A bounded path size route choice model excluding unrealistic routes: formulation and estimation from a large-scale GPS study

References

• Abbe, E., M. Bierlaire, and T. Toledo. 2007. “Normalization and Correlation of Cross-Nested Logit Models.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 41 (7): 795–808.
   Google Scholar
• Bekhor, S., M. Ben-Akiva, and M. Ramming. 2002. “Adaptation of Logit Kernel to Route Choice Situation.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1805: 78–85.
   Google Scholar
• Bekhor, S., and J. Prashker. 1999. “Formulations of Extended Logit Stochastic User Equilibrium Assignments.” In Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, 351–372. Jerusalem: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bekhor, S., and J. Prashker. 2001. “Stochastic User Equilibrium Formulation for the Generalized Nested Logit Model.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1752: 84–90.
   Google Scholar
• Bekhor, S., T. Toledo, and J. Prashker. 2008. “Effects of Choice set Size and Route Choice Models on Path-Based Traffic Assignment.” Transportmetrica 4 (2): 117–133.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva, M., and M. Bierlaire. 1999. “Discrete Choice Methods and Their Applications to Short Term Travel Decisions.” In Handbook of Transportation Science, edited by R. W. Halled, 5–33. Boston: Kluwer Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva, M., and D. Bolduc. 1996. “Multinomial Probit with a Logit Kernel and a General Parametric Specification of the Covariance Structure.” Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva, M., and S. Ramming. 1998. “Lecture Notes: Discrete Choice Models of Traveler Behavior in Networks.” Prepared for Advanced Methods for Planning and Management of Transportation Networks. Capri.
   Google Scholar
• Bierlaire, M. 2002. “The Network GEV Model.” Conference paper STRC 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Bierlaire, M. 2006. “A Theoretical Analysis of the Cross-Nested Logit Model.” Annals of Operations Research 144: 287–300.
   Google Scholar
• Bliemer, M., and P. Bovy. 2008. “Impact of Route Choice Set on Route Choice Probabilities.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2076: 10–19.
   Google Scholar
• Bovy, P., S. Bekhor, and C. Prato. 2008. “The Factor of Revisited Path Size: Alternative Derivation.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2076: 132–140. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Bovy, P., and S. Fiorenzo-Catalano. 2007. “Stochastic Route Choice Set Generation: Behavioral and Probabilistic Foundations.” Transportmetrica 3: 173–189.
   Google Scholar
• Bunch, D. 1991. “Estimability in the Multinomial Probit Model.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 25: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Byrd, R., P. Lu, J. Nocedal, and C. Zhu. 1995. “A Limited Memory Algorithm for Bound Constrained Optimization.” J. Sci. Comput 16 (5): 1190–1208.
   Google Scholar
• Cantarella, G., and M. Binetti. 2002. “Stochastic Assignment with Gammit Path Choice Models.” In Transportation Planning: State of the Art, edited by M. Patriksson and M. Labbé’s, 53–68. Boston: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cascetta, E., A. Nuzzolo, F. Russo, and A. Vitetta. 1996. “A Modified Logit Route Choice Model Overcoming Path Overlapping Problems: Specification and Some Calibration Results for Interurban Networks.” In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, 697–711. Leon: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Chorus, C., T. Arentze, and H. Timmermans. 2008. “A Random Regret-Minimization Model of Travel Choice.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 42: 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, C. 1989. “A Paired Combinatorial Logit Model for Travel Demand Analysis.” In Proceedings of the Fifth World Conference on Transportation Research, Vol. 4, 295–309. Ventura, CA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Connors, R., S. Hess, and A. Daly. 2014. “Analytic Approximations for Computing Probit Choice Probabilities.” Transportmetrica A: Transport Science 10 (2): 119–139.
   Google Scholar
• Daganzo, C., and Y. Sheffi. 1977. “On Stochastic Models of Traffic Assignment.” Transportation Science 11: 253–274.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, A., and M. Bierlaire. 2006. “A General and Operational Representation of Generalised Extreme Value Models.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 40: 285–305.
   Google Scholar
• Dansie, B. 1985. “Parameter Estimability in the Multinomial Probit Model.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 19: 526–528.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, L., D. Watling, R. Connors, T. Rasmussen, and O. Nielsen. 2020. “Path Size Logit Route Choice Models: Issues with Current Models, a New Internally Consistent Approach, and Parameter Estimation on a Large-Scale Network with GPS Data.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 135: 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Gliebe, J., F. Koppleman, and A. Ziliaskopoulos. 1999. “Route Choice Using a Paired Combinatorial Logit Model.” Presented at the 78th Annual Meeting of the Transportation research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogendoorn-Lanser, S., R. van Nes, and P. Bovy. 2005. “Path Size and Overlap in Multi-Modal Transport Networks, a new Interpretation.” In Flow, Dynamics and Human Interaction, Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, edited by H. S. Mahmassani, 63–84. New York: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Isaacson, E., and H. Keller. 1966. Analysis of Numerical Methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, M. 1992. “A Note on Identification in the Multinomial Probit Model.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 10: 193–200.
   Google Scholar
• Kitthamkesorn, S., and A. Chen. 2013. “A Path-Size Weibit Stochastic User Equilibrium Model.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 57: 378–397.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, X., and M. Bierlaire. 2015. “Specification of the Cross-Nested Logit Model with Sampling of Alternatives for Route Choice Models.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 80: 220–234.
   Google Scholar
• Marzano, V., and A. Papola. 2008. “On the Covariance Structure of the Cross-Nested Logit Model.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 42 (2): 83–98.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, D., and K. Train. 2000. “Mixed MNL Models for Discrete Response.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 15 (5): 447–470.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, O. 2000. “A Stochastic Transit Assignment Model Considering Differences in Passengers Utility Functions.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 34 (5): 377–402. Elsevier Science Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Prashker, J., and S. Bekhor. 2004. “Route Choice Models Used in the Stochastic User Equilibrium Problem: a Review.” Transport Reviews 24 (4): 437–463.
   Google Scholar
• Prato, C. 2005. “Latent Factors and Route Choice Behaviour.” Ph.D. thesis, Polytechnic, Italy, Turin.
   Google Scholar
• Prato, C. 2014. “Expanding the Applicability of Random Regret Minimization for Route Choice Analysis.” Transportation 41: 351–375.
   Google Scholar
• Prato, C., and S. Bekhor. 2006. “Applying Branch-and-Bound Technique to Route Choice Set Generation.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1985: 19–28.
   Google Scholar
• Prato, C., T. Rasmussen, and O. Nielsen. 2014. “Estimating Value of Congestion and of Reliability from Observation of Route Choice Behavior of Car Drivers.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2412: 20–27.
   Google Scholar
• Pravinvongvuth, S., and A. Chen. 2005. “Adaptation of the Paired Combinatorial Logit Model to the Route Choice Problem.” Transportmetrica 1 (3): 223–240.
   Google Scholar
• Ramming, S. 2002. “Network Knowledge and Route Choice.” Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, T., O. Nielsen, D. Watling, and C. Prato. 2016. “The Restricted Stochastic User Equilibrium with Threshold model: Large-scale Application and Parameter Testing.” European Journal of Transport Infrastructure Research (EJTIR) 17 (1): 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, A. 2003. “Probit Based Methods in Traffic Assignment and Discrete Choice Modelling.” Unpublished PhD thesis, Napier University.
   Google Scholar
• Vovsha, P. 1997. “Application of Cross-Nested Logit Model to Mode Choice in Tel Aviv, Israel, Metropolitan Area.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1607: 6–15.
   Google Scholar
• Watling, D., T. Rasmussen, C. Prato, and O. Nielsen. 2018. “Stochastic User Equilibrium with a Bounded Choice Model.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 114: 254–280.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, C., and F. Koppelman. 2001. “The Generalized Nested Logit Model.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 35 (7): 627–641.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, X., A. Chen, S. Kitthamkesorn, H. Yang, and H. K. Lo. 2015. “Modeling Absolute and Relative Cost Differences in Stochastic User Equilibrium Problem.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 81: 686–703.
   Google Scholar