The moral authority of science: Evidence from parliamentary debates in seven countries

References

• Alasuutari, P. (2016). The synchronization of national policies. Ethnography of the global tribe of moderns. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alasuutari, P. (2018). Authority as epistemic capital. Journal of Political Power, 11(2), 165–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alasuutari, P., & Qadir, A. (2014). Epistemic governance: An approach to the politics of policy-making. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 1(1), 67–84.
   Google Scholar
• Alasuutari, P., & Qadir, A. (2016). Imageries of the social world in epistemic governance. International Sociology, 31(6), 633–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alasuutari, P., & Qadir, A. (2019). Epistemic governance: Social change in the modern world. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Alasuutari, P., Rautalin, M., & Syväterä, J. (2016). Organisations as epistemic capital: The case of independent children’s rights institutions. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 29(1), 57–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alasuutari, P., & Vähä-Savo, V. (2018). Owning worldwide principles: The case of American exceptionalism. Social Science Information, 57(4), 533–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayley, P. (2004). Cross-cultural perspectives on parliamentary discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. E., Bal, R., & Hendriks, R. (2009). The paradox of scientific authority. The role of scientific advice in democracies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bogenschneider, K., & Corbett, T. J. (2011). Evidence-based policymaking: Insights from policy-minded researchers and research-minded policymakers. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification. Economies of worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boswell, C. (2009). Knowledge, legitimation and the politics of risk: The functions of research in public debates on migration. Political Studies, 57(1), 165–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. A. (1986). Scientific revolution and the grammar of culture: The case of Darwin’s origin. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 72(4), 351–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castilla, E. J. (2009). The institutional production of national science in the 20th century. International Sociology, 24(6), 833–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, H. T., & Nutley, S. M. (2000). What works?: Evidence-based policy and practice in public services. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drori, G. S., & Meyer, J. W. (2006). Global scientization: An environment for expanded organization. In G. S. Drori, J. W. Meyer, & H. Hwang (Eds.), Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change (pp. 50–68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., & Schofer, E. (2003). Science in the modern world polity: Institutionalization and globalization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (2010). Sociology and philosophy. (D. F. Pocock, Trans.; 2nd ed.). London: Routledge. (1953) (Original work published 1924).
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, É. (1961). Moral education. (E. K. Wilson & H. Schnurer, Trans.). Cambridge: The Free Press (Original work published 1925).
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, É. (1995). The elementary forms of the religious life (Repr. ed.). Cambridge: The Free Press (Original work published 1912).
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson, R. (1984). Rhetoric in sociology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fahnestock, J. (1998). Accommodating science: The rhetorical life of scientific facts. Written Communication, 15(3), 330–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2013). Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, D. J., Hironaka, A., & Schofer, E. (2000). The nation-state and natural environment over the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 96–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobo, G. (2008). Re-conceptualizing generalization: Old issues in a new frame. In P. Alasuutari, L. Bickman, & J. Brannen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social research methods (pp. 193–213). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, A. G. (1996). The rhetoric of science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guston, D. H. (1999). Stabilizing the boundary between US politics and science: The role of the office of technology transfer as a boundary organization. Social Studies of Science, 29(1), 87–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse. Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R. B. (1997). Moral authority as power resource. International Organization, 51(4), 591–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R. T. (1987). Emile Durkheim: Ethics and the sociology of Morals. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hellman, M., Hakkarainen, P., & Saebo, G. (2016). Underpinnings of tobacco policy: An epistemic governance perspective. In M. Hellman, V. Berridge, K. Duke, & A. Mold (Eds.), Concepts of addictive substances and behaviours across time and place (pp. 151–168). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hitlin, S., & Vaisey, S. (2013). The new sociology of morality. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 51–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, A. (2008). STS perspectives on scientific governance. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 583–607). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (1994). The fifth branch. Science advisers as policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig, M. (2008). Institutional change in the world polity: International human rights and the construction of collective identities. International Sociology, 23, 95–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamont, M. (2012). Toward a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 201–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2012). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 144–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Bromley, P. (2013). The worldwide expansion of “organization”. Sociological Theory, 31(4), 366–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Jepperson, R. L. (2000). The “actors” of modern society: The cultural construction of social agency. Sociological Theory, 18(1), 100–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., Frank, D. J., & Schofer, E. (2007). Higher education as an institution. In P. J. Gumport (Ed.), Sociology of higher education: Contributions and their contexts (pp. 187–221). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, K., Kleinman, D. L., Hess, D., & Frickel, S. (2011). Science and neoliberal globalization: A political sociological approach. Theory and Society, 40(5), 505–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulkay, M. (1994). The triumph of the pre-embryo: Interpretations of the human embryo in parliamentary debate over embryo research. Social Studies of Science, 24(4), 611–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulkay, M. (1995). Galileo and the embryos: Religion and science in parliamentary debate over research on human embryos. Social Studies of Science, 25(3), 499–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojala, M. (2017). The making of a global elite: Global economy and the Davos Man in the Financial Times 2001–2011 University of Helsinki. Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Paananen, M., Alasuutari, M., Karila, K., & Siippainen, A. (2020). Epistemic governance in local policy debates: The case of entitlement to early childhood education and care in Finland. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 7(1), 52–74.
   Google Scholar
• Pi Ferrer, L., & Rautajoki, H. (2020). Navigating coercion in political rhetoric: Shifting strategies to cope with intervention by the Troika in Portugal. Contemporary Politics, 26(2), 206–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pielke, R. A., Jr. (2007). The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Qadir, A. (2014). The ideal of utility in British Indian policy: Tropes of the colonial chrestomathic university, 1835–1904. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 37(2), 197–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rautalin, M., Alasuutari, P., & Vento, E. (2019). Globalisation of education policies: Does PISA have an effect? Journal of Education Policy, 34(4), 500–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson, I. (2002). Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration, 80(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofer, E. (1999). Science associations in the international sphere, 1875–1990: The rationalization of science and the scientization of society. In J. Boli & G. M. Thomas (Eds.), Constructing world culture: International nongovernmental organizations since 1875 (pp. 249–268). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schofer, E., & Meyer, J. W. (2005). Worldwide expansion of higher education in the 20th century. American Sociological Review, 70, 898–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofer, E., Ramirez, F. O., & Meyer, J. W. (2000). The effects of science on national economic development, 1970-1990. American Sociological Review, 65(6), 866–887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapin, S. (2010). Never pure: Historical studies of science as if it was produced by people with bodies, situated in time, space, culture, and society, and struggling for credibility and authority. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skinnell, R. (2018). Faking the News: What rhetoric Can Teach Us about Donald J. Trump. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, A. (2011). Telling policy stories: An ethnographic study of evidence in policy-making in the UK. Journal of Social Policy, 40(2), 237–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syväterä, J. (2020). Tieteen monitahoinen auktoriteetti: Analyysi uutta lainsäädäntöä koskevista täysistuntokeskusteluista [The multifaceted authority of science: An analysis of debates on draft laws in the Parliament of Finland]. Sosiologia, 57(1), 44–64.
   Google Scholar
• Tuominen, K., & Turja, T. (2007). Use of social scientific information in parliamentary discussion. In E. D. Garten, D. E. Williams, J. M. Nyce, & S. Talja (Eds.), Advances in library administration and organization (Vol. 25, pp. 133–154). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Vähä-Savo, V., Syväterä, J., & Tervonen-Gonçalves, L. (2019). The authority of Meta-organizations: Making the International association of national public health institutes attractive to prospective members. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 6(4), 474–502.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press (Original work published 1922).
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A. L., & Baker, J. O. (2012). Homosexuality, religion and science: Moral authority and the persistence of negative attitudes. Sociological Inquiry, 82(4), 487–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylä-Anttila, T., & Luhtakallio, E. (2016). Justifications analysis: Understanding moral evaluations in public debates. Sociological Research Online, 21(4), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, R. J. C. (1996). The idea of a Chrestomathic University. In Torn Halves: Political conflict in literary and cultural theory (pp. 184–221). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zapp, M. (2018). The scientization of the world polity: International organizations and the production of scientific knowledge, 1950-2015. International Sociology, 33(1), 3–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar