The authority of meta-organisations: Making the international association of National Public Health Institutes attractive to prospective members

References

• Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (1998). Why states act through formal international organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42(1), 3–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adigun, L., Dusenbury, C., & Schoub, B. D. (2007). Public health in Africa - the role of national public health institutes. South African Medical Journal, 97(11), 1036–1039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahrne, G., & Brunsson, N. (2005). Organizations and meta-organizations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 21(4), 429–449.
   Google Scholar
• Ahrne, G., & Brunsson, N. (2008). Meta-organizations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Ahrne, G., Brunsson, N., & Kerwer, D. (2016). The paradox of organizing states. Journal of International Organizations Studies, 7(1), 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Alasuutari, P. (2015). The discursive side of New institutionalism. Cultural Sociology, 9(2), 162–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alasuutari, P. (2016). The synchronization of national policies. Ethnography of the global tribe of moderns. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alasuutari, P. (2018). Authority as epistemic capital. Journal of Political Power, 11(2), 165–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alasuutari, P., & Qadir, A. (2014). Epistemic governance: An approach to the politics of policy-making. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 1(1), 67–84.
   Google Scholar
• Alasuutari, P., & Qadir, A. (2016). Imageries of the social world in epistemic governance. International Sociology, 31(6), 633–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alasuutari, P., Rautalin, M., & Syväterä, J. (2016). Organisations as epistemic capital: The case of independent children's rights institutions. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 29(1), 57–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ancelovici, M., & Jenson, J. (2013). Standardization for transnational diffusion: The case of truth commissions and conditional cash transfers. International Political Sociology, 7(3), 294–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, C. (2014). International organizations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berényi, E., & Neumann, E. (2009). Grappling with PISA. Reception and translation in the hungarian policy discourse. Sísifo, 10, 41–52.
   Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, H., Bucheli, M., & Dumez, H. (2017). Collectively designing CSR through meta-organizations: A case study of the oil and gas industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(4), 753–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder, S., Adigun, L. E., & Greenspan, A. L. (2008). NPHI Creation: Lessons learned and future directions. Journal of Public Health Policy, 29(4), 459–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder, S., & Laing, A. M. (2009). The national public health institutes of the world–update. Journal of Public Health Policy, 30(4), 467–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boli, J., & Thomas, G. M. (1997). World culture in the world polity: A century of international non-governmental organization. American Sociological Review, 62(2), 171–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boli, J., & Thomas, G. M. (eds.). (1999). Constructing world culture. International nongovernmental organizations since 1875. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bromley, P., & Meyer, J. W. (2015). Hyper-organization. Global organizational expansion: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buhari-Gulmetz, Didem. (2010). Stanford School on Sociological institutionalism: A global cultural approach. International Political Sociology 4(3), 253–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M., & Law, J. (1982). On interests and their transformation: Enrolment and counter-enrolment. Social Studies of Science, 12(4), 615–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz-Castro, L., & Sanz-Menéndez, L. (2007). New legitimation models and the transformation of the public research organizational field. International Studies of Management & Organization, 37(1), 27–52.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Agency for Science, T. a. I. (2009). Danish University evaluation 2009: Evaluation report. Copenhagen: The Danish University and Property Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Government. (2006). Denmark’s National Reform Programme: First Progress Report. Contribution to EU’s Growth and Employment Strategy (The Lisbon Strategy).
   Google Scholar
• Djelic, M.-L., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (eds.). (2006). Transnational governance. Institutional dynamics of regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W., & Hwang, H. (2006). Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse. Textual analysis for social research: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M. (1993). International organizations as teachers of norms: The united nations Educational, scientific, and cultural organization and science policy. International Organization, 47(4), 565–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (2001). Taking Stock: The constructivist research program in international relations and comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 391–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grek, S., Lawn, M., & Ozga, J. (2009). PISA and the policy debate in Scotland: Policy narratives about Scottish participation in the international comparison. Sísifo, 10, 73–84.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, E. B. (1980). Why collaborate? Issue-linkage and international regimes. World Politics, 32(3), 357–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggard, S., & Simmons, B. A. (1987). Theories of international regimes. International Organization, 41(03), 491–517.
   Google Scholar
• Hassar, M. (2008). NPHIs and public good: A perspective from Morocco. Journal of Public Health Policy, 29(1), 22–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House of Lords. (2008). Diseases Know No Frontiers: How effective are Intergovernmental Organisations in controlling their spread? Select Committee on Intergovernmental Organisations. 1st Report of Session 2007–08. HL Paper 143–I.
   Google Scholar
• IANPHI. (2006). Constitution of the International Association of National Public Health Institutes.
   Google Scholar
• IANPHI. (2007a). Framework for the Creation and Development of National Public Health Institutes.
   Google Scholar
• IANPHI. (2007b). IANPHI annual report 2007.
   Google Scholar
• IANPHI. (2007c). NPHI case study - Profile of creation and growth. Morocco: Institut Pasteur du Maroc. Retrieved from http://www.ianphi.org/_includes/documents/CS_Pasteur Institute of Morocco.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IANPHI. (2010). WHO Director Advocating for NPHI Creation As Way to Develop Sustainable Public Health Systems. IANPHI News Archives 4.5.2010.
   Google Scholar
• IANPHI. (2011a). Comprehensive NPHI moves forward in Morocco. IANPHI World: Update from the International Association of National Public Health Institutes (13), 1.
   Google Scholar
• IANPHI. (2011b). National Public Health Institutes: European perspective. Report 40/2011. Helsinki: National Institute for Health and Welfare.
   Google Scholar
• IANPHI. (2011c). Plan for NPHI development. Retrieved from http://www.ianphi.org/whatwedo/projects/morocco.html
   Google Scholar
• IANPHI. (2011d). Saving lives through NPHIs. Retrieved from http://www.ianphi.org/_includes/images/resources/IANPHI_Longtermprojects_8_31_11_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IANPHI. (2012). Transforming Public Health. Progress Report 2010–2012. Retrieved from http://www.ianphi.org/_includes/documents/progressreport20102012
   Google Scholar
• IANPHI. (2016a). IANPHI 10 year report. Retrieved from https://indd.adobe.com/view/2fc92296-5160-40ec-b8dc-ad8332efe162
   Google Scholar
• IANPHI. (2016b). The International Association of National Public Health Institutes. Retrieved from http://www.ianphi.org/
   Google Scholar
• IANPHI. (2017). Public Health England (PHE) Evaluation and Recommendations. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/661350/PHE-Evaluation_and_Recommendations.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, B., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2006). Dynamics of soft regulations. In M.-L. Djelic, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), Transnational governance: Institutional dynamics of regulation (pp. 247–265). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karlberg, E., & Jacobsson, K. (2015). A meta-organizational perspective on the Europeanization of civil society: The case of the Swedish Women’s Lobby. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(4), 1438–1459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1999). Transnational advocacy networks in international and regional politics. International Social Science Journal, 51(159), 89–101.
   Google Scholar
• Kerwer, D. (2013). International organizations as meta-organizations: The case of the European Union. Journal of International Organizations Studies, 4(2), 40–53.
   Google Scholar
• Koplan, J. P., Dusenbury, C., Jousilahti, P., & Puska, P. (2007). The role of national public health institutes in health infrastructure development. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 335(7625), 834–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNeely, C. L. (1995). Constructing the nation-state: International organization and prescriptive action. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 144–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Bromley, P. (2013). The worldwide expansion of “organization”. Sociological Theory, 31(4), 366–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Jepperson, R. L. (2000). The “actors” of modern society: The cultural construction of social agency. Sociological Theory, 18(1), 100–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011). Public research institutions: Mapping Sector Trends. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• PREST. (2002). A comparative analysis of public, semi-public and recently privatised research Centres. Brussels: CEC. July.
   Google Scholar
• Public Health Wales. (2012). International Association of National Public Health Institutes - Annual Meeting. Report by Consultant in Public Health, Susan Mably. Board meeting of the Public Health Wales, 25 October 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Public Health Wales. (2018). IHCC Progress Report 2015–2017: Working towards a globally responsible, resilient and prosperous NHS in Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Rautalin, M., & Alasuutari, P. (2009). The uses of the national PISA results by Finnish officials in central government. Journal of Education Policy, 24(5), 539–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodier, G., Greenspan, A. L., Hughes, J. M., & Heymann, D. L. (2007). Global public health security. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 13(10), 1447–1452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2010). Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’. European Political Science Review, 2(1), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofer, E. (1999). Science associations in the international sphere, 1875–1990: The rationalization of science and the scientization of society. In J. Boli & G. M. Thomas (Eds.), Constructing world culture: International nongovernmental organizations since 1875 (pp. 249–266). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Senker, J., Balázs, K., Higgins, T., Laredo, P., Munoz, E., Santesmases, M., … di Marchi, M. (1999). European comparison of public research systems. Final Report TSER-Project European Comparison of Public Research Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, D., & Meyer, J. W. (1993). Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society, 22(4), 487–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syväterä, J., & Qadir, A. (2015). The construction and spread of global models: Worldwide synchronisation and the rise of national bioethics committees. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 2(3–4), 267–290.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (2003). The politics of collective violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vifell, ÅC, & Thedvall, R. (2012). Organizing for social sustainability: Governance through bureaucratization in meta-organizations. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 8(1), 50–58.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. (2008). International health Regulations (2005) (2nd ed.). Geneva: WHO.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, L. A., & Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar