‘Society on its own’: the sociological promise today

References

• Alapuro, R. (2012). Nordic and Finnish modernity: A comparison. In J. P. Arnason & B. Wittrock (Eds.), Nordic paths to modernity (pp. 191–206). New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Baudrillard, J. (1983/1978). In the shadow of silent majorities or ‘The Death of the Social’. New York, NY: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (1991). Modernity and ambivalence. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (1992). Intimations of postmodernity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1995). Ecological enlightenment: Essays on the politics of the risk society (M. A. Ritter, Trans.). Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (2005). Power in the global age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2005/1999). The new spirit of capitalism (G. Elliot, Trans.). London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, C. (1987). The romantic ethic and the spirit of modern consumerism. London: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Castel, R. (1995). Les métamorphoses de la question sociale: Une chronique du salariat. Paris: Fayard.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. (2010). What is society? Social thought and the arts of government. The British Journal of Sociology, 61, 677–695. doi: 10.1111j.1468-4446.2010.01336.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donzelot, J. (1984). L'invention du social: Essai sur le déclin des passions politiques. Paris: Fayard.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, É. (1984/1893). The division of labour in society (W. D. Halls, Trans.). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, É. (1997/1951). Suicide: A study in sociology. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality, with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (2002/1962). Capitalism and freedom: Fortieth anniversary edition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, D. (1994). Citizens without sovereignty: Equality and sociability in French thought, 1670–1789. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, D. (2001). Introduction: Postmodernism and the French enlightenment. In D. Gordon (Ed.), Postmodernism and the enlightenment (pp. 3–8). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., & Lamont, M. (Eds.). (2013). Social resilience in the neoliberal era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. V. (1959). The constitution of liberty. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, J. (1980). Der Sicherheitsstaat: Das ‘Modell Deutschland’, seine Krise und die neuen sozialen Bewegungen. Frankfurt am Main: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, T. (1971/1611). Leviathan. London: Fontana Library.
   Google Scholar
• Hobsbawm, E. (1992). Nations and nationalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, D. (1987/1777). Essays, moral, political and literary (F. Miller, Ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Koselleck, R. (1988/1959). Critique and crisis: Enlightenment and the pathogenesis of modern society. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krippner, G.R. (2011). Capitalizing on crisis: The political origins of the rise of finance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lefort, C. (1986). The political forms of modern society: Bureaucracy, democracy, totalitarianism (J. B. Thompson, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, J. (1894). An essay concerning human understanding (C. Fraser, Ed.). Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. W. (1956). The sociological imagination. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. W. (1959). The power elite. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2005). The democratic paradox. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Myrdal, A., & Myrdal, G. (1935). Kris i befolkningsfrågan [The crisis in the population question]. Stockholm: Albert Bonniers Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1937). The structure of social action. New York, NY: Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, C. (1991). Beyond the welfare state? Philadelphia, PA: Pennsylvania University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. (1957/1944). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. (1956). The open society and its enemies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosanvallon, P. (2008). Counter-democracy: Politics in an age of distrust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1996). The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of government. Economy and Society, 25, 327–356. doi: 10.1080/03085149600000018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, J.-J. (1998/1762). Du contrat social ou Principes du droit politique. Paris: Nathan.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, J.-J. (1998/1755). Discours sur l'origine et les fondements de l'inégalité parmi les hommes. Paris: Nathan.
   Google Scholar
• Slagstad, R. (1998). De nasjonale strateger [The national strategies]. Oslo: Pax Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (1976/1790). The theory of moral sentiments. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, A. (1998). On kings, pietism and rent-seeking in Scandinavian welfare states. Acta Sociologica, 41, 363–376. doi: 10.1177/000169939804100405
   Google Scholar
• Stenius, H. (2012). Paradoxes of the Finnish political culture. In J. P. Arnason & B. Wittrock (Eds.), Nordic Paths to Modernity (pp. 207–228). New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stråth, B. (2012). Nordic modernity: Origins, trajectories, perspectives. In J. P. Arnason & B. Wittrock (Eds.), Nordic Paths to Modernity (pp. 25–48). New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sulkunen, P. (2007). Re-inventing the social contract. Acta Sociologica, 50, 325–333. doi:10.1177/0001699307080939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulkunen, P. (2009). The saturated society: Governing risk and lifestyles in consumer culture. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sulkunen, P. (2012). Is mass society a threat to representative democracy? Revisiting David Riesman's ‘Other Directed Character’. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 1, 5–30. doi:10.4471/rimcis.2012.01
   Google Scholar
• Sulkunen, P. (accepted for publication June 2014). The consumer society and the social bond. The neoliberal turn in Norway. In P. Strandbacken & J. Gronow (Eds.), Consumer Culture. Oslo: Akker Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E.P. (1991/1963). The making of the English working class. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tolonen, M. (2013). Mandeville and Hume: Anatomists of civil society. Oxford: The Voltaire Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Vandervelde, É. (1910). Les socialistes et les Bons Templars. Cahors and Berne: Roggwill.
   Google Scholar