Discharge measurements field validation using remote-controlled boat with ADCP

References

• Boldt JA, Oberg KA. 2016. Validation of streamflow measurements made with M9 and RiverRay acoustic Doppler current profilers. J Hydraul Eng. 142:04015054. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001087.
   Google Scholar
• Brown J, Tuggle C, MacMahan J, Reniers A. 2011. The use of autonomous vehicles for spatially measuring mean velocity profiles in rivers and estuaries. Intel Serv Robotics. 4:233–244. doi:10.1007/s11370-011-0095-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Despax A, Le Coz J, Hauet A, Mueller DS, Engel FL, Blanquart B, Renard B, Oberg KA. 2019. Decomposition of uncertainty sources in acoustic Doppler current profiler streamflow measurements using repeated measures experiments. Water Resour Res. 55:7520–7540. doi:10.1029/2019WR025296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flener C, Wang Y, Laamanen L, Kasvi E, Vesakoski J-M, Alho P. 2015. Empirical modeling of spatial 3D flow characteristics using a remote-controlled ADCP system: monitoring a spring flood. Water (Switzerland). 7(1):217–247.
   Google Scholar
• Gamaro PEM. 2013. Medição de vazão em bacias hidrográficas brasileiras utilizando medidores acústicos Doppler – ADCP [Thesis (Ph.D. in Agricultural Engineering)]. Cascavel: Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná; p. 106.
   Google Scholar
• García CM, Tarrab L, Oberg K, Szupiany R, Cantero MI. 2012. Variance of discharge estimates sampled using acoustic Doppler current profilers from moving platforms. J Hydraul Eng. 138:684–694. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000558.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon RL. 1989. Acoustic measurement of river discharge. J Hydraul Eng. 115(7):925–936.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero M, Rüther N, Szupiany RN. 2012. Laboratory validation of acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) techniques for suspended sediment investigations. Flow Meas Instrum. 23(1):40–48. doi:10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2011.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunawan B, Neary VS, Hill C. 2017. Comparing fixed-vessel and moving-vessel ADCP measurements in a large laboratory flume. J Hydraul Eng. 143(5):06017001.1–06017001.11. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001272.
   Google Scholar
• Herschy RW. 2009. Streamflow measurement, 3rd ed. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis; p. 507.
   Google Scholar
• Huang H. 2018. Estimating bias limit of moving-boat ADCP streamflow measurements. J Hydraul Eng. 144(6):04018024.1–04018024.10. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001465.
   Google Scholar
• Jarque CM, Bera AK. 1987. A test for normality of observations and regression residuals. Int Stat Rev. 55(2):163–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klema MR, Pirzado AG, Venayagamoorthy SK, Gates TK. 2020. Analysis of acoustic Doppler current profiler mean velocity measurements in shallow flows. Flow Meas Instrum. 74; p. 101755. doi:10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2020.101755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee K, Ho H-C, Muste M, Wu C-H. 2014. Uncertainty in open channel discharge measurements acquired with StreamPro ADCP. J Hydrol. 509:101–114. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilliefors HW. 1967. On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown. J Am Stat Assoc. 62(318):399–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey FJ. 1951. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit. J Am Stat Assoc. 46(253):68–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morlock SE. 1996. Evaluation of acoustic Doppler current profiler measurements of river discharge. Indianapolis: USGS.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller DS. 2018. Assessment of acoustic Doppler current profiler heading errors on water velocity and discharge measurements. Flow Meas Instrum. 64:224–233. doi:10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2018.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller DS, Wagner CR, Rehmel MS, Oberg KA, Rainville F. 2013. Measuring discharge with acoustic Doppler current profilers from a moving boat (v. 2.0, December 2013). U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods Book 3, Chapter A22, USGS, Reston (VA), 95 p.
   Google Scholar
• Muste M, Yu K, Spasojevic M. 2004. Practical aspects of ADCP data use for quantification of mean river flow characteristics; Part I: moving-vessel measurements. Flow Meas Instrum. 15:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberg KA, Mueller DS. 2007. Validation of streamflow measurements made with acoustic Doppler current profilers. J Hydraul Eng. 133:1421–1432. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:12(1421).
   Google Scholar
• Ott RL, Longnecker M. 2001. An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis. 5th ed. Pacific Grove (CA): Duxbury: Thomson Learning; p. 1152.
   Google Scholar
• Shih HH, Payton C, Sprenkle J, Mero T. 2000. Towing basin speed calibration of acoustic Doppler current profiling instruments. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Services, Silver Spring (MD); p. 10. doi:10.1061/40517(2000)317.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson MR. 2001. Discharge measurements using a broad-band acoustic Doppler current profiler, 1st ed. Sacramento: USGS; p. 123.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson MR, Oltmann RN. 1993. Discharge-measurement system using an acoustic Doppler current profiler with applications to large rivers and estuaries, 1st ed. Washington (DC): United States Government Printing Office; p. 32.
   Google Scholar
• SonTek. 2000. Acoustic Doppler Profiler (ADP) principles of operation. San Diego: SonTek/YSI; p. 28.
   Google Scholar
• SonTek. 2017. RiverSurveyor S5/M9 system manual firmware version 4.02. San Diego: SonTek/YSI; p. 232.
   Google Scholar
• Szupiany RN, Amsler ML, Best JL, Parsons DR. 2007. Comparison of fixed- and moving-vessel flow measurements with an aDp in a large river. J Hydraul Eng. 133:1299–1309. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:12(1299).
   Google Scholar
• Teledyne RD Instruments. 2011. Acoustic Doppler current profiler: principles of operation – a practical primer. Poway: TRDI; p. 56
   Google Scholar
• Triola MF. 1999. Introdução à Estatística, 7th ed (portuguese version). Rio de Janeiro: Livros Técnicos e Científicos; p. 410.
   Google Scholar
• USGS. 2022. United States Geological Survey Hydroacoustics Web pages. Access date: July 11th 2022. https://hydroacoustics.usgs.gov/movingboat/m9s5.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Yorke TM, Oberg KA. 2002. Measuring river velocity and discharge with acoustic Doppler profilers. Flow Meas Instrum. 13(5–6):191–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar