Is an urban waste-to-energy plant a “green” megaproject? The power of narratives in shaping the city: a Danish case study

References

• Abbot, K. W., and S. Bernstein. 2015. “The High-Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development: Orchestration by Default and Design.” Global Policy 6 (3): 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. J., and J. G. Pontusson. 2007. “Workers, Worries and Welfare States: Social Protection and Job Insecurity in 15 OECD Countries.” European Journal of Political Research 46 (2): 211–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00692.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreotti, A., P. Le Galès, and F. J. Moreno-Fuentes. 2015. Globalised Minds, Roots in the City: Urban Upper Middle Classes in Europe. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Anthopoulos, L. G. 2017. “Understanding the Smart City Domain: A Literature Review.” In Transforming City Governments for Successful Smart Cities. Public Administration and Information Technology, edited by M. P. Rodríguez-Bolívar, Vol. 8. Switzerland: Springer Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Beveridge, R., and P. Koch. 2017. “The Post-Political Trap? Reflections on Politics, Agency and the City.” Urban Studies 54 (1): 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016671477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugge, M. M., T. Hansen, and A. Klitkou. 2016. “What Is the Bioeconomy? A Review of the Literature.” Sustainability 8 (7): 691. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural Holes. The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Capano, G., M. T. Galanti, and G. Barbato. 2023. “When the Political Leader Is the Narrator: The Political and Policy Dimensions of Narratives.” Policy Sciences 56:233–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-023-09505-6.
   Google Scholar
• Caragliu, A., C. Del Bo, and P. Nijkamp. 2011. “Smart Cities in Europe.” Journal of Urban Technology 18 (2): 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardullo, P., and R. Kitchin. 2019. “Smart Urbanism and Smart Citizenship: The Neoliberal Logic of ‘Citizen-Focused’ Smart Cities in Europe.” Environment & Planning C Politics & Space 37 (5): 813–830. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X18806508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch, C., and A. Pizzorno, eds. 1977. Conflitti in Europa: Lotte di Classe, Sindacati e Stato dopo il ’68. Milano: Etas Libri.
   Google Scholar
• De Lange, M., and M. De Waal. 2013. “Owning the City: New Media and Citizen Engagement in Urban Design.” First Monday 18 (11). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i11.4954.
   Google Scholar
• Del Cerro Santamaria, G. 2013. “Megaprojects, Development and Competitiveness: Building the Infrastructure for Globalization and Neoliberalism.” Athens Journal of Social Sciences 6 (4): 263–290. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajss.6-4-1.
   Google Scholar
• Desdemoustier, J., N. Crutzen, M. Cools, and J. Teller. 2019. “Smart City Appropriation by Local Actors: An Instrument in the Making.” Cities 92:175–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito, F., G. Taffoni, and L. T. De Paolis. 2021. “Narratives and Policy Processes: The Role of Storytelling in Shaping Smart City Policies.” Journal of Urban Technology 28 (1): 103–119.
   Google Scholar
• Esposito, G., A. Terlizzi, and N. Crutzen. 2020. “Policy Narratives and Megaprojects: The Case of the Lyon-Turin High-Speed Railway.” Public Management Review 24 (1): 55–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1795230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito, G., A. Terlizzi, M. Guarino, and N. Crutzen. 2023. “Interpreting Digital Governance at the Municipal Level: Evidence from Smart City Projects in Belgium.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 90 (2): 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523231167538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2014. “What You Should Know About Megaprojects and Why: An Overview.” Project Management Journal 45 (2): 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss, N. J., P. G. Klein, and C. Bjørnskov. 2018. “The Context of Entrepreneurial Judgment: Organizations, Markets, and Institutions.” Journal of Management Studies 56 (6): 1197–1213. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasmeier, A. K., and M. Nebiolo. 2016. “Thinking About Smart Cities. The Travels of a Policy Idea That Promises a Great Deal, but so Far Has Delivered Modest Results.” Sustainability 8 (11): 1122. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8111122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollands, R. 2015. “Critical Interventions into the Corporate Smart City.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy & Society 8 (1): 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollands, R. G. 2008. “Will the Real Smart City Please Stand Up? Intelligent, Progressive or Entrepreneurial?” City 12 (3): 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810802479126.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D., A. J. Norval, and Y. Stavrakakis, eds. 2000. Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E. 1995. “Planning Theory’s Emerging Paradigm: Communicative Action and Interactive Practice.” Sage 14 (3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9501400307.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. D., and M. K. McBeth. 2010. “A Narrative Policy Framework: Clear Enough to Be Wrong?” Policy Studies Journal 38 (2): 329–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00364.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joss, S., F. Sengers, D. Schraven, F. Caprotti, and Y. Dayot. 2019. “The Smart City as Global Discourse: Storylines and Critical Junctures Across 27 Cities.” Journal of Urban Technology 26 (1): 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2018.1558387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz-Rosene, R. M. 2017. “From Narrative of Promise to Rhetoric of Sustainability: A Genealogy of Oil Sands.” Environmental Communication 11 (3): 401–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2016.1253597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. 2003. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2nd ed. Boston: Addison-Wesley Longman Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kohl, U. 2019. “The Copenhill Crisis: The Dark Side of Planning. The Greenest Waste-Fired Power Plant Ever Seen.” Master’s thesis, Malmö Högskola. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-21591.
   Google Scholar
• Kohl, U., and J. Andersen. 2022. “Copenhagen’s Struggle to Become the World’s First Carbon Neutral Capital: How Corporatist Power Beats Sustainability.” Urban Planning 7 (3): 230–241. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i3.5327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leifeld, P., and L. Brandenberger. 2019. “Endogenous Coalition Formation in Policy Debates.” arXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1904.05327.
   Google Scholar
• Leipold, S., P. H. Feindt, G. Winkel, and R. Keller. 2019. “Discourse Analysis of Environmental Policy Revisited: Traditions, Trends, Perspectives.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 21 (5): 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1660462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima, M. 2020. “Smarter Organizations: Insights from a Smart City Hybrid Framework.” International Entrepreneurship & Management Journal 16 (4): 1281–1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00690-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucciarini, S., and R. Galdini. 2023. “Bridging the “Consent gap”: Mechanisms of Legitimization in a Cross-Border Megaproject.” Policy and Society 42 (2): 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puad007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, H. 2018. “The Smart City and Other ICT-Led Techno-Imaginaries: Any Room for Dialogue with Degrowth?” Journal of Cleaner Production 197 (Part 2): 1694–1703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.154.
   Google Scholar
• Margherita, G. M., D. E. Escobar, G. Esposito, and N. Crutzen. 2023. “Exploring the Potential Impact of Smart Urban Technologies on Urban Sustainability Using Structural Topic Modelling: Evidence from Belgium.” Cities, 141.
   Google Scholar
• Marvin, S., A. Luque-Ayala, and C. McFarlane, eds. 2016. Smart Urbanism: Utopian Vision or False Dawn?. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McBeth, M. K., and E. A. Shanahan. 2004. “Public Opinion for Sale: The Role of Policy Marketers in Greater Yellowstone Policy Conflict.” Policy Sciences 37:319–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-005-8876-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, A., and M. Bolivar. 2016. “Governing the Smart City: A Review of the Literature on Smart Urban Governance.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 82 (2): 392–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K., and E. E Barber. 2002. Viaggi e avventure della Serendipity. Bologna: il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Mishler, E. G. 1995. “Models of Narrative Analysis: A Typology.” Journal of Narrative & Life History 5 (2): 87–123. https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.5.2.01mod.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, T., and T. A. Pardo. 2011. “Conceptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, People, and Institutions.” Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, 282–291. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037556.2037602.
   Google Scholar
• Nordestgaard, P. M., and C. H. Arndt. 2019. “Amager Bakke. A Steel Building with the Design Challenge of Creating a World Famous Recreational Roof.” The 14th Nordic Steel Construction Conference, 151–156. 3, Copenhagen, Denmark. 18–20 September 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.1156.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development). 2019. 1st OECD Roundtable on Smart Cities and Inclusive Growth. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1996. “Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development.” World Development 24 (6): 1073–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, M. 2011. ““København Dropper Storstilet Affaldsprojekt” [Copenhagen Drops Large‐scale Waste Project].” Energy Supply. December 6. https://www.energy-supply.dk/article/view/73152/kobenhavn_dropper_storstilet_affaldsprojekt.
   Google Scholar
• Savini, F. 2021. “Towards an Urban Degrowth: Habitability, Finity and Polycentric Autonomism.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 53 (5): 1076–1095. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20981391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. 2008. “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science 11:303–326. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R., R. E. Levitt, and R. J. Orr, eds. 2011. Global Projects: Institutional and Political Challenges. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seergeva, N., and J. Ninan. 2023. Narratives of the Futures. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seergeva, N., and G. M. Winch. 2021. “Project Narratives That Potentially Perform and Change the Future.” Project Management Journal 52 (3): 264–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972821995340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 2012. “No One Likes a City That Is Too Smart.” The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/dec/04/smart-city-rio-songdo-masdar.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, E. A., M. K. McBeth, and P. L. Hathaway. 2011. “Narrative Policy Framework: The Influence of Media Policy Narratives on Public Opinion.” Politics & Policy 39 (3): 373–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2011.00295.x.
   Google Scholar
• Shenhar, A., and V. Holzmann. 2017. “The Three Secrets of Megaproject Success: Clear Strategic Vision, Total Alignment, and Adapting to Complexity.” Project Management Journal 48 (6): 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697281704800604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, W., and K. Thelen, eds. 2005. Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uggla, Y., and M. Bostrom. 2018. “Ambivalence in Environmental Representation. A Theoretical Contribution.” Sociologisk Forskning 55 (4): 447–466. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26600033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanolo, A. 2014. “Smartmentality: The Smart City as Disciplinary Strategy.” Urban Studies 51 (5): 883–898. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013494427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vukelić, I., S. Milošević, D. Đurđević, G. Racić, and T. Vilmoš. 2023. “Sustainable Transition of the Republic of Serbia: Measuring Capacity for Circularity in Agriculture and Rural Areas.” Energy Sustainability and Society 13 (1): 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-023-00413-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, G., H. Qinghua, M. Xianhai, G. Locatelli, T. Yu, and X. Yan. 2017. “Exploring the Impact of Megaproject Environmental Responsibility on Organizational Citizenship Behaviours for the Environment: A Social Identity Perspective.” International Journal of Project Management 35 (7): 1402–1414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte, J., H. Wamelink, M. L. Veenswijk, K. Smits, O. Lofgren, K. Lauche, C. Ivory, and A. N. Esra. 2015. “Inside Megaprojects: Understanding Cultural Practices Advances.” In Organization Studies Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press, edited by R. Williams, 175–209. Copenhagen, DenmarkCopenhagen Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D., and E. Wyly. 2023. “Toward a Dracula Urbanism: Smart City Building in Flint and Jakarta.” Dialogues in Urban Research 1 (2): 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/27541258221134500.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, C. M. L., and S. Lockie. 2018. “Sociology, Risk and the Environment: A Material-Semiotic Approach.” Journal of Risk Research 21 (9): 1077–1092. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1422783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai, L., Y. Xin, and C. Cheng. 2009. “Understanding the Value of Project Management from a Stakeholder’s Perspective: Case Study of Megaproject Management.” Project Management Journal 40 (1): 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar