Juggling grammars, translating common-place: Justifying an anti-liberal referendum to a liberal public

References

• Alexander, J. C. (2006). The civil sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (1999). The sociology of critical capacity. European Journal of Social Theory, 2, 359–77. doi: 10.1177/136843199002003010
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ďurinová, P. (2015). Slovakia. In E. Kováts & M. Poim (Eds.), Gender as symbolic glue (pp. 104–25). Budapest: FEPS – Foundation for European Progressive Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Eranti, V. (2017). Re-visiting NIMBY: From conflicting interests to conflicting valuations. The Sociological Review, 65, 285–301. doi: 10.1177/0038026116675554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (2006). Religion in the public sphere. European Journal of Philosophy, 14, 1–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0378.2006.00241.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhar, R. (2015). Playing with science: Sexual citizenship and the Roman Catholic Church counter-narratives in Slovenia and Croatia. Women’s Studies International Forum, 49, 84–92. doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2014.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, M. J. (1997). Are human rights universal? The relativist challenge and related matters. Human Rights Quarterly, 19, 461–509. doi: 10.1353/hrq.1997.0022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, M. J. (1998). Liberal democracy and religious morality. DePaul Law Review, 48(1), 1–50.
   Google Scholar
• Petö, A. (2015). Epilogue: ‘Anti-gender’ mobilisational discourse of conservative and far right parties as a challenge for progressive politics. In E. Kováts & M. Poim (Eds.), Gender as symbolic glue (pp. 126–31). Budapest: FEPS – Foundation for European Progressive Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1996). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silber, I. F. (2011). Emotions as regime of justification?: The case of civic anger. European Journal of Social Theory, 14, 301–20. doi: 10.1177/1368431011412347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavo-Debauge, J. (2012). Le loup dans la bergerie. Le fondamentalisme chrétien à l’assaut de l’espace public. Genève: Labor et Fides.
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L. (2007). The plurality of cognitive formats and engagements: Moving between the familiar and the public. European Journal of Social Theory, 10, 409–23. doi: 10.1177/1368431007080703
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L. (2011). Power and oppression from the perspective of the sociology of engagements: A comparison with Bourdieu’s and Dewey’s critical approaches to practical activities. Irish Journal of Sociology, 19, 35–67. doi: 10.7227/IJS.19.1.3
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L. (2014). Voicing concern and difference: From public spaces to common-places. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 1, 7–34. doi: 10.1080/23254823.2014.905749
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L. (2015). Making commonality in the plural on the basis of binding engagements. In P. Dumouchel & R. Gotoh (Eds.), Social bonds as freedom: Revisiting the dichotomy of the universal and the particular (pp. 82–108). New York: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L., & Kareva, N. (2009). “Čudesnyj hleb” gostepriimstva (nedorazumenija, projasnjajuŝie otkrytost’ i zakrytost’ soobŝestv). Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie, 100, 678–701.
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L., & Kareva, N. (forthcoming). Le pain merveilleux de l’hospitalité. Malentendus éclairant les constructions du commun. SociologieS.
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L., Moody, M., & LaFaye, C. (2000). Forms of valuing nature: Arguments and modes of justification in French and American environmental disputes. In M. Lamont & L. Thévenot (Eds.), Rethinking comparative cultural sociology: Repertoires of evaluation in France and the United States (pp. 229–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, B. (2008). Acts of piety: The political and the religious, or a tale of two cities. In E. F. Isin & Greg M. Nielsen (Eds.), Acts of citizenship (pp. 121–136). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9, 387–412. doi: 10.1177/0957926598009003005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., & Krzyzanowski, M. (2008). Qualitative discourse analysis in the social sciences. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wuthnow, R. (1996). Christianity and civil society. Valley Forge, PA: A&C Black.
   Google Scholar
• Ylä-Anttila, T., & Luhtakallio, E. (2016). Justifications analysis: Understanding moral evaluations in public debates. Sociological Research Online, 21(4), 1–15. doi: 10.5153/sro.4099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar