Epistemological lacunae in conceptualising political structure: a solution from field theory

References

• Abdukadirov, S. (2009). The failure of presidentialism in Central Asia. Asian Journal of Political Science, 17(3), 285–298. doi: 10.1080/02185370903403509
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. (2010). Routine, reflexivity, and realism. Sociological Theory, 28(3), 272–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01375.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhard, M., Reenock, C., & Nordstrom, T. (2004). The legacy of Western overseas colonialism on democratic survival. International Studies Quarterly, 48(1), 225–250. doi: 10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.00298.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose, S., & Jalal, A. (2004). Modern South Asia: History, culture, political economy. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1990a). In other words: Essays towards a reflexive sociology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1990b). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1999). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian meditations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., Chamboredon, J.-C., Passeron, J.-C., & Krais, B. (Eds.). (1991). The craft of sociology: Epistemological preliminaries. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooker, P. (2013). Non-democratic regimes. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Mcmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J., Farrell, D. M., & McAllister, I. (2011). Political parties and democratic linkage: How parties organize democracy. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Domhoff, G. W. (1998). Who rules America? Power and politics in the year 2000. CA: McGraw-Hill Humanities, Social Sciences & World Languages.
   Google Scholar
• Duverger, M. (1954). Political parties: Their organisation and activity in the Modern State. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Evens, T. M. (1999). Bourdieu and the logic of practice: Is all giving Indian-giving or is “generalized materialism” not enough?. Sociological Theory, 17(1), 3–31. doi: 10.1111/0735-2751.00063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuhse, J. A. (2009). The meaning structure of social networks. Sociological Theory, 27(1), 51–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.00338.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F., Dressel, B., & Chang, B.-S. (2005). Facing the perils of presidentialism? Journal of Democracy, 16(2), 102–116. doi: 10.1353/jod.2005.0026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasiorowski, M. J. (1995). Economic crisis and political regime change: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review, 89(4), 882–897. doi: 10.2307/2082515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, A. C., & Maggio, A. J. (2007). Democracy, dictatorship, and economic development: A model of reference-dependent choices with experimental data. In G. Munck (Ed.), Regimes and Democracy in Latin America: Theories and Methods, (pp. 231–247). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hermens, F. A. (1941). Democracy or anarchy?: A study of proportional representation. New York, NY: Johnson Reprint Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Higley, J. (2010). Elite theory and elites. In K. T. Leicht & J. Craig Jenkins (Eds.), Handbook of politics (pp. 161–176). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Higley, J., & Burton, M. G. (2006). The elite foundations of liberal democracy. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Higley, J., Hoffmann-Lange, U., Kadushin, C., & Moore, G. (1991). Elite integration in stable democracies: A reconsideration. European Sociological Review, 7(1), 35–53.
   Google Scholar
• Hiroi, T., & Omori, S. (2009). Perils of parliamentarism? Political systems and the stability of democracy revisited. Democratisation, 16(3), 485–507. doi: 10.1080/13510340902884598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. (1991/1993). The third wave: Democratisation in the late twentieth century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaviraj, S. (1986). Indira Gandhi and Indian politics. Economic and Political Weekly, 21(38/39), 1697–1708.
   Google Scholar
• King, A. (2000). Thinking with Bourdieu against Bourdieu: A ‘practical’ critique of the habitus. Sociological Theory, 18(3), 417–433. doi: 10.1111/0735-2751.00109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochanek, S. A. (1976). Mrs. Gandhi's pyramid: The new Congress. In H. C. Hart (Ed.), Indira Gandhi’s India: A political system reappraised (pp. 93–124). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kothari, R. (1989). State against democracy: In search of humane governance. New York: Apex Pr.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, M., & Taagepera, R. (1979). ‘Effective’ number of parties: A measure with application to west Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 12(1), 3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, J.-E., & Ersson, S. (2007). Party system instability in Europe: Persistent differences in volatility between West and East? Democratisation, 14(1), 92–110. doi: 10.1080/13510340601024322
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in plural societies: A comparative exploration. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (1984). Democracies: Majoritarian and consensus patterns of government in twenty one countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (1996). The puzzle of Indian democracy: A consociational interpretation. American Political Science Review, 90(2), 258–268. doi: 10.2307/2082883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipset, S. M., & Rokkan, S. (1990). Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignments. In P. Mair (Ed.), The West European Party System (pp. 91–111). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy. Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69–105. doi: 10.2307/1951731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., & Roberts, M. (2013). Why institutions matter: The new institutionalism in political science. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, S. (1993). Presidentialism, multipartism, and democracy the difficult combination. Comparative Political Studies, 26(2), 198–228.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (2006). Party system change. In R. S. Katz & W. J. Crotty (Eds.), Handbook of Party Politics (pp. 63–73). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, P. D. (2007). The art of the network: Strategic interaction and patronage in renaissance Florence. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mische, A., & White, H. (1998). Between conversation and situation: Public switching dynamics across network domains. Social Research, 65(3), 695–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mische, A. (2003). Cros s-talk in movements: Reconceiving the culture-network link. In M. Diani & D. McAdam (Eds.), Social movements and networks: Relational approaches to collective action (pp. 258–280). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mtimkulu, P. (2009). The key to one-party dominance: A comparative analysis of selected states: Some lessons for South Africa? Journal of African Elections, 8(2), 23–45.
   Google Scholar
• Myles, J. (1999). From habitus to mouth: Language and class in Bourdieu's sociology of language. Theory and Society, 28(6), 879–901. doi: 10.1023/A:1007070332177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyong’o, P. A. (1992). Africa: The failure of one-party rule. Journal of Democracy, 3(1), 90–96. doi: 10.1353/jod.1992.0005
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M. E., Cheibub, J. A., & Limongi, F. (2000). Democracy and development: Political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rudolph, L. I., & Rudolph, S. H. (1987). In pursuit of Lakshmi: The political economy of the Indian state. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rustow, A. D. (1970). Transitions to democracy: Toward a dynamic model. Comparative Politics, 2(3), 337–363. doi: 10.2307/421307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, G. (1976). Parties and party systems: A framework for analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sayeed, K. B. (1959). Collapse of parliamentary democracy in Pakistan. The Middle East Journal, 13(4), 389–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlemmer, L. (2006). Deformations of political culture by one party domination. In Ostheimer (Ed.), Challenges to democracy by one party domination (pp. 117–123). Johannesburg: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, W. H., Jr. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1–29. doi: 10.1086/229967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S. (2016). Appreciating field theory’s insights into politics: An empirical illustration using the case of emergency in India (1975–77). Theory and Society, 45(2), 107–142. doi: 10.1007/s11186-016-9266-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, A., & Skach, C. (1993). Constitutional frameworks and democratic consolidation: Parliamentarianism versus presidentialism. World Politics, 46(1), 1–22. doi: 10.2307/2950664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarlo, E. (2003). Unsettling memories: Narratives of the emergency in Delhi. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M., & Herman, V. M. (1971). Party systems and government stability. American Political Science Review, 65(1), 28–37. doi: 10.2307/1955041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenberghe, F. (1999). “The real is relational”: An epistemological analysis of Pierre Bourdieu's generative structuralism. Sociological Theory, 17(1), 32–67. doi: 10.1111/0735-2751.00064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, P., & White, S. (2007). Party politics in new democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, M. (1987). Empirical democratic theory and the transition from authoritarianism to democracy. PS: Political Science & Politics, 20(4), 861–866. doi: 10.2307/419247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zolberg, A. R. (1966). Creating political order. The party-states of West Africa. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar