Slowing the nanotechnology treadmill: impact science versus production science for sustainable technological development

References

• Anderson, N. 2015. “Universities fear the federal research funding pipeline is withering.” Washington Post, February 25. Accessed April 11, 2015. http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/grade-point/wp/2015/02/25/universities-fear-the-federal-research-funding-pipeline-is-withering/.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 1992. The Risk Society. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beder, S. 1997. Global Spin: The Corporate Assault on Environmentalism. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
   Google Scholar
• Bhabra, G., A. Sood, B. Fisher, L. Cartwright, M. Saunders, W. H. Evans, A. Suprenant, et al. 2009. “Nanoparticles Can Cause DNA Damage Across A Cellular Barrier.” Nature Nanotechnology 4: 876–883. doi:10.1038/nnano.2009.313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boadi, K. 2014. “Erosion of funding for the National Institutes of Health Threatens U.S. Leadership in Biomedical Research.” Center for American Progress, March 25. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/economy/report/2014/03/25/86369/erosion-of-funding-for-the-national-institutes-of-health-threatens-u-s-leadership-in-biomedical-research/.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, D. M., and G. A. Hodge. 2012. “Nanotechnology and Global Regulation.” In Nanotechnology and Global Sustainability, edited by D. Maclurcan and N. Radywyl, 261–280. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P. 2007. Toxic Exposures: Contested Illnesses and the Environmental Health Movement. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., and E. J. Mikkelsen. 1997. No Safe Place: Toxic Waste, Leukemia and Community Action. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. H. 1993. “Modern Science: Institutionalization of Knowledge and Rationalization of Power.” The Sociological Quarterly 34: 153–168. doi:10.1111/tsq.1993.34.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, L., J. Burkhardt, and W. B. Lacy. 1992. Plants, Power, and Profit: Social, Economic and Ethical Consequences of the New Biotechnologies. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun, C. 2006. “Is the University in Crisis?” Society 43(4): 8–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, R. 1962. Silent Spring. 40th Anniversary Special Edition, 2002, Boston, MA: Mariner Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cientifica. 2009. “Nanotechnology Takes a Deep Breath… And Prepares to Save the World! Global Nanotechnology Funding in 2009.” Accessed July 28, 11. http://cientifica.eu/blog/white-papers/nanotechnologies-in-2009/.
   Google Scholar
• Cientifica. 2011. “Global Nanotechnology Funding 2011.” Accessed September 30, 13. http://www.cientifica.com/research/white-papers/global-nanotechnology-funding-2011/.
   Google Scholar
• Colman, B. P., C. L. Arnaout, C. K. Sarah Anciaux, M. F. Gunsch, B. K. Hochella, G. V. Lowry, B. M. McGill, et al. 2013. “Low Concentrations of Silver Nanoparticles in Biosolids Cause Adverse Ecosystem Responses under Realistic Field Scenario.” PLoS ONE 8 (2): e57189. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drexler, K. E. 2013. Radical Abundance: How a Revolution in Nanotechnology Will Change Civilization. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Electronics.ca Research Network. 2011. “Global Funding of Nanotechnologies 2011.” Accessed September 30, 13. http://www.electronics.ca/presscenter/articles/1542/1/Annual-Global-Nanotechnology-Research-Funding-Running-at-10-Billion-Per-Year/Page1.html.
