Sustainable transport in neighbourhoods: effect of accessibility on walking and bicycling

References

• ABS. 2011. Australian Bureau of Statistics [Online]. www.abs.gov.au/.
   Google Scholar
• Aho, K., D. Derryberry, and T. Peterson. 2014. “Model Selection for Ecologists: The Worldviews of AIC and BIC.” Ecology 95: 631–636. doi: 10.1890/13-1452.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andren, T., L. Flood, J. Hansen, D. Popa, and A. Tasiran. 1999. Introduction to SAS. Department of Economics, School of Economics and Commercial Law, Gothenburg University.
   Google Scholar
• AUSTROADS. 2011. Application of accessibility measures, AP-R397-11. In: AUTHORITIES, A. O. A. A. N. Z. R. T. A. T. (Ed.). Sydney, NSW: Austroads.
   Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L., and F. Le Clercq. 2003. “Urban Development Without More Mobility by Car? Lessons from Amsterdam, a Multimodal Urban Region.” Environment and Planning A 35: 575–589. doi: 10.1068/a3592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L., F. Le Clercq, and L. Kapoen. 2005. “Sustainable Accessibility: a Conceptual Framework to Integrate Transport and Land use Plan-Making. Two Test-Applications in the Netherlands and a Reflection on the way Forward.” Transport Policy 12: 207–220. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boisbunon, A., S. Canu, D. Fourdrinier, W. Strawderman, and M. T. Wells. 2014. “Akaike’s Information Criterion, CP and Estimators of Loss for Elliptically Symmetric Distributions.” International Statistical Review 82: 422–439. doi: 10.1111/insr.12052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, C. A., and L. Pickle. 2002. “Evaluation of Methods for Classifying Epidemiological Data on Choropleth Maps in Series.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92: 662–681. doi: 10.1111/1467-8306.00310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brömmelstroet, M. 2010. “Equip the Warrior Instead of Manning the Equipment: Land Use and Transport Planning Support in the Netherlands.” Journal of Transport and Land Use 3: 25–41.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, X., S. L. Handy, and P. L. Mokhtarian. 2006. “The Influences of the Built Environment and Residential Self-Selection on Pedestrian Behavior: Evidence From Austin, TX.” Transportation 33: 1–20. doi: 10.1007/s11116-005-7027-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, X., P. L. Mokhtarian, and S. L. Handy. 2009. “Examining the Impacts of Residential Self-Selection on Travel Behaviour: A Focus on Empirical Findings.” Transport Reviews 29: 359–395. doi: 10.1080/01441640802539195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerin, E., E. Leslie, L. D. Toit, N. Owen, and L. D. Frank. 2007. “Destinations That Matter: Associations with Walking for Transport.” Health & Place 13: 713–724. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakhtoura, C., and D. Pojani. 2016. “Indicator-based Evaluation of Sustainable Transport Plans: A Framework for Paris and Other Large Cities.” Transport Policy 50: 15–28. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawla, N. V., K. W. Bowyer, L. O. Hall, and W. P. Kegelmeyer. 2002. “SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique.” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 16: 321–357. doi: 10.1613/jair.953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, R., M. Burke, E. Leslie, M. Donald, and N. Owen. 2010. “Perceptions of Representatives of Public, Private, and Community Sector Institutions of the Barriers and Enablers for Physically Active Transport.” Transport Policy 17: 496–504. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coruh, E., A. Bilgic, and A. Tortum. 2015. “Accident Analysis with Aggregated Data: The Random Parameters Negative Binomial Panel Count Data Model.” Analytic Methods in Accident Research 7: 37–49. doi: 10.1016/j.amar.2015.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couclelis, H. 2000. “From Sustainable Transportation to Sustainable Accessibility: Can We Avoid a New Tragedy of the Commons?” In Information, Place, and Cyberspace. Advances in Spatial Science, edited by D. G. Janelle and D. C. Hodge, 341–356. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cubukcu, E. 2013. “Walking for Sustainable Living.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 85: 33–42. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.335
   Google Scholar
• Dalvi, M. Q., and K. Martin. 1976. “The Measurement of Accessibility: Some Preliminary Results.” Transportation 5: 17–42. doi: 10.1007/BF00165245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, M. J., E. Winkler, T. Sugiyama, E. Cerin, L. Dutoit, E. Leslie, and N. Owen. 2010. “Relationships of Land Use Mix with Walking for Transport: Do Land Uses and Geographical Scale Matter?” Journal of Urban Health 87: 782–795. doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9488-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eizaguirre-Iribar, A., L. E. Igiñiz, and R. J. Hernández-Minguillón. 2016. “A Multilevel Approach of non-Motorised Accessibility in Disused Railway Systems: The Case-Study of the Vasco-Navarro Railway.” Journal of Transport Geography 57: 35–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ermagun, A., and A. Samimi. 2015. “Promoting Active Transportation Modes in School Trips.” Transport Policy 37: 203–211. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espada, I., P. Bennett, D. Green, and D. Hatch. 2015. Development of the accessibility-based network operations planning framework.
   Google Scholar
• Espada, I., and J. Luk. 2011. Application of accessibility measures.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., and R. Cervero. 2010. “Travel and the Built Environment.” Journal of the American Planning Association 76: 265–294. doi: 10.1080/01944361003766766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., G. Meakins, S. Hamidi, and A. C. Nelson. 2014. “Relationship between Urban Sprawl and Physical Activity, Obesity, and Morbidity – Update and Refinement.” Health & Place 26: 118–126. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.12.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, L. D., and G. Pivo. 1994. “Impacts of Mixed Use and Density on Utilization of Three Modes of Travel: Single-Occupant Vehicle, Transit, and Walking.” Transportation Research Record 1466: 44–52.
   Google Scholar
• Geurs, K. T., and B. Van Wee. 2004. “Accessibility Evaluation of Land-use and Transport Strategies: Review and Research Directions.” Journal of Transport Geography 12: 127–140. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, R., and R. Tolley. 2003. The Decline of Everyday Walking in the UK: Explanations and Policy Implications. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Grengs, J., J. Levine, Q. Shen, and Q. Shen. 2010. “Intermetropolitan Comparison of Transportation Accessibility: Sorting Out Mobility and Proximity in San Francisco and Washington, D.C.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 29: 427–443. doi: 10.1177/0739456X10363278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallgrimsdottir, B., H. Wennberg, H. Svensson, and A. Ståhl. 2016. “Implementation of Accessibility Policy in Municipal Transport Planning – Progression and Regression in Sweden between 2004 and 2014.” Transport Policy 49: 196–205. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handy, S. L., and D. A. Niemeier. 1997. “Measuring Accessibility: an Exploration of Issues and Alternatives.” Environment and Planning A 29: 1175–1194. doi: 10.1068/a291175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, S. 2007. Akaike information criterion. Center for Research in Scientific Computation.
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, M., K. J. Krizek, and A. El-Geneidy. 2010. “Measuring non-Motorized Accessibility: Issues, Alternatives, and Execution.” Journal of Transport Geography 18: 133–140. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun, M.-J., J. I. Kim, J. H. Kwon, and J.-E. Jeong. 2012. The effects of high-density suburban development on commuter mode choices in Seoul, Korea. Cities.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., S. Park, and J. S. Lee. 2014. “Meso- or Micro-Scale? Environmental Factors Influencing Pedestrian Satisfaction.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 30: 10–20. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitamura, R., P. L. Mokhtarian, and L. Laidet. 1997. “A Micro-Analysis of Land use and Travel in Five Neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area.” Transportation 24: 125–158. doi: 10.1023/A:1017959825565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knaap, G.-J., Y. Song, and Z. Nedovic-Budic. 2007. “Measuring Patterns of Urban Development: New Intelligence for the War on Sprawl.” Local Environment 12: 239–257. doi: 10.1080/13549830601183412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komanoff, C., and C. Roelofs. 1993. The Environmental Benefits of Bicycling and Walking. Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Krizek, K. J. 2003. “Residential Relocation and Changes in Urban Travel: Does Neighborhood-Scale Urban Form Matter?” Journal of the American Planning Association 69: 265–281. doi: 10.1080/01944360308978019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M.-S., and K. G. Goulias. 1997. Accessibility indicators for transportation planning using GIS.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J.-S., J. Nam, and S.-S. Lee. 2014. “Built Environment Impacts on Individual Mode Choice: An Empirical Study of the Houston-Galveston Metropolitan Area.” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 8: 447–470. doi: 10.1080/15568318.2012.716142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, T., and R. Church. 2010. “Mapping Transit-Based Access: Integrating GIS, Routes and Schedules.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 24: 283–304. doi: 10.1080/13658810902835404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, J., J. Grengs, Q. Shen, and Q. Shen. 2012. “Does Accessibility Require Density or Speed? A Comparison of Fast Versus Close in Getting Where you Want to go in US Metropolitan Regions.” Journal of the American Planning Association 78: 157–172. doi: 10.1080/01944363.2012.677119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, J., L. Merlin, and J. Grengs. 2017. “Project-level Accessibility Analysis for Land-use Planning.” Transport Policy 53: 107–119. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López, M. C. R., and Y. D. Wong. 2017. “Attitudes Towards Active Mobility in Singapore: a Qualitative Study.” Case Studies on Transport Policy 5: 662–670. doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2017.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamun, S. 2011. Public transit accessibility and need indices: Approaches for measuring service gap.
   Google Scholar
• Manaugh, K., and T. Kreider. 2013. “What is Mixed Use? Presenting an Interaction Method for Measuring Land Use Mix.” Journal of Transport and Land Use 6: 63–72. doi: 10.5198/jtlu.v6i1.291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayeres, I. 2000. “The Efficiency Effects of Transport Policies in the Presence of Externalities and Distortionary Taxes.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 34: 233–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccartney, G., B. Whyte, M. Livingston, and F. Crawford. 2012. “Building a Bridge, Transport Infrastructure and Population Characteristics: Explaining Active Travel Into Glasgow.” Transport Policy 21: 119–125. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercier, J., M. Carrier, F. Duarte, and F. Tremblay-Racicot. 2016. “Policy Tools for Sustainable Transport in Three Cities of the Americas: Seattle, Montreal and Curitiba.” Transport Policy 50: 95–105. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millward, H., J. Spinney, and D. Scott. 2013. “Active-transport Walking Behavior: Destinations, Durations, Distances.” Journal of Transport Geography 28: 101–110. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miralles-Guasch, C., and E. Domene. 2010. “Sustainable Transport Challenges in a Suburban University: The Case of the Autonomous University of Barcelona.” Transport Policy 17: 454–463. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse-Mcnabb, E. 2011. “The Victorian Land Use Information System (VLUIS): A new Method for Creating Land use Data for Victoria, Australia.” In Surveying and Spatial Sciences Conference, 155.
   Google Scholar
• Neter, J., M. H. Kutner, C. J. Nachtsheim, and W. Wasserman. 1996. Applied Linear Statistical Models. Chicago: Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., and R. Küller. 2000. “Travel Behaviour and Environmental Concern.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 5: 211–234. doi: 10.1016/S1361-9209(99)00034-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peiravian, F., S. Derrible, and F. Ijaz. 2014. “Development and Application of the Pedestrian Environment Index (PEI).” Journal of Transport Geography 39: 73–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.06.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posada, D., and T. R. Buckley. 2004. “Model Selection and Model Averaging in Phylogenetics: Advantages of Akaike Information Criterion and Bayesian Approaches Over Likelihood Ratio Tests.” Systematic Biology 53: 793–808. doi: 10.1080/10635150490522304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prud'homme, R., and J. P. Bocarejo. 2005. “The London Congestion Charge: A Tentative Economic Appraisal.” Transport Policy 12: 279–287. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall, T. A., and B. W. Baetz. 2001. “Evaluating Pedestrian Connectivity for Suburban Sustainability.” Journal of Urban Planning and Development 127: 1–15. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2001)127:1(1)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattan, A., A. Campese, and C. Eden. 2012. “Modeling Walkability.” Arc User Winter 2012: 30–33.
   Google Scholar
• Rendall, S., S. Page, F. Reitsma, E. Van Houten, and S. Krumdieck. 2011. “Quantifying Transport Energy Resilience: Active Mode Accessibility.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2242: 72–80. doi: 10.3141/2242-09
   Google Scholar
• Reyes, M., A. Páez, and C. Morency. 2014. “Walking Accessibility to Urban Parks by Children: A Case Study of Montreal.” Landscape and Urban Planning 125: 38–47. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saghapour, T., S. Moridpour, and R. Thompson. 2016. “Measuring Cycling Accessibility in Metropolitan Areas.” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 5: 381–394.
   Google Scholar
• Saghapour, T., S. Moridpour, and R. Thompson. 2017. “Measuring Walking Accessibility in Metropolitan Areas.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2661: 111–119. In press. doi: 10.3141/2661-13
   Google Scholar
• Silva, C., L. Bertolini, M. Te Brömmelstroet, D. Milakis, and E. Papa. 2017. “Accessibility Instruments in Planning Practice: Bridging the Implementation Gap.” Transport Policy 53: 135–145. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinnott, R., G. Galang, M. Tomko, and R. Stimson. 2011. Australian Urban Research Infrastructure Network.
   Google Scholar
• Song, Y., and G.-J. Knaap. 2004. “Measuring Urban Form: Is Portland Winning the war on Sprawl?” Journal of the American Planning Association 70: 210–225. doi: 10.1080/01944360408976371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Y., L. Merlin, and D. Rodriguez. 2013. “Comparing Measures of Urban Land Use Mix.” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 42: 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinney, J., and W.-I. Lin. 2018. “Are you Being Shared? Mobility, Data and Social Relations in Shanghai’s Public Bike Sharing 2.0 Sector.” Applied Mobilities 3: 66–83. doi: 10.1080/23800127.2018.1437656
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. Q. 1948. “Demographic Gravitation: Evidence and Applications.” Sociometry 11: 31–58. doi: 10.2307/2785468
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, B., and C. P. Wild. 2016. World cancer report 2014. World.
   Google Scholar
• Taniguchi, E., R. G. Thompson, and T. Yamada. 2014. “Concepts and Visions for Urban Transport and Logistics Relating to Human Security.” In Urban Transportation and Logistics: Health, Safety, and Security Concerns, Vol. 1, 1–30. ROUTLEDGE in association with GSE Research.
   Google Scholar
• TFL. 2010. Measuring public transport accessibility levels. In T. F. London (ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Tight, M., P. Timms, D. Banister, J. Bowmaker, J. Copas, A. Day, D. Drinkwater, M. Givoni, A. Gühnemann, and M. Lawler. 2011. “Visions for a Walking and Cycling Focussed Urban Transport System.” Journal of Transport Geography 19: 1580–1589. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transport, D. O. 2009. Victorian Integrated Survey of Travel and Activity [Online]. Vicoria, Australia. http://www5.transport.vic.gov.au/.
   Google Scholar
• Vale, D. S., M. Saraiva, and M. Pereira. 2016. “Active Accessibility: A Review of Operational Measures of Walking and Cycling Accessibility.” Journal of Transport and Land use 9: 209–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, D., Y. Chai, and F. Li. 2011. “Built Environment Diversities and Activity–Travel Behaviour Variations in Beijing, China.” Journal of Transport Geography 19: 1173–1186. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winters, M., M. Brauer, E. M. Setton, and K. Teschke. 2010. “Built Environment Influences on Healthy Transportation Choices: Bicycling Versus Driving.” Journal of Urban Health 87: 969–993. doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9509-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamaoka, K., T. Nakagawa, and T. Uno. 1978. “Application of Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) in the Evaluation of Linear Pharmacokinetic Equations.” Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 6: 165–175. doi: 10.1007/BF01117450
   PubMedGoogle Scholar