Understanding forest pictures on social media– A method to grasp nonverbal dimensions of human–nature relationships

References

• Anderson, C. 2017. “In the Millennial, Social-media-centric Age, Instagrammable Hotels Stand Out.” In 3.
   Google Scholar
• Bachmann-Medick, D. 2019. “Cultural Turns.” docupedia Zeitgeschichte. doi:10.14765/zzf.dok-1389.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhshi, S., D. A. Shamma, L. Kennedy, and E. Gilbert. 2015. “Why We Filter Our Photos and How It Impacts Engagement.” In Proceedings of the Ninth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Banham, R. 2020. “Emotion, Vulnerability, Ontology: Operationalising ‘Ontological Security’ for Qualitative Environmental Sociology.” Environmental Sociology 6 (2): 132–142. doi:10.1080/23251042.2020.1717098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. 1990. Der entgegenkommende und der stumpfe Sinn, Kritische Essays. Frankfurt a. M: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Beckley, T. M., R. C. Stedman, S. M. Wallace, and M. Ambard. 2007. “Snapshots of What Matters Most: Using Resident-employed Photography to Articulate Attachment to Place.” Society & Natural Resources 20 (10): 913–929. doi:10.1080/08941920701537007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bethmann, S. 2019. Methoden als Problemlöser: Wegweiser für die qualitative Forschungspraxis. Weinheim, Basel. Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, M. A. 2020. “Theorising Visual Framing: Contingency, Materiality and Ideology.” Visual Studies 35 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1080/1472586X.2020.1715244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeriis, M., and J. Holsanova. 2012. “Tracking Visual Segmentation: Connecting Semiotic and Cognitive Perspectives.” Visual Communication 11 (3): 259–281. doi:10.1177/1470357212446408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohnsack, R. 2003. “Qualitative Methoden der Bildinterpretation.” Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 6 (2): 239–256. doi:10.1007/s11618-003-0025-2.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnsack, R. 2008. “The Interpretation of Pictures and the Documentary Method.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 9: 3.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnsack, R. 2013a. “Die dokumentarische Methode in der Bild- und Fotointerpretation.” In Die dokumentarische Methode und ihre Forschungspraxis, edited by R. Bohnsack, 75–98. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnsack, R. 2013b. “Einleitung: Die dokumentarische Methode und ihre Forschungspraxis.” In Die dokumentarische Methode und ihre Forschungspraxis. Grundlagen qualitativer Sozialforschung, edited by R. Bohnsack, I. Nentwig-Gesemann, and A.-M. Nohl, 9-32. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Boström, M., and Y. Uggla. 2016. “A Sociology of Environmental Representation.” Environmental Sociology 2 (4): 355–364. doi:10.1080/23251042.2016.1213611.
   Google Scholar
• Breckner, R. 2007. “Bildwelten–Soziale Welten. Zur Interpretation von Bildern und Fotografien.” Paper presented at the Workshop & Workshow „Visuelle Soziologie“, Wien.
   Google Scholar
• Breckner, R. 2012. “Bildwahrnehmung–Bildinterpretation.” Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 37 (2): 143–164. doi:10.1007/s11614-012-0026-6.
   Google Scholar
• Brewster, B. H., and A. J. Puddephatt. 2017. “Introduction: Awakening Micro-theoretical Perspectives in environmental sociology.” In Microsociological Perspectives for Environmental Sociology. edited by B. H. Brewster and A. J. Puddephatt, 1: 1-16. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory. Vol. 2. London, Thousand Oaks (California), New Delhi, Singapore, Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. 2005. Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn. Sage. London.
   Google Scholar
• Dryden, P. N., and M. Andrew. 2017. “#nature: Postmodern Narrative, Place, and Nature in Santa Barbara, CA.” Environmental Sociology 3 (3): 286–296. doi:10.1080/23251042.2017.1310363.
   Google Scholar
• Dunkel, A. 2015. “Visualizing the Perceived Environment Using Crowdsourced Photo Geodata.” Landscape and Urban Planning 142: 173–186. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., and A. L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L., and N. Taylor. 2017. Ethnography after Humanism: Power, Politics and Method in Multi-species Research. London, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. 2008. “When Species Meet.” In Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Cop. 2008. London: University of Minnesota Press. Series Editor: Cary Wolfe, Series Title: Post Humanities, Series Vol. 3
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, D. 1988. “Visual Sociology: Expanding Sociological Vision.” The American Sociologist 19 (1): 54–70. doi:10.1007/BF02692374.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, S., and E. H. Segal. 2013. “Visualizing Qualitative Data in Evaluation Research.” In New Directions for Evaluation, edited by T. Azzam and S. Evergreen, 53–71. Wiley, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Hoggenmüller, S. W. 2016. “Die Welt im (Außen-) Blick. Überlegungen zu einer ästhetischen Re| Konstruktionsanalyse am Beispiel der Weltraumfotografie ‚Blue Marble ‘.” ZQF–Zeitschrift für Qualitative Forschung 17 (1+ 2): 5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Holsanova, J. 2011. “How We Focus Attention in Picture Viewing, Picture Description, and during Mental Imagery.” In Bilder - sehen - denken: Zum Verhältnis von begrifflich-philosophischen und empirisch-psychologischen Ansätzen in der bildwissenschaftlichen Forschung, edited by K. Sachs-Hombach and R. Totzke, 291–313, Köln: von Halem.
   Google Scholar
• Holton, J. A. 2007. “The Coding Process and Its Challenges.” The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory 3: 265–289.
   Google Scholar
• Imdahl, M. 1995. “Ikonik - Bilder und ihre Anschauung.” In Was ist ein Bild?, edited by G. Boehm, 300–324. München: Fink Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kruse, J. 2015. “Qualitative Interviewforschung. Ein Integrativer Ansatz.” In Weinheim, Basel: Beltz Juventa.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlhüser, S. 2017. “#fernweh #wanderlust #explore: Reise- »Erzählungen« auf Instagram.” Rhetorik 36 (1): 84. doi:10.1515/rhet.2017.007.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2007. Eine neue Soziologie für eine neue Gesellschaft: Einführung in die Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2013. “Wir sind nie modern gewesen: Versuch einer symmetrischen Anthropologie.” In Wir sind nie modern gewesen. De Gruyter. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Mannheim, K. 1952. “Wissenssoziologie.” In Ideologie und Utopie, edited by K. Mannheim, 227–267. Frankfurt a. M: Schulte-Bulmke.
   Google Scholar
• Masterson, V. A., R. C. Stedman, J. Enqvist, M. Tengö, M. Giusti, D. Wahl, and U. Svedin. 2017. “The Contribution of Sense of Place to Social-ecological Systems Research: A Review and Research Agenda.” Ecology and Society 22 (1): 1. doi:10.5751/ES-08872-220149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejía, G., and S. Pink. 2017. “Entangled Belonging: Barcelona-to-Melbourne Professional Transient Migrants.” Transitions: Journal of Transient Migration 1 (1): 85–100.
   Google Scholar
• Mey, G., and M. Dietrich. 2017. “From Text to Image–Shaping a Visual Grounded Theory Methodology.” Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung 42 (4): 280–300. doi:10.12759/hsr.42.2017.4.280-300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meißner, Stefan. 2015. “Die Medialität und Technizität internetbasierter Daten: Plädoyer für mehr Offenheit der Qualitativen Sozialforschung.” In Die qualitative Analyse internetbasierter Daten: Methodische Herausforderungen und Potenziale von Online-Medien. edited by Dominique Schirmer, Nadine Sander and Andreas Wenninger Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Milton, K. 2003. Loving Nature. Towards an Ecology of Emotion. London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W. J. T. 1995. Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nohl, A.-M. 2013. “Komparative Analyse. Forschungspraxis Und Methodologie Dokumentarischer Interpretation.” In Die dokumentarische Methode und ihre Forschungspraxis. Grundlagen qualitativer Sozialforschung, edited by R. Bohnsack, I. Nentwig-Gesemann, and A.-M. Nohl, 271–293. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Oteros-Rozas, E., B. Martín-López, N. Fagerholm, C. Bieling, and T. Plieninger. 2018. “Using Social Media Photos to Explore the Relation between Cultural Ecosystem Services and Landscape Features across Five European Sites.” Ecological Indicators 94: 74–86. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panofsky, E. 1978. “Ikonographie und Ikonologie. Eine Einführung in die Kunst der Renaissance.” In Sinn und Deutung in der bildenden Kunst, edited by E. Panofsky, 36–62, Köln.
   Google Scholar
• Pascale, C.-M. 2011. “Analytic Induction.” In Cartographies of Knowledge: Exploring Qualitative Epistemologies, (Eds.), Pascale, Celine-Marie, 39–76. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi, Singapore: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, G. 2016. Das visuelle Zeitalter: Punkt und Pixel. Göttingen: Wallstein.
   Google Scholar
• Peez, G. 2006. “Fotoanalyse nach Verfahrensprinzipien der objektiven Hermeneutik.” In Bildinterpretation und Bildverstehen, edited by W. Marotzki and H. Niesyto, 121–141. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, C., C. Walden-Schreiner, A. Barros, and S. D. Rossi. 2020. “Using Social Media Images and Text to Examine How Tourists View and Value the Highest Mountain in Australia.” Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 29: 100252. doi:10.1016/j.jort.2019.100252.
   Google Scholar
• Pilarczyk, U. 2006. “Selbstbilder im Vergleich. Junge Fotograf/innen in der DDR und in der Bundesrepublik vor 1989.” In Bildinterpretation und Bildverstehen, edited by W. Marotzki and H. Niesyto, 253–286. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 2016. Visual Methodologies. An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. Vol. 3. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, P. 2020. “Offizielle Nutzerzahlen: Instagram in Deutschland und Weltweit.” allfacebook.de. https://allfacebook.de/instagram/instagram-nutzer-deutschland.
   Google Scholar
• Schlehe, J., and V. I. Yulianto. 2018. “Waste, Worldviews and Morality at the South Coast of Java: An Anthropological Approach.” Occasional Paper, 41.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber, M., and M. Kramer. 2016. „Verdammt schön“. Methodologische und methodische Herausforderungen der Rekonstruktion von Bildpraktiken auf Instagram.” ZQF–Zeitschrift für Qualitative Forschung 17: 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Siever, C. M. 2015. Multimodale Kommunikation im Social Web : Forschungsansätze und Analysen zu Text-Bild-Relationen. Frankfurt am Main, Bern, Wien Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1996. Grounded Theory: Grundlagen Qualitativer Sozialforschung. Weinheim: Beltz, PsychologieVerlagsUnion.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, T. 2012. “Nature in the Anthropocene?: A Reflection on A Photograph.” The Yearbook of Comparative Literature 58 (58): 228–234.
   Google Scholar
• Weinbrenner, H., J. Breithut, W. Hebermehl, A. Kaufmann, T. Klinger, T. Palm, and K. Wirth. 2021, submitted. ““The Forest Has Become Our New Living Room” – The Critical Importance of Urban Forests during the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Frontiers in Forests and Global Change - people and forests.
   Google Scholar
• Winsky, N., and G. Zimmermann. 2020. “Insta-Research zum# westweg im Schwarzwald–wie digital repräsentierte Wandererfahrungen auf Instagram mittels quantitativer und qualitativer Methoden untersucht werden können.” Zeitschrift für Tourismuswissenschaft 12 (3): 317–342. doi:10.1515/tw-2020-0022.
   Google Scholar
• Zappavigna, M. 2016. “Social Media Photography: Construing Subjectivity in Instagram Images.” Visual Communication 15 (3): 271–292. doi:10.1177/1470357216643220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar