Environmental expertise for social transformation: roles and responsibilities for social science

References

• And, G. K., and R. Lidskog. 2018. “Organizing International Experts. IPBES’s Efforts to Gain Epistemic Authority.” Environmental Sociology 4 (4): 445–456. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2018.1463488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacevic, J. 2021. “Unthinking Knowledge Production: From Post-covid to Post-carbon Futures.” Globalizations 18 (7): 1206–1218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1807855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, J. 2006. Environment and Social Theory. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, A., and G. Born. 2013. “Interdisciplinarity: Reconfigurations of the Social and Natural Sciences.” In Interdisciplinarity: Reconfigurations of Social and Natural Sciences, edited by A. Barry and G. Born, 1–56. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 2015. “Emancipatory Catastrophism: What Does It Mean to Climate Change and Risk Society?” Current Sociology 63 (1): 75–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114559951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, S., and M. Mahoney. 2018. “The IPCC and the New Map of Science and Politics.” WIREs Climate Change e547. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.547.
   Google Scholar
• Borie, M., M. Mahony, N. Obermeister, and M. Hulme. 2021. “Knowing like a Global Expert Organization: Comparative Insights from the IPCC and IPBES.” Global Environmental Change 8: 102261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102261.
   Google Scholar
• Boström, M., and M. Klintman. 2008. Eco-standards, Product Labelling and Green Consumerism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Boström, M., R. Lidskog, and Y. Uggla. 2017. “A Reflexive Look at Reflexivity in Environmental Sociology.” Environmental Sociology 3 (1): 6–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2016.1237336.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. 2019. “Navigating Climate’s Human Geographies: Exploring the Whereabouts of Climate Politics.” Dialogues in Human Geography 9 (1): 3–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820619829920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1980. “Struggles and Negotiations to Decide What Is Problematic and What Is Not: The Socio-logics of Translation.” In The Social Process of Scientific Investigation, edited by K. Knorr, R. Krohn, and R. Whitley, 197–219. Dordrecht D: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1986. “Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay.” In Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, edited by J. Law, 196–233. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Castree, N., R. Bellamy, and S. Osaka. 2021. “The Future of Global Environmental Assessments: Making a Case for Fundamental Change.” The Anthropocene Review 28 (1): 56–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019620971664.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, N., and B. Szerszynski. 2021. Planetary Social Though: The Anthropocene Challenges to the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. J., and S. Foote. 2021. The Cambridge Companion to Environmental Humanities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coliva, A., and N. J. L. L. Pedersen, eds. 2017. Epistemic Pluralism. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H., and R. Evans. 2007. Rethinking Expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H., R. Evans, D. Durant, and M. Weinel. 2020. Experts and the Will of the People. Society, Populism and Science. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Corbera, E., L. Calvet-Mir, H. Hughes, and M. Paterson. 2016. “Patterns of Authorship in the IPCC Working Group III Report.” Nature Climate Change 6 (1): 94–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Reviriego, I., E. Turnhout, and S. Beck. 2019. “Participation and Inclusiveness in the Intergovernmental Science–Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.” Nature Sustainability 2 (6): 457–464. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0290-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz, S., U. Pascual, M. Stenseke, B. Martín-López, R. T. Watson, Z. Molnár, R. Hill, et al. 2018. “Assessing Nature’s Contributions to People.” Science 359 (6373): 270–272. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, P. N. 2010. A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esguerra, A., S. Beck S, and R. Lidskog. 2017. “Stakeholder Engagement in the Making: IPBES Legitimization Politics.” Global Environmental Politics 17 (1): 59–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyal, G. 2019. The Crisis of Expertise. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faith, D. P. 2018. “Avoiding Paradigm Drifts in IPBES: Reconciling ‘Nature’s Contributions to People.” Biodiversity, and Ecosystem Services. Ecology and Society 23 (2): 40. doi:https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10195-230240.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2001. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, B. 2021. How to Avoid a Climate Disaster: The Solutions We Have and the Breakthroughs We Need. New York: Random House Large Print.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, A., J. Anshelm, M. Fridahl, and S. Haikola. 2021. “Boundary Work and Interpretations in the IPCC Review Process of the Role of Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) in Limiting Global Warming to 1.5◦C.” Frontiers in Climate 3: 643224. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.643224.
   Google Scholar
• Hecker, S., M. Haklay, A. Bowser, Z. Makuch, J. Vogel, and A. Bonn. 2018. Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, R., Ç. Adem, W. V. Alangui, Z. Molnár, Y. Aumeeruddy-Thomas, P. Bridgewater, M. Tengö, et al. 2020. “Working with Indigenous, Local and Scientific Knowledge in Assessments of Nature and Nature’s Linkages with People.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 43: 8–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, H. R., and M. Paterson. 2017. “Narrowing the Climate Field: The Symbolic Power of Authors in the IPCC’s Assessment of Mitigation.” Review of Policy Research 34 (6): 744–766. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, M., R. Lidskog, J. M. White, and A. Standring. 2020. “Social Scientific Knowledge in Times of Crisis: What Climate Change Can Learn from Coronavirus (And Vice Versa).” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Climate Change 11 (4): e656. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPBES. 2019. Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. E. S. Brondizio, J. Settele, S. Díaz, and H. T. Ngo edited by. Bonn: IPBES secretariat. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831673.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2018. Global Warming of 1.5 C: An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5 C above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty. Geneva: IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2021. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/ (accessed 30 September 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, A., and B. Wynne, eds. 2004. Misunderstanding Science? the Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. New ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2003. “Breaking the Waves in Science Studies: Comment on H. M. Collins and Robert Evans, the Third Wave of Science Studies.” Social Studies of Science 33 (3): 389–400. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127030333004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., ed. 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2005. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2006. “Transparency in Public Science Purposes, Reasons, Limits.” Law and Contemporary Problems 69 (3): 21–46.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2007. “Technologies of Humility.” Nature 450 (7166): 33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/450033a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., and S. Kim, ed. 2015. Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lahsen, M., and E. Turnhout. 2021. “How Norms, Needs, and Power in Science Obstruct Transformations Towards Sustainability.” Environmental Research Letters 16 (2): 025008. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abdcf0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2003. “Has Critique Run Out of Steam? from Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry 30 (2): 225–248. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/421123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2004. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lidskog, R., and E. Löfmarck. 2015. “Managing Uncertainty. The Forest Professionals’ Claim and Epistemic Authority in the Face of Societal and Climate Change.” Risk Management 17 (3): 145–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/rm.2015.10.
   Google Scholar
• Lidskog, R., and A. Standring. 2020. “The Institutional Machinery of Expertise: Producing Facts, Figures and Futures in COVID-19.” Acta Sociologica 63 (4): 443–446. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699320961807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidskog, R., and G. Sundqvist. 2018. ““Environmental Expertise as Group Belonging: Environmental Sociology Meets Science and Technology Studies.” Nature and Culture 13 (3): 309–331. doi:https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2018.130301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidskog, R., and C. Waterton. 2016. “Anthropocene – A Cautious Welcome from Environmental Sociology?” Environmental Sociology 2 (4): 395–406. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2016.1210841.
   Google Scholar
• Lockie, S. 2013. “Market Instruments, Ecosystem Services, and Property Rights: Assumptions and Conditions for Sustained Social and Ecological Benefits.” Land Use Policy 31: 90–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.08.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfmarck, E., and R. Lidskog. 2017. “Bumping against the Boundary: IPBES and the Knowledge Divide.” Environmental Science & Policy 69: 22–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lövbrand, E., S. Beck, J. Chilvers, T. Forsyth, J. Hedrén, M. Hulme, R. Lidskog, and E. Vasileiadou. 2015. “Who Speaks for the Future of Earth? How Critical Social Science Can Extend the Conversation on the Anthropocene.” Global Environmental Change 32: 211–218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masood, E. 2018. “Battle over Biodiversity: An Ideological Clash Could Undermine a Crucial Assessment of the World’s Disappearing Plant and Animal Life.” Nature 560 (7719): 423–425. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05984-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McElwee, P., Á. Fernández‐Llamazares, Y. Aumeeruddy‐Thomas, D. Babai, P. Bates, K. Galvin, and M. Guèze. 2020. “Working with Indigenous and Local Knowledge (ILK) in Large‐scale Ecological Assessments: Reviewing the Experience of the IPBES Global Assessment.“ Journal of Applied Ecology 57: 1666–1667. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2001. Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Oppermann, S., and S. Iovino, eds. 2017. Environmental Humanities: Voices from the Anthropocene. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Pestre, D. 2003. “Regimes of Knowledge Production in Society: Towards a More Political and Social Reading.” Minerva 41 (3): 245–261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025553311412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pielke, R. A. 2007. The Honest Broker. Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plumwood, V. 2003. Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Raworth, K. 2017. Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think like a 21st Century Economist. White River Junction VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rockström, J., and O. Gaffney. 2021. Breaking Boundaries: The Science of Our Planet. London: Dorling Kindersley.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, H. 2015. “Capitalism as a Spiral of Dynamization: Sociology as Social Critique.” In Sociology, Capitalism, Critique, edited by K. Dörre, S. Lessenich, and H. Rosa, 67–97. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, H. 2020. The Uncontrollability of the World. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., and A. Stirling. 2020. “Uncertainty and the Politics of Transformation.” In The Politics of Uncertainty: Challenges of Transformation, edited by I. Scoones and A. Stirling, 1–30. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shapin, S., and S. Schaffer. 2011. Leviathan and the Air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton N.J: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sörlin, S. 2013. “Reconfiguring Environmental Expertise.” Environmental Science & Policy 28: 14–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standring, A., and R. Lidskog. 2021. “(How) Does Diversity Still Matter for the IPCC? Instrumental, Substantive and Co-productive Logics of Diversity in Global Environmental Assessments.” Climate 9 (6): 99. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/cli9060099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenseke, M., and A. Larigauderie. 2018. “The Role, Importance and Challenges of Social Sciences and Humanities in the Work of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES).” Innovation 31 (sup1): S10–S14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2017.1398076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevance, A.-S., P. Bridgewater, S. Louafi, N. King, T. D. Beard, A. S. van Jaarsveld, Z. Ofir, et al. 2020. “The 2019 Review of IPBES and Future Priorities: Reaching beyond Assessment to Enhance Policy Impact.” Ecosystems and People 16 (1): 70–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2019.1702590.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, H. 2021. “Reforming Global Climate Governance in an Age of Bullshit.” Globalizations 18 (1): 86–102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1774315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tengö, M., R. Hill, P. Malmer, C. M. Raymond, M. Spierenburg, F. Danielsen, T. Elmqvist, and C. Folke. 2017. “Weaving Knowledge Systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond—Lessons Learned for Sustainability.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 26–27: 17–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadrot, A., A. Rankovic, R. Lapeyre, P.-M. Aubert, and Y. Laurans. 2018. “Why are Social Sciences and Humanities Needed in the Works of IPBES? A Systematic Review of the Literature.” Innovation 31 (sup1): S78–S100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1443799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, D. F., A. P. Rudy, and B. J. Gareau. 2016. Environments, Natures and Social Theory: Towards a Critical Hybridity. Basingstoke Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. 2003. “Seasick on the Third Wave? Subverting the Hegemony of Propositionalism.” Social Studies of Science 33 (3): 401–417. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2F03063127030333005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. 2005. “Risk as Globalizing ‘Democratic’ Discourse? Framing Subjects and Citizens.” In Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement, edited by M. Leach, I. Scoones, and B. Wynne, 66–82. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Zalasiewicz, J., M. Williams, W. Steffen, and P. Crutzen. 2010. “The New World of the Anthropocene.” Environmental Science & Technology 44 (7): 2228–2231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/es903118j.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar