What sewage sludge is and conflicts in Swedish circular economy policymaking

References

• Balmer, P., and R. C. Frost. 1990. “Managing Change in an Environmentally Conscious Society: A Case Study, Gothenburg (Sweden).” Water Science and Technology 22 (12): 45–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1990.0099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, T., L. Ekman Burgman, L. Andreas, and A. Lagerkvist. 2020. “Effects of the Different Implementation of Legislation Relating to Sewage Sludge Disposal in the EU.” Detritus 10 (10): 92–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.31025/2611-4135/2020.13944.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, M., and A.-M. Tillman. 2004. “Actors and Interpretations in an Environmental Controversy: The Swedish Debate on Sewage Sludge Use in Agriculture.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 42 (1): 65–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, I. R. 1999. “Recycling Urban Waste on Farmland: An Actor-Network Interpretation.” Applied Geography 19 (1): 29–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-6228(98)00033-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner, P. H. 2010. “Clean Cycles and Safe Final Sinks.” Waste Management & Research 28 (7): 575–576. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X10370987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgman, L. E., and B. Wallsten. 2021. “Should the Sludge Hit the Farm? – How Chemo-Social Relations Affect Policy Efforts to Circulate Phosphorus in Sweden.” Sustainable Production and Consumption 27 (July): 1488–1497. Elsevier. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SPC.2021.03.011.
   Google Scholar
• Christodoulou, A., and K. Stamatelatou. 2016. “Overview of Legislation on Sewage Sludge Management in Developed Countries Worldwide.” Water Science and Technology 73 (3): 453–462. doi:https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2015.521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordell, D., and S. White. 2011. “Peak Phosphorus: Clarifying the Key Issues of a Vigorous Debate about Long-Term Phosphorus Security.” Sustainability 3 (10): 2027–2049. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su3102027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EEC. 1986. “Council Directive 86/278/EEC of 12 June 1986 on the Protection of the Environment, and in Particular of the Soil, When Sewage Sludge Is Used in Agriculture.”
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. Communication from the Commission – Consultative Communication on the Sustainable Use of Phosphorus. Brussels: COM(2013) 517 Final.
   Google Scholar
• European commission. 2015. Communication from the Commission – Closing the Loop – An EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy. Brussels: COM (2015) 614 Final.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2018. “Data on Sewage Sludge Disposal.” http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=env_ww_spd&lang=e
   Google Scholar
• Gerling, D. M. 2019. “Excrementalisms: Revaluing What We Have Only Ever Known as Waste.” Food, Culture & Society 1751–7443. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2019.1638126.
   Google Scholar
• Goldfarb, W., U. Krogmann, and C. Hopkins. 1999. “Unsafe Sewage Sludge or Beneficial Biosolids: Liability, Planning, and Management Issues regarding the Land Application of Sewage Treatment Residuals.” Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review 26: 687–768.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, J. R., and P. G. Brett. 2006. “Beneficial or Biohazard? How the Media Frame Biosolids.” Public Understanding of Science 15 (3): 359–375. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506062468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goven, J., E. R. (Lisa) Langer, V. Baker, J. Ataria, and A. Leckie. 2012. “Community Engagement in the Management of Biosolids: Lessons from Four New Zealand Studies.” Journal of Environmental Management 103 (July): 154–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.02.007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Government Offices of Sweden. 2018. Giftfri Och Cirkulär Återföring Av Fosfor Från Avloppsslam. Stockholm: Miljö- och energidepartmentet.
   Google Scholar
• Government Offices of Sweden. 2020. Hållbar Slamhantering. Stockholm: Norstedts juridik.
   Google Scholar
• Guzman, G., and M. M. P. De Souza. 2018 . “Shifting modes of governing municipal waste – A sociology of translation approach.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 50 (4): 922–938. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18763609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamlin, C. 1980. “Sewage: Waste or Resource?” Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 22 (8): 16–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.1980.9932440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hird, M. J. 2012. “Knowing Waste: Towards an Inhuman Epistemology.” Social Epistemology 26 (3–4): 453–469. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2012.727195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson, K., and N. Lynch. 2016. “Diversifying and De-Growing the Circular Economy: Radical Social Transformation in a Resource-Scarce World.” Futures 82: 15–25. Elsevier Ltd. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, W., and T. Jefferson. 2008. “The Free Association Narrative Interview Method.” In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, edited by L. Given, 296–315. Sevenoaks, California: Sage Online.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, N., C. Velis, and H. Corvellec. 2020 . “Towards clean material cycles: Is there a policy conflict between circular economy and non-toxic environment?” Waste Management & Research 38 (7): 705–707. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X20934251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchmann, H., G. Börjesson, T. Kätterer, and Y. Cohen. 2017. “From Agricultural Use of Sewage Sludge to Nutrient Extraction: A Soil Science Outlook.” Ambio 46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0816-3.
   Google Scholar
• Kortenkamp, A., T. Backhaus, and M. Faust. 2009. “State of the Art Report on Mixture Toxicity.” https://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/effects/pdf/report_mixture_toxicity.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Law, J., and V. Singleton. 2005. “Object Lessons.” Organization 12 (3): 331–355. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508405051270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBlanc, R. J., P. Matthews, and R. P. Richard. 2008. Global Atlas of Excreta, Wastewater Sludge, and Biosolids Management: Moving Forward the Sustainable and Welcome Uses of a Global Resource (Local Economic Development Series). Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, S. 2017. “Markets for Waste and Waste–Derived Fertilizers. An Empirical Survey.” Journal of Rural Studies 55 (October): 83–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.07.017.
   Google Scholar
• Malmqvist, P.-A., E. Kärrman, and B. Rydhagen. 2006. “Evaluation of the ReVAQ Project to Achieve Safe Use of Wastewater Sludge in Agriculture.” Water Science and Technology 54 (11–12): 129–135. doi:https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2006.759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margaret Del Carmen, M., L. Harris, and G. Öberg. 2014. “Citizenshit: The Right to Flush and the Urban Sanitation Imaginary.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 46 (12): 2816–2833. doi:https://doi.org/10.1068/a130331p.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini, M., D. Caro, and M. Thomsen. November 2020. “The New Fertilizer Regulation: A Starting Point for Cadmium Control in European Arable Soils?” Science of the Total Environment 745: 140876. Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2020.140876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason-Renton, S. A., and I. Luginaah. 2018. “Conceptualizing Waste as a Resource: Urban Biosolids Processing in the Rural Landscape.” Canadian Geographer 62 (2): 266–281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merli, R., M. Preziosi, and A. Acampora. 2018. “How Do Scholars Approach the Circular Economy? A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Cleaner Production 178: 703–722. Elsevier Ltd. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A. 1999. “Ontological Politics. A Word and Some Questions.” The Sociological Review 47 (1_suppl): 74–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03483.x.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, S. A. 2012. “Garbage Matters.” Progress in Human Geography 36 (6): 780–799. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132512437077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morone P and Imbert E. (2020).“Food waste and social acceptance of a circular bioeconomy: the role of stakeholders.“ Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry 23: 55–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2020.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberg, G., and S. A. Mason-Renton. 2018. “On the Limitation of Evidence-Based Policy: Regulatory Narratives and Land Application of Biosolids/Sewage Sludge in BC, Canada and Sweden.” Environmental Science & Policy 84: 88–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollans, L. B. 2017. “Trapped in Trash: ‘Modes of Governing’ and Barriers to Transitioning to Sustainable Waste Management.” Environment & Planning A 49 (10): 2300–2323. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17719461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, L. 2011. “Using Documents in Social Science.” In Qualitative Research : Issues of Theory, Method and Practice, edited by D. Silverman, 93–110. 3rd ed. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer, H. R., S. Dennis, and S. Fitzpatrick. 2020. “Cadmium: Mitigation Strategies to Reduce Dietary Exposure.” Journal of Food Science 85 (2): 260–267. Blackwell Publishing Inc. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SEPA (Swedish Environmental Protection Agency). 2002. Aktionsplan För Återföring Av Fosfor Ur Avlopp – Huvudrapport till Bra Slam Och Fosfor I Kretslopp. Stockholm: Naturvårdsverket.
   Google Scholar
• SEPA (Swedish Environmental Protection Agency). 2010. Uppdatering Av “Aktionsplan För Återföring Av Fosfor Ur Avlopp”. Stockholm: Naturvårdsverket.
   Google Scholar
• SEPA (Swedish Environmental Protection Agency). 2013. “Hållbar Återföring Av Fosfor [Sustainable Recycling of Phosphorus].” Stockholm: Report 6580.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, B., A. Sarkar, P. Singh, and R. P. Singh. 2017. “Agricultural Utilization of Biosolids: A Review on Potential Effects on Soil and Plant Grown.” Waste Management. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.03.002.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöstrand, Y. S. 2014. Stadens Sopor: Tillvaratagande, Förbränning Och Tippning I Stockholm 1900–1975 [The Garbage of the City: Resource Recovery, Incineration and Dumping in Stockholm 1900–1975]. Stockholm: Nordic Academic Press. http://su.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:740367/FULLTEXT01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. 2018. Statistiskt Meddelande-Utsläpp till Vatten Och Slamproduktion 2018. Stockholm: SCB.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Ethical Review Authority. 2021. “Vad Säger Lagen? [What Does the Law Say?]” https://etikprovningsmyndigheten.se/for-forskare/vad-sager-lagen
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Water. 2020. 2019 Årsrapport. Stockholm: Svenskt Vatten.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Michael 2017. Rubbish Theory : The Creation and Destruction of Value. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S., and I. Tavory. 2012. “Theory Construction in Qualitative Research.” Sociological Theory 30 (3): 167–186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiechmann, B., C. Dienemann, C. Kabbe, S. Brandt Andrea, I. Vogel, and A. Roskosch. 2015. Sewage Sludge Management in Germany. Bonn: Umwelt Bundesamt.
   Google Scholar
• Woolgar, S., and J. Lezaun. 2013. “The Wrong Bin Bag: A Turn to Ontology in Science and Technology Studies?” Social Studies of Science 43 (3): 321–340. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713488820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., J. Hu, D. J. Lee, Y. Chang, and Y. J. Lee. 2017. “Sludge treatment: Current research trends.” Bioresource Technology 243: 1159–1172. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar