Marine sources as an unexplored bone tissue reconstruction material -A review

References

• Yu J, Xia H, Teramoto A, et al. Res. A.The effect of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on mechanical behavior and biological performance of porous shape memory polyurethane scaffolds. J Biomed Mater. 2018;106(1):244–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berthiaume F, Maguire T, Yarmush J, et al. Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: history, progress, and challenges Annu. Rev Chem Biomol Eng. 2011;2:403–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng X, Shao Z, Li C, et al. Isolation, characterization and evaluation of collagen from jellyfish rhopilema esculentum kishinouye for use in hemostatic applications. PLoS One. 2017 12; e0169731. 10.1371/journal.pone.0169731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer R. Perspectives and challenges in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Adv Mater. 2009 21;21(32–33):3235–3236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhari A, Vig A, Baganizi, D.R K, et al. Future prospects for scaffolding methods and biomaterials in skin tissue engineering: a review. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17. 10.3390/ijms17121974. 1974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Z, Yu C, Wei H. Injectable hydrogels as three-dimensional network reservoirs for osteoporosis treatment. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2021;27(5):430–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hing K, Philos A. Bone repair in the twenty-first century: biology, chemistry or engineering. A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2004;362(1825):2821–2850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroli B, Pharm J. Sci.From natural bone grafts to tissue engineering therapeutics: brainstorming on pharmaceutical formulative requirements and challenges. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2009;98(4):1317–1375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitriou R, Jones E, McGonagle D, et al. Bone regeneration: current concepts and future directions. BMC Med. 2011 9;9(1):66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin I, Suetterlin R, Baschong W, et al. Enhanced cartilage tissue engineering by sequential exposure of chondrocytes to FGF-2 during 2D expansion and BMP-2 during 3D cultivation. J Cell Biochem. 2001;83(1):121–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs D,M, Vaezi M,Y, Oreffo, R,O S. Hope versus hype: what can additive manufacturing realistically offer trauma and orthopedicsurgery. Regen Med. 2014 9;9(4):535–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz G, White S, Mitchell, R M, et al. Science.Epithelial wound healing enhanced by transforming growth factor-alpha and vaccinia growth factor. Science (New York, N.Y.). 1987;235(4786):350–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moya M, Cheng L, M H, et al. The effect of FGF-1 loaded alginate microbeads on neovascularization and adipogenesis in a vascular pedicle model of adipose tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2010 31. 2816–2826. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entezari A, Swain M, Gooding V, et al. A modular design strategy to integrate mechanotransduction concepts in scaffold-based bone tissue engineering. Acta.Biomater. 2020;118:100–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregor A, Filová E, Novák M, et al. Designing of PLA scaffolds for bone tissue replacement fabricated by ordinary commercial 3D printer. J Biol Eng. 2017;11(1):31.
   Google Scholar
• Januariyasa I, Ana K, I D, et al. Biol. Appl.Nanofibrous poly(vinyl alcohol)/chitosan contained carbonated hydroxyapatite nanoparticles scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater. 2020;107:110347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoarau-Véchot J, Rafii A, Touboul C, et al. Halfway between 2D and animal models: are 3D cultures the ideal tool to study cancer-microenvironment interactions. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(1):181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duval K, Grover H, Han L,H, et al. Modeling physiological events in 2D vs. 3D cell culture. Physiology Bethesda. 2017;32:266–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachlos E, Czernuszka J, Eur T. Making tissue engineering scaffolds work. Review: the application of solid freeform fabrication technology to the production of tissue engineering scaffolds. Cell. Mater. 2003;5:29–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Augustyniak J, Bertero A, Coccini T, et al. Organoids are promising tools for species-specific in vitro toxicological studies. Journal of Applied Toxicology: JAT. 2019;39(12):1610–1622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz-Rodriguez P, López-Álvarez M, Serra J, et al. Current stage of marine ceramic grafts for 3D bone tissue regeneration. Mar Drugs. 2019;17(8):471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayak G, Bhuyan, R S, Sahu A, et al. Review on biomedical applications of marine algae-derived biomaterials. Univers J Public Health. 2022;10(1):15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Ohlstein B, Kai T, Decotto E, et al. The stem cell niche: theme and variations. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2004;16(6):693–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houacine C, Yousaf SS, Khan I, et al. Potential of natural biomaterials in nano-scale drug delivery. Curr Pharm Des. 2018;24(43):5188–5206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciuffi S, Zonefrati R, Brandi M, et al. Adipose stem cells for bone tissue repair. Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2017;14:217–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao S, Zhao P, Lin C, et al. Differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells into neuron-like cells which are compatible with photocurable three-dimensional scaffolds. Tissue Engineering. Part A. 2014;20(7–8):1271–1284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunnell B, Flaat A, Gagliardi M, et al. Methods.Adipose-derived stem cells: isolation, expansion and differentiation. Methods (San Diego, Calif.). 2008;45(2):115–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafaei H, Kalarestaghi H. Adipose-derived stem cells: an appropriate selection for osteogenic differentiation. Journal of Cellular Physiology. 2020;235(11):8371–8386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal S, Pittenger M,F. Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate allogeneic immune cell responses. Blood. 2005;105:1815–1822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe R,J, Mao J. Bone tissue engineering and regeneration: from discovery to the clinic–an overview. Tissue. Eng. Part. B. Rev. 2011 17; 389–392. 10.1089/ten.TEB.2011.0475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rophael J, Craft A, R O, et al. Angiogenic growth factor synergism in a murine tissue engineering model of angiogenesis and adipogenesis. Am.J.Pathol. 2007;171(6):2048–2057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gothard D, Smith E, Kanczler L, et al. Tissue engineered bone using select growth factors: a comprehensive review of animal studies and clinical translation studies in man. Eur Cell Mater. 2014;28:166–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedorovich N, Alblas, J E, Hennink W,E, et al. Organ printing: the future of bone regeneration. Trends.Biotechnol. 2011;29(12):601–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang D, Tare R, Yang S, et al. Biofabrication of bone tissue: approaches, challenges and translation for bone regeneration. Biomaterials. 2016;83:363–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holesh J, Bass E, A N, et al. Physiology, Ovulation. In: Stat.Pearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• DiCorleto P, Bowen-Pope, DF E. Cultured endothelial cells produce a platelet-derived growth factor-like protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983;80(7):1919–1923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley A, Davidson J, Kamerath M, et al. U. S. A. Sustained release of epidermal growth factor accelerates wound repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1985;82(21):7340–7344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim D, Lee B, Thomopoulos S, et al. Nat Commun.The role of confined collagen geometry in decreasing nucleation energy barriers to intrafibrillar mineralization. Nature Communications. 2018;9(1):962.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Young MF. Int. Bone matrix proteins: their function, regulation, and relationship to osteoporosis. Osteoporos. 2003;14(3):S35–S42.
   Google Scholar
• Bonjour J,P. Nutritional disturbance in acid-base balance and osteoporosis: a hypothesis that disregards the essential homeostatic role of the kidney. Br J Nutr. 2013;110(7):1168–1177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppola D, Oliviero M, Vitale G,A, et al. Marine collagen from alternative and sustainable sources: extraction, processing and applications. Mar Drugs. 2020;18:214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh R, Kumar M, Mittal A, et al. Microbial enzymes: industrial progress in 21st century. Biotech. 2016;6(3):174.
   Google Scholar
• Ivankovic H, Gallego F, Tkalcec G, et al. Med.Preparation of highly porous hydroxyapatite from cuttlefish bone. J Mater Sci Mater. 2009;20(5):1039–1046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amna T. Valorization of Bone Waste of Saudi Arabia by Synthesizing Hydroxyapatite. Appl.Biochem.Biotechnol. 2018;186(3):79–788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesan J, Lowe B, Manivasagan P, et al. Isolation and Characterization of Nano-Hydroxyapatite from Salmon Fish Bone. Materials Basel. 2015;8:5426–5439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Goh C, Shrestha A. Biomaterial properties modulating bone regeneration. Shrestha A. Macromol.Biosci. 2021;21(4):e2000365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemin G, Patat J, Fournie L, et al. The use of coral as a bone graft substitute. J Biomed Mater Res. 1987;21(5):557–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröder H, Wang C, Tremel X, et al. Biofabrication of biosilica-glass by living organisms. Nat Prod Rep. 2008;25(3):455–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Wang X, Draenert F,G, et al. Bioactive and biodegradable silica biomaterial for bone regeneration. Bone. 2014;67:292–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks R, Russ G, Alcala R, et al. Effectiveness of marine protected areas in the Philippines for biodiversity conservation. Conserv Biol. 2010;24(2):531–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrenko I, Bazhenov V, Galli, R V, et al. Chitin of poriferan origin and the bioelectrometallurgy of copper/copper oxide. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017;104(Pt B):1626–1632.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perić K, Ž R, Alkildani, S P, et al. An introduction to bone tissue engineering. Int J Artif Organs. 2020;43(2):69–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Enriquez S, Guadarrama H, Reyes-González, I E, et al. Mechanical performance and in vivo tests of an acrylic bone cement filled with bioactive sepia officinalis cuttlebone. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2010;21(1):113–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palaveniene A, Harkavenko V, Kharchenko V, et al. Cuttlebone as a marine-derived material for preparing bone grafts. Biotechnol.(NY). Mar. 2018; 20: 363–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Li D, Chen X, et al. Surf .B.Biointerfaces.Biomimetic cuttlebone polyvinyl alcohol/carbon nanotubes/hydroxyapatite aerogel scaffolds enhanced bone regeneration. Colloids. 2021;112221. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021
   Google Scholar
• Palaveniene A, Harkavenko V, Kharchenko V, et al. Cuttlebone as a marine-derived material for preparing bone grafts. Biotechnol. NY. Mar. 2018;20:363–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutmacher D,W. Biomaterials.Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials. 2000;21(24):2529–2543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu CH, Yao CH, Chan TM, et al. Effects of different concentrations of collagenous peptide from fish scales on osteoblast proliferation and osteoclast resorption. Chin. J Physiol. 2016 59; 191–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto R, Uemura T, Xu Z, et al. Rapid oriented fibril formation of fish scale collagen facilitates early osteoblastic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomed Mater Res. 2015;103(8):2531–2539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langasco R, Cadeddu B, Formato M, et al. Natural collagenic skeleton of marine sponges in pharmaceutics: innovative biomaterial for topical drug delivery. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017;70(Pt 1):710–720.
