To seek and save the lost: human trafficking and salvation schemas among American evangelicals

References

• Alexander, C., & Becker, H. (1978). The use of vignettes in survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 93–104. doi: 10.1086/268432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allain, J., & Bales, K. (2011). Slavery and its definition. Queen's University Belfast Law Research Paper No. 12–06.
   Google Scholar
• Bales, K. (2012). Disposable people: New slavery in the global economy, (3rd ed.). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benford, R. D. (1997). An insider's critique of the social movement framing perspective. Sociological Inquiry, 67, 409–430. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1997.tb00445.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, J. (2006). The left, the right, and the prostitute: The making of US antitrafficking in persons policy. Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law, 14, 269–293.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, J. (2010). Staging ‘A special evil’: Trafficking in women, male victimization, and heroic return of sovereignty. Paper presented at the International Studies Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, E. (2007). The sexual politics of the ‘new abolitionism.’ Differences, 18(3), 128–151. doi: 10.1215/10407391-2007-013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, E. (2010). Militarized humanitarianism meets carceral feminism: The politics of sex, rights, and freedom in contemporary anti-trafficking campaigns. Signs, 36, 45–71. doi: 10.1086/652918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysk, A., & Choi-Fitzpatrick, A. (Eds.). (2012). From human trafficking to human rights: Reframing contemporary slavery. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Choi-Fitzpatrick, A. (2012). Rethinking trafficking: Contemporary slavery. In A. Brysk & A. Choi-Fitzpatrick (Eds.), From human trafficking to human rights: Reframing contemporary slavery (pp. 13–24). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Choi-Fitzpatrick, A. (n.d.). A human rights approach to contemporary slavery. Unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• Church of the Brethren Statements on Slavery. (2008). Retrieved from www.brethren.org/advocacy/documents/statements-on-modern-day.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Collett, J., Guidry, T., Martin, N., & Sager, R. (2006). Faith-based decisions? The consequences of heightened religious salience in social service referral decisions. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 45, 119–127. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2006.00010.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D. B. [1962] (1999). Emergence of immediatism in British and American antislavery thought. In J. R. McKivigan (Ed.), Abolitionism and American reform (pp. 1–23). Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Desyllas, M. C. (2007). A critique of the global trafficking discourse and US policy. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 34, 57–79.
   Google Scholar
• Doezema, J. (2000). Loose women or lost women? Gender Studies, 18, 23–50.
   Google Scholar
• Duguay, C. (Director), Doyle, C. (Writer), & Dominik, A. (Writer). (2006). Human trafficking [Television series]. Lifetime Television and Muse. Muse Entertainment Enterprises: Filmed in Montreal, Bangkok and Prague.
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103, 962–1023. doi: 10.1086/231294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetner, T. (2008). How the religious right shaped lesbian and gay activism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, S. T. (2009). Cooperative collective action: Framing faith-based community development. Mobilization, 14, 181–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• General Social Survey (GSS). (1998). Retrieved from http://www.thearda.com/Archive/Files/Descriptions/GSS1998.asp
   Google Scholar
• Gillan, K. (2008). Understanding meaning in movements: A hermeneutic approach to frames and ideologies. Social Movement Studies, 7, 247–263. doi: 10.1080/14742830802485643
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974 [1986]). Frame Analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grittner, F. K. (1986). White slavery: Myth, ideology, and American law. Milwaukee: University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, P. E., & Hunter, J. D. (1984). On maintaining plausibility: The worldview of evangelical college students. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 23, 221–238. doi: 10.2307/1386038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heltzel, P. G. (2009). Jesus and justice: Evangelicals, race, and American politics. Hartford, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hertzke, A. D. (2004). Freeing God’s children: The unlikely alliance for global human rights. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. (2005). Bury the chains: Prophets and rebels in the fight to free an empire’s slaves. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. D. (1982). Subjectivization and the new evangelical theodicy. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 21, 39–47. doi: 10.2307/1385568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. D. (1987). Evangelicalism: The coming generation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, H. (1995). A methodology for frame analysis: From discourse to cognitive schemata. In H. Johnston & B. Klandermans (Eds.), Social movements and culture (pp. 217–246). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A. (2007). Testimony before the House Subcommittee on Border, Maritime and Global Counterterrorism, March 20, US House of Representatives. Retrieved from http://chsdemocrats.house.gov/SiteDocuments/20070320165954-38416.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kristof, N. (2004, December 22). Where the right is right. The New York Times, p. A31.
   Google Scholar
• Landesman, P. (2004, January 25). The girl next door. The New York Times Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/25/magazine/25SEXTRAFFIC.html
   Google Scholar
• Lichterman, P. (2008). Religion and the construction of civic identity. American Sociological Review, 73, 83–104. doi: 10.1177/000312240807300105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, M. D. (2007). Faith in the halls of power: How evangelicals joined the American elite. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loveland, A. (1966). Evangelicalism and ‘immediate emancipation’ in American Antislavery Thought. Journal of Southern History, 32, 172–188. doi: 10.2307/2204556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., McCarthy, J.D., & Zald, M.N. (1996). Introduction: Opportunities, mobilizing structures, and framing processes: Toward a synthetic, comparative perspective on social movements. In D. McAdam, J.D. McCarthy, & M.N. Zald (Eds.), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings (pp. 1–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, W. (2004). Traffic counts, symbols and agendas: A critique of the campaign against trafficking of human beings. International Review of Victimology, 11, 143–176. doi: 10.1177/026975800401100108
   Google Scholar
• Morris, A. (1986). Origins of the civil rights movement: Black communities organizing for change. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Munson, Z. (2008). The making of pro-life activists: How social movement mobilization works. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nepstad, S. E. (2004). Persistent resistance: Commitment and community in the plowshares movement. Social Problems, 51, 43–60. doi: 10.1525/sp.2004.51.1.43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noll, M. (1994). The scandal of the evangelical mind. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans.
   Google Scholar
• Outshoorn, J. (2005). The political debates on prostitution and trafficking of women. Social Politics, 12, 141–155. doi: 10.1093/sp/jxi004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirk, J. (2011). The anti-slavery project: From the slave trade to human trafficking. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell Jr., W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1). doi: 10.1086/229967
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, N. (2004, August 25). The new abolitionists. Seattle Weekly. Retrieved from http://www.seattleweekly.com/2004-08-25/news/the-new-abolitionists/
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, N. (2005). Anti-trafficking rhetoric and the making of a global apartheid. NWSA Journal, 17(3), 88–111. doi: 10.2979/NWS.2005.17.3.88
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. G., & Johnson, B. (2010). The liberalization of young evangelicals: A research note. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49, 351–360. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01514.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. (1996a). Disruptive religion: The force of faith in social movement activism. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. (1996b). Resisting Reagan: The US Central America peace movement. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C., Emerson, M., Gallagher, S., Kennedy, P., & Sikkink, D. (1998). American evangelicalism: Embattled and thriving. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D A., Burke Rochford, Jr. E., Worden, S. K., and Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4): 464–481. doi: 10.2307/2095581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soderlund, G. (2005). Running from the rescuers: New US crusades against sex trafficking and the rhetoric of abolition. NWSA Journal, 17(3), 64–87. doi: 10.2979/NWS.2005.17.3.64
   Google Scholar
• Steensland, B., & Goff, P. (Eds.). (2014). The new evangelical social engagement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, Anselm. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1997). Roads from past to future. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2000). Protocol to prevent, suppress and punish trafficking in persons, especially women and children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime. Retrieved from http://www.uncjin.org/Documents/Conventions/dcatoc/final_documents_2/convention_%20traff_eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vance, C. S. (2011). Thinking trafficking, thinking sex. GLQ, 17, 135–143. doi: 10.1215/10642684-2010-024
   Google Scholar
• Weitzer, R. (2007). The social construction of sex trafficking: Ideology and institutionalization of a moral crusade. Politics & Society, 35, 447–475. doi: 10.1177/0032329207304319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, J. R, & Zald, M. N. (1987). Aspects of racial integration in the methodist church: Sources of resistance to organizational policy. In M. Zald, & J. McCarthy (Eds.), Social movements in an organizational society: Collected essays (pp.223–246). Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, R. L. (2002). Faith in action: Religion race and democratic organizing in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wuthnow, R. (1999). Mobilizing civic engagement: The changing impact of religious involvement. In T. Skocpol & M. Fiorina (Eds.), Civic engagement in American democracy (pp. 331–362). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. P. (2002). Confessional protest: The religious birth of US national social movements. American Sociological Review, 67, 660–688. doi: 10.2307/3088911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. P. (2006). Bearing witness against sin: The evangelical birth of the American social movement. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, D. (2010). Theorizing the role of culture in social movements: Illustrated by protests and contentions in modern China. Social Movement Studies, 9, 33–50. doi: 10.1080/14742830903442493
   Google Scholar