In-silico screening of bioactive compounds from nut grass (Cyperus rotundus) to inhibit the α-bungarotoxin from Kraits (Bungarus spp.) venom

References

• Gutiérrez JM, Calvete JJ, Habib AG, et al. Snakebite envenoming. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3(1):1–21. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.63
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Snakebite envenoming 2022. [cited 2022 Nov 27]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/snakebite-envenoming
   Google Scholar
• Williams DJ, Faiz MA, Abela-Ridder B, et al. Strategy for a globally coordinated response to a priority neglected tropical disease: snakebite envenoming. PloS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(2):12–14. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebrewold G, Colston TJ, Abebe A, et al. Distribution of snake species and snakebites in hotspots of Ethiopia. J Infect Developing Countries. 2022;16(8.1):45S–51S. doi: 10.3855/jidc.15973
   Google Scholar
• Longbottom J, Shearer FM, Devine M, et al. Vulnerability to snakebite envenoming: a global mapping of hotspots. Lancet. 2018;392(10148):673–684. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31224-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uetz P, Hallermann J The reptile database 2023. [cited 2023 May 22]. Available from: https://reptile-database.reptarium.cz/advanced_search?genus=bungarus&submit=Search
   Google Scholar
• Patra A, Chanda A, Mukherjee AK. Quantitative proteomic analysis of venom from southern India common krait (Bungarus caeruleus) and identification of poorly immunogenic toxins by immune-profiling against commercial antivenom. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2019;16(5):457–469. doi: 10.1080/1478945020191609945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusmili MRA, Yee TT, Mustafa MR, et al. Proteomic characterization and comparison of Malaysian Bungarus candidus and Bungarus fasciatus venoms. J Proteomics. 2014;110:129–144. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan CH, Lingam TMC, Tan KY. Varespladib (LY315920) rescued mice from fatal neurotoxicity caused by venoms of five major Asiatic kraits (bungarus spp.) in an experimental envenoming and rescue model. Acta Trop. 2022;227:106289. doi: 10.1016/J.ACTATROPICA.2021.106289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan NH, Ponnudurai G. A comparative study of the biological properties of krait (genus Bungarus) venoms. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 1990;95(1):105–109. doi: 10.1016/0742-8413(90)90089-R
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mebs D, Narita K, Iwanaga S, et al. Amino acid sequence of α-bungarotoxin from the venom of bungarus multicinctus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1971;44(3):711–716. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(71)80141-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang MS, Häggblad J, Heilbronn E. Interaction with chick myotube cholinergic receptors of an α-neurotoxin isolated from venom of the banded krait (bungarus fasciatus). Toxicon. 1986;24(7):713–719. doi: 10.1016/0041-0101(86)90034-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuch U, Molles BE, Omori-Satoh T, et al. Identification of alpha-bungarotoxin (A31) as the major postsynaptic neurotoxin, and complete nucleotide identity of a genomic DNA of Bungarus candidus from Java with exons of the Bungarus multicinctus alpha-bungarotoxin (A31) gene. Toxicon. 2003;42(4):381–390. doi: 10.1016/S0041-0101(03)00168-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talukdar A, Malhotra A, Lalremsanga HT, et al. Bungarus fasciatus venom from eastern and north-east India: venom variation and immune cross-reactivity with Indian polyvalent antivenoms. J Protein Proteomics. 2023;14(1):61–76. doi: 10.1007/S42485-022-00104-2
   Google Scholar
• Kullmann FA, Chet de Groat W, Artim DE. Bungarotoxins. In: Jankovic J, Albanese A, Atassi MZ, et al., editors. Botulinum Toxin. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2009; 425–445.
   Google Scholar
• Oswald RE, Freeman JA. Alpha-bungarotoxin binding and central nervous system nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Neuroscience. 1981;6(1):1–14. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(81)90239-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patikorn C, Blessmann J, Nwe MT, et al. Estimating economic and disease burden of snakebite in ASEAN countries using a decision analytic model. PloS Negl Trop Dis. 2022a;16(9):e0010775. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PNTD.0010775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patikorn C, Ismail AK, Abidin SAZ, et al. Situation of snakebite, antivenom market and access to antivenoms in ASEAN countries. BMJ Glob Health. 2022b;7(3):e007639. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schioldann E, Mahmood MA, Kyaw MM, et al. Why snakebite patients in Myanmar seek traditional healers despite availability of biomedical care at hospitals? Community perspectives on reasons. PloS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(2):e0006299. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PNTD.0006299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upasani SV, Beldar VG, Tatiya AU, et al. Ethnomedicinal plants used for snakebite in India: a brief overview. Integr Med Res. 2017;6(2):114–130. doi: 10.1016/J.IMR.2017.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yirgu A, Chippaux JP. Ethnomedicinal plants used for snakebite treatments in Ethiopia: a comprehensive overview. J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis. 2019;25:20190017. doi: 10.1590/1678-9199-JVATITD-2019-0017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey A, De J. Traditional use of plants against snakebite in Indian subcontinent: a review of the recent literature. Afr J Traditional Comple-mentary Altern Med. 2011;9(1). doi: 10.4314/ajtcam.v9i1.20
   Google Scholar
• Dharmadasa RM, Akalanka GC, Muthukumarana PRM, et al. Ethnopharmacological survey on medicinal plants used in snakebite treatments in Western and Sabaragamuwa provinces in Sri Lanka. J Ethnopharmacol. 2016;179:110–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2015.12.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadir MF, Karmoker JR, MdR A, et al. Ethnopharmacological survey of medicinal plants used by traditional healers and indigenous people in Chittagong Hill tracts, Bangladesh, for the treatment of snakebite. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:1–23. doi: 10.1155/2015/871675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira LAF, Henriques OB, Andreoni AAS, et al. Antivenom and biological effects of ar-turmerone isolated from Curcuma longa (zingiberaceae). Toxicon. 1992;30(10):1211–=1218. doi: 10.1016/0041-0101(92)90437-A
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lattmann E, Sattayasai J, Sattayasai N, et al. In-vitro and in-vivo antivenin activity of 2-[2-(5,5,8a-trimethyl-2-methylene-decahydro-naphthalen-1-yl)-ethylidene]-succinaldehyde against ophiophagus hannah venom. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2010;62(2):257–262. doi: 10.1211/JPP.62.02.0014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srimathi R, Sabareesh V, Gurunathan J. Naringenin isolated from citrus reticulata blanco fruit peel inhibits the toxicity of snake venom proteins – an in vitro and in vivo study. Toxicon. 2022;220:106943. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2022.106943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar K Hemanth, Razack S, Nallamuthu I, et al. Phytochemical analysis and biological properties of Cyperus rotundus L. Ind Crops Prod. 2014;52:815–826. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.11.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherf T, Kasher R, Balass M, et al. A β-hairpin structure in a 13-mer peptide that binds α-bungarotoxin with high affinity and neutralizes its toxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(12):6629–6634. doi: 10.1073/pnas.111164298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daina A, Michielin O, Zoete V. SwissADME: a free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–13. doi: 10.1038/srep42717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee P, Eckert AO, Schrey AK, et al. ProTox-II: a webserver for the prediction of toxicity of chemicals. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(W1):W257–W263. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drwal MN, Banerjee P, Dunkel M, et al. ProTox: a web server for the in silico prediction of rodent oral toxicity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(W1):W53–W58. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomize AL, Hage JM, Schnitzer K, et al. PerMM: a web tool and database for analysis of passive membrane permeability and translocation pathways of bioactive molecules. J Chem Inf Model. 2019;59(7):3094–3099. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallakyan S, Olson AJ. Small molecule library screening by docking with PyRx. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• BIOVIA DS. Discovery Studio 2019. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Abraham MJ, Murtola T, Schulz R, et al. GROMACS: high performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX. 2015;1–2:19–25. doi: 10.1016/J.SOFTX.2015.06.001
   Google Scholar
• UAMS WebGro | UAMS. [cited 2023 May 7]. Available from: https://simlab.uams.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Oostenbrink C, Villa A, Mark AE, et al. A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: the GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6. J Comput Chem. 2004;25(13):1656–1676. doi: 10.1002/JCC.20090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Spoel D, Lindahl E, Hess B, et al. GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. J Comput Chem. 2005;26(16):1701–1718. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waring MJ. Defining optimum lipophilicity and molecular weight ranges for drug candidates—molecular weight dependent lower logD limits based on permeability. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2009;19(10):2844–2851. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.03.109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadela-Tomanek M, Jastrzębska M, Marciniec K, et al. Lipophilicity, pharmacokinetic properties, and molecular docking study on sars-cov-2 target for betulin triazole derivatives with attached 1,4-quinone. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(6):781. doi: 10.3390/PHARMACEUTICS13060781/S1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frallicciardi J, Melcr J, Siginou P, et al. Membrane thickness, lipid phase and sterol type are determining factors in the permeability of membranes to small solutes. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29272-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinoda W. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta Permeability across lipid membranes ☆. BBA – Biomembr. 2016;1858(10):2254–2265. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2016.03.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Lu Y, Qi J, et al. An update on oral drug delivery via intestinal lymphatic transport. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2021;11(8):2449–2468. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.12.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long C, Wu F, Lu Q, et al. A strategy for efficient preparation of genus-specific diagnostic antibodies for snakebites. Front Immunol. 2021;12:1–14. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.775678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daina A, Zoete V. A BOILED‐Egg to predict gastrointestinal absorption and brain penetration of small molecules. ChemMedchem. 2016;11(11):1117–1121. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.201600182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadry H, Noorani B, Cucullo L. A blood–brain barrier overview on structure, function, impairment, and biomarkers of integrity. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2020;17(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12987-020-00230-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner JV, Agatonovic-Kustrin S. In silico prediction of oral bioavailability. Compr Med Chem II. 2006;5:699–724. doi: 10.1016/b0-08-045044-x/00147-4
   Google Scholar
• Neumann D, Barchan D, Safran A, et al. Mapping of the alpha-bungarotoxin binding site within the alpha subunit of the acetylcholine receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986;83(9):3008–3011. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.9.3008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen D, Oezguen N, Urvil P, et al. Regulation of protein-ligand binding affinity by hydrogen bond pairing. Sci Adv. 2016;2(3). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyenle ID, Adelusi TI, Ogunlana AT, et al. Consensus scoring-based virtual screening and molecular dynamics simulation of some TNF-alpha inhibitors. Inform Med Unlocked. 2022;28:100833. doi: 10.1016/J.IMU.2021.100833
   Google Scholar
• Sargsyan K, Grauffel C, Lim C. How Molecular Size Impacts RMSD Applications in Molecular Dynamics Simulations. J Chem Theory Comput. 2017;13(4):1518–1524. doi: 10.1021/ACS.JCTC.7B00028/SUPPL_FILE/CT7B00028_SI_001.PDF
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhammad S, Qaisar M, Iqbal J, et al. Exploring the inhibitory potential of novel bioactive compounds from mangrove actinomycetes against nsp10 the major activator of SARS-CoV-2 replication. Chem Papers. 2022;76(5):3051–3064. doi: 10.1007/S11696-021-01997-X/FIGURES/8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durham E, Dorr B, Woetzel N, et al. Solvent accessible surface area approximations for rapid and accurate protein structure prediction. J Mol Model. 2009;15(9):1093–1108. doi: 10.1007/S00894-009-0454-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobanov MI, Bogatyreva NS, Galzitskaia OV. Radius of gyration is indicator of compactness of protein structure. Mol Biol. 2008;42(4):623–628. doi: 10.1134/S0026893308040195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaieb K, Kouidhi B, Hosawi SB, et al. Computational screening of natural compounds as putative quorum sensing inhibitors targeting drug resistance bacteria: molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations. Comput Biol Med. 2022;145:105517. doi: 10.1016/J.COMPBIOMED.2022.105517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pace CN, Fu H, Fryar KL, et al. Contribution of hydrogen bonds to protein stability. Protein Sci. 2014;23(5):652–661. doi: 10.1002/PRO.2449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar