Encouraging normative smoking behaviour

Reference list

• Abrahamse W, Steg L, Vlek C, Rothengatter JA. 2005. A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology 25: 273–291.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer JE, Hyland A, Li Q, Steger C, Cummings KM. 2005. A longitudinal assessment of the impact of smoke-free worksite policies on tobacco use. American Journal of Public Health 95(6): 1024–1029.
   Google Scholar
• Blaxter M. 1997. Whose fault is it? People's own conceptions of the reasons for health inequalities. Social Science and Medicine 44: 747–756.
   Google Scholar
• Bonneux L, Looman C, Coebergh J. n.d. Result filters. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12768 [accessed 13 February 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Brandt AM. 1997. Behaviour, disease, and health in the twentieth-century United States: the moral valence of individual risk. In: Brandt AM, Rozin P (eds), Morality and health. New York: Routledge. pp. 53–77.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB, Kallgren CA, Reno RR. 1991. A focus theory of normative conduct: a theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behaviour. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 24: 201–234.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB, Reno RR, Kallgren CA. 1990. A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58: 1015–1026.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, RB, Goldstein NJ. 2004. Social influence: compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology 55: 591–621.
   Google Scholar
• Darlow S, Lobel M. 2012. Smoking behaviour and motivational flexibility in light and heavy smokers. Elsevier Addictive Behaviours 37: 668–673.
   Google Scholar
• Etienne J. 2010. The impact of regulatory policy on individual behaviour: a goal framing theory approach. Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation An ESRC Research Centre 50(1): 23.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein J. 1991. The stigmatisation of smokers: an empirical investigation. Journal of Drug Education 21(2): 167–182.
   Google Scholar
• Keizer K, Lindenberg S, Steg L. 2008. The spreading of disorder, Science 322: 1681–1685.
   Google Scholar
• Keizer K, Lindenberg S, Steg L. 2011. The reversal effect of prohibition signs. Sage, Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 14(5): 681.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger RA, Casey MA. 2009. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research (4th edn). Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Leeuw ED, Dillman DA, Hox JJ. 2008. International handbook of survey methodology. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lindenberg S, Steg L. 2007. Normative, gain and hedonic goal-frames guiding. Journal of Social Issues 63(1): 117–137.
   Google Scholar
• Louka P, Maguire M, Evans P, Worrel M. 2006. ‘I think that it's a pain in the ass that I have to stand outside in the cold and have a cigarette.’ Representations of smoking and experiences of disapproval in UK and Greek smokers. Journal of Health Psychology 11(3): 441.
   Google Scholar
• Monin B, Norton MI. 2003. Perceptions of a fluid consensus: uniqueness bias, false consensus, false polarization, and pluralistic ignorance in a water conservation crisis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29: 559–567.
   Google Scholar
• OECD Health Data 2011. n.d. How does the Netherlands compare. Available at: www.oecd.org [accessed 4 January 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Ridner SL, Walker KL, Hart JL, Myers JA. 2010. Smoking identities and behavior: evidence of discrepancies, issues for measurement and intervention. Western Journal of Nursing Research 32(4): 434.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz PW, Nolan J, Cialdini R, Goldstein N, Griskevicius V. 2007. The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science 18: 429–434.
   Google Scholar
• Secondhand Smoke. 2011. Action on smoking and health. Available at: http://ash.org.uk/information/facts-and-stats/fact-sheets [accessed 4 September 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Smith M, Thorpe R, Jackson P. 2008. Management research (3rd edn). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smoking in Holland: Dutch Smoking Ban. n.d. South Holland local reference INFOrmation. Available at: southholland.angloinfo.com/countries/holland [accessed 4 September 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Smoking statistics. 2012. Action on smoking and health. Available at: http://ash.org.uk/information/facts-and-stats/fact-sheets [accessed 4 September 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Smoking statistics: Illness and death. 2011. Action on smoking and health. Available at: http://ash.org.uk/information/facts-and-stats/fact-sheets [accessed 4 September 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Smoking statistics: Illness and death. n.d. Ash Fact Sheet. Available at: http://ash.org.uk/files/documents/ASH_107 [accessed 21 September 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Steg L, Vlek C. 2009. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research. Journal of Environmental Psychology 29(1): 309–317.
   Google Scholar
• Stenden University of Applied Sciences. n.d. Stenden Hogeschool voltijd hbo opleidingen, verkorte- en deeltijdopleidingen. Available at: http://www.stenden.com/en/Pages/default [accessed 11 October 2012]
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Health and Human Services. 2004. The health consequences of smoking: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Health and Human Services. 2006. The health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Health and Human Services. 2010. How tobacco smoke causes disease: the biology and behavioral basis for smoking-attributable disease: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.
   Google Scholar
• Van Kleef GA, Homan AC, Finkenauer C, Gündemir S, Stamkou E. 2011. Breaking the rules to rise to power: how norm violators gain power in the eyes of others. Social Psychological And Personality Science 2(5): 500–507.
   Google Scholar
• Weyers H. 2009. Smoking bans in the Netherlands: mix of self-regulation and regulation by government. NJB Nederlands Juristenblad 1: 681–683.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, P., Sagarin, B., Rhoads, K., Barrett, D., & Cialdini, R. (2000). Choosing to encourage or discourage: Perceived effectiveness of persuasive versus prescriptive messages. Environmental Management 26(6): 589–594.
   Google Scholar