Emplacing reablement co-creating an outdoor recreation model in the rural Arctic

References

• World Health Organization. Global strategy and action plan on ageing and health. 2017. https://www.who.int/ageing/WHO-GSAP-2017.pdf?ua=1
   Google Scholar
• Karacsony S, Merl H, O’Brien J, et al. What are the clinical and social outcomes of integrated care for older people? A qualitative systematic review. Int J Integr Care. 2022;22(3):14. Article number: 14. doi: 10.5334/ijic.6469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentijn PP, Schepman SM, Opheij W, et al. Understanding integrated care: a comprehensive conceptual framework based on the integrative functions of primary care. Int J Integr Care. 2013;13(1):13. doi: 10.5334/ijic.886
   Google Scholar
• Bramble M, Young S, Prior S, et al. A scoping review exploring reablement models of training and client assessment for older people in primary health care. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2022;23:23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423621000918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzelthin SF, Rostgaard T, Parsons M, et al. Development of an internationally accepted definition of reablement: a Delphi study. Ageing Soc. 2020;1–21. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X20000999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell BM, Peterson JR. “With age comes wisdom:” a qualitative review of elder perspectives on healthy aging in the Circumpolar North. J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2020;35(2):113–131. doi: 10.1007/s10823-020-09399-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legg L, Gladman J, Drummond A, et al. A systematic review of the evidence on home care reablement services. Clin Rehabilitat. 2016;30(8):741–749. doi: 10.1177/0269215515603220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuntland H, Kjeken I, Folkestad B, et al. Everyday occupations prioritised by older adults participating in reablement. A cross-sectional study. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020;27(4):248–258. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2019.1604800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe A, Ingstad K, Brataas HV. Patient influence in home-based reablement for older persons: qualitative research. BMC health services research. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):736. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2715-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Birkeland A, Tuntland H, Førland O, et al. Interdisciplinary collaboration in reablement – a qualitative study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2017;10:195–203. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S133417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjelle KM, O Skutle, O Førland, et al. The reablement team’s voice: a qualitative study of how an integrated multidisciplinary team experiences participation in reablement. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016;9:575–585. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S115588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergström A, Vik K, Haak M, et al. The jigsaw puzzle of activities for mastering daily life; service recipients and professionals’ perceptions of gains and changes attributed to reablement – a qualitative meta-synthesis. Scand J Occup Ther. 2022;30(5):1–12. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2022.2081603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliassen M, Lahelle A. Enhancing functional improvement in reablement–a qualitative study. Eur J Physiother. 2020;23:1–7. doi: 10.1080/21679169.2020.1761449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson C, Zingmark M, Haak M. Enabling social participation for older people: the content of reablement by age, gender, and level of functioning in occupational therapists’ interventions. Scand J Occup Ther. 2021;29:1–8. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2021.1967442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zingmark M, Kylén M. Feasibility of a reablement-program in a Swedish municipality. Scand J Occup Ther. 2022;30:1–12. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2022.2089229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zingmark M, Evertsson B, Haak M. Characteristics of occupational therapy and physiotherapy within the context of reablement in Swedish municipalities: a national survey. Health Soc Care Community. 2020;28(3):1010–1019. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vik K, Eide AH. Evaluation of participation in occupations of older adults receiving home-based services. Br J Occup Ther. 2014;77(3):139–146. doi: 10.4276/030802214X13941036266540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doh D, Smith R, Gevers P. Reviewing the reablement approach to caring for older people. Ageing Soc. 2020;40(6):1371–1383. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X18001770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zingmark M, Ankre R, Wall-Reinius S. Promoting outdoor recreation among older adults in Sweden–a theoretical and empirical foundation for the development of an intervention. Arch Public Health. 2021;79(1):1–15. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00762-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen E, Schoen G, Liedtke G, et al. Relevance of urban green space for physical activity and health-related quality of life in older adults. Qual Ageing And Older Adults. 2018;19(3):158–166. doi: 10.1108/QAOA-01-2018-0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretty J. How nature contributes to mental and physical health. Spirituality Health Int. 2004;5(2):68–78. doi: 10.1002/shi.220
   Google Scholar
• Peterson JR, Howell BM, Hahn MB. Utilizing the “one health” model to study human aging in Urban environments. Gerontology And Geriatric Med. 2022;8:23337214221116946. doi: 10.1177/23337214221116946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen M, Harris KJ, Brown B, et al. A systematic review of interventions to increase physical activity among American Indian and Alaska Native older adults. Gerontologist. 2022;62(6):e328–e339. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis JP, Kim SM, Asquith-Heinz Z, et al. Cyclical migration in Alaska native elders and its impact on elders’ identity and later life well-being. J Gerontol B. 2023;gbad072. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbad072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpley R, Jepson D. Rural tourism: a spiritual experience? annals of tourism research. Ann Tour Res. 2011;38(1):52–71. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2010.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijering L, Theunissen N, Lettinga AT. Re-engaging with places: understanding bio-geo-graphical disruption and flow in adult brain injury survivors. Soc Sci Med. 2019;231:22–30. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron ES, Hartman L, Hagemann F. From place to emplacement: the scalar politics of sustainability. Local Environ. 2020;25(6):447–462. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2020.1768518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Highfill T, Franks C. Measuring the US outdoor recreation economy, 2012–2016. J Outdoor Recreat Tour. 2019;27:100233. doi: 10.1016/j.jort.2019.100233
   Google Scholar
• Aspinal F, Glasby J, Rostgaard T, et al. New horizons: reablement - supporting older people towards independence. Age Ageing. 2016;45(5):574–578. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMiglio L, Williams A. A sense of place, a sense of well-being. In Sense of place, health and quality of life. Routledge; 2016. pp. 35–50. doi:10.4324/9781315243474.
   Google Scholar
• Kyle GT, Mowen AJ, Tarrant M. Linking place preferences with place meaning: an examination of the relationship between place motivation and place attachment. J Environ Psychol. 2004;24(4):439–454. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger P, Luckmann T. The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin Uk; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Burr V. Social contructionism. third ed. Devon, UK: Routledge; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Donetto S, Pierri P, Tsianakas V, et al. Experience-based co-design and healthcare improvement: realizing participatory design in the public sector. Des J. 2015;18(2):227–248. doi: 10.2752/175630615X14212498964312
   Google Scholar
• Elg M, Engström J, Witell L, et al. Co‐creation and learning in health‐care service development. J Serv Manage. 2012;23(3):328–343. doi: 10.1108/09564231211248435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne SP, Radnor Z, Strokosch K. Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: a suitable case for treatment? Public Manage Rev. 2016;18(5):639–653. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bate P, Robert G. Experience-based design: from redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. BMJ Qual Saf. 2006;15(5):307–310. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.016527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne SP, Strokosch K, Radnor Z. Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: a perspective from service management 1, in co-production and co-creation. Routledge; 2018pp. 18–26. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2017.1350461
   Google Scholar
• Osborne SP. From public service-dominant logic to public service logic: are public service organizations capable of co-production and value co-creation?. Public Manage Rev. 2018;20(2):225–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craggs C, Strategiplan Lofoten som Reisemål 2017-2022 [Strategic plan Lofoten as a traveling destination 2017-2022] 2017: nordnorge.com.
   Google Scholar
• Kaltenborn BP, Linnell JDC, Baggethun EG, et al. Ecosystem services and cultural values as building blocks for ‘the good life’. A case study in the community of Røst, Lofoten Islands, Norway. Ecol Econ. 2017;140:166–176. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vike H. Politics and bureaucracy in the Norwegian welfare state: an anthropological approach. Porsgrunn, Norway: Springer; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• World Medical Association. WMA DECLARATION OF HELSINKI – ETHICAL PRINCIPLES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS. 2017; Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/22.06.2018.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, JACKSON C, SHAW S, et al. Achieving research impact through co‐creation in community‐based health services: literature review and case study. Milbank Q. 2016;94(2):392–429. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research. Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 9th ed. Philadelphia, USA: Wolters Kluwer Health, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez JF, Curcio C-L, Alvarado B, et al. Validity and reliability of the short physical performance Battery (SPPB): a pilot study on mobility in the Colombian andes. Colomb Med. 2013;44(3):165–171. doi: 10.25100/cm.v44i3.1181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. qualitative research in sport. Qual Res Sport Exercise Health. 2019;11(4):589–597. doi: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane A, Furlong M, McGilloway S, et al. Time-limited home-care reablement services for maintaining and improving the functional independence of older adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016(10):1–60. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010825.pub2
   Google Scholar
• Laatikainen TE, Broberg A, Kyttä M. The physical environment of positive places: exploring differences between age groups. Preventive med. 2017;95:S85–S91. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bixler RD, Floyd MF, Hammitt WE. Environmental socialization: quantitative tests of the childhood play hypothesis. Environ Behav. 2002;34(6):795–818. doi: 10.1177/001391602237248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holcomb B The perception of natural vs. built environments by young children. In: Children, Nature, and the Urban Environment: Proceedings of a Symposium-Fair; Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-30. Upper Darby, PA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 32–36. 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Baron M, Fletcher C, Riva M. Aging, health and place from the perspective of elders in an Inuit community. J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2020;35(2):133–153. doi: 10.1007/s10823-020-09398-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartig T, Mitchell R, de Vries S, et al. Nature and health. annual review of public health, 2014. Ann Rev Public Health. 2014;35(1):207–228. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie M, Colley K, Irvine KN. Outdoor recreation for older adults in Scotland: qualitatively exploring the multiplicity of constraints to participation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(14):7705. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen FA, Vik K. Health professionals’ perspectives of next of kin in the context of reablement. Disabilit Rehabilitat. 2018;41:1–8. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1450452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjelle KM, Alvsvåg H, Førland O. The relatives’ voice: how do relatives experience participation in reablement? A qualitative study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2017;10:1. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S122385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggebø H, Munkejord MC, Schönfelder W. Land, history and people: older people’s stories about meaningful activities and social relations in later life. J Popul Ageing. 2020;13(4):465–483. doi: 10.1007/s12062-019-09253-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayalon L, Tesch-Römer C. Contemporary perspectives on ageism. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Morelle K, Buchecker M, Kienast F, et al. Nearby outdoor recreation modelling: an agent-based approach. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2019;40:286–298. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhury H, Campo M, Michael Y, et al. Neighbourhood environment and physical activity in older adults. Soc Sci Med. 2016;149:104–113. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.12.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keskinen KE, Rantakokko M, Suomi K, et al. Nature as a facilitator for physical activity: defining relationships between the objective and perceived environment and physical activity among community-dwelling older people. Health Place. 2018;49:111–119. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber SC, Porter MM, Menec VH. Mobility in older adults: a comprehensive framework. Gerontologist. 2010;50(4):443–450. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnq013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor JK, Buchan IE, Van Der Veer SN. Assessing life-space mobility for a more holistic view on wellbeing in geriatric research and clinical practice. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019;31(4):439–445. doi: 10.1007/s40520-018-0999-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rantakokko M, Portegijs E, Viljanen A, et al. Changes in life-space mobility and quality of life among community-dwelling older people: a 2-year follow-up study. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(5):1189–1197. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1137-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Silva NA, Gregory MA, Venkateshan SS, et al. Examining the association between life-space mobility and cognitive function in older adults: a systematic review. J Aging Res. 2019;2019:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2019/3923574
   Google Scholar
• Herr K, Anderson GL. The action research dissertation: a guide for students and faculty. Los Angeles, USA: Sage publications; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Elg M, Gremyr I, Halldórsson Á, et al. Service action research: review and guidelines. J Serv Marketing. 2020;34(1):87–99. doi: 10.1108/JSM-11-2018-0350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semken S, Ward EG, Moosavi S, et al. Place-based education in geoscience: theory, research, practice, and assessment. J Geosci Educ. 2017;65(4):542–562. doi: 10.5408/17-276.1
   Google Scholar
• Ward EMG, Semken S, Libarkin JC. The design of place-based, culturally informed geoscience assessment. J Geosci Educ. 2014;62(1):86–103. doi: 10.5408/12-414.1
   Google Scholar
• Jette AM, Haley SM, Coster WJ, et al. Late life function and disability instrument: I. Development and evaluation of the disability component. J Gerontol. 2002;57A(4):M209–M216. doi: 10.1093/gerona/57.4.M209
   Google Scholar
• Arnadottir SA, Gunnarsdottir ED, Stenlund H, et al. Participation frequency and perceived participation restrictions at older age: applying the International Classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) framework. Disability And Rehablitation. 2011;33(22–23):2208–2216. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.563818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portegijs E, Rantakokko M, Mikkola TM, et al. Association between physical performance and sense of autonomy in outdoor activities and life-space mobility in community-dwelling older people. J American Geriatrics Society. 2014;62(4):615–621. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thuesen J, Feiring M, Doh D, et al. Reablement in need of theories of ageing: would theories of successful ageing do? Ageing Soc. 2021;43(7):1–13. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X21001203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar