Right-wing populism as a worldview and online practice: Social media communication by ordinary citizens between ideology and lifestyles

References

• Aalberg, T., Esser, F., Reinemann, C., Stromback, J., & De Vreese, C. (Eds.). (2016). Populist political communication in Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Adorno, T., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D., & Sanford, J. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper and Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Akkerman, T. (2011). Friend or foe? Right-wing populism and the popular press in Britain and the Netherlands. Journalism, 12(8), 931–945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aupers, S. (2012). ‘Trust no one’: Modernization, paranoia and conspiracy culture. European Journal of Communication, 27, 22–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betz, H. (2017). Nativism across time and space. Swiss Political Science Review, 23, 335–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betz, H., & Johnson, C. (2004). Against the current—Stemming the tide: The nostalgic ideology of the contemporary radical populist right. Journal of Political Ideologies, 9, 311–327.
   Google Scholar
• Blassnig, S., Engesser, S., Ernst, N., & Esser, F. (2019). Hitting a nerve: Populist news articles lead to more frequent and more populist reader comments. Political Communication, 36, 629–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeije, H. (2010). Analysis in qualitative research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bos, L., & Brants, K. (2014). Populist rhetoric in politics and media: A longitudinal study of the Netherlands. European Journal of Communication, 29, 703–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos, L., van der Brug, W., & de Vreese, C. (2010). Media coverage of right-wing populist leaders. Communications, 35, 141–163.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2018). The affordances of social media platforms. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Poell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 233–253). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bures, E. (2020). Beachhead or refugium? The rise and dilemma of New Right counterculture. Journal for the Study of Radicalism, 14, 29–64.
   Google Scholar
• Burrell, J. (2009). The field site as a network: A strategy for locating ethnographic research. Field Methods, 21, 181–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47, 2–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Converse, P. (1964). ‘The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent’ (pp. 206–261). New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Cleen, B. (2016). The party of the people versus the cultural elite: Populism and nationalism in Flemish radical right rhetoric about artists. JOMEC Journal, 9, 70–91.
   Google Scholar
• Decker, F., & Lewandowsky, M. (2011). Populismus. Entstehungsformen, Entstehungshintergründe und Folgen eines politischen Phänomens. In O. Agard, C. Helmreich, & H. Vinckel-Roisin (Eds.), Das populäre: Untersuchungen zu Interaktionen und Differenzierungsstrategien in Literatur, Kultur und Sprache (pp. 331–351). Göttingen: V & R unipress.
   Google Scholar
• Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Büchel, F. (2017). Populism and social media: How politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society, 20, 1109–1126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, N., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Blassnig, S., & Esser, F. (2017). Extreme parties and populism: An analysis of Facebook and Twitter across six countries. Information, Communication & Society, 20, 1347–1364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flecker, J., Altreiter, C., & Schindler, S. (2018). Erfolg des ‘Rechtspopulismus durch exkludierende Solidarität? Das Beispiel Österreich. In K. Becker, K. Dörre, & P. Reif-Spirek (Eds.), Arbeiterbewegung von rechts? Ungleichheit – Verteilungskämpfe - populistische Revolte (pp. 245–256). Frankfurt: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Forchtner, B., Kroneder, A., & Wetzel, D. (2018). Being skeptical? Exploring far-right climate-change communication in Germany. Environmental Communication, 12, 589–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeden, M. (1998). Is nationalism a distinct ideology? Political Studies, 46, 748–765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeden, M. (2003). Ideology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2014). Populism 2.0. In D. Trottier & C. Fuchs (Eds.), Social media, politics and the state: Protests, revolutions, riots, crime and policing in the age of Facebook, Twitter and YouTube (pp. 16–67). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Grbich, C. (2012). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, R. (1991). The nature of fascism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Groshek, J., & Engelbert, J. (2013). Double differentiation in a cross-national comparison of populist political movements and online media uses in the United States and the Netherlands. New Media & Society, 15, 183–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haller, A., & Holt, K. (2019). Paradoxical populism: How PEGIDA relates to mainstream and alternative media. Information, Communication & Society, 22, 1665–1680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M. (2018). A typology of populism. Toward a revised theoretical framework on the sender side and receiver side of communication. International Journal of Communication, 12, 2171–2190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hark, S., & Villa, P. (Eds.). (2015). Anti-Genderismus: Sexualität und Geschlecht als Schauplätze aktueller politischer Auseinandersetzungen. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Heinisch, R., Holtz-Bacha, C., & Mazzoleni, O. (Eds.). (2017). Political populism. A handbook. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Hentges, G., & Nottbohm, K. (2017). Die Verbindung von Antifeminismus und Europakritik. Positionen der Parteien „Alternative für Deutschland” und „Front National“. In G. Hentges, K. Nottbohm, & H. Platzer (Eds.), Europäische Identität in der Krise? (pp. 167–208). Wiesbaden: VS.
   Google Scholar
• Herkman, J. (2017). The life cycle model and press coverage of Nordic populist parties. Journalism Studies, 18, 430–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstadter, R. (1996). The paranoid style in American politics. In R. Hofstadter (Ed.), The paranoid style in American politics and other essays (pp. 3–40). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hondrich, K. O., & Koch-Arzberger, C. (1992). Solidarität in der modernen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Hradil, S. (1987). Sozialstrukturanalyse in einer fortgeschrittenen Gesellschaft: von Klassen und Schichten zu Lagen und Milieus. Opladen: Leske+ Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Ignazi, P. (1992). The silent counter-revolution: Hypotheses on the emergence of extreme right-wing parties in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 22, 3–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2017). Trump and the populist authoritarian parties: The silent revolution in reverse. Perspectives on Politics, 15, 443–454.
   Google Scholar
• Ivarsflaten, E. (2008). What unites right-wing populists in Western Europe? Re-examining grievance mobilization models in seven successful cases. Comparative Political Studies, 41, 3–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joy, M. (2011). Why we love dogs, eat pigs, and wear cows: An introduction to carnism. San Franscisco, CA: Conari Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kösters, R., & Jandura, O. (2019). A stratified and segmented citizenry? Identification of political milieus and conditions for their communicative integration. Javnost – The Public, 26, 33–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kösters, R., Obert, P., Begenat, M., & Jandura, O. (2019). In der Krise vereint? Milieuspezifische Perspektiven auf die Flüchtlingskrise. Studies in Communication Sciences, 19, 105–129.
   Google Scholar
• Krämer, B. (2017). Populist online practices. The function of the Internet in right-wing populism. Information, Communication & Society, 20, 1293–1309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krämer, B., & Klingler, M. (2020). ‘A bad political climate for climate research and trouble for gender studies: Right-wing populism as a challenge to science communication’. In B. Krämer, & C. Holtz-Bacha (Eds.), Perspectives on populism and the media. Avenues for research (pp. 253–271). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lepsius, M. R. (1966). ‘Parteiensystem und Sozialstruktur: zum Problem der Demokratisierung der deutschen Gesellschaft’. In W. Abel, K. Borchardt, H. Kellenbenz, & W. Zorn (Eds.), Wirtschaft, Geschichte und Wirtschaftsgeschichte. Festschrift zum 65. Geburtstag von Friedrich Lütge (pp. 371–393). Stuttgart: Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M. (2018). Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda: Exploring the linkages. Environmental Politics, 27, 712–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannheim, K. (1929). Ideologie und Utopie. Bonn: Cohen.
   Google Scholar
• Matuschek, I., Krähnke, U., Kleemann, F., & Ernst, F. (2011). Links sein. Politische Praxen und Orientierungen in linksaffinen Alltagsmilieus. Wiesbaden: VS.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2004). ‘Qualitative content analysis’. In U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 159–176). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moffitt, B. (2015). How to perform crisis: A model for understanding the key role of crisis in contemporary populism. Government & Opposition, 50, 189–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffitt, B. (2017). Liberal illiberalism? The reshaping of the contemporary populist radical right in Northern Europe. Politics and Governance, 5, 112–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2004). The populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39, 541–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2013). Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: Comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition, 48, 147–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, J.-W. (2016). What is populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Natale, S., & Ballatore, A. (2014). The Web will kill them all: New media, digital utopia, and political struggle in the Italian 5-Star Movement. New Media & Society, 36, 105–121.
   Google Scholar
• Nuernbergk, C. (2020). Das publikum von Politikjournalisten als Interaktionspartner auf Twitter: Interaktionsstruktur, Motive und Erfahrungen anschreibender Nutzer. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 30, 241–259.
   Google Scholar
• Oesch, D. (2008). ‘Explaining workers’ support for right-wing populist parties in Western Europe: Evidence from Austria, Belgium, France, Norway, and Switzerland’. International Political Science Review, 29, 349–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (Ed.). (2010). The networked self: Identity, community and culture on social network sites. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2015). Digital ethnography. Principles and practices. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Priester, K. (2011). Definitionen und Typologien des Populismus. Soziale Welt, 62, 185–198.
   Google Scholar
• Ravn, S., Barnwell, A., & Barbosa Neves, B. (2020). What is “publicly available data”? Exploring blurred public–private boundaries and ethical practices through a case study on Instagram. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15, 40–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rensmann, L. (2006). Populismus und Ideologie. In F. Decker (Ed.), Populismus: Gefahr für die Demokratie oder nützliches Korrektiv? (pp. 59–80). Wiesbaden: VS.
   Google Scholar
• Rensmann, L. (2017). The noisy counter-revolution: Understanding the cultural conditions and dynamics of populist politics in Europe in the digital age. Politics and Governance, 5, 123–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M. (2014). The mesmerising message: The diffusion of populism in public debates in Western European media. Political Studies, 62, 726–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P. A., Espejo, P. O., & Ostiguy, P. (Eds.). (2017). The Oxford handbook of populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saurette, P., & Gunster, S. (2011). Ears wide shut: Epistemological populism, argutainment and Canadian conservative talk radio. Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, 44, 195–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Longon: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J. (2013). ‘You have one identity’: Performing the self on Facebook and LinkedIn. Media, Culture & Society, 35, 199–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vester, M., von Oertzen, P., Geiling, H., Hermann, T., & Müller, D. (2001). Soziale Milieus im gesellschaftlichen Strukturwandel. Zwischen Integration und Ausgrenzung. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• von Oertzen, P. (2006). ‘Klasse und Milieu als Bedingungen gesellschaftlich-politischen Handelns’. In H. Bremer & A. Lange-Vester (Eds.), Soziale Milieus und Wandel der Sozialstruktur. Die gesellschaftlichen Herausforderungen und die Strategien der sozialen Gruppen (pp. 37–69). Wiesbaden: VS.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, F. (1999). Katholisches Milieu und politischer Katholizismus in säkularisierten Gesellschaften: Deutschland, Österreich und die Niederlande im Vergleich. In T. Dürr & F. Walter (Eds.), Solidargemeinschaft und fragmentierte Gesellschaft: Parteien, Milieus und Verbände im Vergleich (pp. 43–71). Wiesbaden: VS.
   Google Scholar
• Weiß, R. (2009). Politisch-kommunikative Milieus. Notwendigkeit und Nutzen einer milieutheoretischen Analyse politischer Kommunikation. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 57, 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Weyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American politics. Comparative Politics, 34, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear. What right-wing populist discourses mean. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ylä-Anttila, T. (2018). Populist knowledge: ‘Post-truth’ repertoires of contesting epistemic authorities. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 5, 356–388.
   Google Scholar