Environmental sociology and the Frankfurt School 1: reason and capital

References

• Adorno, T. W. [1951] 1974. Minima Moralia. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Adorno, T. W. [1955] 1967. Prisms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adorno, T. W. [1961] 1992. Notes to Literature. Vol. 2. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adorno, T. W. [1963, 1969] 1998. Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adorno, T. W. [1963] 2000. Problems of Moral Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adorno, T. W. [1964, 1965] 2006. History and Freedom. Malden, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Adorno, T. W. 1966. Negative Dialectics. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Adorno, T. W. [1970] 1984. Aesthetic Theory. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Adorno, T. W., E. Frenkel-Brunswik, D. J. Levinson, and R. N. Sanford. [1950] 1969. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Aronowitz, S. 1981. The Crisis in Historical Materialism: Class, Politics and Culture in Marxist Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aronowitz, S. 1988. Science as Power: Discourse and Ideology in Modern Society. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aronowitz, S. 2003. How Class Works: Power and Social Movement. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Assadourian, E. 2012. “The Path to Degrowth in Overdeveloped Countries.” In State of the World 2012: Moving Toward Sustainable Prosperity, The Worldwatch Institute, edited by L. Starke, 22–37. Washington, DC: Island Press/Center for Resource Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Assadourian, E. 2013. “Building an Enduring Environmental Movement.” In State of the World 2013: Is Sustainability still Possible?, The Worldwatch Institute, edited by L. Starke, 292–303. Washington, DC: Island Press/Center for Resource Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Balbus, I. D. 1982. Marxism and Domination. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, J. 2007. Environment and Social Theory. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biro, A. 2005. Denaturalizing Ecological Politics: Alienation from Nature from Rousseau to the Frankfurt School and Beyond. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biro, A., ed. 2011. Critical Ecologies: The Frankfurt School and Contemporary Environmental Crises. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bookchin, M. 1982a. The Ecology of Freedom: The Emergence and Dissolution of Hierarchy. Palo Alto, CA: Cheshire Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bookchin, M. 1982b. “Finding the Subject: Notes on Whitebook and ‘Habermas Ltd.’” Telos 62: 78–98.
   Google Scholar
• Bookchin, M. 1988. “Social Ecology versus Deep Ecology.” Socialist Registrar 18 (3): 9–29.
   Google Scholar
• Brulle, R. 2000. Agency, Democracy and Nature: The U.S. Environmental Movement from a Critical Theory Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brulle, R. 2002. “Habermas and Green Political Thought: Two Roads Converging.” Environmental Politics 11 (4): 1–20. doi:10.1080/714000651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buttel, F. H. 1996. “Environmental and Resource Sociology: Theoretical Issues and Opportunities for Synthesis.” Rural Sociology 61 (1): 56–75. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.1996.tb00610.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buttel, F. H., and C. R. Humphrey. 2002. “Sociological Theory and the Natural Environment.” In Handbook of Environmental Sociology, edited by R. E. Dunlap and W. Michelson, 33–69. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buttel, F. H., R. E. Dunlap, P. Dickens, and A. Gijswijt. 2002. “Sociological Theory and the Environment: An Overview and Introduction.” In: Sociological Theory and the Environment, edited by R. E. Dunlap, et al., 3–32. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Carolyn, M., ed. 1994. Ecology: Key Concepts in Critical Theory. Atlantic Heights, NJ: Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Catton, W. R., and R. E. Dunlap. 1978. “Environmental Sociology: A New Paradigm.” The American Sociologist 13 (1): 41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Catton, W. R., and R. E. Dunlap. 1980. “A New Ecological Paradigm for Post-exuberant Sociology.” American Behavioral Scientist 24 (1): 15–47. doi:10.1177/000276428002400103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronon, W. 1991. Nature’s Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, T. 1984. “Social Impact Assessment as a Tool for Rangelands Management” In Developing Strategies for Rangelands Management, edited by National Research Council, 1613–1634. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, T. 1987. “Theory and Method in Social Impact Assessment.” Sociological Inquiry 57: 54–69. doi:10.1111/soin.1987.57.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, T. 1988. “Social Impact Assessment as Applied Human Ecology: Integrating Theory and Method.” In Human Ecology: Research and Applications, edited by R. J. Borden and J. Jacobs, 220–227. College Park, MD: Society for Human Ecology.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, T. 1992. “The Challenges of Global Environmental Change for Human Ecology.” In Human Responsibility and Global Change, edited by L. Hansson and B. Jungen, 30–46. Göteborg, Sweden: University of Göteborg.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, T. 1994. “‘What Should We Do?’: Human Ecology and Collective Decision Making.” Human Ecology Review 1 (2): 301–309.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, T. 2013. “Bringing Values and Deliberation to Science Communication.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (Supplement_3): 14081–14087. doi:10.1073/pnas.1212740110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson, A. 1993. “Critical Theory and Green Politics.” In The Politics of Nature: Explorations in Green Political Theory, edited by A. Dobson and P. Lucardie. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., F. H. Buttel, P. Dickens, and A. Gijswitj, eds. 2002. Sociological Theory and the Environment: Classical Foundations, Contemporary Insights. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., and W. R. Catton. 1979. “Environmental Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 5: 243–273. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.05.080179.001331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., and W. R. Catton. 1994. “Toward an Ecological Sociology: The Development, Current Status, and Probable Future of Environmental Sociology.” In Ecology, Society and the Quality of Social Life, edited by W. V. D’Antonio, M. Sasaki, and Y. Yonebayashi, 11–31. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R. 1990. “Habermas and Green Political Thought: Two Roads Diverging.” Theory and Society 19 (6): 739–776. doi:10.1007/BF00191896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R. 1992. Environmentalism and Political Theory: Toward an Ecocentric Approach. New York: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, J. B. 1999. “Marx’s Theory of Metabolic Rift: Classical Foundations for Environmental Sociology.” American Journal of Sociology 105 (2): 366–405. doi:10.1086/ajs.1999.105.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, J. B. 1994. The Vulnerable Planet: A Short Economic History of the Environment. New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, J. B. 2000. Marx’s Ecology: Materialism and Nature. New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, J. B. 2002. “Marx’s Ecology in Historical Perspective.” International Socialism Journal 96: 71–86.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, J. B. 2011. “Capitalism and Degrowth – An Impossibility Theorem.” Monthly Review 62 (8): 26–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, J. B., and H. Holleman. 2012. “Weber and the Environment: Classical Foundations for a Post-exemptionalist Sociology.” American Journal of Sociology 117 (6): 1625–1673. doi:10.1086/664617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournier, V. 2008. “Escaping from the Economy: The Politics of Degrowth.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 28: 528–545. doi:10.1108/01443330810915233.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. [1930] 1961. Civilization and Its Discontents. New York: WW Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, K. A., D. N. Pellow, and A. Schnaiberg. 2008. The Treadmill of Production: Injustice and Unsustainability in the Global Economy. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gunderson, R. 2014a. “Erich Fromm’s Ecological Messianism: The First Biophilia Hypothesis as Humanistic Social Theory.” Humanity & Society 38 (2): 182–204.
   Google Scholar
• Gunderson, R. 2014b. “Habermas in Environmental Thought: Anthropocentric Kantian or Forefather of Ecological Democracy?” Sociological Inquiry 84 (4): 626–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunderson, R. 2014c. “Social Barriers to Biophilia: Merging Structural and Ideational Explanations for Environmental Degradation.” The Social Science Journal 51 (4): 681–685. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2014.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthman, J. 2007. “Commentary on Teaching Food: Why I Am Fed up with Michael Pollan et al.” Agriculture and Human Values 24 (2): 261–264. doi:10.1007/s10460-006-9053-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1971. Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. [1985] 1987. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 1982. The Limits to Capital. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 1996. Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Held, D. 1980. Introduction to Critical Theory: Horkheimer to Habermas. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, M. [1930] 1993. “Beginnings of the Bourgeois Philosophy of History.” In Between Philosophy and Social Science: Selected Early Writings, 313–388, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, M. 1947. Eclipse of Reason. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, M. [1957] 1974. “The Concept of Man.” In Critique of Instrumental Reason, 1–33, Continuum: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, M., and T. W. Adorno. [1944] 1969. Dialectic of Enlightenment. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Jänicke, M., and K. Jacob. 2004. “Lead Markets for Environmental Innovations: A New Role for the Nation State.” Global Environmental Politics 4 (1): 29–46. doi:10.1162/152638004773730202.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, M. 1973. The Dialectical Imagination: History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research 1923-1950. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, J. 2008. “The Citizen-consumer hybrid: Ideological Tensions and the Case of Whole Foods Market.” Theory and Society 37 (3): 229–270. doi:10.1007/s11186-007-9058-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallis, G. 2011. “In Defence of Degrowth.” Ecological Economics 70 (5): 873–880. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovel, J. 2002. The Enemy of Nature. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Leiss, W. 1974. The Domination of Nature. New York: Braziller.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, H. 1955. Eros and Civilization: A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. New York: Vintage Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, H. [1960] 1989. “From Ontology to Technology: Fundamental Tendencies of Industrial Society.” In Critical Theory and Society: A Reader, edited by S. E. Bronner and D. Kellner, 119–127. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, H. 1964. One-Dimensional Man. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, H. [1964] 1968. “Industrialization and Capitalism in Max Weber.” In Negations, 201–226, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, H. 1969. An Essay on Liberation. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, H. 1972. Counterrevolution and Revolt. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, H. [1972] 1994. “Ecology and Revolution.” In Ecology: Key Concepts in Critical Theory, edited by C. Merchant, 51–54, Atlantic Heights, NJ: Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Alier, J., U. Pascual, F.-D. Vivien, and E. Zaccai. 2010. “Sustainable De-growth: Mapping the Context, Criticisms and Future Prospects of an Emergent Paradigm.” Ecological Economics 69: 1741–1747. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K. [1858] 1973. Grundrisse. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, C. 1980. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, P. J. 1991. “Feminism and Ecology: On the Domination of Nature.” Hypatia 6 (1): 162–178. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1991.tb00215.x.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. P. J. 2001. Globalization and Environmental Reform: The Ecological Modernization of the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, R. 1994. Rationality and Nature: A Sociological Inquiry into a Changing Relationship. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, E. S. 2011. “Revisiting the Dialectic of Environment: Nature as Ideology and Ethics in Adorno and the Frankfurt School.” Telos 155: 105–126.
   Google Scholar
• Norgaard, R. B. 1994. Development Betrayed: The End of Progress and a Co-evolutionary Revisioning of the Future. New York: Rouledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, J. 1998. Natural Causes: Essays in Ecological Marxism. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ottmann, H. 1982. “Cognitive Interests and Self-reflection.” In Habermas: Critical Debates, edited by J. B. Thompson and D. Held, 79–97. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papadakis, E. 2002. “Social Theory and the Environment: A Systems-theoretical Perspective.” In: Sociological Theory and the Environment, edited by R. E. Dunlap, et al., 119–143. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Paul., S., L. Kalof, T. Thomas Dietz, and G. A. Guagnano. 1995. “Values, Beliefs, and Proenvironmental Action: Attitude Formation toward Emergent Attitude Objects.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 25 (18): 1611–1636. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb02636.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renn, O. 2008. Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J.T., and P. E. Grimes. 2002. “World-system Theory and the Environment: Toward a New Synthesis.” In: Sociological Theory and the Environment, edited by R. E. Dunlap, et al., 167–194. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, E., O. Renn, and A. McCright. 2013. The Risk Society Revisited: Social Theory and Governance. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salleh, A. K. 1988. “Epistemology and the Metaphors of Production: An Eco-feminist Reading of Critical Theory.” Studies in the Humanities 15 (2): 130–139.
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson, S. K. 2005. “Reforming Theoretical Work in Sociology: A Modest Proposal.” Perspectives 28 (2): 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, A. 1971. The Concept of Nature in Marx. London: New Left Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schnaiberg, A. 1980. The Environment: From Surplus to Scarcity. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, F., G. Kallis, and M.-A. Joan. 2010. “Crisis or Opportunity? Economic Degrowth for Social Equity and Ecological Sustainability. Introduction to This Special Issue.” Journal of Cleaner Production 18: 511–518. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E. 2010. “Beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change.” Environment and Planning A 42: 1273–1285. doi:10.1068/a42282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, P. 1977. Origin and Significance of the Frankfurt School: A Marxist Perspective. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P., and T. Dietz. 1994. “The Value Basis of Environmental Concern.” Journal of Social Issues 50 (3): 65–84. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02420.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szasz, A. 2007. Shopping Our Way to Safety: How We Changed from Protecting the Environment to Protecting Ourselves. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, S. 1996. Against Nature: The Concept of Nature in Critical Theory. New York: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. [1919] 1946. “Science as Vocation.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by H. H. Gerth and C. W. Mills, 129–156. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. [1921, 1922] 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webler, T. 1995. “‘Right’ Discourse in Citizen Participation: An Evaluative Yardstick.” In Fair and Competent Citizen Participation: Evaluating New Models for Environmental Discourse, edited by O. Renn, T. Webler, and P. Widemann, 33–84. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Wehling, P. 2002. “Dynamic Constellations of the Individual, Society, Nature: Critical Theory and Environmental Sociology.” In: Sociological Theory and the Environment, edited by R. E. Dunlap, et al., 144–166. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• White Jr., L. 1967. “The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis.” Science 155: 1203–1207. doi:10.1126/science.155.3767.1203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilding, A. 2008. “Ideas for a Critical Theory of Nature.” Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 19 (4): 48–67. doi:10.1080/10455750802559590.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, M. M., and J. B. Schor. 2013. “Does Changing a Light Bulb Lead to Changing the World? Political Action and the Conscious Consumer.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 644 (1): 160–190. doi:10.1177/0002716212454831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• York, R., and B. Clark. 2010. “Critical Materialism: Science, Technology, and Environmental Sustainability.” Sociological Inquiry 80 (3): 475–499. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1475-682X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• York, R., and P. Mancus. 2009. “Critical Human Ecology: Historical Materialism and Natural Laws.” Sociological Theory 27 (2): 122–149. doi:10.1111/soth.2009.27.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar