Interoperability in supply chain and logistics: What can the Common Framework offer? – A scientific evaluation

References

• Christopher M, Peck H. Building the resilient supply chain. Int J Logist Manage. 2004;15(2):1–14.10.1108/09574090410700275
   Google Scholar
• Kitchenham B, Brereton OP, Budgen D, Turner M, Bailey J, Linkman S. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – a systematic systematic literature review. Inform Software Tech. 2009;51(1):7–15.10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuechler B, Vaishnavi V. Promoting relevance in IS research: an informing system for design science research. Informing Sci Int J Emerg Transdiscipline. 2011;14(1):125–138.
   Google Scholar
• Pries-Heje J, Baskerville R, Venable JR. Strategies for design science research; evaluation. Galway, Ireland: AIS Electronic Library; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Sein M, Henfridsson O, Purao S, Rossi M, Lindgren R. Action design research. MIS Quarterly. 2011;35(1):37–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oosterhout MP, Veenstra A, Meijer M, Popal N, Van den Berg J. Visibility platforms for enhancing supply chain security: a case study in the Port of Rotterdam. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Symposium on Maritime Safety, Security and Environmental Protection; 2007 Sep 20-21; Athens, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries HJ, van Wessel RM. Internet architecture and innovation. Bus Hist. 2014;56:683–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis GA, Morris E, Simanta S, Wrage L. Why standards are not enough to guarantee end-to-end interoperability. Paper presented at: the Seventh International Conference on Composition-Based Software Systems (ICCBSS 2008); 2008 Feb 25–29; Madrid, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• He K-Q, Wang J, Liang P. Semantic interoperability aggregation in service requirements refinement. J Comput Sci Tech. 2010;25(6):1103–1117.10.1007/s11390-010-9392-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legner C, Wende K. Towards an excellence framework for business interoperability. Paper presented at: 19th Bled eConference; 2006 Jun 5–7; Bled, Slovenia.
   Google Scholar
• Gottschalk P. Maturity levels for interoperability in digital government. Gov Inform Q. 2009;26(1):75–81.10.1016/j.giq.2008.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legner C, Lebreton B. Preface to the focus theme section: “Business Interoperability”, Business interoperability research: present achievements and upcoming challenges. Electron Mark. 2007;17(3):176–186.10.1080/10196780701503054
   Google Scholar
• Pazos Corella V, Chalmeta Rosaleñ R, Martínez Simarro D. SCIF-IRIS framework: a framework to facilitate interoperability in supply chains. Int J Comput Integ Manuf. 2012;25(12):1114–1133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berre AJ, Elvesæter B, Figay N, Guglielmina C, Johnsen SG, Karlsen D, Knothe T, Lippe S. The ATHENA interoperability framework. In: Gonçalves R, Muller JP, Mertins K, Zelm M, editors. Enterprise Interoperability II. London: Springer; 2007. p. 569–580.
   Google Scholar
• SCOR. The SCOR Model. Available from: http://supply-chain.org/scor.
   Google Scholar
• Huan SH, Sheoran SK, Wang G. A review and analysis of supply chain operations reference (SCOR) model. Supply Chain Manage Int J. 2004;9(1):23–29.10.1108/13598540410517557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgise FB, Thoben K-D, Seifert M. Adapting the SCOR model to suit the different scenarios: a literature review & research agenda. Int J Bus Manage. 2012;7(6):2–17.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou H, Benton W, Schilling DA, Milligan GW. Supply chain integration and the SCOR model. J Bus Logist. 2011;32(4):332–344.10.1111/jbl.2011.32.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen JT. One common framework for information and communication systems in transport and logistics: facilitating interoperability. In: Golinska P, Hajdul M, editors. Sustainable transport. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2012. p. 165–196.
   Google Scholar
• Hajdul M, Cudzilo M. One common framework for information and communication systems in transport and logistics: case study. In: Golinska P, Fertsch M, Marx-Gómez J, editors. Information technologies in environmental engineering. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2011. p. 501–513.
   Google Scholar
• Melzer-Ridinger R. Supply chain management. Munich: Oldenburg Academic Publishers; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Guédria W, Naudet Y, Chen D. Interoperability maturity Meersman R, Tari Z, Herrero P, editors. On the move to meaningful internet systems: OTM 2008 Workshops. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2008. p. 273–282.
   Google Scholar
• Montreuil B. Toward a physical Internet: meeting the global logistics sustainability grand challenge. Logist Res. 2011;3(2–3):71–87.10.1007/s12159-011-0045-x
   Google Scholar
• Montreuil B, Meller RD, Thivierge C, Montreuil Z. Functional design of physical internet facilities: a unimodal road-based crossdocking hub. In: Montreuil B, Carrano A, de Kostner MMR, Gue KR, Ogle M, Smith J, editors. Progress in material handling research. Charlotte, NC: MHIA; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Sohrabi H, Montreuil B. From private supply networks and shared supply webs to physical internet enabled open supply webs. In: Camarinha-Matos LM, Pereira-Klen A, Afsarmanesh H, editors. Adaptation and value creating collaborative networks. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2011. p. 235–244.
   Google Scholar