018;3:302–309. doi: 10.1038/s41564-017-0092-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimojima M, Takada A, Ebihara H, et al. Tyro3 family-mediated cell entry of Ebola and Marburg viruses. J Virol. 2006;80:10109–10116. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01157-06
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham DK, Dawson TL, Mullaney DL, et al. Cloning and mRNA expression analysis of a novel human protooncogene, c-mer. Cell Growth Differ. 1994;5:647–657.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lu Q, Lemke G. Homeostatic regulation of the immune system by receptor tyrosine kinases of the Tyro 3 family. Science. 2001;293:306–311. doi: 10.1126/science.1061663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Chen Y, Ge Y, et al. Immunoexpression of Tyro 3 family receptors–Tyro 3, Axl, and Mer–and their ligand Gas6 in postnatal developing mouse testis. J Histochem Cytochem. 2005;53:1355–1364. doi: 10.1369/jhc.5A6637.2005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Q, Gore M, Zhang Q, et al. Tyro-3 family receptors are essential regulators of mammalian spermatogenesis. Nature. 1999;398:723–728. doi: 10.1038/19554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar