Population genomics of emerging Elizabethkingia anophelis pathogens reveals potential outbreak and rapid global dissemination

References

• Jean SS, Lee WS, Chen FL, et al. Elizabethkingia meningoseptica: an important emerging pathogen causing healthcare-associated infections. J Hosp Infect. 2014 Apr;86(4):244–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim KK, Kim MK, Lim JH, et al. Transfer of Chryseobacterium meningosepticum and Chryseobacterium miricola to Elizabethkingia gen. nov. as Elizabethkingia meningoseptica comb. nov. and Elizabethkingia miricola comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005 May;55(Pt 3):1287–1293.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicholson AC, Gulvik CA, Whitney AM, et al. Revisiting the taxonomy of the genus Elizabethkingia using whole-genome sequencing, optical mapping, and MALDI-TOF, along with proposal of three novel Elizabethkingia species: Elizabethkingia bruuniana sp. nov., Elizabethkingia ursingii sp. nov., and Elizabethkingia occulta sp. nov. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2018 Jan;111(1):55–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin JN, Lai CH, Yang CH, et al. Elizabethkingia infections in humans: from genomics to clinics. Microorganisms. 2019 Aug 28;7(9):e295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank T, Gody JC, Nguyen LB, et al. First case of Elizabethkingia anophelis meningitis in the Central African Republic. Lancet. 2013 May;381(9880):1876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulagonda EP, Manivannan B, Mahalingam N, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of a naturally competent Elizabethkingia anophelis isolated from an eye infection. Sci Rep. 2018 May 31;8(1):8447.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hu S, Jiang T, Zhang X, et al. Elizabethkingia anophelis isolated from patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and lower respiratory tract infection: report of Two cases and literature review. Front Microbiol. 2017 Mar;8:382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau SK, Chow WN, Foo CH, et al. Elizabethkingia anophelis bacteremia is associated with clinically significant infections and high mortality. Sci Rep. 2016 May;6:26045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janda JM, Lopez DL. Mini review: New pathogen profiles: Elizabethkingia anophelis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Jun;88(2):201–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi MH, Kim M, Jeong SJ, et al. Risk factors for Elizabethkingia acquisition and clinical characteristics of patients, South Korea. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019 Jan;25(1):42–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed TAN, Watson G, Kheng C, et al. Elizabethkingia anophelis infection in infants, Cambodia, 2012-2018. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Feb;26(2):320–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin JN, Lai CH, Yang CH, et al. Clinical manifestations, molecular characteristics, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and contributions of target gene mutation to fluoroquinolone resistance in Elizabethkingia anophelis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 May 28;73(9):2497–2502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin A, Larsonneur E, Nicholson AC, et al. Evolutionary dynamics and genomic features of the elizabethkingia anophelis 2015 to 2016 Wisconsin outbreak strain. Nat Commun. 2017 May 24;8:15483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navon L, Clegg WJ, Morgan J, et al. Notes from the field: investigation of Elizabethkingia anophelis cluster - Illinois, 2014-2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Dec;65(48):1380–1381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo J, Tan SY, Tay M, et al. First case of E anophelis outbreak in an intensive-care unit. Lancet. 2013 Sep;382:855–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han MS, Kim H, Lee Y, et al. Relative prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical isolates of elizabethkingia species based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing. J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Jan;55(1):274–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin JN, Lai CH, Yang CH, et al. Comparison of clinical manifestations, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, and mutations of fluoroquinolone target genes between Elizabethkingia meningoseptica and Elizabethkingia anophelis isolated in Taiwan. J Clin Med. 2018 Dec;7(12):e538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle AL. Elizabethkingia anophelis: exploring the outbreak of disease in the midwest. Nursing. 2017 Mar;47(3):61–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lau SK, Wu AK, Teng JL, et al. Evidence for Elizabethkingia anophelis transmission from mother to infant, Hong Kong. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015 Feb;21(2):232–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang M, Gao H, Lin N, et al. The antibiotic resistance and pathogenicity of a multidrug-resistant Elizabethkingia anophelis isolate. MicrobiologyOpen. 2019 Nov;8(11):e804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besemer J, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M. Genemarks: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 Jun;29(12):2607–2618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha S, Bridges S, Magbanua ZV, et al. Empirical comparison of ab initio repeat finding programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Apr;36(7):2284–2294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Jan;27(2):573–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Mar;25(5):955–964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rodland EA, et al. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Apr;35(9):3100–3108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner PP, Daub J, Tate JG, et al. Rfam: updates to the RNA families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(Database issue):D136–D140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nawrocki EP, Kolbe DL, Eddy SR. Infernal 1.0: inference of RNA alignments. Bioinformatics. 2009 May 15;25(10):1335–1337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao W, Wan I, Jones SJ, et al. Islandpath: aiding detection of genomic islands in prokaryotes. Bioinformatics. 2003 Feb;19(3):418–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, et al. High throughput ANI analysis of 90 K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun. 2018 Nov;9(1):5114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kurtz S, Phillippy A, Delcher AL, et al. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol. 2004;5(2):R12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guindon S, Gascuel O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol. 2003 Oct;52(5):696–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, et al. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 2015 Jan;32(1):268–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian B, Gao S, Lercher MJ, et al. Evolview v3: a webserver for visualization, annotation, and management of phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jul;47(W1):W270–w275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argimón S, Abudahab K, Goater RJE, et al. Microreact: visualizing and sharing data for genomic epidemiology and phylogeography. Microbial Genomics. 2016 Nov;2(11):e000093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi D, Xu Z, Harrison EM, et al. ICEberg: a web-based resource for integrative and conjugative elements found in bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jan;40(Database issue):D621–D626.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu J, Pei D, Nicholson A, et al. In silico identification of three types of integrative and conjugative elements in Elizabethkingia anophelis strains isolated from around the world. mSphere. 2019 Apr 3;4(2):e00040–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouckaert R, Vaughan TG, Barido-Sottani J, et al. BEAST 2.5: An advanced software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Apr;15(4):e1006650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieux A, Khatchikian CE. . tipdatingbeast: an r package to assist the implementation of phylogenetic tip-dating tests using beast. Mol Ecol Resour. 2017 Jul;17(4):608–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, et al. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics. 2015 Nov 15;31(22):3691–3693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014 May;30(9):1312–1313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007 Jan;57(Pt 1):81–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Banuelos-Vazquez LA, Torres Tejerizo G, Brom S. Regulation of conjugative transfer of plasmids and integrative conjugative elements. Plasmid. 2017 May;91:82–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson CM, Grossman AD. Integrative and conjugative elements (ICEs): what they Do and How they work. Annu Rev Genet. 2015 Oct;49:577–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wozniak RA, Waldor MK. Integrative and conjugative elements: mosaic mobile genetic elements enabling dynamic lateral gene flow. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010 Aug;8(8):552–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng YH, Perng CL, Sun JR, et al. Multicentre MDR Elizabethkingia anophelis isolates: novel random amplified polymorphic DNA with capillary electrophoresis systems to rapid molecular typing compared to genomic epidemiology analysis. Sci Rep. 2019 Feb;9(1):1806.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelly AJ, Karpathy SE, Gulvik CA, et al. A real-time multiplex PCR assay for detection of Elizabethkingia species and differentiation between Elizabethkingia anophelis and E. meningoseptica. J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Apr;57(4):e01619-18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chew KL, Cheng B, Lin RTP, et al. Elizabethkingia anophelis is the dominant Elizabethkingia species found in blood cultures in Singapore. Journal of Clinical Mcrobiology. 2018 Mar;56(3):e01445-17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang TY, Chen HY, Chou YC, et al. In vitro activities of imipenem, vancomycin, and rifampicin against clinical Elizabethkingia species producing BlaB and GOB metallo-beta-lactamases. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Offic Publ Eur Soc Clin Microbiol. 2019 Nov;38(11):2045–2052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paharik AE, Horswill AR. The Staphylococcal biofilm: adhesins, regulation, and host response. Microbiol Spectr. 2016 Apr;4(2):10.1128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiedrowski MR, Horswill AR. New approaches for treating staphylococcal biofilm infections. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011 Dec;1241:104–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dengler HV, Boumasmoud M, Haffner N, et al. In-host evolution of Staphylococcus epidermidis in a pacemaker-associated endocarditis resulting in increased antibiotic tolerance. Nat Commun. 2019 Mar 8;10(1):1149.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vulin C, Leimer N, Huemer M, et al. Prolonged bacterial lag time results in small colony variants that represent a sub-population of persisters. Nat Commun. 2018 Oct 4;9(1):4074.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brauner A, Fridman O, Gefen O, et al. Distinguishing between resistance, tolerance and persistence to antibiotic treatment. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016 Apr;14(5):320–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridman O, Goldberg A, Ronin I, et al. Optimization of lag time underlies antibiotic tolerance in evolved bacterial populations. Nature. 2014 Sep;513(7518):418–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar