Assessment of natural variability in leaf morphological and physiological traits in maize inbreds and their related hybrids during early vegetative growth

References

• Verheye W. Growth and production of maize: traditional low-input cultivation. In: Verheye W, editor. Land use, land cover and soil sciences. UNESCO-EOLSS Publishers; 2010. p. 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Oaks A. Efficiency of nitrogen assimilation in C3 and C4 cereals. Plant Physiol. 1994;106:407–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betran FJ, Ribaut JM, Beck D, et al. Genetic diversity, specific combining ability, and heterosis in tropical maize under stress and nonstress environments. Crop Sci. 2003;43:797–806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu K, Goodman M, Muse S, et al. Genetic structure and diversity among maize inbred lines as inferred from DNA microsatellites. Genet. 2003;165:2117–2128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srikanth M, Amanullah M, Muthukrishnan P. Influence of plant density and fertilizer on yield attributes and grain quality of hybrid maize. J Madras Agric. 2009;96:139–143.
   Google Scholar
• Ghannoum O, Evans JR, Caemmerer SV. Nitrogen and water use efficiency of C4 plants. In: Raghavendra AS, Sage RF, editors. C4 photosynthesis and related CO₂ concentration mechanisms. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science and Business Media; 2010. p. 129–146.
   Google Scholar
• Mengel K, Kirkby E. Principles of plant nutrition. 5th ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Näsholm T, Kielland K, Ganeteg U. Uptake of organic nitrogen by plants. New Phytol. 2009;182:31–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masclaux-Daubresse C, Daniel-Vedel F, Dechorgnat J, et al. Nitrogen uptake assimilation and remobilization in plants: challenges for sustainable and productive agriculture. Ann Bot. 2010;105:1141–1157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoneyama T, Ito O, Engelaar WM. Uptake metabolism and distribution of nitrogen in crop plants traced by enriched and natural 15 N: progress over the last 30 years. Phytochem Rev. 2003;2:121–132.
   Google Scholar
• Huppe H, Turpin D. Integration of carbon and nitrogen metabolism in plant and algal cells. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1994;45:577–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang R, Okamoto M, Xing X, et al. Microarray analysis of the nitrate response in Arabidopsis roots and shoots reveals over 1000 rapidly responding genes and new linkages to glucose trehalose-6-phosphate iron and sulfate metabolism. Plant Phys. 2003;132:556–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes M, Araus J. Comparative genomic and physiological analysis of nutrient response to NH4+, NH4+: NO3− and NO3− in barley seedlings. Physiol Plant. 2008;134:134–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oseni TO, Masarirambi MT. Effect of climate change on maize (Zea mays) production and food security in Swaziland. Am-Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci. 2011;11:385–391.
   Google Scholar
• Shull GH. The composition of a field of maize. J Heredity. 1908;1:296–301.
   Google Scholar
• Fu D, Xiao M, Hayward A, et al. Utilization of crop heterosis: a review. Euphytica. 2014;197:161–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• East EM. Heterosis. Genetics. 1936;4:375–397.
   Google Scholar
• Goff SA. A unifying theory for general multigenic heterosis: energy efficiency protein metabolism, and implications for molecular breeding. New Phytol. 2010;189:923–937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum A. Heterosis, stress, and the environment: a possible road map towards the general improvement of crop yield. J Exp Bot. 2013;16:4829–4837.
   Google Scholar
• Hoecker N, Keller B, Piepho HP, et al. Manifestation of heterosis during early maize (Zea mays L.) root development. Theor Appl Genet. 2006;1:421–429.
   Google Scholar
• Stupar R, Gardiner J, Oldre A, et al. Gene expression analyses in maize inbreds and hybrids with varying levels of heterosis. BMC Plant Biol. 2008;8:33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flint-Garcia SA, Buckler ES, Tiffin P, et al. Heterosis is prevalent for multiple traits in diverse maize germplasm. PLoS ONE. 2009;10:e7433.
   Google Scholar
• Ko DK, Rohozinski D, Song Q, et al. Temporal shift of circadian-mediated gene expression and carbon fixation contributes to biomass heterosis in maize hybrids. PLOS Genet. 2016;12:e1006197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paschold A, Marcon C, Hoecker N, et al. Molecular dissection of heterosis manifestation during early maize root development. Theor Appl Genet. 2010;120:383–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnable P, Springer N. Progress toward understanding heterosis in crop plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2013;64:71–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reif JC, Hallauer AR, Melchinger AE. Heterosis and heterotic patterns in maize. Maydica. 2005;50:215–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Luo L, Mei H, et al. Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice I. Biomass and grain yield. Genetics. 2001;158:1737–1753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson-Wagner R, Jia Y, DeCook R, et al. All possible modes of gene action are observed in a global comparison of gene expression in a maize F1 hybrid and its inbred parents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:6805–6810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber WT, Zhang W, Win H, et al. Repeat associated small rNAs vary among parents and following hybridization in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;26:10444–10449.
   Google Scholar
• Chen ZJ. Genomic and epigenetic insights into the molecular bases of heterosis. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;7:471–482.
   Google Scholar
• Ng DW, Miller M, Helen HY, et al. A role for CHH methylation in the parent-of-origin effect on altered circadian rhythms and biomass heterosis in Arabidopsis intraspecific hybrids. Plant Cell. 2014;26:2430–2440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coors J, Pandey S. The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Tollenaar M, Lee E. Dissection of physiological processes underlying grain yield in maize by examining genetic improvement and heterosis. Maydica. 2006;51:399–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharopova N, McMullen MD, Schultz L, et al. Development and mapping of SSR markers for maize. Plant Mol Biol. 2002;48:463–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee M, Sharapova N, Beavis WD, et al. Expanding the genetic map of maize with the intermated B73 x Mo17 (IBM) population. Plant Mol Biol. 2002;48:453–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnable PS, Ware D, Fulton RS, et al. The B73 maize genome: complexity diversity and dynamics. Science. 2009;2009(326):1112–1115.
   Google Scholar
• Mikel M, Dudley J. Evolution of North American dent corn from public to proprietary germplasm. Crop Sci. 2006;46:1193–1205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adawy SS, Assem SK, Hussein EH, et al. Development of AFLP markers and genotyping of elite maize inbred lines. Arabian J Biotech. 2004;7:53–64.
   Google Scholar
• Sadek SE, Ahmed MA, El-Ghaney HA. Correlation and path coefficient analysis in five parents inbred lines and their six white maize (Zea mays L.) single crosses developed and grown in Egypt. J Appl Sci Res. 2006;2:159–167.
   Google Scholar
• Mousa WME, Sadek SE, El-Nahrawy MM. Silage yield and quality of some maize and teosinte genotypes and their hybrid. Am-Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci. 2017;17:373–378.
   Google Scholar
• AOAC. Association of official analytical chemists. 17th ed. Maryland: A.O.A.C. international; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Sadasivam S. Biochemical methods. 1st ed. New Delhi: New Age International; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt R. Plant growth analysis: studies in biology. London: Edward Arnold London; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Zhang J, Zhang H, et al. Mechanisms for the relationships between water-use efficiency and carbon isotope composition and specific leaf area of maize (Zea mays L.) under water stress. J Plant Growth Regul. 2015;77:233–43.
   Google Scholar
• Lee E, Ahmadzadeh A, Tollenaar M. Quantitative genetic analysis of the physiological processes underlying maize grain yield. Crop Sci. 2005;45:981–987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzner H, Rau H, Senger H. Untersuchungen zur synchronisierbarkeit einzelner pigmentmangel-mutanten von Chlorella studies on synchronization of some pigment-deficient Chlorella mutants. Planta. 1965;65:186–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kissimon J Analysis of the photosynthetic pigment composition: In international. Workshop and Training Course on Microalgal Biol. and Biotech. Mosonmagyarouar: 1999; p. 13–26.
   Google Scholar
• Riazi A, Matsuda K, Arslan A. Water-stress induced changes in concentrations of proline and other solutes in growing regions of young barley leaves. J Exp Bot. 1985;36:1716–1725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handel EV. Direct micro determinations of sucrose. Anal Biochem. 1968;22:280–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yemm E, Willis A. The estimation of carbohydrates by anthrone. J Biochem. 1954;57:508–514.
   Google Scholar
• Yemm E, Willis A. The respiration of barely plants. IX. The metabolism of roots during the assimilation of nitrogen. New Phytol. 1956;55:229–252.
   Google Scholar
• Naguib MI. Effect of sevin (N-methyl-1-naphthyl carbamate) on carbohydrates and nitrogen metabolism during the germination of cotton seeds. Ind J Exp Biol. 1964;2:149–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muting D, Kaiser E. Spectrophotometric method of determination of α-amino-N in biological material by means of the ninhydrin reaction. Hopper Seyler’s Z Physiol Chem. 1963;332:276–289.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chinbal A, Rees M, Williams E. The total nitrogen content of egg albumin and other proteins. Biochem J. 1943;3:354–359.
   Google Scholar
• Fehr WR. Principles of cultivar development: theory and technique. New York: MacMillan publishing Co; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Uziak Z, Borowski E, Blamowski Z. The attempt to explain the various reactions of rape and corn plants on the nitrogen use in the ammonium or nitrate forms. Acta Agrobotanica. 1993;1:39–49.
   Google Scholar
• Whaley W, Heimsch C, Rabideau G. The growth and morphology of two maize inbreds and their hybrid. Am J Bot. 1950;37:77–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias MAN, Mondo VHV, Cicero SM. Maize seed vigor and weed competition. Braz Seed J. 2010;32:93–101.
   Google Scholar
• Mondo V, Cicero S, Dourado-Neto D, et al. Maize seed vigor and plant performance. Braz J. 2012;34:143–155.
   Google Scholar
• Hauck AL, Novais J, Grift TE, et al. Characterization of mature maize (Zea mays L.) root system architecture and complexity in a diverse set of Ex-PVP inbreds and hybrids. SpringerPlus. 2015;4:424.
   Google Scholar
• Burkholder PR, McVeighm I. Growth and differentiation of maize in relation to nitrogen supply. Am J Bot. 1940;27:414–424.
   Google Scholar
• Fujimoto R, Taylor J, Shirasawa S, et al. Heterosis of Arabidopsis hybrids between C24 and Col is associated with increased photosynthesis capacity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:7109–7114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemoine R, La Camera S, Atanassova R, et al. Source-to-sink transport of sugar and regulation by environmental factors. Front Plant Sci. 2013;4:272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoecker N, Keller B, Muthreich N, et al. Comparison of maize (Zea mays L.) F1-hybrid and parental inbred line primary root transcriptomes suggests organ-specific patterns of non-additive gene expression and conserved expression trends. Genetics. 2008;179:1275–1283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding H, Qin C, Luo X, et al. Heterosis in early maize ear inflorescence development: a genome-wide transcription analysis for two maize inbred lines and their hybrid. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15:13892–13915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer N, Stupar R. Allelic variation and heterosis in maize: how do two halves make more than a whole? Genome Res. 2007;17:264–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar