Analysis of a multiplicative hybrid route choice model in stochastic assignment paradox

References

• Acemoglu, D., A. Makhdoumi, A. Malekian, and A. Ozdaglar. 2018. “Informational Braess’ Paradox: The Effect of Information on Traffic Congestion.” Operations Research 66 (4): 893–917.
   Google Scholar
• Akamatsu, T. 2000. “A Dynamic Traffic Equilibrium Assignment Paradox.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 34 (6): 515–531.
   Google Scholar
• Arnott, R., A. De Palma, and R. Lindsey. 1993. “Properties of Dynamic Traffic Equilibrium Involving Bottlenecks, Including A Paradox and Metering.” Transportation Science 27 (2): 148–160.
   Google Scholar
• Bagloee, S. A., M. Sarvi, B. Wolshon, and V. Dixit. 2017. “Identifying Critical Disruption Scenarios and A Global Robustness Index Tailored to Real Life Road Networks.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 98: 60–81.
   Google Scholar
• Braess, D. 1968. “Über ein Paradoxon aus der Verkehrsplanung.” Unternehmensforschung 12 (1): 258–268.
   Google Scholar
• Braess, D., A. Nagurney, and T. Wakolbinger. 2005. “On A Paradox of Traffic Planning.” Transportation Science 39 (4): 446–450.
   Google Scholar
• Cantarella, G. E., G. Pavone, and A. Vitetta. 2006. “Heuristics for Urban Road Network Design: Lane Layout and Signal Settings.” European Journal of Operational Research 175 (3): 1682–1695.
   Google Scholar
• Cascetta, E., A. Nuzzolo, F. Russo, and A. Vitetta. 1996. “A Modified Logit Route Choice Model Overcoming Path Overlapping Problems. Specification and Some Calibration Results for Interurban Networks.” In Transportation and Traffic Theory. Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo, E., J. M. Menéndez, P. Jiménez, and A. Rivas. 2008. “Closed Form Expressions for Choice Probabilities in the Weibull Case.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 42 (4): 373–380.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, A., H. Lo, and H. Yang. 2001. “A Self-Adaptive Projection and Contraction Algorithm for the Traffic Assignment Problem with Path-Specific Costs.” European Journal of Operational Research 135 (1): 27–41.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, A., S. Pravinvongvuth, X. Xu, S. Ryu, and P. Chootinan. 2012. “Examining the Scaling Effect and Overlapping Problem in Logit-Based Stochastic User Equilibrium Models.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 46 (8): 1343–1358.
   Google Scholar
• Daganzo, C. F., and Y. Sheffi. 1977. “On Stochastic Models of Traffic Assignment.” Transportation Science 11 (3): 253–274.
   Google Scholar
• Di, X., X. He, X. Guo, and H. X. Liu. 2014. “Braess Paradox Under the Boundedly Rational User Equilibria.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 67: 86–108.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1962. “The law of Peak-Hour Expressway Congestion.” Traffic Quarterly 16 (3): 393–409.
   Google Scholar
• Du, M., H. Tan, and A. Chen. 2020. “A Faster Path-Based Algorithm with Barzilai-Borwein Step Size for Solving Stochastic Traffic Equilibrium Models.” European Journal of Operational Research 290: 982–999.
   Google Scholar
• Hallefjord, A., K. Jørnsten, and S. Storøy. 1994. “Traffic Equilibrium Paradoxes When Travel Demand is Elastic.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Operations Research 11 (1): 41–50.
   Google Scholar
• Han, D., H. K. Lo, J. Sun, and H. Yang. 2008. “The Toll Effect on Price of Anarchy When Costs are Nonlinear and Asymmetric.” European Journal of Operational Research 186 (1): 300–316.
   Google Scholar
• Henn, V., and M. Ottomanelli. 2006. “Handling Uncertainty in Route Choice Models: From Probabilistic to Possibilistic Approaches.” European Journal of Operational Research 175 (3): 1526–1538.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseininasab, S. M., S. N. Shetab-Boushehri, S. R. Hejazi, and H. Karimi. 2018. “A Multi-Objective Integrated Model for Selecting, Scheduling, and Budgeting Road Construction Projects.” European Journal of Operational Research 271 (1): 262–277.
   Google Scholar
• Kitahara, Y., and T. Hayakawa. 2019. “Analysis of Dynamic Traffic Demand on a Paradoxical Phenomenon and Reachability with Input Constraints.” In 2019 SICE International Symposium on Control Systems (SICE ISCS). IEEE, 65–71.
   Google Scholar
• Kitthamkesorn, S., and A. Chen. 2014. “Unconstrained Weibit Stochastic User Equilibrium Model with Extensions.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 59: 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, W. H., and H. K. Lo. 2009. “Investigating Braess’ Paradox with Time-Dependent Queues.” Transportation Science 43 (1): 117–126.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, P., X. Xu, A. Chen, C. Yang, and L. Xiao. 2017. “A Select Link Analysis Method Based on Logit–Weibit Hybrid Model.” Journal of Modern Transportation 25 (4): 205–217.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, C., Q. Cai, S. Alam, B. Sridhar, and V. N. Duong. 2019. “Airway Network Management Using Braess’s Paradox.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 105: 565–579.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, J., D. Li, L. Cheng, X. Lou, C. Sun, and W. Tang. 2018. “Link Restriction: Methods of Testing and Avoiding Braess Paradox in Networks Considering Traffic Demands.” Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems 144 (2): 04017076.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. 1978. “Modeling the Choice of Residential Location.” Transportation Research Record 673: 72–77.
   Google Scholar
• Nagurney, A. 2000. “Congested Urban Transportation Networks and Emission Paradoxes.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 5 (2): 145–151.
   Google Scholar
• Perederieieva, O., A. Raith, and M. Schmidt. 2018. “Non-additive Shortest Path in the Context of Traffic Assignment.” European Journal of Operational Research 268: 325–338.
   Google Scholar
• Prashker, J. N., and S. Bekhor. 2000. “Some Observations on Stochastic User Equilibrium and System Optimum of Traffic Assignment.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 34 (4): 277–291.
   Google Scholar
• Ryu, S., A. Chen, and K. Choi. 2017. “Solving the Combined Modal Split and Traffic Assignment Problem with Two Types of Transit Impedance Function.” European Journal of Operational Research 257 (3): 870–880.
   Google Scholar
• Sheffi, Y. 1985. Urban Transportation Networks. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Sheffi, Y., and C. F. Daganzo. 1978. “Another ‘Paradox’ of Traffic Flow.” Transportation Research 12 (1): 43–46.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, L., L. Liu, Z. Xu, Y. Jie, D. Wei, and P. Wang. 2015. “Locating Inefficient Links in a Large-Scale Transportation Network.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 419: 537–545.
   Google Scholar
• Szeto, W. Y. 2011. “Cooperative Game Approaches to Measuring Network Reliability Considering Paradoxes.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 19 (2): 229–241.
   Google Scholar
• Szeto, W. Y., and Y. Jiang. 2014. “Transit Assignment: Approach-Based Formulation, Extragradient Method, and Paradox.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 62: 51–76.
   Google Scholar
• Szeto, W. Y., X. Li, and M. O'Mahony. 2008. “Simultaneous Occurrence of the Braess and Emission Paradoxes.” Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Traffic and Transportation Studies, 625–634.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, J. M. 1977. Great Cities and Their Traffic. London: Victor Gollancz.
   Google Scholar
• Transportation Networks for Research Core Team. Transportation Networks for Research. Accessed May 16, 2018. https://github.com/bstabler/TransportationNetworks.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, G., Z. Gao, and M. Xu. 2019. “Integrating Link-Based Discrete Credit Charging Scheme into Discrete Network Design Problem.” European Journal of Operational Research 272 (1): 176–187.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., and W. Y. Szeto. 2017. “Excessive Noise Paradoxes in Urban Transportation Networks.” Transportmetrica A: Transport Science 13 (3): 195–221.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W. W., D. Z. Wang, F. Zhang, H. Sun, W. Zhang, and J. Wu. 2017. “Overcoming the Downs-Thomson Paradox by Transit Subsidy Policies.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 95: 126–147.
   Google Scholar
• Wardrop, J. G. 1952. “Some Theoretical Aspects of Road Traffic Research.” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers 1 (3): 325–362.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, M., A. Chen, and Z. Gao. 2008. “An Improved Origin-Based Algorithm for Solving the Combined Distribution and Assignment Problem.” European Journal of Operational Research 188 (2): 354–369.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, X., A. Chen, S. Kitthamkesorn, H. Yang, and H. K. Lo. 2015. “Modeling Absolute and Relative Cost Differences in Stochastic User Equilibrium Problem.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 81: 686–703.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, H. 1997. “Sensitivity Analysis for the Elastic-Demand Network Equilibrium Problem with Applications.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 31 (1): 55–70.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, H., and M. G. Bell. 1998. “A Capacity Paradox in Network Design and How to Avoid It.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 32 (7): 539–545.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C., and A. Chen. 2009. “Sensitivity Analysis of the Combined Travel Demand Model with Applications.” European Journal of Operational Research 198 (3): 909–921.
   Google Scholar
• Yao, J., and A. Chen. 2014. “An Analysis of Logit and Weibit Route Choices in Stochastic Assignment Paradox.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 69: 31–49.
   Google Scholar
• Yao, J., Z. Cheng, J. Dai, A. Chen, and S. An. 2019a. “Traffic Assignment Paradox Incorporating Congestion and Stochastic Perceived Error Simultaneously.” Transportmetrica A: Transport Science 15 (2): 307–325.
   Google Scholar
• Yao, J., W. Huang, A. Chen, Z. Cheng, S. An, and G. Xu. 2019b. “Paradox Links can Improve System Efficiency: An Illustration in Traffic Assignment Problem.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 129: 35–49.
   Google Scholar
• Yao, J., F. Shi, S. An, and J. Wang. 2015. “Evaluation of Exclusive bus Lanes in A bi-Modal Degradable Road Network.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 60: 36–51.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, Q., D. Fang, and W. Du. 2014. “Solving the Logit-Based Stochastic User Equilibrium Problem with Elastic Demand Based on the Extended Traffic Network Model.” European Journal of Operational Research 239: 112–118.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., W. H. Lam, and H. J. Huang. 2008. “Braess’s Paradoxes in Dynamic Traffic Assignment with Simultaneous Departure Time and Route Choices.” Transportmetrica 4 (3): 209–225.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, C., B. Fu, and T. Wang. 2014. “Braess Paradox and Robustness of Traffic Networks Under Stochastic User Equilibrium.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 61: 135–141.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Z., A. Chen, and S. Bekhor. 2012. “C-logit Stochastic User Equilibrium Model: Formulations and Solution Algorithm.” Transportmetrica 8 (1): 17–41.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Z., A. Chen, and S. Wong. 2009. “Alternative Formulations of A Combined Trip Generation, Trip Distribution, Modal Split, and Trip Assignment Model.” European Journal of Operational Research 198: 129–138.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, B., X. Li, and J. He. 2014. “Exploring Trust Region Method for the Solution of Logit-Based Stochastic User Equilibrium Problems.” European Journal of Operational Research 239: 46–57.
   Google Scholar