El potencial de la enseñanza del vocabulario basada en corpus: optimismo con precaución

Bibliografía

• American Psychological Association. 2008. “Reporting Standards for Research in Psychology: Why Do We Need Them? What Might They Be?”. American Psychologist 63 (9): 839–51. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.9.839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulton, A. 2008. “Esprit de corpus: promouvoir l'exploitation de corpus en apprentissage des Langues”. Texte et Corpus 3: 37–46.
   Google Scholar
• Boulton, A. 2010a. “Data-Driven Learning: Taking the Computer Out of the Equation”. Language Learning 60 (3): 534–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00566.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulton, A. 2010b. “Learning Outcomes from Corpus Consultation”. En Exploring New Paths in Language Pedagogy: Lexis and Corpus-Based Language Teaching, eds. M. Moreno Jaén, F. Serrano Valverde y M. Calzada Pérez, 129–44. London: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, L. 2008. “Spanish Verb Support Construction from a Learner Perspective”. ELIA 8: 151–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buyse, K. y S. Verlinde. 2013. “Possible Effects of Free on Line Data Driven Lexicographic Instruments on Foreign Language Learning: The Case of Linguee and the Interactive Language Toolbox”. Procedia 95: 507–12.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, A. 2007. “Popularising Corpus Consultation by Language Learners and Teachers”. En Corpora in the Foreign Language Classroom, eds. E. Hidalgo, L. Quereda, y J. Santana, 3–16. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, A. 2010. “What is Data-Driven Learning?”. En The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, eds. A. O'Keefe y M. McCarthy, 345–58. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collentine, J. 2009. Reseña de From Corpus to Classroom: Language Use and Language Teaching, eds. A. O'Keeffe, M. McCarthy, y R. Carter. Modern Language Journal 93: 453–5.
   Google Scholar
• Colmenares, J. y L. Plonsky. En preparación. Quality in Data-Driven Learning Research: A Synthesis of Methodology and Reporting Practices.
   Google Scholar
• Egbert, J., D. Biber y B. Gray. En prensa. Designing and Evaluating Language Corpora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C. 1994. “Consciousness in Second Language Learning: Psychological Perspectives on the Role of Conscious Processes in Vocabulary Acquisition”. AILA Review 11: 37–56.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 2008. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flowerdew, L. 2009. “Applying Corpus Linguistics to Pedagogy: A Critical Evaluation”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14 (3): 393–417. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.14.3.05flo
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotos, S. S. 1994. “Integrating Grammar Instruction and Communicative Language Use through Grammar Consciousness-Raising Tasks”. TESOL Quarterly 28 (2): 323–51. doi: 10.2307/3587436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilquin, G. y S. Granger. 2010. “How Can Data-Driven Learning Be Used in Language Teaching?”. En The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, eds. A. O'Keeffe y M. McCarthy, 359–69. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• González Grueso, F. D. 2006. “Las colocaciones en la enseñanza del español de los negocios”. MarcoELE 2: 1–39. http://marcoele.com/descargas/2/gonzalez-colocaciones_espanol_negocios.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, E., y A. Lazaraton. 1991. The Research Manual: Design and Statistics for Applied Linguistics. Boston: Heinle y Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Hulstijn, J. 2001. “Intentional and Incidental Second Language Vocabulary Learning: A Reappraisal of Elaboration, Rehearsal and Automaticity”. En Cognition and Second Language Instruction, ed. P. Robinson, 258–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hulstijn, J. y B. Laufer. 2001. “Some Empirical Evidence for the Involvement Load Hypothesis in Vocabulary Acquisition”. Language Learning 51 (3): 539–58. doi: 10.1111/0023-8333.00164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, T. 1991. “Should You Be Persuaded: Two Examples of Data-Driven Learning. Classroom Concordancing”. ELR Journal 4: 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Koosha, M. y A. A. Jafarpour. 2006. “Data-Driven Learning and Teaching Collocation of Prepositions: The Case of Iranian EFL Adult Learners”. Asian EFL Journal 8 (4): 192–209.
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. 1988. Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. New York: Prentice-Hall International.
   Google Scholar
• Laufer, B. 2005. “Focus on Form in Second Language Vocabulary Learning”. EUROSLA Yearbook 5: 223–50. doi: 10.1075/eurosla.5.11lau
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M., J. McCarten y H. Sandiford. 2005. Touchstone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nagy, W. 2007. “Metalinguistic Awareness and Vocabulary-Comprehension Connection”. En Vocabulary Acquisition: Implications for Reading Comprehension, eds. R. K. Wagner, A. E. Muse y K. R. Tannenbaum, 52–77. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H. 2003. “L2 Vocabulary Learning from Context: Strategies, Knowledge Sources, and Their Relationship with Success in L2 Lexical Inferencing”. TESOL Quarterly 37 (4): 645–70. doi: 10.2307/3588216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P. 2007. “The Four Strands”. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 1: 1–12. doi: 10.2167/illt039.0
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P. 2013. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nica, V. 2012. “Los corpus discursivos orales como herramienta didáctica para los niveles iniciales”. Foro de Profesores de E/LE 8: 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Paz, Y. 2013. “Aplicación pedagógica de la lingüística de corpus a una clase de gramática avanzada de español como segunda lengua”. MarcoELE 16. http://marcoele.com/descargas/16/paz-corpus.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Plonsky, L. 2013. “Study Quality in SLA: An Assessment of Designs, Analyses, and Reporting Practices in Quantitative L2 Research”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35: 655–87. doi: 10.1017/S0272263113000399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plonsky, L. y S. Gass. 2011. “Quantitative Research Methods, Study Quality, and Outcomes: The Case of Interaction Research”. Language Learning 61 (2): 325–66. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00640.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plonsky, L. y L. Gurzynski-Weiss. 2014. “Research Methods”. En Manual of Language Acquisition, ed. C. Fäcke, 31–49. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Plonsky, L. y S. Loewen. 2013. “Focus on Form and Vocabulary Acquisition in the Spanish L2 Classroom”. Language, Interaction, and Acquisition 4 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1075/lia.4.1.01plo.
   Google Scholar
• Plonsky, L. y F. L. Oswald. 2014. “How Big is ‘Big’? Interpreting Effect Sizes in L2 Research”. Language Learning 64 (4): 878–912. doi:10.1111/lang.12079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, P., A. Mackey, S. Gass y R. Schmidt. 2012. “Attention and Awareness in Second Language Acquisition”. En The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, eds. S. Gass y A. Mackey, 247–67. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Römer, U. 2011. “Corpus Research Applications in Second Language Teaching”. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31: 205–25. doi:10.1017/S0267190511000055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz Yepes, G. y R. Krishnamurthy. 2010. “Corpus Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition: The Use of ACORN in the Teaching of Spanish Grammar”. Lebende Sprachen 55 (1): 108–22. doi:10.1515/les.2010.008.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez Rufat, A., y F. Jiménez Calderón. 2012. “Combinatoria léxica y corpus como input”. Language Design 14: 61–81.
   Google Scholar
• Sans Baulenas, N., E. Martín Peris y A. Garmendia Iglesias. 2011. Bitácora. Madrid: Difusión.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. W. 1990. “The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning”. Applied Linguistics 11 (2): 129–58. doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N. 2008. “Review Article: Instructed Second Language Vocabulary Learning”. Language Teaching Research 12 (3): 329–63. doi:10.1177/1362168808089921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secchi, D. 2014. “Los corpus discursivos orales como recurso didáctico: La oralidad a través del texto en contexto”. Foro de Profesores de E/LE 10: 241–50.
   Google Scholar
• Sidoti, R. 2011. “Las colocaciones en el aula de E/LE”. RedELE 21. http://www.mecd.gob.es/dctm/redele/Material-RedEle/Revista/2011_21/2011_redELE_21_07Sidoti.pdf?documentId=0901e72b80dcdfd9.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, H. y F. Boers. 2015. “Exercises on Collocations: A Comparison of Trial-and-Error and Exemplar-Guided Procedures”. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching 2 (2). doi:10.1080/23247797.2015.1104030.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, H. F. Boers, A. Housen, y J. Eyckmans. 2011. “Formulaic Sequences and L2 Oral Proficiency: Does the Type of Target Language Influence the Association?”. IRAL 49 (4): 321–43. doi:10.1515/iral.2011.017.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlin, R. S. y V. Villa. 1994. “Attention in Cognitive Science and Second Language Acquisition”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16 (2): 183–203. doi:10.1017/S0272263100012870.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, S. 2007. “The Effects of Repetition on Vocabulary Knowledge”. Applied Linguistics 28 (1): 46–65. doi:10.1093/applin/aml048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar