Money, competences or behaviour? On the many worths of the unemployed

References

• Bauer, S. (2014). Framing af ledige: Fremstillinger af ledige; dovne hunde, systemets ofre eller jobjægere? Copenhagen: Cevea.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L. (2012). Love and justice as competences. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism (1st ed.). London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (1999). The sociology of critical capacity. European Journal of Social Theory, 2(3), 359–377.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borghi, V. (2011). One-way Europe? Institutional guidelines, emerging regimes of justification, and paradoxical turns in European welfare capitalism. European Journal of Social Theory, 14(3), 321–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caswell, D., & Larsen, F. (2020). Co-creation in an era of welfare conditionality: Lessons from Denmark. Journal of Social Policy, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dencker-Larsen, S., & Lundberg, K. G. (2016). Depicted welfare-recipient stereotypes in Norway and Denmark: A photo-elicitation study. Nordic Journal of Social Research, 7, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Esmark, A., & Schoop, S. R. (2017). Deserving social benefits? Political framing and media framing of ‘deservingness’ in two welfare reforms in Denmark. Journal of European Social Policy, 27(5), 417–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S. (1997). The voice of the people: Public opinion and democracy. London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, M. (2018). Varieties of Scandinavian universalism: A comparative study of welfare justifications. Acta Sociologica, 61(1), 3–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garthwaite, K. (2011). ‘The language of shirkers and scroungers?’ Talking about illness, disability and coalition welfare reform. Disability & Society, 26(3), 369–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. E., & Dryzek, J. S. (2006). Deliberative impacts: The macro-political uptake of mini-publics. Politics & Society, 34(2), 219–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. P. (2017). Trying the unemployed. Justification and critique, emancipation and coercion towards the ‘active society’. A study of contemporary reforms in France and Denmark. [Doctoral dissertation, Copenhagen Business School]. PhD series, Nr. 10.2017.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. P. (2019). The moral economy of activation: Ideas, politics and policies. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harkins, S., & Lugo-Ocando, J. (2016). How Malthusian ideology crept into the newsroom: British tabloids and the coverage of the ‘underclass’. Critical Discourse Studies, 13(1), 78–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedegaard, T. F. (2014). Stereotypes and welfare attitudes: A panel survey of how “poor Carina” and “lazy Robert” affected attitudes towards social assistance in Denmark. Nordic Journal of Social Research, 5, 139–160.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, T. (2014). Welfare commonsense, poverty porn and doxosophy. Sociological Research Online, 19(3), 277–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, H., Klindt, M. P., & Rasmussen, S. (2020). Aktiv arbejdsmarkedspolitik: Etablering, udvikling og fremtid.
   Google Scholar
• Lafont, C. (2015). Deliberation, participation, and democratic legitimacy: Should deliberative mini-publics shape public policy? Journal of Political Philosophy, 23(1), 40–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamont, M., & Thévenot, L. (2000). Rethinking comparative cultural sociology. Repertoires of evaluation in France and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, C. A. (2008). The institutional logic of welfare attitudes: How welfare regimes influence public support. Comparative Political Studies, 41(2), 145–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, C. A., & Dejgaard, T. E. (2013). The institutional logic of images of the poor and welfare recipients: A comparative study of British, Swedish and Danish newspapers. Journal of European Social Policy, 23(3), 287–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister, R. (2004). A politics of recognition and respect: Involving people with experience of poverty in decision-making that affects their lives. In J. Andersen, & B. Siim (Eds.), The politics of inclusion and empowerment. (pp. 116–138) London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lister, R. (2015). To count for nothing: Poverty beyond the statistics. Journal of the British Academy, 3, 139–165.
   Google Scholar
• Lødemel, I., & Trickey, H. (eds.). (2001). ‘An offer you can't refuse': Workfare in international perspective. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• McArthur, D., & Reeves, A. (2019). The rhetoric of recessions: How British newspapers talk about the poor when unemployment rises, 1896–2000. Sociology, 53(6), 1005–1025.
   Google Scholar
• Melrose, M., & Dean, H. (1998). Poverty, riches and social citizenship. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M. H. (2014). Nytteaktiveringens retfærdiggørelse: Et pragmatisk sociologisk perspektiv på aktivering af arbejdsløse. Dansk Sociologi, 1(25), 9–31.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M. H. (2015). Acting on welfare state retrenchment: In-between the private and the public. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 35(11/12), 756–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M. H. (2018). Four normative languages of welfare: A pragmatic sociological investigation. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 19(19), 47–67.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M. H., Frederiksen, M., & Larsen, C. A. (2020). Deservingness put into practice: Constructing the (un)deservingness of migrants in four European countries. The British Journal of Sociology, 71(1), 112–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick, R. (2017). For whose benefit? The everyday realities of welfare reform. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patriotta, G., Gond, J. P., & Schultz, F. (2011). Maintaining legitimacy: Controversies, orders of worth, and public justifications. Journal of Management Studies, 48(8), 1804–1836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. B., Slothuus, R., Stubager, R., & Togeby, L. (2007). Hvem fortjener velfærd? Politica, 39(1), 31–48.
   Google Scholar
• Pultz, S. (2018). Shame and passion: The affective governing of young unemployed people. Theory & Psychology, 28(3), 358–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shildrick, T., & MacDonald, R. (2013). Poverty talk: How people experiencing poverty deny their poverty and why they blame ‘the poor’. The Sociological Review, 61(2), 285–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, H. (2009). Hvordan forstås fattigdom i VelfærdsDanmark? CASA.
   Google Scholar
• Soss, J., Fording, R. C., Schram, S. F., & Schram, S. (2011). Disciplining the poor: Neoliberal paternalism and the persistent power of race. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor-Gooby, P., Leruth, B., & Chung, H. (2019). Identifying attitudes to welfare through deliberative forums: The emergence of reluctant individualism. Policy & Politics, 47(1), 97–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L. (2002). Which road to follow? The moral complexity of an ‘equipped’ humanity. In J. Law, & A. Mol (Eds.), Complexities: Social studies of Knowledge practices (pp. 53–87). Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L. (2014). Voicing concern and difference: From public spaces to common-places. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 1(1), 7–34.
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L., Moody, M., & Lafaye, C. (2000). Forms of valuing nature: Arguments and modes of justification in French and American environmental disputes. In M. Lamont & L. Thévenot (Eds.), Rethinking comparative cultural sociology: Repertoires of evaluation in France and the United States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. (2004). Det stille sporskifte i velfærdsstaten: En diskursteoretisk beslutningsprocesanalyse. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Van Oorschot, W. (2000). Who should get what and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public. Policy and Politics, 28(1), 33–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oorschot, W. (2006). Making the difference in social Europe: Deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(1), 23–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S. (2016). Conceptualising the active welfare subject: Welfare reform in discourse, policy and lived experience. Policy & Politics, 44(2), 235–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylä-Anttila, T., & Luhtakallio, E. (2016). Justifications analysis: Understanding moral evaluations in public debates. Sociological Research Online, 21(4), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar