Depth of processing in L2 learning: theory, research, and pedagogy

References

• Baralt, M. 2013. “The Impact of Cognitive Complexity on Feedback Efficacy during Online versus Face-to-Face Interactive Tasks.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35 (4): 689–725. doi:10.1017/S0272263113000429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, S. 2012. “Expert Knowledge, Distinctiveness, and Levels of Processing in Language Learning.” Applied Psycholinguistics 33 (4): 665–89. doi:10.1017/S014271641100052X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles, M. A. 2003. “The Effects of Textual Input Enhancement on Language Learning: An Online/Offline Study of Fourth Semester Students Spanish.” In Theory, Practice, and Acquisition: Papers from the 6th Hispanic Linguistic Symposium and 5th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese, eds. P. Kempchinsky, and C.-E. Piñeros, 395–411. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, M. A. 2008. “Task Type and Reactivity of Verbal Reports in SLA: A First Look at an L2 Task Other Than Reading.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30 (4): 359–87.
   Google Scholar
• Cerezo, L., M. Baralt, B.-R. Suh, and R. P. Leow. 2013. “Does the Medium Really Matter in L2 Development? The Validity of CALL Research Designs.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 27 (4): 294–310. doi:10.1080/09588221.2013.839569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craik, F. I. M., and R. S. Lockhart. 1972. “Levels of Processing: A Framework for Memory Research.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11 (6): 671–84. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X.
   Google Scholar
• Craik, F. I. M., and E. Tulving. 1975. “Depth of Processing and the Retention of Words in Episodic Memory”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104 (3): 268–94. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Fuente, M. J. 2015. “Explicit Corrective Feedback and Computer-Based, Form-Focused Instruction: The Role of L1 in Promoting Awareness of L2 Forms.” In A Psycholinguistic Approach to Technology and Language Learning, eds. R. P. Leow, L. Cerezo, and M. Baralt. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C. 2007. “The Associative-Cognitive CREED.” In Theories in Second Language Acquisition, eds. B. VanPatten, and J. Williams, 77–95. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gardiner, J. M. 1988. “Functional Aspects of Recollective Experience.” Memory & Cognition 16 (4): 309–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gass, S. M. 1997. Input, Interaction, and the Second Language Learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gass, S. M., I. Svetics, and S. Lemelin. 2003. “Differential Effects of Attention.” Language Learning 53 (3): 497–546. doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grgurovic, M., C. A. Chapelle, and M. C. Shelley. 2013. “A Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness Studies on Computer Technology-Supported Language Learning.” ReCALL Journal 25 (2): 165–98. doi:10.1017/S0958344013000013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-C. 2008. “The Effects of Type of Exposure and Type of Post-exposure Task on L2 Development.” Journal of Foreign Language Instruction 2: 117–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-C., N. Moreno, and R. P. Leow. 2015. “Awareness, Type of Medium, and L2 Development: Revisiting Hsieh 2008.” In A Psycholinguistic Approach to Technology and Language Learning, eds. R. P. Leow, L. Cerezo, and M. Baralt. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Konstantinou, I., and J. M. Gardiner. 2005. “Conscious Control and Memory Awareness When Recognizing Famous Faces.” Memory 13 (5): 449–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, B., and J. Hulstijn. 2001. “Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition in a Second Language: The Construct of Task-induced Involvement.” Applied Linguistics 22 (1): 1–26. doi:10.1093/applin/22.1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leow, R. P. 1998. “Toward Operationalizing the Process of Attention in SLA: Evidence for Tomlin and Villa’s (1994) Fine-grained Analysis of Attention.” Applied Psycholinguistics 19 (1): 133–59. doi:10.1017/S0142716400010626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leow, R. P. 2001a. “Attention, Awareness and Foreign Language Behavior.” Language Learning 51: 113–55. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.2001.tb00016.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leow, R. P. 2001b. “Do Learners Notice Enhanced Forms While Interacting with the L2? An Online and Offline Study of the Role of Written Input Enhancement in L2 Reading.” Hispania 84 (3): 496–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leow, R. P. 2012. “Explicit and Implicit Learning in the L2 Classroom: What Does the Research Suggest?” The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL 2: 117–29.
   Google Scholar
• Leow, R. P. 2015. Explicit Learning in the L2 Classroom: A Student-Centered Approach. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leow, R. P., H.-C. Hsieh, and N. Moreno. 2008. “Attention to Form and Meaning Revisited.” Language Learning 58 (3): 665–95. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00453.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loschky, L., and R. Bley-Vroman. 1993. “Grammar and Task-based Methodology.” In Task and Language Learning: Integrating Theory and Practice, eds. G. Crookes, and S. M. Gass, 123–67. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Lyster, R., and J. Izquierdo. 2009. “Prompts versus Recasts in Dyadic Interaction.” Language Learning 59 (2): 453–98. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00512.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Fernández, A. 2008. “Revisiting the Involvement Load Hypothesis: Awareness, Type of Task and Type of Item.” In Selected Proceedings of the 2007 Second Language Research Forum, eds. M. Bowles, R. Foote, S. Perpiñán, and R. Bhatt, 210–28. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, B. 1987. Theories of Second-Language Learning. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan-Short, K., J. Heil, A. Botero-Moriarty, and S. Ebert. 2012. “Allocation of Attention to Second Language Form and Meaning: Issues of Think Alouds and Depth of Processing.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34 (4): 659–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi, D. S., and S. Lapkin. 2001. “Exploring the Role of Noticing in a Three-Stage Second Language Writing Task.” Journal of Second Language Writing 10 (4): 277–303. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00046-7.
   Google Scholar
• Rajaram, S. 1993. “Remembering and Knowing: Two Means of Access to the Personal Past.” Memory & Cognition 21 (1): 89–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, P. 1995. “Attention, Memory, and the ‘Noticing’ Hypothesis.” Language Learning 45 (2): 283–331. doi:10.1111/j.1467–1770.1995.tb00441.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, P. 2003. “Attention and Memory in SLA.” In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, eds. C. Doughty, and M. H. Long, 631–78. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, E. M., and R. P. Leow. 2004. “Awareness, Different Learning Conditions, and Second Language Development.” Applied Psycholinguistics 25 (2): 269–92. doi:10.1017/S0142716404001134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, E. M., and M. D. O’Neill. 1999. “Explicitness, Intake, and the Issue of Awareness.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21 (4): 511–56.
   Google Scholar
• Rott, S. 2005. “Processing Glosses: A Qualitative Exploration of How Form-Meaning Connections are Established and Strengthened.” Reading in a Foreign Language 17 (2): 95–124.
   Google Scholar
• Sanz, C., and K. Morgan-Short. 2004. “Positive Evidence vs. Explicit Rule Presentation and Explicit Negative Feedback: A Computer-Assisted Study.” Language Learning 53 (4): 35–78. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00248.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. W. 1990. “The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning.” Applied Linguistics 11 (2): 129–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. W. 2001. “Attention.” In Cognition and Second Language Learning, ed. P. Robinson, 3–32. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shook, D. J. 1994. “FL/L2 Reading, Grammatical Information, and the Input-to-Intake Phenomenon.” Applied Language Learning 5 (1): 57–93.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M. 2005. “The Output Hypothesis: Theory and Research.” In Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, ed. E. Hinkel, 471–83. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlin, R. S., and V. Villa. 1994. “Attention in Cognitive Science and Second Language Acquisition.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16 (2): 183–203.
   Google Scholar
• VanPatten, B. 2004. Processing Instruction: Theory, Research, and Commentary. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Winke, P. 2013. “The Effects of Input Enhancement on Grammar Learning and Comprehension: A Modified Replication of Lee (2007), with Eye-Movement Data.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35 (2): 323–52. doi:10.1017/S0272263112000903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar