A discrete day-to-day link flow dynamic model considering travelers’ heterogeneous inertia patterns

References

• Balijepalli, N. C., and D. P. Watling. 2005. “Doubly Dynamic Equilibrium Distribution Approximation Model for Dynamic Traffic Assignment.” In Transportation and Traffic Theory. Flow, Dynamics and Human Interaction. 16th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory University of Maryland, College Park.
   Google Scholar
• Bertsekas, D. P. 1999. Nonlinear Programming, 2nd Printing. Belmont: Athena scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Bifulco, G. N., G. E. Cantarella, F. Simonelli, and P. Velonà. 2016. “Advanced Traveller Information Systems Under Recurrent Traffic Conditions: Network Equilibrium and Stability.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 92: 73–87. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2015.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bifulco, G. N., F. Simonelli, and R. Di Pace. 2009. “The Role of the Uncertainty in ATIS Applications.” In Applications of Soft Computing, edited by E. Avineri, M. Köppen, K. Dahal, Y. Sunitiyoso, and R. Roy, 230–239. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cantarella, G. E. 2013. “Day-to-day Dynamic Models for Intelligent Transportation Systems Design and Appraisal.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 29: 117–130. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2012.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantarella, G. E., and E. Cascetta. 1995. “Dynamic Process and Equilibrium in Transportation Networks: Towards a Unifying Theory.” Transportation Science 31: 107–128. doi: 10.1287/trsc.31.2.107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantarella, G. E., and D. P. Watling. 2016a. “Modelling Road Traffic Assignment as a day-to-day Dynamic, Deterministic Process: a Unified Approach to Discrete-and Continuous-Time Models.” EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics 5 (1): 69–98. doi: 10.1007/s13676-014-0073-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantarella, G. E., and D. P. Watling. 2016b. “A General Stochastic Process for day-to-day Dynamic Traffic Assignment: Formulation, Asymptotic Behaviour, and Stability Analysis.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 92: 3–21. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2016.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Q., Z. Liu, and W. Y. Szeto. 2019. “A Cell-Based Dynamic Congestion Pricing Scheme Considering Travel Distance and Time Delay.” Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics 7 (1): 1286–1304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chorus, C. G., and B. G. Dellaert. 2012. “Travel Choice Inertia: the Joint Role of Risk Aversion and Learning.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 46 (1): 139–155.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhury, C. F., and M. E. Ben-Akiva. 2013. “Modelling Driving Decisions: a Latent Plan Approach.” Transportmetrica A: Transport Science 9 (6): 546–566. doi: 10.1080/18128602.2011.632846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di, X., H. Liu, X. Ban, and J. Yu. 2015. “Submission to the DTA 2012 Special Issue: on the Stability of a Boundedly Rational day-to-day Dynamic.” Networks and Spatial Economics 15 (3): 537–557. doi: 10.1007/s11067-014-9233-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finan, M. B. 2017. “Lecture notes on elementary modern algebra.” Chapter 13.
   Google Scholar
• Friesz, T. L., D. Bernstein, N. J. Mehta, R. L. Tobin, and S. Ganjalizadeh. 1994. “Day-to-day Dynamic Network Disequilibria and Idealized Traveler Information Systems.” Operations Research 42 (6): 1120–1136. doi: 10.1287/opre.42.6.1120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, X., and H. X. Liu. 2011. “Bounded Rationality and Irreversible Network Change.” Transportation Research Part B 45 (10): 1606–1618. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2011.05.026
   Google Scholar
• Guo, R. Y., H. Yang, and H. J. Huang. 2013. “A Discrete Rational Adjustment Process of Link Flows in Traffic Networks.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 34: 121–137. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2013.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, R. Y., H. Yang, H. J. Huang, and Z. Tan. 2015. “Link-based day-to-day Network Traffic Dynamics and Equilibria.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 71: 248–260. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2014.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, L., and L. Du. 2012. “On a Link-Based day-to-day Traffic Assignment Model.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 46 (1): 72–84. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2011.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, L., H. Sun, J. Wu, and C. Zhu. 2011. ““Day-to-day Evolution of the Traffic Network with Advanced Traveler Information System.” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 44 (10): 914–919. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2011.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, X., X. Guo, and H. X. Liu. 2010. “A Link-Based day-to-day Traffic Assignment Model.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 44 (4): 597–608. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2009.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, X., and H. X. Liu. 2012. “Modeling the day-to-day Traffic Evolution Process After an Unexpected Network Disruption.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 46 (1): 50–71. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2011.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hearn, D. W., and M. V. Ramana. 1998. Solving Congestion Toll Pricing Models. In Equilibrium and Advanced Transportation Modelling (pp. 109-124). Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, J. L. 1984. “The Stability of Stochastic Equilibrium in a Two Link Transportation Network.” Transportation Research 8B: 13–28. doi: 10.1016/0191-2615(84)90003-1
   Google Scholar
• Liu, W., X. Li, F. Zhang, and H. Yang. 2017a. “Interactive Travel Choices and Traffic Forecast in a Doubly Dynamical System with User Inertia and Information Provision.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 85: 711–731. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2017.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., S. Wang, B. Zhou, and Q. Cheng. 2017b. “Robust Optimization of Distance-Based Tolls in a Network Considering Stochastic day to day Dynamics.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 79: 58–72. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2017.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, H. K., and W. Y. Szeto. 2004. “Modeling Advanced Traveler Information Services: Static Versus Dynamic Paradigms.” Transportation Research Part B 38 (6): 495–515. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2003.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Nagurney, A. 2000. “A Multiclass, Multicriteria Traffic Network Equilibrium Model.” Mathematical and Computer Modelling 32 (3-4): 393–411. doi: 10.1016/S0895-7177(00)00142-4
   Google Scholar
• Patriksson, M. 1998. “Decomposition Methods for Differentiable Optimization Problems Over Cartesian Product Sets.” Computational Optimization and Applications 9 (1): 5–42. doi: 10.1023/A:1018358602892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockafellar, R. T. 1976. “Monotone Operators and the Proximal Point Algorithm.” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 14 (5): 877–898. doi: 10.1137/0314056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandholm, W. H. 2001. “Potential Games with Continuous Player Sets.” Journal of Economic Theory 97 (1): 81–108. doi: 10.1006/jeth.2000.2696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang, W., K. Han, W. Ochieng, and P. Angeloudis. 2017. “Agent-based day-to-day Traffic Network Model with Information Percolation.” Transportmetrica A: Transport Science 13 (1): 38–66. doi: 10.1080/23249935.2016.1209254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. J. 1983. “The Existence and Calculation of Traffic Equilibria.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 17 (4): 291–301. doi: 10.1016/0191-2615(83)90047-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. J. 1984. “The Stability of a Dynamic Model of Traffic Assignment – an Application of a Method of Lyapunov.” Transportation Science 18 (3): 259–304. doi: 10.1287/trsc.18.3.245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M., M. L. Hazelton, H. K. Lo, G. E. Cantarella, and D. P. Watling. 2014. “The Long Term Behaviour of day-to-day Traffic Assignment Models.” Transportmetrica A: Transport Science 10 (7): 647–660. doi: 10.1080/18128602.2012.751683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M., and R. Mounce. 2011. “A Splitting Rate Model of Traffic re-Routing and Traffic Control.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 45 (9): 1389–1409. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2011.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. J., and D. P. Watling. 2016. “A Route-Swapping Dynamical System and Lyapunov Function for Stochastic User Equilibrium.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 85: 132–141. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2015.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, C., L. Cheng, S. Zhu, F. Han, and Z. Chu. 2019. “Multi-criteria User Equilibrium Model Considering Travel Time, Travel Time Reliability and Distance.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 66: 3–12. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, P. 1991. “Decomposition Algorithm for Convex Differentiable Minimization.” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 70 (1): 109–135. doi: 10.1007/BF00940507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling, D. P., and G. E. Cantarella. 2013. “Modelling Sources of Variation in Transportation Systems: Theoretical Foundations of day-to-day Dynamic Models.” Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics 1 (1): 3–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling, D. P., and G. E. Cantarella. 2015. “Model Representation & Decision-Making in an Ever-Changing World: the Role of Stochastic Process Models of Transportation Systems.” Networks and Spatial Economics 15 (3): 843–882. doi: 10.1007/s11067-013-9198-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling, D., and M. L. Hazelton. 2003. “The Dynamics and Equilibria of day-to-day Assignment Models.” Networks and Spatial Economics 3 (3): 349–370. doi: 10.1023/A:1025398302560
   Google Scholar
• Watling, D. P., and M. L. Hazelton. 2018. “Asymptotic Approximations of Transient Behaviour for day-to-day Traffic Models.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 118: 90–105. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2018.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., H. Sun, D. Z. W. Wang, M. Zhong, L. Han, and Z. Gao. 2013. “Bounded-rationality Based day-to-day Evolution Model for Travel Behavior Analysis of Urban Railway Network.” Transportation Research Part C 31: 73–82. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2013.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, F., H. Yang, and H. Ye. 2016. “Physics of day-to-day Network Flow Dynamics.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 86: 86–103. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2016.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, C., and Z. Liu. 2014. “On the Stochastic Network Equilibrium with Heterogeneous Choice Inertia.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 66: 90–109. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2014.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, F., and H. X. Liu. 2007. “A new modeling framework for travelers’ day-to-day route choice adjustment processes.” In Transportation and Traffic Theory 2007. Papers Selected for Presentation at ISTTT17 Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (Great Britain) Rees Jeffreys Road FundTransport Research Foundation TMS ConsultancyOve Arup and Partners, Hong Kong Transportation Planning (International) PTV AG.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, F., and D. Zhang. 2009. “Day-to-day Stationary Link Flow Pattern.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 43 (1): 119–126. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2008.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, H., and H. Yang. 2017. “Rational Behavior Adjustment Process with Boundedly Rational User Equilibrium.” Transportation Science 51 (3): 968–980. doi: 10.1287/trsc.2016.0715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., Z. He, W. Guan, and G. Qi. 2018. “Day-to-Day Rerouting Modeling and Analysis with Absolute and Relative Bounded Rationalities.” Transportmetrica A: Transport Science 14 (3): 256–273. doi: 10.1080/23249935.2017.1373713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, D., and A. Nagurney. 1996. “On the Local and Global Stability of a Travel Route Choice Adjustment Process.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 30 (4): 245–262. doi: 10.1016/0191-2615(95)00034-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., and H. Yang. 2015. “Modeling Route Choice Inertia in Network Equilibrium with Heterogeneous Prevailing Choice Sets.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 57: 42–54. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2015.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar