432
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Stewarding relations of trust: citizen scientist perspectives on fostering community trust in science

, , &
Pages 31-50 | Received 26 Jan 2022, Accepted 10 Aug 2022, Published online: 17 Aug 2022

References

  • Aceves-Bueno, E., A. S. Adeleye, D. Bradley, W. Tyler Brandt, P. Callery, M. Feraud, K. L. Garner, et al. 2015. “Citizen Science as an Approach for Overcoming Insufficient Monitoring and Inadequate Stakeholder Buy-in in Adaptive Management: Criteria and Evidence.” Ecosystems 18 (3): 493–506. doi:10.1007/s10021-015-9842-4.
  • Andrejevic, M. 2013. “Cutting through the Glut: Knowledge Small Enough to Know.” In Info-glut: How Too Much Information Is Changing the Way We Think, 136–165. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Ballerini, L., and S. Bergh. 2021. “Using Citizen Science to Monitor the Sustainable Development Goals: A Bottom-Up Analysis.” Sustainability Science 16 (6): 1945–1962. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-01001-1.
  • Beck, S. 2012. “Between Tribalism and Trust: The IPCC under the Public Microscope.” Nature and Culture 7 (2): 151–173. doi:10.3167/nc.2012.070203.
  • Blacker, S., A. Kimura, and A. Kinchy. 2021. “When Citizen Science Is Public Relations.” Social Studies of Science 51 (5): 780–796. doi:10.1177/03063127211027662.
  • Blake, C., A. Rhanor, and C. Pajic. 2020. “The Demographics of Citizen Science Participation and Its Implications for Data Quality and Environmental Justice.” Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 5 (1): 21, 1–10.
  • Bonney, R., C. B. Cooper, J. Dickinson, S. Kelling, T. Phillips, K. V, J. Shirk, et al. 2009. “Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy.” BioScience 59 (11): 977–984. DOI:10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9.
  • Breyman, S., N. Campbell, V. Eubanks, and A. Kinchy. 2017. “STS and Social Movements: Pasts and Futures.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies: Fourth Edition, edited by U. Felt, R. Fouche, C. A. Miller, and L. Smith-Doerr, 289–318. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Brown, P. 1997. “Popular Epidemiology Revisited.” Current Sociology 45 (3): 137–156. doi:10.1177/001139297045003008.
  • Bucchi, M. 2009. Beyond Technocracy: Science, Politics, and Citizens. London: Springer.
  • Carlson, T., and A. Cohen. 2018. “Linking Community-Based Monitoring to Water Policy: Perceptions of Citizen Scientists.” Journal of Environmental Management 219: 168–177. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.077.
  • Cherry, E. 2019. “’Not an Environmentalist:’ Strategic Centrism,Cultural Stereotypes, and Disidentification.” Sociological Perspectives 62 (5): 755–772. doi:10.1177/0731121419859297.
  • Chilvers, J., and M. Kearnes. 2019. “Remaking Participation in Science and Democracy.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 45 (3): 347–380. doi:10.1177/0162243919850885.
  • Clark, B. J., A. Paterson, A. Jeziorsky, and S. Kelsey. 2010. “Assessing Variability in Total Phosphorus Measurements in Ontario Lakes.” Lake and Reservoir Management 26 (1): 63–72. doi:10.1080/07438141003712139.
  • Clean Water Act of 1972. Public Law 92-500. US Statutes at Large 86 (2002): 816-903. Codified at US Code 33, §§ 1251 et seq.
  • Coffey, A., and P. L. Atkinson. 1996. Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Collins, H. M., and R. Evans. 2002. “The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience.” Social Studies of Science 32 (2): 235–296. doi:10.1177/0306312702032002003.
  • Collins, H. M., R. Evans, and M. Weinel. 2017. “STS as Science or Politics?” Social Studies of Science 47 (4): 580–586. doi:10.1177/0306312717710131.
  • Conrad, C. C., and K. G. Hilchey. 2011. “A Review of Citizen Science and Community-based Environmental Monitoring: Issues and Opportunities.” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 176 (1–4): 273–291. doi:10.1007/s10661-010-1582-5.
  • Cooper, C., and B. Lewenstein. 2016. “Two Meanings of Citizen Science.” In Citizen Science: The Rightful Place of Science, edited by D. Cavalier, 51–62. Phoenix: Arizona State University Press.
  • Corburn, J. 2005. Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Creswell, J. W., and J. D. Creswell. 2018. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
  • Danielsen, F., N. D. Burgess, A. Balmford, P. F. Donald, M. Funder, J. P. G. Jones, P. Alviola, et al. 2009. “Local Participation in Natural Resource Monitoring: A Characterization of Approaches.” Conservation Biology 23 (1): 31–42. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01063.x.
  • Demeritt, D. 2015. “The Promises of Participation in Science and Political Ecology.” In The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology, edited by T. Perreault, G. Bridge, and J. McCarthy, 224–234. Abingdon: Routledge International.
  • Dickinson, J. L., J. Shirk, D. Bonter, R. Bonney, R. L. Crain, J. Martin, T. Phillips, and K. Purcell. 2012. ”The Current State of Citizen Science as a Tool for Ecological Research and Public Engagement.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10 (6): 291–297.
  • Eitzel, M. V., J. L. Cappadonna, C. Santos-Lang, R. E. Duerr, A. Virapongse, S. E. West, C. C. M. Kyba, et al. 2017. “Citizen Science Terminology Matters: Exploring Key Terms.” Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 2 (1): 1. doi:10.5334/cstp.96.
  • Ellis, R., and C. Waterton. 2005. “Caught between the Cartographic and the Ethnographic Imagination: The Whereabouts of Amateurs, Professionals, and Nature in Knowing Biodiversity.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23 (5): 673–693. doi:10.1068/d353t.
  • Epstein, S. 1996. Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Eyal, G. 2019. The Crisis of Expertise. London: Polity.
  • Federation of Ontario Cottagers’ Associations (FOCA), The Lake Partner Program, (Peterborough, ON, 2019), https://foca.on.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/LPP-Long-Report_FINAL-REPORT.pdf.
  • Frank, T. 2020. “Chapter 8: Let Us Now Scold Uncouth Men.” In The People, No: A Brief History of Anti-Populism, 223–244. New York: Metropolitan Books.
  • Frickel, S., S. Gibbon, J. Howard, J. Kempner, G. Ottinger, and D. J. Hess. 2010. “Undone Science: Charting Social Movement and Civil Society Challenges to Research Agenda Setting.” Science Technology and Human Values 35 (4): 444–473. doi:10.1177/0162243909345836.
  • Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic Justice: Power & Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Fujimura, J. H., and C. J. Holmes. 2019. “Staying the Course: On the Value of Social Studies of Science in Resistance to the “Post-truth” Movement.” Sociological Forum 34 (1): 1251–1263. doi:10.1111/socf.12545.
  • Fuller, S. 2017. Is STS All Talk and No Walk? EASST Review 36 1: Available at https://easst.net/article/is-sts-all-talk-and-no-walk/
  • Funk, C., M. Hefferon, B. Kennedy, and C. Johnson. 2019. “Trust and Mistrust in Americans’ Views of Scientific Experts.” PEW Research Centre. Accessed 2 August 2019. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2019/08/02/trust-and-mistrust-in-americans-views-of-scientific-experts/
  • Funk, C., and B. Kennedy. 2016. “The Politics of Climate.” PEW Research Center, Accessed 4 October 2016. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2016/10/PS_2016.10.04_Politics-of-Climate_FINAL.pdf
  • Ghinea, N. 2019. “Citizen Science and the Politicization of Epistemology.” American Journal of Bioethics 19 (8): 58–60. doi:10.1080/15265161.2019.1619860.
  • Glaser, B. G. 2016. “Open Coding Descriptions.” Grounded Theory Review: An International Journal 15 (2): 108–110.
  • Haklay, M. 2018. “Participatory Citizen Science.” In Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society, and Policy, edited by S. Hecker, M. Haklay, A. Bowser, Z. Makuch, J. Vogel, and A. Bonn, 52–62. London: UCL Press.
  • Hannigan, J. A. 2016. Environmental Sociology. 3rd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Hano, M. C., L. Wei, B. Hubbell, and A. G. Rappold. 2020. “Scaling Up : Citizen Science Engagement and Impacts beyond the Individual.” Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 5 (1): 1–13. doi:10.5334/cstp.244.
  • Hess, D. J. 2020. “The Sociology of Ignorance and Post-Truth Politics.” Sociological Forum 35 (1): 241–249. doi:10.1111/socf.12577.
  • Hoffarth, M. R., and G. Hodson. 2016. “Green on the Outside, Red on the Inside: Perceived Environmentalist Threat as a Factor Explaining Political Polarization of Climate Change.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 45: 40–49. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.002.
  • Hornsey, M. J., E. A. Harris, P. G. Bain, and K. S. Fielding. 2016. “Meta-analyses of the Determinants and Outcomes of Belief in Climate Change.” Nature Climate Change 6 (6): 622–626. doi:10.1038/nclimate2943.
  • Hoyer, M., and D. Canfield. 2021. “Volunteer-collected Water Quality Data Can Be Used for Science and Management.” Lake and Reservoir Management 37 (3): 235–245. doi:10.1080/10402381.2021.1876190.
  • Irwin, A. 1995. Citizen Science: A Study of People, Knowledge, and Expertise. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Irwin, A. 2008. “STS Perspectives on Scientific Governance.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, and J. Wajcman, 583–607. London: MIT Press.
  • Irwin, A. 2014. “From Deficit to Democracy (Re-Visited).” Public Understanding of Science 23 (1): 71–76. doi:10.1177/0963662513510646.
  • Iyengar, S., and D. S. Massey. 2019. “Scientific Communication in a Post-truth Society.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (16): 7656–7661. doi:10.1073/pnas.1805868115.
  • Jalbert, K., and A. Kinchy. 2016. “Sense and Influence: Environmental Monitoring Tools and the Power of Citizen Science.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 18 (3): 379–397. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2015.1100985.
  • Jordan, R., A. Crall, S. Gray, T. Phillips, and D. Mellor. 2015. “Citizen Science as a Distinct Field of Inquiry.” Bioscience 65 (2): 208–211. doi:10.1093/biosci/biu217.
  • Kimura, A. H., and A. Kinchy. 2016. “Citizen Science: Probing the Virtues and Contexts of Participatory Research.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 2: 331–361. doi:10.17351/ests2016.099.
  • Kimura, A. H., and A. Kinchy. 2020. Science by the People. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
  • Kinchy, A. 2017. “Citizen Science and Democracy: Participatory Water Monitoring in the Marcellus Shale Fracking Boom.” Science as Culture 26 (1): 88–110. doi:10.1080/09505431.2016.1223113.
  • Kullenberg, C., D. Kasperowski, and P. Dorta-González. 2016. “What Is Citizen Science? A Scientometric Meta-analysis.” PLoS ONE 11 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147152.
  • Latimore, J. A., and P. J. Steen. 2014. “Integrating Freshwater Science and Local Management through Volunteer Monitoring Partnerships: The Michigan Clean Water Corps.” Freshwater Science 33 (2): 686–692. doi:10.1086/676118.
  • Lave, R. 2012. “Neoliberalism and the Production of Environmental Knowledge.” Environment and Society: Advances in Research 3 (2): 19–38. doi:10.3167/ares.2012.030103.
  • Lerner, S. 2010. Sacrifice Zones: The Front Lines of Toxic Chemical Exposure in the United States. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Lidskog, R., and G. Sundqvist. 2018. “Environmental Expertise as Group Belonging: Environmental Sociology Meets Science and Technology Studies.” Nature and Culture 13 (3): 309–331. doi:10.3167/nc.2018.130301.
  • Lubchenco, J. 2017. “Environmental Science in a Post-truth World.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 15 (1): 3. doi:10.1002/fee.1454.
  • Maher, C., M. Hadfield, M. Hutchings, and A. de Eyto. 2018. “Ensuring Rigor in Qualitative Data Analysis: A Design Research Approach to Coding Combining NVivo with Traditional Material Methods.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 17 (1): 160940691878636. doi:10.1177/1609406918786362.
  • Malm, A. the Zetkin Collective. 2021. White Skin, Black Fuel: On the Dangers of Fossil Fascism. New York, NY: Verso.
  • Martin, V. Y. 2017. “Citizen Science as a Means for Increasing Public Engagement in Science: Presumption or Possibility?” Science Communication 39 (2): 142–168. doi:10.1177/1075547017696165.
  • McCright, A. M., and R. E. Dunlap. 2011. “The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public’s Views of Global Warming, 2001–2010.” The Sociological Quarterly 52 (2): 155–194. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x.
  • McIntyre, L. 2018. Post Truth: MIT Press Essential Knowledge Series. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Mede, N. G., and M. S. Schäfer. 2020. “Science-related Populism: Conceptualizing Populist Demands toward Science.” Public Understanding of Science 29 (5): 473–491. doi:10.1177/0963662520924259.
  • Miles, M. B., A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña. 2019. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Millar, E. E., E. C. Hazell, and S. J. Melles. 2019. “The ‘Cottage Effect’ in Citizen Science? Spatial Bias in Aquatic Monitoring Programs.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 33 (8): 1612–1632. doi:10.1080/13658816.2018.1423686.
  • Mirowski, P. 2018. “The Future(s) of Open Science.” Social Studies of Science 48 (2): 171–203. doi:10.1177/0306312718772086.
  • Mirowski, P. 2020. “Democracy, Expertise and the Post-Truth Era: An Inquiry into the Contemporary Politics of STS.” https://www.academia.edu/42682483/Democracy_Expertise_and_the_Post_Truth_Era_An_Inquiry_into_the_Contemporary_Politics_of_STS
  • Moczek, N., S. Voigt-Heucke, K. G. Mortega, C. Fabó Cartas, and J. Knobloch. 2021. “A Self-Assessment of European Citizen Science Projects on Their Contribution to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (Sdgs).” Sustainability 13 (4): 1744. doi:10.3390/su13041774.
  • Moore, K. 2008. Disrupting Science: Social Movements, American Scientists, and the Politics of the Military, 1945-1975. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Ontario Data Catalogue. 2020. “Lake Partner Program.” Government of Ontario. Accessed 5 May 2022. https://data.ontario.ca/dataset/ontario-lake-partner
  • Ottinger, G. 2010. “Buckets of Resistance: Standards and the Effectiveness of Citizen Science.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 35 (2): 137–156. doi:10.1177/0162243909337121.
  • Ottinger, G. 2022. “Misunderstanding Citizen Science: Hermeneutic Ignorance in U.S. Environmental Regulation.” Science as Culture 1–26. Ahead of print. doi:10.1080/09505431.2022.2035710.
  • Ottinger, G., J. Barandiaran, and A. H. Kimura. 2017. “Environmental Justice: Knowledge, Technology, and Expertise.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies: Fourth Edition, edited by U. Felt, R. Fouche, C. A. Miller, and L. Smith-Doerr, 1029–1058. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Palliser, A., and G. Dodson. 2019. “Avoiding Post-Truth Environmental Conflict in New Zealand: Communicating Uncertainties in Endangered Species Science.” Journal of Science Communication 18 (4): 1–24. doi:10.22323/2.18040205.
  • Pateman, R., A. Dyke, and S. West. 2021. ““The Diversity of Participants in Environmental Citizen Science.” Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 6 (1): 9, 1–16.
  • Pollock, R. M., and G. S. Whitelaw. 2005. “Community-based Monitoring in Support of Local Sustainability.” Local Environment 10 (3): 211–228. doi:10.1080/13549839.2005.9684248.
  • Porcelli, A. M., and J. F. Besek. 2022. “Sub-disciplining in Sociology: Bridges and Barriers between Environmental STS and Environmental Sociology.” Environmental Sociology 8 (2): 149–160. doi:10.1080/23251042.2021.1991647.
  • Radin, J. 2019. “Alternative Facts and States of Fear: Reality and STS in an Age of Climate Fictions.” Minerva 57 (4): 411–431. doi:10.1007/s11024-019-09374-5.
  • Ravetz, J., and A. Saltelli. 2015. “The Future of Public Trust in Science.” Nature 524 (7564): 161. doi:10.1038/524161a.
  • Rose, D. C. 2018. “Avoiding a Post-truth World: Embracing Post-normal Conservation.” Conservation and Society 16 (4): 518–524. doi:10.4103/cs.cs_17_131.
  • Rowe, G., and L. J. Frewer. 2005. “A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms.” Science Technology and Human Values 30 (2): 251–290. doi:10.1177/0162243904271724.
  • Saldaña, J. 2016. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
  • Saltelli, A., and S. Funtowicz. 2017. “What Is Science’s Crisis Really About?” Futures 91 (5): 5–11. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2017.05.010.
  • Sharpe, A., and C. Conrad. 2006. “Community Based Ecological Monitoring in Nova Scotia: Challenges and Opportunities.” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 113 (1–3): 395–409. doi:10.1007/s10661-005-9091-7.
  • Shirk, J. J. L., H. H. Ballard, C. C. Wilderman, T. Phillips, A. Wiggins, R. Jordan, E. McCallie, et al. 2012. “Public Participation in Scientific Research: A Framework for Intentional Design.” Ecology and Society 17 (2): 29. doi:10.5751/ES-04705-170229.
  • Silvertown, J. 2009. “A New Dawn for Citizen Science.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24 (9): 467–471. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017.
  • Soleri, D., J. Long, M. Ramirez-Andreotta, R. Eitemiller, and R. Pandya. 2016. “Finding Pathways to More Equitable and Meaningful Public-Scientist Partnerships.” Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 1 (9): 1–11.
  • Sorichetti, R. J., M. Raby, C. Holeton, N. Benoit, L. Carson, A. DeSellas, Diep, et al. 2022. “Chloride Trends in Ontario’s Surface and Groundwaters.” Journal of Great Lakes Research 48 (2): 512–525. DOI:10.1016/j.jglr.2022.01.015.
  • Stepenuck, K. F., and K. D. Genskow. 2018. “Characterizing the Breadth and Depth of Volunteer Water Monitoring Programs in the United States.” Environmental Management 61 (1): 46–57. doi:10.1007/s00267-017-0956-7.
  • Syed, M., and S. Nelson. 2015. “Guidelines for Establishing Reliability When Coding Narrative Data.” Emerging Adulthood 3 (6): 375–387. doi:10.1177/2167696815587648.
  • Thornton, T., and J. Leahy. 2012. “Trust in Citizen Science Research: A Case Study of the Groundwater Education through Water Evaluation & Testing Program.” JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 48 (5): 1032–1040. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012.00670.x.
  • Vaidhyanathan, S. 2018. Anti-social Media: How Facebook Disconnects Us and Undermines Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Welsh, I., and B. Wynne. 2013. “Science, Scientism and Imaginaries of Publics in the UK: Passive Objects, Incipient Threats.” Science as Culture 22 (4): 540–566. doi:10.1080/14636778.2013.764072.
  • Wilderman, C. C., and J. Monismith. 2016. “Monitoring Marcellus: A Case Study of a Collaborative Volunteer Monitoring Project to Document the Impact of Unconventional Shale Gas Extraction on Small Streams.” Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 1 (1): 1–17. doi:10.5334/cstp.20.
  • Winter, J. G., A. M. DeSallas, R. Fletcher, L. Heintsch, A. Morley, L. Nakamoto, and K. Utsumi. 2011. “Algal Blooms in Ontario, Canada: Increases in Reports since 1994.” Lake and Reservoir Management 27 (2): 107–114. doi:10.1080/07438141.2011.557765.
  • Wynne, B. 1996. “May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Lay-Expert Divide.” In Risk, Environment, Modernity: Towards a New Ecology, edited by S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, and B. Wynne, 44–83. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Wynne, B. 2006. “Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science: Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music?” Public Health Genomics 9 (3): 211–220. doi:10.1159/000092659.
  • Yearley, S. 2002. “The Social Construction of Environmental Problems: A Theoretical Review and Some Not-Very Herculean Labors.” In Sociological Theory and the Environment: Classical Foundations, Contemporary Insights, edited by R. Dunlap, F. H. Buttel, P. Dickens, and A. Gijswijt, 274–285. Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Ylä-Anttila, T. 2018. “Populist Knowledge: ‘Post-truth’ Repertoires of Contesting Epistemic Authorities.” European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 5 (4): 356–388. doi:10.1080/23254823.2017.1414620.
  • Ziman, J. 1991. “Public Understanding of Science.” Science, Technology & Human Values 16 (1): 99–105. doi:10.1177/016224399101600106.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.