Advanced search
Publication Cover
European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology Volume 3, 2016 - Issue 2-3: Special issue: ‘Neoinstitutionalism and world society theory: Global-local entanglements’. Guest editor: Ali Qadir
Submit an article Journal homepage
405
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Weaving political fields: non-violent INGOs and the global grass roots

Selina Gallo-CruzSociology and Anthropology, College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, MA, USACorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
Pages 243-279 | Received 23 Dec 2015, Accepted 05 Jul 2016, Published online: 29 Jul 2016

References

  • Alasuutari, P. (2009). The domestication of worldwide models. Ethnologia Europaea, 39(1), 66–71.
  • Alasuutari, P. (2011). The governmentality of consultancy and competition: The influence of the OECD. In G. Solinís & N. Baya-Laffite (Eds.), Mapping out the research-policy matrix: Highlights from the first international forum on the social science, policy nexus (pp. 147–165). Paris: UNESCO.
  • Alasuutari, P. (2013). Spreading global models and enhancing banal localism: the case of local government cultural policy development. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 19(1), 103–119.
  • Alasuutari, P., & Qadir, A. (2013). National policy making: Domestication of global trends. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Alasuutari, P., & Qadir, A. (2014). Epistemic governance: An approach to the politics of policy making. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 1(1), 67–84.
  • Alasuutari, P., Qadir, A., & Creutz, K. (2013). The domestication of foreign news: News stories related to the 2011 Egyptian revolution in British, Finnish, and Pakistani newspapers. Media, Culture, & Society, 35(6), 692–707.
  • Alasuutari, P., & Rasimus, A. (2009). Use of the OECD in justifying policy reforms: The case of Finland. Journal of Power, 2(1), 89–109.
  • Anderson, B. (2002). The domestication of information and communication technologies. Colchester: University of Essex.
  • Andia, T. (2015). The inverse boomerang pattern: The global Kaletra campaign and access to antiviral drugs in Colombia and Ecuador. Studies in Comparative International Development, 50(2), 203–227.
  • Armstrong, E. A., & Bernstein, M. (2008). Culture, power, and institutions: A multi-institutional power approach to social movements. Sociological Theory, 26(1), 74–99.
  • Barassi, V. (2013). Ethnographic cartographies: Alternative media, social movements and the spaces of networks. Social Movement Studies: Journal of Social, Cultural and Political Protest, 12(1), 48–62.
  • Barry, C. M., Bell, S. R., Clay, K. C., Flynn, M. E., & Murdie, A. M. (2015). Choosing the best house in a bad neighborhood: Location strategies of human rights INGOs in the non-western world. International Studies Quarterly, 59, 86–98.
  • Betsill, M. M., & Corell, E. (2008). NGO diplomacy: The influence of nongovernmental organizations in international environmental negotiations. Global Environmental Politics, 8(4), 146–148.
  • Bob, C. (2002). The marketing of rebellion: Insurgent, media, and international activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Boli, J., Gallo-Cruz, S., & Matthias, M. (2011). World polity theory. In R. A. Denemark (Ed.), The international studies compendium project. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Boli, J., & Thomas, G. (Eds.). (1999). Constructing world culture: International nongovernmental organizations since 1875. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Broadbent, J., & Brockman, V. (2011). East Asian social movements: Power, protest, and change in a dynamic region. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Brysk, A. (1993). From above and below: Social movements, the international system, and human rights in Argentina. Comparative Political Studies, 26(3), 259–285.
  • Bunce, V., & Wolchik, S. (2010). Transnational networks, diffusion dynamics, and electoral change in the postcommunist world. In R. K. Givan, K. M. Roberts, & S. A. Soule (Eds.), The diffusion of social movements. Actors, mechanisms, and political effects (pp. 140–162). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Carpenter, R. C. (2007). Setting the advocacy agenda: Theorizing issue emergence and nonemergence in transnational advocacy networks. International Studies Quarterly, 51(1), 99–120.
  • Chabot, S. (2000). Transnational diffusion and the African American reinvention of Gandhian repertoire. Mobilization: An International Journal, 5(2), 201–216.
  • Chabot, S. (2012). Transnational roots of the civil rights movement: African American explorations of the Gandhian repertoire. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
  • Chabot, S., & Dyvendok, J. D. (2002). Globalization and transnational diffusion between social movements: Reconceptualizing the dissemination of the Gandhian repertoire and the ‘coming out’ routine. Theory and Society, 31, 697–740.
  • Christie, R. (2012). Peacebuilding and NGOs: State and civil-society relations. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Clark, H. (Ed.). (2009). People power: Unarmed resistance and global solidarity. London: Pluto Press.
  • Clark, A. M., Friedman, E. J., & Hochstetler, K. (1998). The sovereign limits of global civil society: A comparison of NGO participation in UN world conferences on the environment, human rights, and women. World Politics, 51(1), 1–35.
  • Dale, J. G. (2008). Burma’s boomerang: human rights, social movements and transnational legal mechanisms ‘from below’. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 45(1), 151–184.
  • Deats, R. (2009). Marked for life: The story of Hildegard Goss-Mayr. (Leaders and Witnesses). New York, NY: New York City Press.
  • della Porta, D., Andretta, M., Mosca, L., & Reiter, H. (2006). Globalization from below: Transnational activists and protest networks. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • della Porta, D., & Tarrow, S. (2005). Transnational processes and social activism. In D. della Porta & S. Tarrow (Eds.), Transnational protest and global activism (pp. 1–20). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Dobbin, F., Simmons, B., & Garrett, G. (2007). The global diffusion of public policies: Social construction, coercion, competition, or learning? Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 449–472.
  • Edwards, G. (2014). Infectious innovations? Diffusion of tactical innovation in social movement networks, the case of suffragette militancy. Social Movement Studies, 13(1), 48–69.
  • Flesher Fominaya, C. (2014). Social movements and globalization: How protests, occupations and uprisings are changing the world. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Flesher Fominaya, C., & Cox, L. (2013). Understanding European social movements: New social movements, global justice struggles, anti-austerity protests. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2011). Toward a general theory of strategic action fields. Sociological Theory, 29(1), 1–26.
  • Florini, A. (2000). The third force: The rise of transnational civil society. New York, NY: Carnegie Endowment for Peace.
  • Gallo-Cruz, S. (2012a). Organizing global nonviolence: The growth and spread of nonviolent INGOs, 1948–2003. Research in Social Movements, Conflict, and Change, 34, 213–256.
  • Gallo-Cruz, S. (2012b). Negotiating the lines of contention: Counterframing and boundary-work in the school of the Americas debate. Sociological Forum, 27(1), 21–45.
  • Gallo-Cruz, S. (2013). Cleansing our hands of the dirty war: The Colombian domestication of human rights. In P. Alasuutari & A. Qadir (Eds.), National policy making: Domestication of global trends (pp. 181–196). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Gallo-Cruz, S. (in press-a). Nonviolence beyond the state: International NGOs and local nonviolent mobilization. Journal for the Study of Peace and Conflict.
  • Gallo-Cruz, S. (in press-b). The insufficient imagery of top down, bottom up in global analysis. Social Movement Studies, 16(2).
  • Gamson, W. A., & Meyer, D. S. (1996). Framing political opportunity. In D. McAdam, J. McCarthy, & M. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures and cultural framings (pp. 275–290). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Giugni, M. (1995). The cross-national diffusion of protest. In H. Kriesi, R. Koopmans, J. W. Dyvendok, & M. Giugni (Eds.), New social movements in Western Europe: A comparative analysis (pp. 181–206). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Givan, R. K., Roberts, K. M., & Soule, S. A. (2010). The diffusion of social movements: Actors, mechanisms, and political effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Goldstone, J. A., & Useem, B. (2012). Putting values and institutions back into the theory of strategic action fields. Sociological Theory, 30(1), 37–47.
  • Gough, C., & Shackley, S. (2001). The respectable politics of climate change: The epistemic communities and NGOs. International Affairs, 77(2), 329–346.
  • Guidry, J., Kennedy, M. D., & Zald, M. (2000). Globalizations and social movements: Culture, power, and the transnational public sphere. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Hannah, E. (2011). NGOs and the European Union: Examining the power of epistemes in the EC’s TRIPS and access to medicines negotiations. Journal of Civil Society, 7(2), 179–206.
  • Johnson, E., & McCarthy, J. D. (2005). The sequencing of transnational and national social movement mobilization: The organizational mobilization of the US and global environmental movements. In D. della Porta & S. Tarrow (Eds.), Transnational protest and global activism (pp. 71–94). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Johnston, H., & Almeida, P. (2006). Latin American social movements: Globalization, democratization, and transnational networks. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Kaldor, M., Anheier, H. K., & Glasius, M. (2003). Global civil society in an age of regressive globalization: The state of global civil society in 2003. In M. Kaldor, H. K. Anheier, & M. Glasius (Eds.), Global civil society (pp. 3–33). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Keck, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell.
  • Kim, Y. S. (1999). Constructing a global identity: The role of Esperanto. In J. Boli & G. M. Thomas (Eds.), Constructing world culture: International nongovernmental organizations since 1875 (pp. 127–148). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Koenig, M. (2008). Institutional change in the world polity: International human rights and the construction of collective identities. International Sociology, 23(1), 95–114.
  • Kolb, F. (2005). The impact of transnational protest on social movement organizations: Mass media and the making of ATTAC Germany. In D. della Porta & S. Tarrow (Eds.), Transnational protest and global activism (pp. 95–120). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Konefal, B. (2010). For every Indio who falls: A history of Maya activism in Guatemala, 1960–1990. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
  • Koopmans, R. (2013). The End of the social movement as we know it?: Adaptive challenges in changed contexts. In J. van Stecklenberg, C. Roggeband, & B. Klandermans (Eds.), The future of social movement research (pp. 315–323). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Kurzman, C. (1996). Structural opportunity and perceived opportunity in social-movement theory: The Iranian revolution of 1979. American Sociological Review, 61(1), 153–170.
  • Krücken, G., & Drori, G. (2009). World society: The writings of John W. Meyer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Landy, D. (2015). Bringing the outside in: Field interaction and transformation from below in political struggles. Social Movement Studies: Journal of Social, Cultural, and Political Protest, 14(3), 255–269.
  • Lang, S. (2012). NGOs, civil society, and the public sphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Larson, J., & Lizardo, O. (2015). An institutional logics approach to the analysis of social movement fields. Social Currents, 2(1), 58–80.
  • Mahoney, L., & Eguren, E. (1997). Unarmed bodyguards: International accompaniment for the protection of human rights. West Hartford: Kumarian Press.
  • Martin, J. L. (2003). What is field theory? The American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 1–49.
  • Mayo, M. (2005). Global citizens: Social movements and the challenge of globalization. London: Zed Books.
  • McAdam, D., & Rucht, D. (1993). The cross-national diffusion of movement ideas. Annals, American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528, 56–74.
  • McAdam, D., & Scott, W. S. (2005). Organizations and movements. In G. F. Davis, D. McAdam, W. S. Scott, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Social movements and organization theory (pp. 4–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Meyer, R. E. (2014). ‘Re-localisation’ as micromobilization of consent and legitimacy. In G. S. Drori, M. A. Hollerer, & P. Walgenbach (Eds.), Global themes and local variations in organization and management: Perspectives on glocalization (pp. 79–89). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Milani, C. R. S., & Laniado, R. N. (2007). Transnational social movements and the globalization agenda: A methodological approach based on the analysis of the world social forum. Brazilian Political Science Review, 1(2), 10–39.
  • Moghadam, V. (2012). Globalization and social movements: Islamism, feminism, and the global justice movement. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Moser-Puangsuwan, Y., & Weber, T. (2000). Nonviolent intervention across borders: A recurrent vision. Honolulu: University of Hawai’I Press.
  • Meyer, J. W., & Jepperson, R. L. (2000). The ‘Actors’ of modern society: The cultural construction of social agency. Sociological Theory, 18(1), 100–120.
  • Motta, R. (2014). Social disputes over GMOs: An overview. Sociology Compass, 8(12), 1360–1376.
  • Nissen, B. (2003). Unions in a globalized environment: Changing borders, organizational boundaries, and social roles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Panda, B. (2007). Top-down or bottom-up? A study of grassroots NGOs’ approach. Journal of Health Management, 9(2), 257–273.
  • Qadir, A., & Alasuutari, P. (2013). Taming terror: Domestication of the war on terror in the Pakistani media. Asian Journal of Communication, 23(6), 575–589.
  • Rautalin, M. (2013). Domestication of international comparisons. The role of the OECD programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) in Finnish Education Policy (Doctoral dissertation). Acta Universitatis 1876, School of Social Sciences & Humanities, University of Tampere, Finland.
  • Ray, R. (1999). Fields of protest: Women’s movements in India. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Reimann, K. D. (2003). Building global civil society from the outside in? Japanese international development NGOs, the state, and international norms. In F. J. Schwartz & S. J. Pharr (Eds.), The state of civil society in Japan (pp. 298–315). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Reimann, K. D. (2009). The rise of Japanese NGOs: Activism from above. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Risse, T., Ropp, S. C., & Sikkink, K. (1999). The power of human rights: International norms and domestic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ritter, D. (2015). The Iron cage of liberalism: International politics and unarmed revolutions in the middle east and North Africa. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash, & R. Robertson (Eds.), Global modernities (pp. 25–44). London: Sage.
  • Roggeband, C. (2010). Transnational networks and institutions: How diffusion shaped the politicization of sexual harassment in Europe. In R. K. Givan, K. M. Roberts, & S. A. Soule (Eds.), The diffusion of social movements. Actors, mechanisms, and political effects (pp. 19–33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rosenau, J. (2006). The study of world politics: Globalization and governance. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Rossi, F. (2015). Conceptualizing strategy making in a historical and collective perspective. In Rossi, F. & von Bulow, M. Social movement dynamics: New perspectives on theory and research from Latin America. Farnham: Ashgate.
  • Rossi, F. M., & von Bulow, M. (2015). Social movement dynamics: New perspectives on theory and research from Latin America. Farnham: Ashgate.
  • Rothman, F. D., & Oliver, P. E. (1999). From local to global: The anti-dam movement in southern Brazil, 1979–1992. Mobilization, 4(1), 41–57.
  • Routledge, P., Cumbers, A., & Nativel, C. (2007). Grassrooting network imaginaries: Relationality, power, and mutual solidarity in global justice networks. Environment and Planning, 39, 2575–2592.
  • Rucht, D. (1999). The transnationalization of social movements: Trends, causes, and problems. In D. della Porta, H. Kriesi, & D. Rucht (Eds.), Social movements in a globalizing world (pp. 206–222). New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
  • Ruggie, J. G. (2002). Constructing the world polity: Essays on international institutionalization. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Schneiker, A. (2016). Humanitarian NGOs, (in)security and identity: Epistemic communities and security governance. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Shawki, N. (2013). Understanding the transnational diffusion of social movements: An analysis of the US solidarity economy network and transition US. Humanity and Society, 37(2), 131–158.
  • Sikkink, K. (2009). The power of networks in international politics. In M. Kahler (Ed.), Networked politics: Agency, power, and governance (pp. 228–247). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Smith, J., Chatfield, C., & Pagnucco, R. (1997). Transnational social movements and global politics. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
  • Smith, J., & Johnston, H. (2002). Globalization and resistance: Transnational dimensions of social movements. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Smith, J., & Weist, D. (2012). Social movements in the world system: The politics of crisis and transformation. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Soule, S. (1999). The diffusion of an unsuccessful innovation: The case of the shantytown protest tactic. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566, 120–131.
  • Spalding, R. J. (2015). Domestic loops and deleveraging hooks: Transnational social movements and the politics of scale shift. In F. Rossi (Ed.), Social movement dynamics: New perspectives on theory and research in Latin America (pp. 181–214). Burlington: Ashgate.
  • van Stecklenberg, J., Roggeband, C., & Klandermans, B. (2013). The future of social movement research. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Steffek, J. (2013). Explaining cooperation between IGOs and NGOs – push factors, pull factors, and the policy cycle. Review of International Studies, 39(4), 993–1013.
  • Stone, D. (2004). Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization’ of policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(3), 545–566.
  • Strang, D., & Meyer, J. (1993). Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society, 22(4), 487–511.
  • Strang, D., & Soule, S. (1998). Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 265–290.
  • Sundstrom, L. M. (2006). Funding civil society: Foreign assistance and NGO development in Russia. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
  • Syväterä, J., & Alasuutari, P. (2013). Conforming to global policy trends: Legitimating narratives in the case of ethical policy advice. Critical Policy Studies, 7(1), 37–52.
  • Tarrow, S. (1989). Democracy and disorder: Protest and politics in Italy, 1965–1975. Oxford: Clarendon.
  • Tarrow, S. (1994). Power in movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tarrow, S. (2005). The new transnational activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tarrow, S. (2010). Dynamics of diffusion: mechanisms, institutions, and scale shift. In R. K. Givan, K. M. Roberts, & S. A. Soule (Eds.), The diffusion of social movements. Actors, mechanisms, and political effects (pp. 204–220). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tarrow, S. (2005). Shifting the scale of. In S. Tarrow (Ed.), The new transnational activism (pp. 120–140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tilly, C. (1977). Getting it together in burgundy. Theory and Society, 4, 479–504.
  • Tilly, C. (1993). Contentious repertoires in Great Britain, 1758–1854. Social Science History, 17, 253–280.
  • Tsutsui, K., & Wotipka, C. M. (2004). Global civil society and the international human rights movement: Citizen participation in human rights international nongovernmental organizations. Social Forces, 83(2), 587–620.
  • Wallerstein, I., Chase-Dunn, C., & Sutter, C. (2016). Overcoming global inequalities (Political Economy of the World System Annuals). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Walsh-Russo, C. (2014). Diffusion of protest. Sociology Compass, 8(1), 31–42.
  • Weber, T. & Burrowes, R. J. (1991). Nonviolence: An introduction. Melbourne: Victorian Association for Peace Studies.
  • Williford, B., & Subramaniam, M. (2015). Transnational field and frames: Organizations in Ecuador and the US. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts, and Change, 38, 37–67.
  • Wood, L. J. (2012). Direct action, deliberation, and diffusion: Collective action after the WQTO protests in Seattle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Peace Brigades International Archival Data References (In order of in-text citation).
  • PBI. (1988, June). Evaluating the Guatemala team experience. Peace Brigades, p. 2.
  • PBI. (1982). Minutes of Consultation of an International Peace Brigade held on Grindstone Island near Portland, Ontario, 1981-08-31. p. 2.
  • PBI. (1982). Exploratory team report: Guatemala.
  • PBI. (1982). Exploratory team report: Guatemala.
  • PBI. (1983, May). PBI team in Guatemala to continue: Ready response brigade being organized. PBI Reports, No. 3.
  • Scott, B. (1987, October). The risks and rewards of PBI service. Peaceworks.
  • Jaffe, R. (1998). How do you capture the imagination of an international audience without depicting a typical good-guy/bad-guy scenario? PBI Open Letter.
  • PBI. (1983, September). Guatemala Team Continues After New Coup. PBI Reports No. 4. p.2.
  • PBI. (1992). Internationalcharacter. General Principles, p. 1.
  • PBI. (1987, April). Human rights violations reported under the Administration of President Vinicio Cerezo Arevalo. p. 1.
  • PBI. (Undated). Peace Brigades International: Practical experiments in peacemaking. Pamphlet.
  • PBI. (1992). Brigadas de Paz Internacionales Aclara.
  • PBI. (1985). Guatemala report. Peace Brigades, Vol. 3, No. 1, p. 1.
  • PBI. (Undated 2). Internal report.
  • PBI. (Undated 3). Informe Interno. 15 de Junio – 15 de Julio. p. 4.
  • Lindsay, L. (1983, August 16). Peace Brigades seeking role as go-between in conflicts. Christian Science Monitor, Tuesday.
  • PBI. (1986). To outgoing escorts. Memo.
  • Robinson, E. (1987, November 15). Reflections on PBI.
  • Lindsay, L. (1983, August 16). Peace Brigades seeking role as go-between in conflicts. Christian Science Monitor, Tuesday.
  • PBI. (1986). To outgoing escorts. Memo.
  • Walker, C. C. (Undated). Why non-Partisan. Peace Brigades.
  • PBI. (1992). Guatemala team: A look back at 1991. PBI Annual Report, p. 2.
  • PBI. (1987, May 11). Amnesty international says Guatemalan Government must investigate past atrocities by security forces. PBI Regional News Item, Monday. p. 3.
  • PBI. (Undated 4). Press release. p. 2.
  • PBI. (1992). Article 2.3 establishing contacts. Mandate.
  • PBI. (1985, October). On the Guatemala front. Peace Brigades, Vol. 3, No. 3. p.1.
  • PBI. (1990). PBI’s history. Annual Report.
  • PBI. (1987). Informe Interno. p. 30.
  • PBI. (1994). Guatemalan team: Work of the team. Annual Report.
  • Mahoney, L. (1988). Guatemala team report. Peace Brigades. p. 3.
  • Mahoney, L., & Eguren, E. (1997). Unarmed bodyguards: International Accompaniment for the protection of human rights. West Hartford: Kumarian Press.
  • PBI. (1987). PBI team in Guatemala. Peace Brigades. p. 7.
  • PBI. (1992). Guatemala team: A look back at 1991.
  • PBI. (1991). Guatemala team report: Encuentro Continental. Peace Brigades.
  • Mahoney, L., & Eguren, E. (1997). Unarmed bodyguards: International accompaniment for the protection of human rights. West Hartford: Kumarian Press.
  • PBI. (1989). Human rights workshop. Informe Interno. 15 de Octubre-fines de Noviembre.
  • PBI. (Undated 5). Part of principles and mandate. Handwritten memo.
  • PBI. (1990). Presencia Acompañimiento y Educacion Para La Paz en Guatemala.
  • PBI. (1990). Metas revistas en el Proyecto.
  • PBI. (Undated 6). Training report.
  • PBI. (1987). Human rights and nonviolence: Our ‘new’ guideline in Guatemala. Informe Interno.
  • PBI. (Undated 7). El Trabajo. Informe Interno. p. 2.
  • PBI. (1987). Human Rights and Nonviolence: Our ‘new’ guideline in Guatemala. Informe Interno.
  • PBI. (1994). Realize the vision of international peacemaking teams on a large scale. Letter from David.
  • Scott, B. (1987, October). The risks and rewards of PBI service. Peaceworks.
  • PBI. (Undated 8). Power and perception.
  • Scott, B. (1987, October). The risks and rewards of PBI service. Peaceworks.
  • PBI. (1998, June). Guatemala team report. PBI Bulletin, p. 7.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.