267
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Biggish data: Friedrich Engels, material ecology, and Victorian data

Pages 343-364 | Received 04 Sep 2018, Accepted 04 Jan 2019, Published online: 17 Apr 2019

References

  • Adamson, J. (2016). Networking networks and constellating new practices in the environmental humanities. PMLA, 131(1), 347–355. doi: 10.1632/pmla.2016.131.2.347
  • Alaimo, S. (2010). Bodily natures: Science, environment, and the material self. Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
  • Bailey, J., & Pregill, L. (2014). Speak to the eyes: The history and practice of information visualization. Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America, 33, 168–191.
  • Barad, K. (1998). Getting real: Technoscientific practices and the materialization of reality. Differences, 10(2), 87–128.
  • Barad, K. (2008). Posthumanist performativity: Towards an understanding of how matter comes to matter. In S. Alaimo & S. Hekman (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 120–157). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Barer, S. (2000). The doctors of revolution: 19th-century thinkers who changed the world. London: Thames & Hudson.
  • Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Bode, K., & Arthur, P. L. (2014). Advancing digital humanities: Research, methods, theories. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Bruns, A., Burgess, J., & Highfield, T. (2014). A ‘big data’ approach to mapping the Australian Twittersphere. In K. Bode & P. L. Arthur (Eds.), Advancing digital humanities (pp. 113–129). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Clark, B., & Foster, J. B. (2006). The environmental conditions of the working class. Organization & Environment, 19(3), 375–388. doi: 10.1177/1086026606292483
  • Engels, F. (1845/2009). The condition of the working class in England (David McLellan, ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Engels, F. (2007). Dialectics of nature. London: Wellred.
  • Foster, J. B., & Clark, B. (2016, October). Marxism and the dialectics of ecology. Monthly Review, 68(5), 1–17. doi: 10.14452/MR-068-05-2016-09_1
  • Foster, J. B., Clark, B., & York, R. (2010). The ecological rift: Capitalism’s war on the earth. New York: Monthly Review Press.
  • Friendly, M. (2008). A brief history of data visualization. In C.-H. Chen, W. Härdle, & A. Unwin (Eds.), Handbook of data visualization (pp. 15–56). Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
  • Goldman, L. (1991). Statistics and the science of society in early Victorian Britain: An intellectual context for the general register office. Social History of Medicine, 4(3), 415–434. doi: 10.1093/shm/4.3.415
  • Heise, U. K., Christensen, J., & Niemann, M. (Eds.). (2016). Routledge companion to the environmental humanities. London: Routledge.
  • Henderson, W. O., & Chaloner, W. H. (1971). ‘Editor’s introduction’ to Friedrich Engels. In The Condition of the working class in England, xi–xxxv. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Houser, H. (2014). Managing information and materiality in infinite jest and running the numbers. American Literary History, 26(4), 742–764. doi: 10.1093/alh/aju052
  • Hunt, T. (2009). The frock-coated communist: The revolutionary life of Friedrich Engels. London: Allen Lane.
  • Iovino, S., & Oppermann, S. (2012). Theorizing material ecocriticism: A Diptych. Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 19(3), 448–475. doi: 10.1093/isle/iss087
  • Iovino, S., & Oppermann, S. (2017). Environmental humanities: Voices from the anthropocene. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Latour, B. (1991/1993). We have never been modern (Catherine Porter, Trans.). Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  • Latour, B. (1996). On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. Soziale Welt, 47, 369–382.
  • Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy (Catherine Porter, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1961/1977). Notes on the history of quantification in sociology-trends, sources and problems. In M. Kendall & R. L. Plackett (Eds.), Studies in the history of statistics and probability (Vol II, pp. 213–269). London and High Wycombe: Charles Griffin & Company Limited.
  • Maas, H. (2013). The photographic lens: Graphs and the changing practices of Victorian economists. In M. Hewitt (Ed.), The Victorian world (pp. 500–518). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Marcus, S. (1974/2015). Engels, Manchester and the working class. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
  • Marx, K. (1867/1976). Capital: A critique of political economy (Vol. 1). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  • McLellan, D. (1977). Friedrich Engels. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  • Moore, J. W. (2017). Metabolic rift or metabolic shift? Dialectics, nature, and the world-historical method. Theory and Society, 46, 285–318. doi: 10.1007/s11186-017-9290-6
  • Morrison, S. S. (2013). Waste aesthetics: Form as restitution’. Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 20(3), 464–478. doi: 10.1093/isle/ist057
  • Morton, T. (2014). Victorian hyperobjects. Nineteenth-Century Contexts, 36(5), 489–500. doi: 10.1080/08905495.2014.974940
  • Nixon, R. (2011). Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
  • Nowotny, H. (1991). Knowledge for certainty: Poverty, welfare institutions and the institutionalization of social science. In P. Wagner, B. Wittrock, & R. Whitley (Eds.), Discourses on society: The shaping of social science disciplines (pp. 23–41). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Poovey, M. (1995). Making a social body: British cultural formation, 1830-1864. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Schweber, L. (2006). Disciplining statistics: Demography and vital statistics in France and England, 1830-1885. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Stigler, S. M. (1986). The history of statistics: The measurement of uncertainty before 1900. Cambridge, MA and London: The Belknap Press.
  • Wagner-Pacifici, R., Mohr, J. W., & Breiger, R. L. (2015, July–December). Ontologies, methodologies, and new uses of big data in the social and cultural sciences. Big Data & Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/2053951715613810.
  • Yeo, E. J. (1996). The contest for social science: Relations and representations of gender and class. London: Rivers Oram Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.