From inclusion to epistemic belonging in international environmental expertise: learning from the institutionalisation of scenarios and models in IPBES

References

• Arpin, I., M. Barbier, G. Ollivier, and C. Granjou. 2016. “Institutional Entrepreneurship and Techniques of Inclusiveness in the Creation of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.” Ecology and Society 21 (4): 11. doi:10.5751/Es-08644-210411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BiodivERsA. 2017. “Call Brochure: Scenarios of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services” https://www.biodiversa.org/1400
   Google Scholar
• Borie, M., K. M. Gustafsson, N. Obermeister, E. Turnhout, and P. Bridgewater. 2020. “Institutionalising Reflexivity? Transformative Learning and the Intergovernmental Science-policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES).” Environmental Science & Policy 110: 71–76. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chilvers, J., and M. Kearnes. 2019. “Remaking Participation in Science and Democracy.” Science, Technology & Human Values45 (3): 347–380. doi:10.1177/0162243919850885
   Google Scholar
• Diaz, S., S. Demissew, C. Joly, W. M. Lonsdale, and A. Larigauderie. 2015. “A Rosetta Stone for Nature’s Benefits to People.” PLOS Biology 13 (1): e1002040. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Reviriego, I., E. Turnhout, and S. Beck. 2019. “Participation and Inclusiveness in the Intergovernmental Science–Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.” Nature Sustainability 2 (6): 457–464. doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0290-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esson, J., P. Noxolo, R. Baxter, P. Daley, and M. Byron. 2017. “The 2017 RGS-IBG Chair’s Theme: Decolonising Geographical Knowledges, or Reproducing Coloniality?” Area 49 (3): 384–388. doi:10.1111/area.12371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S., and B. T. Pentland. 2003. “Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change.” Administrative Science Quarterly 48 (1): 94–118. doi:10.2307/3556620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felt, U., J. Igelsböck, A. Schikowitz, and V. Thomas. 2013. “Growing into What? The (Un-)disciplined Socialisation of Early Stage Researchers in Transdisciplinary Research.” Higher Education 65 (4): 511–524. doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9560-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, K. M., M. Berg, R. Lidskog, and L. Erik. 2019. “Intersectional Boundary Work in Socializing New Experts. The Case of IPBES.” Ecosystems and People 15 (1): 181–191. doi:10.1080/26395916.2019.1628105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, K. M., and R. Lidskog. 2018. “Organizing International Experts: IPBES’s Efforts to Gain Epistemic Authority.” Environmental Sociology 4 (4): 445–456. doi:10.1080/23251042.2018.1463488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakkarainen, V., C. B. Anderson, M. Eriksson, C. J. Van Riper, A. Horcea-Milcu, and C. M. Raymond. 2020. “Grounding IPBES Experts’ Views on the Multiple Values of Nature in Epistemology, Knowledge and Collaborative Science.” Environmental Science & Policy 105: 11–18. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2019.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho-Lem, C., H. Zerriffi, and M. Kandlikar. 2011. “Who Participates in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and Why: A Quantitative Assessment of the National Representation of Authors in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.” Global Environmental Change 21 (4): 1308–1317. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, M., and M. Mahony. 2010. “Climate Change: What Do We Know about the IPCC?” Progress in Physical Geography 34 (5): 705–718. doi:10.1177/0309133310373719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPBES. 2013. Procedures for the Preparation of the Platform’s Deliverables. Decision IPBES-2/3. Antalya, Turkey: IPBES.
   Google Scholar
• IPBES. 2015. Proposal on the Further Development of Tools and Methodologies regarding Scenarios and Models (Deliverable 3 (C)). IPBES/4/5. Bonn, Germany: IPBES.
   Google Scholar
• IPBES. 2016a. Report of the Plenary of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on the Work of Its Fourth Session. IPBES/4/19. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: IPBES.
   Google Scholar
• IPBES. 2016b. Summary for Policymakers of the Methodological Assessment Report on Scenarios and Models of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn, Germany: IPBES.
   Google Scholar
• IPBES. 2019. Report of the Plenary of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on the Work of Its Seventh Session. IPBES/7/10. Bonn, Germany: IPBES.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S, ed. 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., and M. L. Martello. 2004. Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance, Politics, Science, and the Environment. Cambridge, MA.; London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knaggård, Å., B. Ness, and D. Harnesk. 2018. “Finding an Academic Space: Reflexivity among Sustainability Researchers.” Ecology and Society 23 (4): 4. doi:10.5751/ES-10505-230420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr Cetina, K. 2007. “Culture in Global Knowledge Societies: Knowledge Cultures and Epistemic Cultures.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 32 (4): 361–375. doi:10.1179/030801807X163571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok, M. T. J., G. D. K. Kok, R. H. Peterson, R. Hill, J. Agard, and S. R. Carpenter. 2017. “Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Require IPBES to Take Novel Approach to Scenarios.” In Sustainability Science, 1–512: 177–181. doi:10.1007/s11625-016-0354-8
   Google Scholar
• Larigauderie, A., and H. A. Mooney. 2010. “The Intergovernmental Science-policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Moving a Step Closer to an IPCC-like Mechanism for Biodiversity.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2 (1–2): 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2010.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leadley, P., H. M. Pereira, R. Alkemade, J. F. Fernandez-Manjarrés, V. Proença, J. P. W. Scharlemann, and M. J. Walpole. 2010. “Biodiversity Scenarios: Projections of 21st Century Change in Biodiversity and Associated Ecosystem Services. A Technical Report for the Global Biodiversity Outlook 3.” In Technical Series no. 50, 132. Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
   Google Scholar
• Lidskog, R., and G. Sundqvist. 2018. “Environmental Expertise as Group Belonging.” Nature and Culture 13 (3): 309–331. doi:10.3167/nc.2018.130301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfmarck, E., and R. Lidskog. 2017. “Bumping against the Boundary: IPBES and the Knowledge Divide.” Environmental Science & Policy 69: 22–28. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marres, N. 2012. Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. Houndmills. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N., and J. Lezaun. 2011. “Materials and Devices of the Public: An Introduction.” Economy and Society 40 (4): 489–509. doi:10.1080/03085147.2011.602293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElwee, P., Á. Fernández-Llamazares, Y. Aumeeruddy-Thomas, D. Babai, P. Bates, K. Galvin, M. Guèze, et al. 2020. “Working with Indigenous and Local Knowledge (ILK) in Large-scale Ecological Assessments: Reviewing the Experience of the IPBES Global Assessment.” Journal of Applied Ecology 57 (9): 1666–1676. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.13705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. A. 2007. “Democratization, International Knowledge Institutions and Global Governance.” Governance 20 (2): 325–357. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00359.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montana, J. 2017. “Accommodating Consensus and Diversity in Environmental Knowledge Production: Achieving Closure through Typologies in IPBES.” Environmental Science & Policy 68: 20–27. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montana, J. 2019. “Co-production in Action: Perceiving Power in the Organisational Dimensions of a Global Biodiversity Expert Process.” Sustainability Science 14 (6): 1581–1591. doi:10.1007/s11625-019-00669-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montana, J. 2020. “Balancing Authority and Meaning in Global Environmental Assessment: An Analysis of Organisational Logics and Modes in IPBES.” Environmental Science & Policy 112: 245–253. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin, J.-F., S. Louafi, A. Orsini, and M. Oubenal. 2017. “Boundary Organizations in Regime Complexes: A Social Network Profile of IPBES.” Journal of International Relations and Development 20 (3): 543–577. doi:10.1057/s41268-016-0006-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obermeister, N. 2017. “From Dichotomy to Duality: Addressing Interdisciplinary Epistemological Barriers to Inclusive Knowledge Governance in Global Environmental Assessments.” Environmental Science & Policy 68: 80–86. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obermeister, N. 2019. “Local Knowledge, Global Ambitions: IPBES and the Advent of Multi-scale Models and Scenarios.” Sustainability Science 14 (3): 843–856. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0616-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, H. M., P. W. Leadley, V. Proença, J. P. Rob Alkemade, W. Scharlemann, J. F. Fernandez-Manjarrés, M. B. Araújo, et al. 2010. “Scenarios for Global Biodiversity in the 21st Century.” Science 330 (6010): 1496. doi:10.1126/science.1196624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrings, C., A. Duraiappah, A. Larigauderie, and H. Mooney. 2011. “Ecology. The Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Science-policy Interface.” Science 331 (6021): 1139–1140. doi:10.1126/science.1202400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, I. M. D., H. M. Pereira, S. Ferrier, R. Alkemade, L. A. Acosta, H. R. Akcakaya, E. den Belder, et al. 2017. “Multiscale Scenarios for Nature Futures.” Nature Ecology & Evolution 1 (10): 1416–1419. doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0273-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soberón, J., and A. T. Peterson. 2015. “Biodiversity Governance: A Tower of Babel of Scales and Cultures.” PLoS Biology 13 (3): 3. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenseke, M., and A. Larigauderie. 2018. “The Role, Importance and Challenges of Social Sciences and Humanities in the Work of the Intergovernmental Science-policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES).” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 31 (sup1): S10–S4. doi:10.1080/13511610.2017.1398076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tengö, M., R. Hill, C. M. Pernilla Malmer, M. S. Raymond, F. Danielsen, T. Elmqvist, C. Folke, and C. Folke. 2017. “Weaving Knowledge Systems in IPBES, CBD and Beyond—lessons Learned for Sustainability.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 26-27: 17–25. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trisos, C. H., J. Auerbach, and M. Katti. 2021. “Decoloniality and Anti-oppressive Practices for a More Ethical Ecology.” Nature Ecology & Evolution. doi:10.1038/s41559-021-01460-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadrot, A. B. M. 2014. The Politics of Knowledge and Global Biodiversity, Routledge Studies in Biodiversity Politics and Management. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar