The relationship between work-family policies and pro-environmental behaviour of single mothers as economically disadvantaged group

References

• Ajzen, I. 1991. “The Theory of Planned Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and And Human Decision Processes 50 (2): 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aral, Ö., and J. López-Sintas. 2021. “Is Pro-Environmentalism a Privilege? Country Development Factors As Moderators of Socio-Psychological Drivers of Pro-Environmental Behavior.” Environmental Sociology 8 (2): 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2021.2018123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benegal, S. 2018. “The Impact of Unemployment and Economic Risk Perceptions on Attitudes Towards Anthropological Climate Change.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 8 (3): 300–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-017-0452-7.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, L., and D. Mortelmans, eds. 2018. Lone Parenthood in the Life Course. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bloodhart, B., and J. Swim. 2020. “Sustainability and Consumption: What’s Gender Got to Do with It?” Journal of Social Issues 76 (1): 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12370.
   Google Scholar
• Boeckmann, I., M. Budig, and J. Misra. 2012. Work-Family Policy Indicators. Sociology Department, University of Massachusetts-Amherst. https://doi.org/10.7275/R5WD3XHS.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, D., and R. Burroway. 2012. “Targeting, Universalism, and Single-Mother Poverty: A Multilevel Analysis Across 18 Affluent Democracies.” Demography 49 (2): 719–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-012-0094-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, A. L. 2012. “Policy Makes Mass Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 15: 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-012610-135202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekman, A. B., and A. Eagly. 2000. “Stereotypes As Dynamic Constructs: Women and Men of the Past, Present, and Future.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26 (10): 1171–1188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200262001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, T., L. Kalof, and P. C. Stern. 2002. “Gender, Values, and Environmentalism.” Social Science Quarterly 83 (1): 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.00088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzialo, L. 2017. “The Feminization of Environmental Responsibility: A Quantitative, Cross-National Analysis.” Environmental Sociology 3 (4): 427–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2017.1327924.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H.1987. Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation. New York: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203781906.
   Google Scholar
• Edin, K., and M. J. Kefalas. 2005. Promises I Can Keep: Why Poor Women Put Motherhood Before Marriage. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elff, M., J. P. Heisig, M. Schaeffer, and S. Shikano. 2020. “Multilevel Analysis with Few Clusters: Improving Likelihood-Based Methods to Provide Unbiased Estimates and Accurate Inference.” British Journal of Political Science 51 (1): 412–426. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123419000097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2019. “Mechanisms Supporting Single Parents Across the European Union.” https://doi.org/10.2767/786465.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2021. How Many Single-Parent Households Are There in the EU? https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/edn-20210601-2.
   Google Scholar
• Gornick, J. C., and M. K. Meyers. 2003. Families That Work: Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment. Russell Sage Foundation. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/9781610442510
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, B. C. 2001. “Gender, Scientific Knowledge, and Attitudes Toward the Environment: A Cross-National Analysis.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (3): 657–671. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290105400309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heisig, J. P., and M. Schaeffer. 2019. “Why You Should Always Include a Random Slope for the Lower-Level Variable Involved in a Cross-Level Interaction.” European sociological review 35 (2): 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hübgen, S. 2020. “Understanding Lone mothers’ High Poverty in Germany: Disentangling Composition Effects and Effects of Lone Motherhood.” Advances in Life Course Research 44 (2020): 100327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2020.100327.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacobs, L., and S. Mettler. 2018. “When and How New Policy Creates New Politics: Examining the Feedback Effects of the Affordable Care Act on Public Opinion.” Politics& Governance 16 (2): 345–363. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592717004182.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, E. H., and J. Kmec. 2018. “Reinterpreting the Gender Gap in Household Pro-Environmental Behaviour.” Environmental Sociology 4 (3): 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2018.1436891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleven, H., C. Landeis, J. Posch, A. Steinhauer, and J. Zweimüller. 2019. “Child Penalties Across Countries: Evidence and Explanations.” NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 25524.
   Google Scholar
• Kulin, J., and I. J. Sevä. 2021. “Quality of Government and the Relationship Between Environmental Concern and Pro-Environmental Behavior: A Cross-National Study.” Environmental Politics 30 (5): 727–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1809160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longhi, S. 2013. “Individual Pro-Environmental Behaviour in the Household Context.” ISER Working Paper Series No. 2013-21. University of Essex, Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER), Colchester.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, K., M. Brooks, A. Darnton, and J. E. Jones. 2008. “Promoting Pro-Environmental Behaviour: Existing Evidence and Policy Implications.” Environmental Science & Policy 11 (5): 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2008.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, C. J. M., and J. J. Hox. 2004. “Robustness Issues in Multilevel Regression Analysis.” Statistica Neerlandica 58 (2): 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0039-0402.2003.00252.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maldonado, L. C., and R. Nieuwenhuis. 2014. “Family Policies and Single Parent Poverty in 18 OECD Countries, 1978-2008.” LIS Working Paper Series No. 622. Luxembourg Income Study (LIS), Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Markkanen, S., and A. Anger-Kraavi. 2019. “Social Impacts of Climate Change Mitigation Policies and Their Implications for Inequality.” Climate Policy 19 (7): 827–844. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1596873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquart-Pyatt, S. T., H. Qian, M. K. Houser, and A. McCright. 2019. “Climate Change Views, Energy Policy Preferences, and Intended Actions Across Welfare State Regimes: Evidence from the European Social Survey.” International Journal of Sociology 49 (1): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2018.1560979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCright, A. M. 2010. “The Effects of Gender on Climate Change Knowledge and Concern in the American Public.” Population and environment 32: 66–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-010-0113-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melo, P. C., J. Ge, T. Craig, M. J. Brewer, and I. Thronicker. 2018. “Does Work-Life Balance Affect Pro-Environmental Behaviour? Evidence for the UK Using Longitudinal Microdata.” Ecological Economics 145 (2018): 170–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.09.006.
   Google Scholar
• Milfont, T. L., N. Harré, C. G. Sibley, and J. Duckitt. 2012. “The Climate-Change Dilemma: Examining the Association Between Parental Status and Political Party Support 1.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 42 (10): 2386–2410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00946.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milfont, T. L., W. Poortinga, C. G. Sibley, and J. Denissen. 2020. “Does Having Children Increase Environmental Concern? Testing Parenthood Effects with Longitudinal Data from the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study.” PLOS ONE 15 (3): e0230361. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra, J., S. Moller, and M. Budig. 2007. “Work-Family Policies and Poverty for Partnered and Single Women in Europe and North America.” Gender and Society 21 (6): 804–827. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243207308445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra, J., S. Moller, E. Strader, and E. Wemlinger. 2012. “Family Policies, Employment and Poverty Among Partnered and Single Mothers.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 30 (1): 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2011.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möhring, K. 2012. “The Fixed Effect As an Alternative to Multilevel Analysis for Cross-National Analyses.” GK SOCLIFE Working Papers Series 16. Cologne: University of Cologne.
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuis, R. 2022. “Single Parents Competing in a Dual-Earner Society: Social Policy to Level the Playing Field.” Annals of the American Academy. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162221122686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, T. A., H. Zacher, S. L. Parker, and N. M. Ashkanasy. 2017. “Bridging the Gap Between Green Behavioural Intentions and Employee Green Behavior: The Role of Green Psychological Climate.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 38 (7): 996–1015. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto, A., and D. Gugushvili. 2020. “Eco-Social Divides in Europe: Public Attitudes Towards Welfare and Climate Change Policies.” Sustainability 12 (404): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010404.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Panarello, D. 2020. “Economic Insecurity, Conservatism, and the Crisis of Environmentalism: 30 Years of Evidence.” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 73:100925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parth, A.-M., and T. Vlandas. 2022. “The Welfare State and Support for Environmental Action in Europe.” Journal of European Social Policy 32 (5): 531–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/09589287221115657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petit, E. 2014. “Ethique du care et comportement pro-environnemental.” Revue d’économie politique 124 (2): 243–267. https://doi.org/10.3917/redp.242.0243.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, A. L., and H. M. Ingram. 2005. Deserving and Entitled: Social Constructions and Public Policy. New York: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scruggs, L., and S. Benegal. 2012. “Declining Public Concern About Climate Change: Can We Blame the Great Recession?” Global Environmental Change 22 (2): 505–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore, J. 2019. “Singled Out or Drawn In?.” Social Polices and Lone Mothers’ Political Engagement. Politics &gender. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X19000278.
   Google Scholar
• Soss, J., and S. Schram. 2007. “A Public Transformed? Welfare Reform as Policy Feedback.” American Political Science Review 101 (1): 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055407070049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadelmann-Steffen, I., and C. Eder. 2020. “Public Opinion in Policy Contexts: A Comparative Analysis of Domestic Energy Policies and Individual Policy Preferences in Europe.” International Political Science Review 42 (1): 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120913047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C. 2000. “New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior.” Journal of Social Issues 56 (3): 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, K. 2009. “Employment and Wage Trajectories for Mothers Entering Low-Skilled Work: Evidence from the British Lone Parent Cohort.” Social Policy& Administration 43 (5): 483–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2009.00675.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swim, J., A. J. Gillis, and K. Hamaty. 2020. “Gender Bending and Gender Conformity: The Social Consequences of Engaging in Feminine and Masculine Pro-Environmental Behaviors.” Sex Roles 80 (5–6): 363–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01061-9.
   Google Scholar
• Thøgersen, J. 2014. “The Mediated Influences of Perceived Norms on Pro-Environmental Behavior.” Revue d’économie politique 124 (2): 179–193. https://doi.org/10.3917/redp.242.0179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G., R. Fisher, L. Whitmarsh, T. L. Milfont, and W. Poortinga. 2018. “The Impact of Parenthood on Environmental Attitudes and Behaviour: A Longitudinal Investigation of the Legacy Hypothesis.” Population and Environment 39 (3): 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-017-0291-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosun, J. 2022. “Addressing Climate Change Through Climate Action.” Climate Action 1 (1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44168-022-00003-8.
   Google Scholar
• Vicente-Molina, M. A., A. Fernández-Sáinz, and J. Izagirre-Olaizola. 2018. “Does gender make a difference in pro-environmental behavior? The case of the Basque Country University students.” Journal of Cleaner Production 176 (1): 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.079.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K., and T. Ha. 2013. Does Becoming a Mother Make Women ‘Greener’? The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/does-becoming-a-mother-make-women-greener-19390.
   Google Scholar
• Zelezny, L., P.-P. Chua, and C. Aldrich. 2000. “New Ways of Thinking About Environmentalism: Elaborating on Gender Differences in Environmentalism.” Journal of Social Issues 56 (3): 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar