Development of a CFD model and procedure for flows through in-stream structures

References

• Abbe TB, Montgomery DR. 1996. Interaction of large woody debris, channel hydraulics and habitat formation in large rivers. Regul Rivers Res Manag. 12:201–221.
   Google Scholar
• Armfield S, Street R. 2002. An analysis and comparison of the time accuracy of fractional step methods for the Navier-Stokes equations on staggered grids. Int J Numer Methods Fluids. 38(3):255–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASCE. 2007. ASCE sedimentation manual. Sedimentation engineering: processes, measurements, modeling and practice. Marcelo Garcia editor. Reston, VA. ASCE Manual and Reports on Engineering Practice No.110.
   Google Scholar
• Behr M, Tezduyar TE. 1994. Finite-element solution strategies for large-scale simulations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 112:3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger RC, Stockstill RL. 1999. A finite-element system for flows. Proceedings of 1999 American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Water Resources Engineering Conference, Water Resources into the New Millennium, Past Accomplishments and New Challenges, Seattle.
   Google Scholar
• Bihs H, Ong M, Kamath A, Arntsen OA. 2013. A level set method based numerical wave tank for calculation of wave forces on horizontal and vertical cylinders. In Proceedings of Seventh National Conference on Computation Mechanics, Trondheim, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Reclamation and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2015. National large wood manual: assessment, planning, design, and maintenance of large wood in fluvial ecosystems: restoring process, function, and structure. 628 pages + Appendix. www.usbr.gov/pn/.
   Google Scholar
• Casulli V. 1997. Numerical simulation of three-dimensional free surface flow in isopycnal coordinates. Int J Numer Methods Fluids. 25:645–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casulli V. 1999. A semi-implicit finite difference method for non-hydrostatic, free-surface flows. Int J Numer Methods Fluids. 30:425–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casulli V, Stelling GS. 1998. Numerical simulation of 3D quasi-hydrostatic, free-surface flows. J Hydraul Eng. 124(7):678–686.
   Google Scholar
• Cokljat D, Younis BA. 1995. Second-order closure study of open-channel flows. J Hydraul Eng. 121(2):94–107.
   Google Scholar
• Demuren AO. 1993. A numerical model for flow in meandering channels with natural bed topography. Water Resour Res. 19(4):1269–1277.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton BC, Hassan MA, Davidson SL. 2012. Modeling wood dynamics, jam formation, and sediment storage in a gravel-bed stream. J Geophys Res. 117:F00A05. DOI:10.1029/2012JF002385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fringer OB, Gerritsen M, Street RL. 2006. An unstructured-grid, finite-volume, nonhydrostatic, parallel coastal ocean simulator. Ocean Model. 14(3–4):139–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goring DG, Nikora VI. 2002. Despiking acoustic Doppler velocimeter data. J Hydraul Eng. 128(1):117–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Z, Wu W, Shields FD. 2009. Numerical analysis of effects of large wood structures on channel morphology and fish habitat suitability in a southern US sandy creek. Ecohydrol. DOI:10.1002/eco.60. Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang JC, Weber LJ. 1998. Numerical simulation of the forebay of lower granite lock and dam. Hydro Vision 98, Reno, Nev, July.
   Google Scholar
• Issa RI. 1986. Solution of the implicitly discretized fluid flow equations by operator-splitting. J Comp Phy. 62(1):40–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia Y. 2013. Technical manual of CCHE3D version 1.1. National Center for Computational Hydroscience and Engineering, The University of Mississippi University, MS 38677. NCCHE-TR-01-2013.
   Google Scholar
• Jones KK, Dunn K, Jacobsen PS, Strickland M, Tennant L, Tippery SE. 2014. Effectiveness of instream wood treatments to restore stream complexity and winter rearing habitat for Juvenile Coho Salmon. Trans Am Fish Soc. 143(2):334–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosronejad A, Kozarek JL, Sotiropoulos F. 2014. Simulation-based approach for stream restoration structure design: model development and validation. J. Hydraul. Eng. 140. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000904.
   Google Scholar
• Lai YG. 2008. SRH-2D theory and user’s manual version 2.0. Denver, CO: Technical Service Center, Bureau of Reclamation.
   Google Scholar
• Lai YG. 2010. Two-dimensional depth-averaged flow modelling with an unstructured hybrid mesh. J Hydraul Eng. 136(1):12–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai YG, Weber LJ, Patel VC. 2003. Nonhydrostatic three-dimensional method for hydraulic flow simulation. I: formulation and verification. J Hydraul Eng. 129(3):196–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai YG, Wu K. 2019. A three-dimensional flow and sediment transport model for free-surface open channel flows on unstructured flexible meshes. Fluids. 4:18. DOI:10.3390/fluids4010018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landsberg A, Chtchelkanova A, Lind C, Boris J, Young T. 1998. Fast3D user and programmer reference manual.
   Google Scholar
• Launder BE, Spalding DB. 1974. The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 3:269–289.
   Google Scholar
• Legates DR, McCabe G Jr. 1999. Evaluating the use of ‘goodness-of-fit’ measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resour Res. 35(1):233–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L’Hommedieu W, Tullos D, Jones J. 2020. Effects of an engineered log jam on spatial variability of the flow field across submergence depths. River Res Appl. 36:383–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahadevan A, Oliger J, Street R. 1996a. A nonhydrostatic mesoscale ocean model. Part I: well-posedness and scaling. J Phys Oceanogr. 26(9):1868–1880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahadevan A, Oliger J, Street R. 1996b. A nonhydrostatic mesoscale ocean model. Part II: numerical implementation. J Phys Oceanogr. 26(9):1881–1900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [NRCS] Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2007. Part 654, stream restoration design handbook, technical supplement 14J. The use of large woody materials for habitat and bank protection. TS14J1 – TS14J13. Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen N. 1994. SSIIM: a three-dimensional numerical model for simulation of water and sediment flow. HYDROSOFT 94, Porto Carras, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen N, Kjellesvig HM. 1998. Three dimensional numerical flow modeling for estimation of maximum local scour depth. J Hydraul Res. 36(4):579590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen N, Melaaen C. 1993. Three-dimensional calculation of scour around cylinders. J Hydraul Eng. 119(9):1048–1054.
   Google Scholar
• OpenFOAM. 2011. OpenFOAM user’s guide. OpenFOAM Foundation. http://www.openfoam.org/docs/user/, 2011–2014.
   Google Scholar
• Papanicolaou ANT, Elhakeem M, Krallis G, Prakash S, Edinger J. 2008. Sediment transport modeling review – current and future developments. J Hydraul Eng ASCE. 134(1):1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patankar SV. 1980. Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Pess GR, Liermann MC, McHenry ML, Peters RJ, Bennett TR. 2012. Juvenile Salmon response to the placement of engineered log jams (ELJs) in the Elwha river, Washington State, USA. River Res Appl. 28:872–881. DOI:10.1002/rra.1481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope SB. 2000. Turbulent flows. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhie CM, Chow WL. 1983. Numerical study of the turbulent flow past an airfoil with trailing edge separation. AIAA J. 21(11):1526–1532.
   Google Scholar
• Shields FD, Coulton KG, Nepf H. 2017. Representation of vegetation in two-dimensional hydrodynamic models. J Hydraul Eng ASCE. 143(8):02517002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sixta M, Ubing C. 2019. Representation of large wood structures using a numerical two-dimensional model. Technical Service Center, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Technical Report ENV-2019-085.
   Google Scholar
• Smith DL, Allen JB, Eslinger O, Valenciano M, Nestler J, Goodwin RA. 2010. Hydraulic modelling of large roughness elements with computational fluid dynamics for improved realism in stream restoration planning. Stream Restor Dyn Fluv Syst. 94:115–122.
   Google Scholar
• Sotiropoulos F, Patel VC. 1992. Flow in curved ducts of varying cross section. Iowa City: Iowa Institute of Hydraulic Research, The University of Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Ullmann S. 2008. Three-dimensional computation of non-hydrostatic free-surface flows [MS thesis]. Delft University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Wahl TL. 2000. Analyzing ADV data using WinADV. Proceedings of the 2000 Joint Conference on Water Resources Engineering and Water Resources Planning and Management. American Society of Civil Engineers, July 30–August 2, Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Wahl TL. 2003. Discussion of ‘despiking acoustic Doppler velocimeter data’ by Derek G. Goring and Vladimir I. Nikora. J Hydraul Eng. 129(6):484–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams R, Brasington J, Vericat D, Hicks DM, Labrosse F, Neal M. 2011. Monitoring braided river change using terrestrial laser scanning and optical bathymetric mapping. In: Smith MJ, Paron P, Griffiths JS, editors. Geomorphological mapping: methods and applications. Oxford: Elsevier; p. 507–532.
   Google Scholar
• Wu W, Rodi W, Wenka T. 2000. 3D numerical modeling of flow and sediment transport open channels. J Hydraul Eng. 126(1):4–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye J, McCorquodale JA. 1998. Simulation of curved open channel flows by 3D hydrodynamic model. J Hydraul Eng. 124(7):687–698.
   Google Scholar
• Yost S. 1995. Three-dimensional nonhydrostatic modeling of free surface flows and transport of cohesive sediment [PhD thesis]. Ann Arbor: Civil Engineering, University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng J, Constantinescu G, Weber L. 2005. A fully 3D nonhydrostatic model for prediction of flow, sediment transport and bed morphology in open channels. 31st International Association Hydraulic Research Congress, Seoul, Korea.
   Google Scholar