   Google Scholar
• Foladori, G., and N. Invernizzi. 2005. “Nanotechnology in Its Socio-Economic Context.” Science Studies 18 (2): 67–73.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, E. “Expert Knowledge, Public Participation and Reflexivity in Social-Ecological Conflicts: Do These Three Really Always Go Together?” In Experts and Campaigners: Scientific Information and Collective Action in Socio-Ecological Conflicts, edited by M. Martínez-Iglesias, 49–70. Valencia: Publicacions de la Universitat de Valencia.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, K. A. 1994. “Legitimacy and Growth in the Balance: The Role of the State in Environmental Remediation.” Industrial and Environmental Crisis Quarterly 8: 237–256.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, K. A., D. N. Pellow, and A. Schnaiberg. 2008. The Treadmill of Production: Injustice and Unsustainability in a Global Economy. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, K. A. 2005. “Os Deuses de Coisas Pequenas: O Poder Insitutional da Nanotecnoloia e a Dinamica.” In Nanotecnologia, Sociedade e Meio Ambiente, editor by P. R. Martins, 244–255. São Paulo: Associação Editorial Humanitas.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, K. A. 2006. “Promoting Sustainability.” In Public Sociologies Reader, edited by J. Blau and K. E. Iyall Smith, 213–230. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, K. A. 2014. “Unsustainable Science in the Treadmill of Production: The Declining Salience of Impact Science in Environmental Conflicts in the U.S.” In Experts and Campaigners: Scientific Information and Collective Action in Socio-Ecological Conflicts, edited by M. Martínez-Iglesias, 35–48. Valencia: Publicacions de la Universitat de Valencia.
   Google Scholar
• Hadlington, S. 2013. “Nanotech Patent Jungle Set To Become Denser in 2013.” Chemistry World January 17. Accessed January 31, 14. http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/2013/01/nanotechnology-patent-thicket-jungle-graphene-nanotubes.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. J., and A. Lamprou. 2012. “Nanotechnology and the Environment.” In Nanotechnology and Global Sustainability, edited by D. Maclurcan and N. Radywyl, 21–44. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, S., and K. J. Wetter. 2012. “Nanotechnology and Geopolitics: There’s Plenty of Room at the Top.” In Nanotechnology and Global Sustainability, edited by D. Maclurcan and N. Radywyl, 69–116. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, K. 2009. “Nanoparticples Used in Common Household Items Cause Genetic Damage in Mice” UCLA Newsroom. Accessed January 30, 14. http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/nanoparticles-used-in-common-househould-112679.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. W., and C. O. Jackson. 1981. City Behind a Fence: Oak Ridge, Tennessee 1942-1946. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, C. C., I. N. Kaiser, and V. C. Moore. 2012. “Nanotechnology Patent Survey: Who Will Be The Leaders in the Fifth Technology Revolution?” Nanotechnology Law and Business Fall 9 (2): 122–132.
   Google Scholar
• Juyoung, K., ed. 2012. Advances in Nanotechnology and the Environment. Singapore: Pan Stanford Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kloppenburg Jr., J. K. 2005. First the Seed: The Political Economy of Plant Biotechnology. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krimsky, S. 1982. Genetic Alchemy: The Social History of the Recombinant DNA Controversy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krimsky, S. 2006. “Autonomy, Disinterest, and Entrepreneurial Science.” Society 43 (4): 22–29. doi:10.1007/BF02687531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll-Smith, S., and H. H. Floyd. 1997. Bodies in Protest: Environmental Illness and the Struggle Over Medical Knowledge. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzweil, R. 2005. The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. New York: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, T. L. 2011. “The Effects of Transnational Environmentalism on Domestic Environmental Coalitions: Thick Conservation Networks and Thin Pollution Networks in Ecuador.” Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research 3 (3): 315–327. doi:10.1080/19390459.2011.591749.
   Google Scholar
• Lux Research. 2008. “Nanotechnology Corporate Strategies.” Lux Research Nanomaterials Intelligence. Accessed April 15, 2011. http://www.printedelectronicsnow.com/whitepapers/download/10/Lux_Research_Nanomaterials_Intelligence_-_Nanotechnology_Corporate_Stratategies.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Maclurcan, D., and N. Radywyl. 2012. “Nanotechnology and Limits to Growth.” In Nanotechnology and Global Sustainability, edited by D. Maclurcan and N. Radywyl, 3–20. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, B. K., and J. S. Picou. 2008. “Postnormal Science, Precautionary Principle, and Worst Cases: The Challenge of Twenty-First Century Catastrophes.” Sociological Inquiry 78 (2): 230–247. doi:10.1111/soin.2008.78.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, P. R. 2006. “Nanotecnologia e Meio Ambiente Para uma Sociedade Sustentável.” In Nanotecnologia Sociedade e Meio Ambiente, edited by P. R. Martins, 114–132. São Paulo: Xamã.
   Google Scholar
• McChesney, R. W. 1997. Corporate Media and the Threat to Democracy. New York: Seven Stories Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCright, A. M., and R. E. Dunlap. 2010. “Anti-Reflexivity: The American Conservative Movement’s Success in Undermining Climate Science and Policy.” Theory, Culture & Society 27: 100–133. doi:10.1177/0263276409356001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKibben, B. 2004. Enough: Staying Human in an Engineered Age. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. P. J., and G. Spaargaren. 2000. “Ecological Modernisation Theory in Debate: A Review.” Environmental Politics 9 (1): 17–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanowerk. 2013. “Ten Things You Should Know About Nanotechnology.” Accessed September 30, 13. http://nanowerk.com/nanotechnology/ten_things_you_should_know.php.
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences. 2012. “Health and Environmental Effects of Nanomaterials Remain Uncertain; Cohesive Research Plan Needed to Help Avoid Potential Risks From Rapidly Evolving Technology.” Accessed March 25, 14. http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=13347.
   Google Scholar
• National Nanotechnology Initiative. 2013. Accessed September 30, 13. http://www.nano.gov/about-nni/what/funding.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, D. F. 1977. America by Design: Science, Technology, and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Nowak, B. 2012. “The Occurrence, Behavior, and Effects of Engineered Nanomaterials in the Environment.” In Advances in Nanotechnology and the Environment, edited by K. Juyoung, 183–218. Singapore: Pan Stanford Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2008. Main Science and Technology Indicators. Vol. 2008/1 Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/msti-v2008-1-en-fr
   Google Scholar
• Sargent Jr., J. F. 2011. Nanotechnology and Environmental, Health, and Safety: Issues for Consideration. Congressional Research Service, RL34614. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Sargent Jr., J. F. 2013. Nanotechnology: A Policy Primer. Congressional Research Service, RL34511. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Schnaiberg, A. 1977. “Obstacles to Environmental Research by Scientists and Technologists: A Social Structural Analysis.” Social Problems 24 (5): 500–520. doi:10.2307/800121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnaiberg, A. 1980. The Environment: From Surplus to Scarcity. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schnaiberg, A., and K. A. Gould. 2000. Environment and Society: The Enduring Conflict. Caldwell, NJ: Blackburn Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, H. S., and A. Sharma. 2007. “Nanoparticles Aggravate Heat Stress Induced Cognitive Deficits, Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption, Edema Formation and Brain Pathology.” Progress in Brain Research 162: 245–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simeonova, P. P., N. Opopol, and M. I. Luster. 2007. Nanotechnology-Toxicological Issues and Environmental Safety. Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Small Time Magazine. 2011. “Annual Ranking of Universities for Nanotechnology Research and Innovation.” Small Time Magazine.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. B., and C. G. Granqvist. 2010. Green Nanotechnology: Energy for Tomorrow’s World. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suppan, S. 2013. Nanomaterials in Soil?: Our Future Food Chain?. Minneapolis: The Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy.
   Google Scholar
• White, G. D. ed. 2000. Campus Inc.: Corporate Power in the Ivory Tower. Albany, NY: Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wickson, F. 2012. “Nanotechnology and Risk.” In Nanotechnology and Global Sustainability, edited by D. Maclurcan and N. Radywyl, 217–240. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yah, C. S., G. S. Simate, and S. E. Iyuke. 2012. “Nanoparticles Toxicity and Their Routes of Exposure.” Pakistani Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 25 (2): 477–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., A. Nel, and K. Riehemann. 2013. “Filling Knowledge Gaps that Distinguish the Safety Profiles of Nano versus Bulk Materials.” Small 9 (9–10): 1426–1427. doi:10.1002/smll.201300500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar