Transnational marriages: National policies, generational transmissions, and gender dynamics – a biographical policy evaluation perspective

References

• Al-Rebholz, A. (2015). Intersectional constructions of (non)belonging in a transnational context: Biographical narratives of Muslim migrant women in Germany. In M. C. La Barbera (Ed.), Identity and migration in Europe: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 59–73). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Rebholz, A. (2016). Globalisierte Familien – transnationale Intimität: Aushandlungen von Männlichkeit und Weiblichkeit in der Heiratsmigration. Migration und Soziale Arbeit, 38/1, 70–79.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Rebholz, A. (2019). Ulusaşırı Aşk. In T. Durna & N. Durna (Eds.), Aşkın Halleri (pp. 35–65). Ankara: um:ag.
   Google Scholar
• Apitzsch, U. (1999). Migration und Traditionsbildung. Opladen/Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Apitzsch, U. (2018). Reversal of the gender order? Male marriage migration to Germany by Turkish men: New forms of gendered transnationalization of migrant offsprings in Germany‘. In I. Crespi, Giada Meda S., & Merla L. (Eds.), Making multicultural families in Europe (pp. 55–70). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Apitzsch, U. (2019). European migration and its consequences: Generational experiences and biographical differences among migrant workers and their children. Special Issue of Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia (RIS) on ‘Biography and Society’ 1/2019.
   Google Scholar
• Apitzsch, U., Inowlocki, L., & Kontos, M. (2008). The method of biographical policy evaluation. In U. Apitzsch & M. Kontos (Eds.), Self-employment activities of women and minorities their success or failure in relation to social citizenship policies (pp. 12–18). Cham: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Aybek, C. (2012). Politics, symbolics and facts: Migration policies and family migration from Turkey to Germany. Perceptions, XVII(2), 37–59.
   Google Scholar
• Aybek, C., & Milewski, N. (2019). Introduction to the special issue on ‘family migration processes in a comparative persepective’. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung/Journal of Family Research, 31(3/2019), 247–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aybek, C., Straßburger, G., & Yüksel-Kaptanoğlu, İ. (2015). Marriage migration from Turkey to Germany: Risks and coping strategies of transnational couples. In C. Aybek, J. Huinink, & R. Muttarak (Eds.), Spatial mobility, migration, and living arrangements (pp. 23–42). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• BAMF, Stichs, A., Babka von Gostomski, C. and Büttner, T. (2014). Die Arbeitsmarktintegration von zugewanderten Ehegattinnen und Ehegatten. http://www.bamf.de/SharedDocs/Anlagen/DE/Downloads/Infothek/Themendossiers/Nach-deutschland-der-liebe-wegen-2014/Praesentation5-buettner-stichs.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
   Google Scholar
• Baykara-Krumme, H., & Fuß, D. (2009). Heiratsmigration nach Deutschland: Determinanten der transnationalen Partnerwahl Türkei stämmiger Migranten. Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft, 34(1–2), 135–163.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2011). Fernliebe. Lebensformen im globalen Zeitalter. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2006). Transnationale Heiratsmuster und transnationale Heiratsstrategien. Ein Erklärungsansatz zur Partnerwahl von Migranten. Soziale Welt, 57, 111–129.
   Google Scholar
• Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2007). Transnational lives, transnational marriages: A review of the evidence from migrant communities in Europe. Global Networks, 7(3), 271–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2011). The marriage route to migration of border artistes: Transnational matchmaking and imported spouses. Nordic Journal of Migration NJMR, 1(2), 60–68.
   Google Scholar
• Block, L. (2014). On female victims and parallel worlds: Gender and ethnicity in policy frames of spousal migration in Germany. In F. Anthias & M. Pajnik (Eds.), Contesting integration, engendering migration: Theory and practice (pp. 242–260). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Block, L. (2021). ‘(Im-)proper’ members with ‘(im-)proper’ families? – framing spousal migration policies in Germany. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(2), 379–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charsley, K. (2012). Transnational marriage. In K. Charsley (Ed.), Transnational marriage (pp. 3–22). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Charsley, K., & Bolognani, M. (2021). Marrying ‘in’/marrying ‘out’? Blurred boundaries in British Pakistani marriage choices. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(2), 361–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charsley, K., Bolognani, M., & Spencer, S. (2016). Marriage migration and integration: Interrogating assumptions in academic and policy debates. Ethnicities, 17(4), 469–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charsley, K., & Liversage, A. (2015). Silenced husbands: Muslim marriage migration and masculinity. Men and Masculunities, 18(4), 489–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glatzer, W., et al. (2004). Integration und Partizipation junger Ausländer vor dem Hintergrund ethnischer und kultureller Identifikation. Materialien zur Bevölkerungswissenschaft, 105c. Wiesbaden: Bundesinstitut für Bevölkerungsforschung.
   Google Scholar
• Hobsbawm, E. J. (1997). Identity history is not enough. In E. J. Hobsbawn (Ed.), On history (pp. 351–366). London: Abacus.
   Google Scholar
• Kalter, F., & Schroedter, J. H. (2010). Transnational marriage among former labour migrants in Germany. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 22(1), 11–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kofman, E. (2004). Family-related migration: A critical review of European studies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30(2), 243–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontos, M. (2014). Restrictive integration policies and the construction of the migrant as ‘unwilling to integrate’: The case of Germany. In F. Anthias & M. Pajnik (Eds.), Contesting integration, engendering migration: Theory and practice (pp. 125–142). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kulu-Glasgow, I., & Leerkes, A. (2013). Restricting Turkish marriage migration? National policy, couples’ coping strategies and international obligations. Migration Letters, 10(3), 369–382.
   Google Scholar
• Leutloff-Grandits, C. (2021). When men migrate for marriage: Negotiating partnerships and gender roles in cross-border marriages between rural Kosovo and the EU. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(2), 397–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lievens, J. (1999). Family-forming migration from Turkey and Morocco to Belgium: The demand for marriage partners from the countries of origin. International Migration Review, 33(3), 717–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindenberg, S. (2001). Social rationality versus rational egoism. In J. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 635–668). New York: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Liversage, A. (2012a). Gender, conflict and subordination within the household: Turkish migrant marriage and divorce in Denmark. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(7), 1119–1136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liversage, A. (2012b). Transnational families breaking up: Divorce among Turkish immigrants in Denmark. In K. Charsley (Ed.), Transnational marriage (pp. 145–160). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Milewski, N., & Hamel, C. (2010). Union formation and partner choice in a transnational context: The case of descendants of Turkish immigrants in France. IMR, 44(3), 615–658.
   Google Scholar
• Moret, J., Andrikopoulos, A., & Dahinen, J. (2021). Contesting categories: Cross-border marriages from the perspectives of the state, spouses and researchers. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(2), 325–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morokvasic-Müller, M. (2014). Integration: Gendered and racialized constructions of otherness. In F. Anthias & M. Pajnik (Eds.), Contesting integration, engendering migration: Theory and practice (pp. 165–183). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nauck, B. (2001). Generationenbeziehungen und Heiratsregime. In T. Klein (Ed.), Partnerwahl und Heiratsmuster (pp. 35–55). Opladen: Leske+Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Nauck, B., & Settles, B. (2001). Immigrant and ethnic minority families: An introduction. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 32(4), 461–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strassburger, G. (2003). Heiratsverhalten und Partnerwahl im Einwanderungskontext: Eheschließungen der zweiten Migrantengeneration türkischer Herkunft. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Strassburger, G. (2004). Transnational ties of the second generation: Marriages of Turks in Germany. In T. Faist & E. Özveren (Eds.), Transnational social spaces: Agents, networks, institutions (pp. 211–232). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Strasser, S. (2014). Repressive autonomy: Discourses on and surveillance of marriage migration from Turkey to Austria. Migration Letters, 11(3), 316–328.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory producers and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L. (2010). Global marriage cross-border marriage migration in global context. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L. (2012). Transnational marriage migration and marriage migration. In K. Charsley (Ed.), Transnational marriage (pp. 23–40). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar