1,210
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

How complex domination enables selection: Academic hiring conventions in a Pakistani university

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 140-164 | Received 07 Dec 2016, Accepted 31 Jan 2018, Published online: 19 Feb 2018

References

  • Ali, Q., & Brandl, J. (2017). HRM research in Pakistan: Existing approaches and future directions. Journal of Management Sciences, 4(2), 174–196. doi: 10.20547/jms.2014.1704203
  • Bleiklie, I., & Kogan, M. (2007). Organization and governance of universities. Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 477–493. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300167
  • Blokker, P. (2014). “The political” in the pragmatic sociology of critique: Reading Boltanski with Lefort and Castoriadis. In S. Susen & B. S. Turner (Eds.), The spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the ‘pragmatic sociology of critique’ (pp. 369–390). London: Anthem Press.
  • Blokker, P., & Brighenti, A. (2011). An interview with Laurent Thévenot: on engagement, critique, commonality, and power. European Journal of Social Theory, 14(3), 383–400. doi: 10.1177/1368431011412351
  • Boltanski, L. (2011). On critique: A sociology of emancipation. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
  • Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Brandl, J., & Bullinger, B. (2017). Individuals’ considerations when responding to competing logics. Journal of Management Inquiry, 26(2), 181–192. doi: 10.1177/1056492616677297
  • Brandl, J., Daudigeos, T., Edwards, T., & Pernkopf, K. (2014). Why French pragmatism matters to organizational institutionalism. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23(3), 314–318. doi: 10.1177/1056492613517463
  • Cret, B., & Musselin, C. (2010). Academic hiring and inequality. In G. Goastellec (Ed.), Understanding inequalities in, through and by higher education (pp. 75–90). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • de Larquier, G., & Marchal, E. (2016). Does the formalization of practices enhance equal hiring opportunities? An analysis of a French nation-wide employer survey. Socio-Economic Review, 14(3), 567–589.
  • Dobbin, F., & Jung, J. (2015). The fourth dimension of power: The social construction of interest in the new economic sociology. In P. Aspers & N. Dodd (Eds.), Re-imagining economic sociology (pp. 174–194). London: Oxford University Press.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
  • Eymard-Duvernay, F., & Marchal, E. (1997). Façons de Recruter: Le Jugement des Compétences sur le Marché du Travail. Paris: Editions Métailié.
  • Islam, N. (2004). Sifarish, sycophants, power and collectivism: Administrative culture in Pakistan. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 70(2), 311–330. doi: 10.1177/0020852304044259
  • Jhatial, A. A., Cornelius, N., & Wallace, J. (2014). Rhetorics and realities of management practices in Pakistan: Colonial, post-colonial and post-9/11 influences. Business History, 56(3), 456–484. doi: 10.1080/00076791.2013.800970
  • Khilji, E. (2002). Modes of convergence and divergence: An integrative view of multinational practices in Pakistan. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(2), 232–253. doi: 10.1080/09585190110102350
  • Kozica, A., & Brandl, J. (2015). Handling paradoxical tensions through conventions: The case of performance appraisal. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(1), 49–68.
  • Lamont, M. (2009). How professors think: Inside the curious world of academic judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Musselin, C. (2002). Diversity around the profile of the “good” candidate within French and German universities. Tertiary Education & Management, 8(3), 243–258. doi: 10.1080/13583883.2002.9967082
  • Oleinik, A. (2010). Uses and abuses of sexuality in social interactions: Empirical evidence from Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 62(5), 749–778. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2010.481385
  • Oleinik, A. (2011). Market as a Weapon: Domination by virtue of a constellation of interests. Forum for Social Economics, 40(2), 157–177. doi: 10.1007/s12143-010-9081-6
  • Reynaud, B. (2005). The void at the heart of rules: Routines in the context of rule-following. The case of the Paris metro workshop. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(5), 847–871. doi: 10.1093/icc/dth073
  • Rodriguez, J. K., Mearns, L., Lendaro, A., & Imdorf, C. (2012). The use of ethnicity in recruiting domestic labour: A case study of French placement agencies in the care sector. Employee Relations, 34(6), 613–627. doi: 10.1108/01425451211267946
  • Thévenot, L. (1990). L’action qui convient. Les formes de l’action, 1, 39–69.
  • Thévenot, L. (2001). Pragmatic regimes governing the engagement with the world. In K. Knorr-Cetina, T. Schatzki, & E. V. Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 56–73). London: Routledge.
  • Thévenot, L. (2002). Which road to follow? The moral complexity of an ‘equipped’ humanity. In L. John & M. Annemarie (Eds.), Complexities: Social studies of knowledge practices (pp. 53–87). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Thévenot, L. (2006). L’action au pluriel: sociologie des régimes d’engagement. Paris: Éditions La Découverte.
  • Thévenot, L. (2007). The plurality of cognitive formats and engagements: Moving between the familiar and the public. European Journal of Social Theory, 10(3), 409–423. doi: 10.1177/1368431007080703
  • Thévenot, L. (2011). Power and oppression from the perspective of the sociology of engagements: A comparison with Bourdieu’s and Dewey’s critical approaches to practical activities. Irish Journal of Sociology, 19(1), 35–67. doi: 10.7227/IJS.19.1.3
  • Thévenot, L. (2015). Certifying the world. Power infrastructures and practices in economies of conventional forms. In P. Aspers & N. Dodd (Eds.), Re-imagining economic sociology (pp. 195–223). London: Oxford University Press.
  • Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods, essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.