   Google Scholar
• Lin Z, Solomon K, Zhang, X L, et al. In vitro evaluation of natural marine sponge collagen as a scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Sci. 2011;7(7):968–977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk A, Handschel J, Drescher W, et al. Current trends and future perspectives of bone substitute materials - from space holders to innovative biomaterials. J.Craniomaxillofac.Surg. 2012;40(8):706–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alakpa E, Burgess V, K E, et al. Topography produces higher crystallinity in bone than chemically induced osteogenesis. ACS. Nano Nacre. 2017 11; 6717–6727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammouche S, Khan W, Drouin H, et al. In vitro Evaluation of Natural Marine Sponge Collagen as a Scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Curr Stem Cell Res. 2012;7(5):336–346.
   Google Scholar
• Chen C, Rosi L, N L. Angew Peptide-based methods for the preparation of nanostructured inorganic materials. Chem Int Ed Engl. 2010;49(11):1924–1942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro O, Kramarsky-Winter H, Gavish E, et al. A coral-on-a-chip microfluidic platform enabling live-imaging microscopy of reef-building corals. Nat.Commun. 2016;7(1):10860.
   Google Scholar
• Macha I, Ben-Nissan J. Marine skeletons: towards hard tissue repair and regeneration. Marine Drugs. 2018;16(225). DOI:10.3390/md16070225
   Google Scholar
• Farabegoli F, Blanco L, Rodríguez L, et al. Phycotoxins in marine shellfish: origin, occurrence and effects on humans. Mar Drugs. 2018;16:188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi R, Singha P, Dey, S K. Water soluble bioactives of nacre mediate antioxidant activity and osteoblast differentiation. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e84584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Lee K, Ko C,Y, et al. Biomaterials.The role of nacreous factors in preventing osteoporotic bone loss through both osteoblast activation and osteoclast inactivation. Biomaterials. 2012;33(30):7489–7496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diogo G, Senra S, E L, et al. Marine collagen/apatite composite scaffolds envisaging hard tissue applications. Mar Drugs. 2018;16:269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallela R, Venkatesan J, Janapala V, et al. Biophysicochemical evaluation of chitosan-hydroxyapatite-marine sponge collagen composite for bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2012;100(2):486–495.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elango J, Zhang J, Bao B, et al. Rheological, biocompatibility and osteogenesis assessment of fish collagen scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016;91:51–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parisi J, Fernandes R, K R, et al. Incorporation of collagen from marine sponges (spongin) into hydroxyapatite samples: characterization and in vitro biological evaluation. Mar Biotechnol (NY). 2019 21;21(1):30–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mredha M, T I, Kitamura N, et al. Anisotropic tough double network hydrogel from fish collagen and its spontaneous in vivo bonding to bone. Biomaterials. 2017;132:85–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt A, Paul B, Gelinsky M. Biphasic scaffolds from marine collagens for regeneration of osteochondral defects. Mar Drugs. 2018 16;16(3):91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigogliuso S, Salamone M, Barbarino E, et al. Production of injectable marine collagen-based hydrogel for the maintenance of differentiated chondrocytes in tissue engineering applications. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:5798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada S, Yamamoto K, Nakazono A, et al. Functional roles of fish collagen peptides on bone regeneration. Dent Mater J. 2021;40(6):1295–1302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Codrea C, Croitoru I, A M, et al. Advances in osteoporotic bone tissue engineering. J Clin Med. 2021;10:253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giardoglou P, Beis D. On zebrafish disease models and matters of the heart. Biomedicines. 2019;7:15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung R, C N, T B, et al. Marine peptides: bioactivities and applications. Marine Drugs. 2015;13(7):4006–4043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Younes I, Rinaudo M. Chitin and chitosan preparation from marine sources. Structure, properties and applications. Mar Drugs. 2015 13;13(3):1133–1174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezoddini-Ardakani F, Navabazam A, Fatehi F, et al. Histologic evaluation of chitosan as an accelerator of bone regeneration in microdrilled rat tibias. Dent Res J. 2012;9:694–699.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu H, Peng H, Wu Y, et al. Biomaterials.The promotion of bone regeneration by nanofibrous hydroxyapatite/chitosan scaffolds by effects on integrin-BMP/Smad signaling pathway in BMSCs. Biomaterials. 2013;34(18):4404–4417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee K, Mooney, D,J, Y. Alginate: properties and biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2012;37(1):106–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senni K, Pereira J, Gueniche F, et al. Marine polysaccharides: a source of bioactive molecules for cell therapy and tissue engineering. Marine Drugs. 2011;9(9):1664–1681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolambkar Y, Dupont M, K M, et al. Biomaterials.An alginate-based hybrid system for growth factor delivery in the functional repair of large bone defects. Biomaterials. 2011;32(1):65–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S, Chun B, K R, et al. The differential effect of high and low molecular weight fucoidans on the severity of collagen-induced arthritis in mice. Phytother Res. 2010;24(9):1384–1391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Changotade S, Korb I, Bassil, J G, et al. Potential effects of a low-molecular-weight fucoidan extracted from brown algae on bone biomaterial osteoconductive properties. J Biomed Mater Res. 2008;87(3):666–675.
   Google Scholar
• Park S, Lee J, K W, et al. The sulfated polysaccharide fucoidan stimulates osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells. Stem Cells. 2012;21:2204–2211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao C, Peng S, Feng P, et al. Bone biomaterials and interactions with stem cells. Bone Res. 2017;5:17059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsayed H, Rincón Romero A, Ferroni L, et al. Bioactive glass-ceramic scaffolds from novel ‘inorganic gel casting’and sinter-crystallization. Mater. 2017;10(2):171.
   Google Scholar
• Webber M, Khan J, O F, et al. A perspective on the clinical translation of scaffolds for tissue engineering. Ann Biomed Eng. 2015;43(3):641–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messina A, Marini M, L O, et al. A step-by-step procedure for bone regeneration using calcium phosphate scaffolds: from site preparation to graft placement. E J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(1):149–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macha I, Ben-Nissan J, Mar B. Marine skeletons: towards hard tissue repair and regeneration. Drugs. 225. 2018. 16 10.3390/md16070225.
   Google Scholar
• Sethmann I, Luft C, Kleebe H. Development of phosphatized calcium carbonate biominerals as bioactive bone graft substitute materials, part I: incorporation of magnesium and strontium ions. J J Funct Biomater. 2018;9(4):69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz-Rodriguez P, López-Álvarez M, Serra J, et al. Current stage of marine ceramic grafts for 3D bone tissue regeneration. Mar Drugs. 2019 17;17(8):471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C,S, Sun J. Impact of marine-based biomaterials on the immunoregulatory properties of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells: potential use of fish collagen in bone tissue engineering. J. ACS. Omega. 2020;20(43):2836.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyer B, Bernhardt A, Heinemann S, et al. Biomimetically mineralized salmon collagen scaffolds for application in bone tissue engineering. M Biomacromolecules. 2012;13(4):1059–1066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallela R, J V, V R, et al. Biophysicochemical evaluation of chitosan hydroxyapatite-marine sponge collagen composite for bone tissue engineering. Kim J Biomed Mater Res A. 2012;100(2):486–495.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sun F, Zhou H, Lee J. Various preparation methods of highly porous hydroxyapatite/polymer nanoscale biocomposites for bone regeneration. Acta.Biomater. 2011;7(11):3813–3828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Park E, Adv K. Recent advances of biphasic calcium phosphate bioceramics for bone tissue regeneration Exp. Med Biol. 2020;1250:177–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marie B, Marin F, Marie A, et al. Evolution of nacre: biochemistry and proteomics of the shell organic matrix of the cephalopod Nautilus macromphalus. Chembiochem: a European Journal of Chemical Biology. 2009;10(9):1495–1506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanz-Herrera J, Reina-Romo, E A. Cell-biomaterial mechanical interaction in the framework of tissue engineering: insights, computational modeling and perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. 2011;12(11):8217–8244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee K, Mooney Y, D J. Alginate: properties and biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2012;37(1):106–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahidi F, Abuzaytoun R. Chitin, chitosan, and co-products: chemistry, production, applications, and health effects. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2005 49; 93–135. 10.1016/S1043-4526(05)49003-8.
   Google Scholar
• Fitton JH. Therapies from fucoidan; multifunctional marine polymers. Mar Drugs. 2011;9(10):1731–1760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivankovic H, Gallego F, Tkalcec G, et al. Preparation of highly porous hydroxyapatite from cuttlefish bone. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009;20(5):1039–1046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar