Neutral experts or passionate participants? Renegotiating expertise and the right to act in Finnish participatory social policy

References

• Autto, J. M., & Törrönen, J. (2017). Justifications of citizens’ subject positions in public debates on welfare. Acta Sociologica, 60(1), 61–73. doi: 10.1177/0001699316672078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. (2010). Foucault, policy and rule: Challenging the problem-solving paradigm. Aalborg: Institut for Historie, Internationale Studier Og Samfundsforhold, Aalborg Universitet (FREIA’s tekstserie; No. 74).
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, M. (2008). Passionate participation: Emotional experiences and expressions in deliberative forums. Critical Social Policy, 28(4), 461–481. doi: 10.1177/0261018308095280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, M. (2009). Authoritative consumers or experts by experience? User groups in health and social care. In R. Simmons, M. Powell, & I. Greener (Eds.), The consumer in public services: Choice, values and difference (pp. 219–234). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, M., & Cotterell, P. (2012). Introduction: User movements. In M. Barnes & P. Cotterell (Eds.), Critical perspectives on user involvement (pp. 1–5). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, M., & Gell, C. (2012). The Nottingham Advocacy Group: A short history. In M. Barnes & P. Cotterell (Eds.), Critical perspectives on user involvement (pp. 19–31). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, M., Newman, J., Knops, A., & Sullivan, H. (2003). Constituting ‘the public’ in public participation. Public Administration, 81(2), 379–399. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. (2002). User involvement in research and evaluation: Liberation or regulation? Social Policy and Society, 1(2), 95–105. doi: 10.1017/S1474746402000222
   Google Scholar
• Berger, M., & Charles, J. (2014). Persona non grata. Au seuil de la participation. Participations, 9(2), 5–36. doi: 10.3917/parti.009.0005
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. (2006). Democratic governance: Systems and radical perspectives. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 426–436. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00599.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blencowe, C. (2013). Biopolitical authority, objectivity and the groundwork for modern citizenship. Journal of Political Power, 6(1), 9–28. doi: 10.1080/2158379X.2013.774968
   Google Scholar
• Blencowe, C., Brigstocke, J., & Dawney, L. (2013). Authority and experience. Journal of Political Power, 6(1), 1–7. doi: 10.1080/2158379X.2013.774973
   Google Scholar
• Blondiaux, L. (2008). Démocratie délibérative vs. démocratie agonistique? Raisons politiques, 30(2), 131. doi: 10.3917/rai.030.0131
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification. Economies of worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, M., & Lippert, R. K. (Eds.). (2016). Governing practices: Neoliberalism, governmentality and the ethnographic imaginary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carrel, M. (2007). Pauvreté, citoyenneté et participation. Quatre positions dans le débat sur la ‘participation des habitants’. In C. Neveu (Ed.), Cultures et pratiques participatives. Perspectives comparatives (pp. 95–112). Paris: L’Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, J. (2016). La participation en actes. Entreprise, ville, association. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H. M., & Evans, R. (2007). Rethinking expertise. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cruikshank, B. (1999). The will to empower. Democratic citizens and other subjects. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dagnino, E. (2007). Participation, citizenship and democracy: Perverse confluence and displacement of meanings. In C. Neveu (Ed.), Cultures et pratiques participatives. Perspectives comparatives (pp. 353–396). Paris: L’Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality. Power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Demszky, A., & Nassehi, A. (2012). Perpetual loss and gain: Translation, estrangement and cyclical recurrence of experience based knowledges in public action. Policy and Society, 31(2), 169–181. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2012.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. (2010). Being an expert professional practitioner. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Eliasoph, N. (2016). The mantra of empowerment talk: An essay. Journal of Civil Society, 12(3), 247–265. doi: 10.1080/17448689.2016.1215895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. (1995). The construction of lay expertise: AIDS activism and the forging of credibility in the reform of clinical trials. Science, Technology & Human Values, 20(4), 408–437. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/689868 doi: 10.1177/016224399502000402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyal, G. (2013). For a sociology of expertise: The social origins of the autism epidemic. American Journal of Sociology, 118(4), 863–907. doi: 10.1086/668448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, experts and the environment. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/1343197? doi: 10.1086/448181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1994). Dits et Écrtis IV (1980–1988). Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2004). Sécurité, territoire, population. Cours au Collège de France 1977–1978. Paris: Gallimard Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Ganuza, E., Baiocchi, G., & Summers, N. (2016). Conflicts and paradoxes in the rhetoric of participation. Journal of Civil Society, 12(3), 328–343. doi: 10.1080/17448689.2016.1215981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourgues, G., Rui, S., & Topçu, S. (2013). Gouvernementalité et participation: Lectures critiques. Participations, 6(2), 5–33. doi: 10.3917/parti.006.0005
   Google Scholar
• Healy, K. (2000). Social work practices: Contemporary perspectives on change. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Knaapen, L., & Lehoux, P. (2016). Three conceptual models of patient and public involvement in standard-setting: From abstract principles to complex practise. Science as Culture, 25(2), 239–263. doi: 10.1080/09505431.2015.1125875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehoux, P., Daudelin, G., & Abelson, J. (2012). The unbearable lightness of citizens within public deliberation processes. Social Science & Medicine, 74(12), 1843–1850. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, T., & Lonkila, M. (2008). Laurent Thévenot ja yhteiselon oikeutukset. Sosiologia, 4, 342–346. Retrieved from http://elektra.helsinki.fi/se/s/0038-1640/45/4/laurentt.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Leino, H., & Peltomaa, J. (2012). Situated knowledge–situated legitimacy: Consequences of citizen participation in local environmental governance. Policy and Society, 31(2), 159–168. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2012.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T. M. (2007). Governmentality. Anthropologica, 49(2), 275–294. doi: 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105900
   Google Scholar
• Liberatore, A., & Funtowicz, S. (2003). ‘Democratising’ expertise, ‘expertising’ democracy: What does this mean, and why bother? Science and Public Policy, 30(3), 146–150. doi: 10.3152/147154303781780551
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., & Sullivan, H. (2008). How low can you go? Rationales and challenges for neighborhood governance. Public Administration, 86(1), 53–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00696.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinetto, M. (2003). Who wants to be an active citizen? The politics and practice of community involvement. Sociology, 37(1), 103–120. doi: 10.1177/0038038503037001390
   Google Scholar
• Martin, G. P. (2008). ‘Ordinary people only’: Knowledge, representativeness, and the publics of public participation in healthcare. Sociology of Health & Illness, 30(1), 35–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01027.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, G. P. (2012). Public deliberation in action: Emotion, inclusion and exclusion in participatory decision making. Critical Social Policy, 32(2), 163–183. doi: 10.1177/0261018311420276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meriluoto, T. (2017). Turning experience into expertise: Technologies of the self in Finnish participatory social policy. Critical Policy Studies. doi:10.1080/19460171.2017.1310051
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P., & Rose, N. (2008). Governing the present: Administering economic, social and personal life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neveu, C. (2011). Just being an ‘active citizen’? Categorisation processes and meanings of citizenship in France. In E. Tonkens & J. Newman (Eds.), Participation, responsibility and choice: Summoning the active citizen in Western European welfare states (pp. 147–159). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J. (2005). Participative governance and the remaking of the public sphere. In J. Newman (Ed.), Remaking governance: Peoples, politics and the public sphere (pp. 119–138). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J., & Clarke, J. (2009). Publics, politics and power: Remaking the public in public services. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Nez, H. (2016). Does participation mean reciprocal learning? The relationships between diverse stakeholders during participatory budgeting in Paris. Journal of Civil Society, 12(3), 266–281. doi: 10.1080/17448689.2016.1215371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, T. (2017). The end of expertise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noorani, T. (2013). Service user involvement, authority and the ‘expert-by-experience’ in mental health. Journal of Political Power, 6(1), 49–68. doi: 10.1080/2158379x.2013.774979
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H. (2003). Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge. Science and Public Policy, 30(3), 151–156. doi: 10.3152/147154303781780461
   Google Scholar
• Polletta, F. (2014). Is participation without power good enough? Introduction to ‘democracy now: Ethnographies of contemporary participation’. The Sociological Quarterly, 55(3), 453–466. doi: 10.1111/tsq.12062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polletta, F. (2016). Participatory enthusiasms: A recent history of citizen engagement initiatives. Journal of Civil Society, 12(3), 231–246. doi: 10.1080/17448689.2016.1213505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabeharisoa, V., Moreira, T., & Akrich, M. (2014). Evidence-based activism: Patients’, users’ and activists’ groups in knowledge society. BioSocieties, 9(2), 111–128. doi: 10.1057/biosoc.2014.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall, J., & Munro, I. (2010). Foucault’s care of the self: A case from mental health work. Organization Studies, 31(11), 1485–1504. doi: 10.1177/0170840610380809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rein, M., & Schön, D. (1996). Frame-critical policy analysis and frame-reflective policy practice. Knowledge and Policy, 9(1), 85–104. doi: 10.1007/BF02832235
   Google Scholar
• Richard-Ferroudji, A. (2011). Limites du modèle délibératif : Composer avec différents formats de participation. Politix, 96(4), 161–181. doi: 10.3917/pox.096.0161
   Google Scholar
• Rissanen, P. (2015). Toivoton tapaus? Autoetnografia sairastumisesta ja kuntoutumisesta. Helsinki: Kuntoutussäätiö.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1993). Government, authority and expertise in advanced liberalism. Economy and Society, 22(3), 283–299. doi: 10.1080/03085149300000019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1998). Inventing our selves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salminen, O., & Wilhelmsson, N. (2013). Valtioneuvoston Demokratiapolitiikka 2002–2013. Katsaus Ministeriön Demokratiapolitiikan Toteutuksiin. Oikeusministeriö: Selvityksiä ja ohjeita 52/2013.
   Google Scholar
• Saurugger, S. (2010). The social construction of the participatory turn: The emergence of a norm in the European Union. European Journal of Political Research, 49(4), 471–495. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01905.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Merry, J. (2012). Experiential knowledge in action: Consulting practitioners for policy change. Policy and Society, 31(2), 131–143. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2012.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, E. (2016). Publics and their health systems: Rethinking participation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Talpin, J. (2006). Jouer les bons citoyens. Les effets contrastés de l’engagement au sein de dispositifs participatifs. Politix, 75(3), 11–31. doi:10.3917/pox.075.0013
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L. (2007). The plurality of cognitive formats and engagements. European Journal of Social Theory, 10(3), 409–423. doi: 10.1177/1368431007080703
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L. (2014a). Autorités à l'épreuve de la critique. Jusqu'aux oppressions du ‘gouvernement par l'objectif’. In B. Frère (Ed.), Le tournant de la théorie critique (pp. 269–292). Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L. (2014b). Une vie éprouvée. Entre migration postcoloniale, discrimination à l'embauche, maternité affectée et adoption salvatrice: quelle ‘identité forgée’? In D. Vrancken (Ed.), Penser l'incertain (pp. 139–160). Laval: Presses de l’Université de Laval.
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L. (2014c). Voicing concern and difference: From public spaces to common places. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 1(1), 7–34. doi: 10.1080/23254823.2014.905749
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L. (2016). Préface: Maille à partir avec la participation: prendre une part critique à la politique, chemin faisant. In J. Charles (Ed.), La participation en actes. Entreprise, ville, association (pp. 7–17). Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.
   Google Scholar
• van Hulst, M. J., & Yanow, D. (2016). From policy ‘frames’ to ‘framing’: Theorizing a more dynamic, political approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(1), 92–112. doi: 10.1177/0275074014533142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, E. T., McQuarrie, M., & Lee, C. W. (2015). Rising participation and declining democracy. In E. T. Walker, M. McQuarrie, & C. W. Lee (Eds.), Democratizing inequalities: Dilemmas of the new public participation (pp. 3–25). New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E. (2009). Governance-driven democratization. Critical Policy Studies, 3(1), 3–13. doi: 10.1080/19460170903158040
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. (2000). Conducting interpretive policy analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ylä-Anttila, T., & Luhtakallio, E. (2016). Justification analysis: Understanding moral evaluations in public debates. Sociological Research Online, 21(4), 14–15. doi: 10.5153/sro.4099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar